Space Trucker Bruce (2014) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
I can deal with the low budget, but I can't deal with the bad acting / writing
JedRift13 December 2016
The sets are impressive, considering the budget. The special effects are not so bad either. In fact, both of the aforementioned have a sort of "Red Dwarf" low budget feel. Unfortunately for Space Trucker Bruce, that is where the comparisons stop. The acting in this movie is quite poor, and not even in a "so bad it's good" way. It's easy to forget that acting takes talent and does not come naturally. We take most movie and television acting for granted, however, all it takes is a movie like this to know when you see bad acting. Pair that with the bad writing and unfunny dialogue and you have a mismatch made in space.

I'd give the movie a higher rating if it was only based on how the sets & special effects were made on a shoestring budget, but when reflecting on the product as a whole, any higher would be unjustified.

This movie is more akin to a student film project for an A/V class and I cannot recommend it. I watched it late at night after stumbling upon it on the internet, but in retrospect, I would have been better off just going to sleep.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This movie isn't enjoyable even if you were making fun of it.
valerintheodore6 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Space Trucker Bruce is a gem I never thought I would spend 1 hour and 26 minutes of my life on. I watched it with a friend, who I thought would make that time more worthwhile. Alas, no. This movie is an absolutely astonishingly horrible. I have nothing against the actors, producer, or writers. I feel it would be unfair to critique their abilities in said fields, since the work they've put out places them somewhere in the middle school age range. The jokes in this movie pander to adults with little to no humor aside from "haha funny sex," or "lol he make funny face." If you were to enjoy the jokes in this film, I would assume you were either a victim of Lele Pons era Vine, or you were 12 years old. Personally, I have qualms with the portrayal of insanity and learning disabilities within this movie. Towards the beginning, when Bruce first picks Max up, he is portrayed as someone who has not interacted with anyone in a long time, and does not know how to. His tendencies can be described as creepy, inhumane, and even intrusive. Max is clearly uneasy because of this, as seen in the board game scene. However, not much later in the movie, Bruce's supposed "insanity" seems to dissipate, or rather, the writers entirely forgot it was there in the first place. Bruce's said mental instability seems to be played off as a quick and cheap gimmick, for laughs at the Funny Way he looks over Max's shoulder. As such, it comes off as insensitive and rather unfunny. The acting doesn't do the script any justice, either. It's clear that everyone involved thought they were masters of the art of theater, similarly to children writing storybooks in their free time. I recommend acting classes, or any amount of effort. The voice acting is horrendous as well. I could not, for the life of me, stand Mr (and later Miss) Sour Cream. They sound like Salad Fingers if Salad Fingers had asthma and a bad sense of humor. The movie had a trope in which Max had (seemingly) begun to go insane and hear Mr. Sour Cream's voice. This could have been a good gateway into a sort of American Psycho-esque commentary. The movie could have gone into how Max is experiencing these inanimate objects telling him to do horrible things, when in reality it's just him going crazy, but the movie had no interest in pursuing anything even remotely entertaining. On top of that, the experience of Mr. Sour Cream coercing the main characters into horrible actions was never brought up again. Mr. Sour Cream seems to be an entirely arbitrary character, among others. The characters are a whole other can of beans. I've already spoken about my issues with Max and Bruce, but to summarize, I don't appreciate the "insanity" ploy for laughs. Bruce is also a huge jackass, which is not the greatest thing to be when you're the protagonist. His objectification of women in the movie is something that's played off as "haha relatable," but is actually rude and misogynistic. He spends a good majority of his time looking at porn, fantasizing about taken women, and being a slob. I find his obsession with Katie to be rather 16th century, so to speak. He thinks of her as simply a prize to be won, not a breathing human being with desires of her own. He even kisses her while she has a boyfriend, as if she weren't in a committed relationship, and assumes she'd be okay with it. Bruce also straight up kidnaps a dead girl, and continually makes jokes about using her sexually. He also fully intends on doing so, despite her being DEAD and NOT ALIVE. He only seems to revive her because Max said that'd be a good thing to do. Jane Doe as a character is completely unimportant. She does nothing for the plot or for the other characters except drop some sewage on another ship and maybe give Bruce a boner or two. The moment she was brought back to life, I was concerned they'd use her as the mentally challenged character, which they did. I do not appreciate the use of her clear mental stress as a quick laugh. It seems they were trying to imply that she was handicapped in some way. Funny how Bruce didn't seem to be interested in her after that... hm. The plot of the movie, from the very beginning, was unclear. I had no idea what the end goal was, or when this would end, and God why won't this end? The movie was so drawn out, and kept creating different plots that I felt like I was watching the Fast and Furious movies, out of order, on 5 times speed, but also at .001 times speed because jesus christ. The feeling you feel when you see how long this review is can be compared to the feeling I felt when looking at the watch time bar being only 1/3 of the way through on this movie. Except tenfold. From my understanding, Bruce's end goal was to deliver the hog fat. That's all fine and dandy, but what's this? He goes on a side quest to pick up Max. No worries. But for some reason, there's a whole training montage about Max learning to accept the simplicity of space? To which Max has no response to. I figured this would be the place that the writers could insert some character development, but by the next scene Max is bored again! So he's ultimately learned nothing and that entire 30 minute arch was for nothing! Then, there's distress signals. I thought, at this point, the movie would finally pick up. I was wrong. They go on this large abandoned ship, and for what? That sexdoll Bruce wanted? The ship itself does not play into the plot whatsoever, and could easily be a plot point that the writers skipped entirely. My brain was so fried at this point that I don't recall any other plot points. Though, knowing the writing, there may not have been any others. Max, Bruce, and Jane Doe finally arrive at the station (for which I cannot recall the name). They supposedly have to stay for a month due to repairs, but I couldn't tell that any time had passed between the station scene and the next ship scene. Plus, what was the point? I assume they completed their hog fat mission, but I wouldn't know for sure because they didn't focus on it at all! Therefore, the main conflict was not resolved, and I don't know why I sat through this entire movie! It seems all the trio went to the station to do was allow Bruce to pick up the taken girl of his dreams. And then there's a whole other plot point left unexplored. I have no clue if this was a set up for a sequel or a complete fluke on the writers' behalf. The fact that it wasn't clear doesn't do a lot in this movie's favor. And I hope to God there isn't a sequel, because I will lose my mind.

Overall, this movie was a disaster. I will not criticize the production or set quality of the film, as I understand it was created on a budget. I do think, however, to overlook those factors and still enjoy the movie, you must be used to leaving movie theaters with less braincells than when you entered. I do not recommend watching this movie. I, in fact, do plan on making a video essay on it. However, I completely and utterly dread going back into the movie to even gather clips of it.

I hope you never remake this film, it's a bad premise with bad writing, and no amount of production value can fix that.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Low budget and mediocre acting don't stop it from being enjoyable
JodyBruchon30 December 2016
Note: I am NOT affiliated with anyone involved on this film. This is an independent review.

I discovered this movie through an Internet comment by its creator that linked to it on YouTube. It is definitely a flawed work, though many low-budget works tend to be out of necessity. That being said, once you get past the somewhat unconvincing acting and the fact that practically the entire ship is obviously made of spray-painted corrugated cardboard, it actually has a lot of charm to it. To illustrate: someone in the same room (who doesn't have the tolerance for crappy productions that I do) started off with a dismissive "what are you watching?" and by the halfway point was actually watching the movie.

First, the bad because there's surprisingly not a lot of that: this movie's low budget is visually obvious and the acting is not very convincing. For some people the acting will be a deal-breaker, but the movie is a comedy and the funny stuff is not damaged by it (and sometimes it even works better.) It is painfully clear that the vast majority of the ship is cheap stuff that was painted to look like ship stuff. Some of the characters and their traits are just plain weird for no real reason; that is, the quirks never prove important later and aren't funny. It would have been nice to have more character development overall. I don't recall ever seeing a single non-CG shot with any camera motion; the whole movie seems to have been shot with a tripod, though it's arguably better that way because so many other low-budget films suffer from annoying constant hand-held camera shake from start to finish. There are obvious problems in execution that will turn general audiences away, labeling this as a "bad movie." With the bad side taken into account, everything else is surprisingly good! If the budget was really only $10,000 then the people behind this movie should be running the financial side of a national government. There's quite a bit of low-budget 3D CG (several complex spaceships and planetary bodies) that works quite well. Something like 90% of the inside environment is made of spray-painted and duct taped cardboard...but these people are MASTERS of cardboard construction! It's so painfully obvious that the place is made of cardboard and fiber packaging materials and duct tape and random hardware store parts and yet there is so much thought put into it that one can't help but admire it all. I've noticed everything from an old credit card reader spray-painted to match the cardboard to the back plate of an old flat-panel TV attached to the wall to an aluminum ladder with string lights attached.

Sure, the acting isn't great...but it's good enough that the comedy generally works and the character quirks are sometimes better off with the bad acting than they would be with Shatner-grade expressiveness. The movie causes the viewer to frequently question the sanity of the characters, sometimes feeling more like low-budget horror more than low-budget comedy. The story itself isn't the greatest screenplay ever made, but it's decently put together. Conflicts get resolved in a reasonable time frame and in a satisfying way. There's some interesting commentary on modern life if you're paying enough attention to notice it. The color in the movie could have used grading (all the colors feel pretty flat) but the lighting is good and makes up for it. I would have liked some more occasional background music but the overall sound design is so good that I wasn't distracted by bad sound...well, except for a couple of klaxons that would abruptly stop in the middle of a loud sound instead of finishing out the sound and going quiet.

The books you catch them reading are pretty funny too. There are a lot of random "ha!" moments to be had, and that's a lot of the charm in the movie. I do wonder where all those Popsicle sticks came from.

Bottom line: if you give it a chance and look past the initial "bad movie" impression, there is a diamond in the rough within Space Trucker Bruce. It isn't going to be everyone's cup of tea because the "standards" set by multi-million dollar Hollywood blockbusters have made us think that frenetic pacing, cookie-cutter "Save the Cat!" story beats, and extremely expensive 3D CG are what make a movie good. For those who can get past the fact that this isn't a high-dollar Transformers or comic book movie, it's fun to watch and definitely worth 87 minutes of your time.

The director has posted the film on YouTube for free at the following URL if you'd like to watch it: https://youtu.be/kcOaAqGBWLo
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
OK, this is a great little movie; it was made for 10K, so I took that into consideration. I got laughs and loved that space problems were solved with easy solutions...
ozmaozoz15 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I took that into consideration. I got laughs and loved that space problems were solved with easy salutations...so get a 6 pack and a large pizza and enjoy. Its just silly fun...tells us a good movie can still be made at home and for little money. Thanks Antone Dorion...nice job and fun movie...I hope to see more adventures of Space Trucker Bruce in the future? Michael Z also the bit with the sour cream containers was wonderful. There is not much more I can say; I loved it. I hope to see more movies like this. And thanks to you tube for posting it. You know what ball busting is: I don't have a lot to say, and I wonder what you guys want?
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Funny Parody
garyhoney198415 June 2019
Well somebody didn't like the acting but it wasn't me. They were having fun just making a movie. To me it was a parody of Star Wars Star Trek meets Alien and Larry the Cable Guy with Rainman. The show made me laugh and grin and that's more than I can say for most high budget movies out there. For just being funny I give it a 10 and to spite the 3 rating. Good job having fun folks and I hope to see more of your films in the future.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clever and campy
ruppertbaird27 February 2021
I've been a fan of low budget 'Troma-style' films for years, and this flick falls into that category. A throw-back to 1950s, low-budget schlock, I was pleasantly surprised by this little fare.

I found much of the direction and script to be rather clever. I mean, who knew hog fat could have so many uses? And the homage to the 1970s trucker movies, shows, and craze was fun.

Seriously, if you're looking for slick production, great CGI, and high budget Hollywood, go watch Star Wars. But, if you just want fun, campy, and a bit odd, 'Space Trucker Bruce' is good fun.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Um, yah, awesome.
livehappy-0521228 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is just wonderful at being more than i expected. It didn't try too hard and miss its mark- it knew exactly how great it is and in what context. I highly recommend!!

The acting was very good, props and sets Appropriate without being either too cheesy or two out-there. I love that the question aboot what the "pool" water is really for was never addressed.

Waiting on the sequel!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
must watch
wjks-2510726 June 2018
Not the greatest movie, but its a great, funny, well thought out movie. I have to hand it do them, they had a dream and they made it happen, and to do it in Alaska is amazing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Off the map!
Irvstump17 March 2020
Combined between the six actors and actresses, they don't have 20 movies under their belt! I'd rather watch any of them than Tom Hanks or any other serious actor or actress in Hollywood! I pray for a sequel, soon!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed