First of all - I love horror films. The recent distaste for so-called 'torture porn' (a horrific example of lazy journalism if ever there was one) is lost on me - I enjoyed Hostel as much for the social commentary as the horror scenes. If someone wants to debate the rights and wrongs of this recent sub-genre, then fair enough - I will happily sit down and argue my views that this is a legitimate form of entertainment, often revealing some form of social commentary (albeit not always, obviously). I often enjoy these arguments, and by the end both participants have (at least in my view) gained an insight into the differing views on the genre.
This might seem like a strange way to start a review, but bear with me. I like the debates. What I don't like is being lectured to. What I especially hate is being lectured to by a film that shows me elaborate scenes of torture before screaming at me that I'm wrong for enjoying it. And that is the problem with untraceable.
The premise is intriguing. A website springs up online, inviting online viewers to 'kill with me'. The more people log on, the faster the victims dies. About as subtle as a brick. But even taking the film at face value has it's problems - whilst some of the torture scenes are well-thought out, there is little to no suspense. Whilst one scene involving the lead character and her daughter does gnaw at the stomach, it's dissipated all too quickly. The victims are either unlikeable or anonymous enough to garner no sympathy, and the concept of cyber crime is never a good one. Watching a computer hacker is about as interesting as a screensaver, and is usually followed by streams of unintelligible dialogue. Note to scriptwriters - you can put in as many long words as you like to make yourself feel clever, but it doesn't always make the film better. Technology is used as an explanation for all plot holes, until it hits the ridiculous extreme as the bad guy hacks INTO A CAR. The villain himself is another ridiculous character, with a back story that was clearly an afterthought.
However, I've given this 3 out of 10. Mainly for Diane Lane, who puts in a good performance, and some inventive scenes. But even at the end, the film cannot help but batter you with its moralising, shouting at you for enjoying the torture scene it's showing you. Frankly, it would have been better if it had just been shouting "BAD! BAD! BAD! BAD! SICK! BAD!" over a picture of a gopher being hit with a hammer. Avoid.
This might seem like a strange way to start a review, but bear with me. I like the debates. What I don't like is being lectured to. What I especially hate is being lectured to by a film that shows me elaborate scenes of torture before screaming at me that I'm wrong for enjoying it. And that is the problem with untraceable.
The premise is intriguing. A website springs up online, inviting online viewers to 'kill with me'. The more people log on, the faster the victims dies. About as subtle as a brick. But even taking the film at face value has it's problems - whilst some of the torture scenes are well-thought out, there is little to no suspense. Whilst one scene involving the lead character and her daughter does gnaw at the stomach, it's dissipated all too quickly. The victims are either unlikeable or anonymous enough to garner no sympathy, and the concept of cyber crime is never a good one. Watching a computer hacker is about as interesting as a screensaver, and is usually followed by streams of unintelligible dialogue. Note to scriptwriters - you can put in as many long words as you like to make yourself feel clever, but it doesn't always make the film better. Technology is used as an explanation for all plot holes, until it hits the ridiculous extreme as the bad guy hacks INTO A CAR. The villain himself is another ridiculous character, with a back story that was clearly an afterthought.
However, I've given this 3 out of 10. Mainly for Diane Lane, who puts in a good performance, and some inventive scenes. But even at the end, the film cannot help but batter you with its moralising, shouting at you for enjoying the torture scene it's showing you. Frankly, it would have been better if it had just been shouting "BAD! BAD! BAD! BAD! SICK! BAD!" over a picture of a gopher being hit with a hammer. Avoid.
Tell Your Friends