Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Evita (1996)
9/10
The Icon Known as Evita
9 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
'Evita' is based on the life of the legendary First lady of Argentina, Eva Peron (also affectionately known as Evita), played by pop superstar Madonna. Eva was born an illegitimate child into a poverty riddled childhood. She had big dreams, and fought her way to the top as an actress, relentlessly using her charisma and sexuality to get ahead. When she meets and marries Colonel Juan Peron (Jonathan Pryce), she uses her savvy, strong will and empathy for the poor to help him become President of Argentina. During this time, her polarizing personality makes her loved by the masses, but loathed by the elite. By the time she dies of cancer at age 33, she leaves behind a legacy.

I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed this film, from beginning to end. I've heard complaints from some about the non-stop singing, but let's not forget that it is supposed to be a musical. The film is an adaptation of the Broadway play. The songs are energetic and ingratiating, especially since some of the melodies and lyrics are used more than once for thematic effect. It never feels gratuitous, but maybe that's because I'm a music lover and understand that music is another way to communicate. My favorite numbers are 'Buenos Aires', 'I'd Be Surprisingly Good For You' and the classic 'Don't Cry For Me Argentina'.

I've also read some stuffy film critics complain that the film was not "deep" enough or the audience wasn't able to connect emotionally to Eva. But I would have to disagree. Eva Peron was a very complex woman. She's ambitious, cunning, passionate, generous, and vulnerable. The film, in my opinion, did a great job at showing her different layers and sides. A lot of this has to do with the lead actress, Madonna. Previously criticized for not showing enough range on screen, Madonna pulls out all the stops as she totally embodies the role of Evita. Most of the time, I was so absorbed in the character that I forgot that I was watching Madonna on screen (which is quite a feat for a superstar of her proportions). As the press and Madonna herself have pointed out before, she and Eva Peron have many things in common and I'm sure that helped her connect to the character. She definitely deserved her Golden Globe.

Antonio Banderas also shines as the film's narrator, Che. Who knew that he had such a voice? He adds an intensity and flavor to to his role, and also serves as Evita's conscience at certain times. He displays the movie's message about Eva's multidimensional nature. She's not exactly the saint that countless Argentinians believed she was, but not the evil whore that the snobbish upper class thought that she was either.

'Evita' really delivers. It is manages to be both entertaining and uplifting. I would recommend to any fan of musicals or to anyone looking to learn more about an iconic woman.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Free Your Mind
19 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
'Girl Interrupted' is set in a women's mental institution in the late 1960's and based on the autobiography by writer Susanna Kaysen. Winona Ryder plays the lead role as Susanna, who's not so much "crazy" as she is a very conflicted and lost young woman. Ryder plays the role convincingly, with a dose of vulnerability, as we watch her character go through her own personal growth and awakening. Ryder has always been a great actress, but Angelina Jolie manages to steal the show as Lisa, the role that brought her mainstream fame and the Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 2000. Jolie nails the role as the sociopath: she's charming and alluring on the surface, yet also dangerously ruthless and insensitive. She's very compelling as an actress, and this film shows she's more than just a sex symbol. Other supporting actresses include Whoopi Goldberg as the tough yet down-to-earth nurse and Clea Duvall as the pathological liar Georgina, who are also great. 'Girl Interrupted' is a solid film, with interesting subject matter, and is worth the watch.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Shining (1980)
7/10
Chilling and Memorable
16 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
'The Shining' is often named as one of the greatest horror films ever made. And while I do agree that it is in the top five in the horror genre, its not exactly a perfect film. It has its superb moments and its lackluster moments, in my opinion.

As far as the good points go, Jack Nicholson is one of the obvious ones. Nicholson is a very talented actor and his role in this film is a display of his brilliance. He has the ability to turn almost every role he plays into a one-man show (for example, his iconic role as The Joker in 1989's Batman). He makes his character, also ironically named Jack, dimensional. He's menacing, conflicted, witty, and eventually psychotic. Danny Lloyd, also playing a character of the same name, also does a great job with his role as the little boy who "sees all". The film in itself, based on the infamous Stephen King's novel, has a disturbing atmosphere to it. A few of the famous scenes ("Redrum", the twins in the hallway, "Here's Johnny!") definitely leave an impression on the viewer.

As far as the negative goes, one big problem I had with the film was the casting of Shelley Duvall. She is, at least in my opinion, a horrible actress. Or shall I say over-actress. But, to her credit, I'm not sure if it was her acting or if her character was actually written to be shrill and stupid. Either way, she was distractingly bad and unintentionally funny in most of her scenes. Also, the running length does go a little long. It clocks in it at over 2 1/2 hours. I can watch a film that long if the story keeps moving and developing. There are a handful of certain scenes that feel too drawn out and prolonged, dragging the pace of the film unnecessarily. I understand King's novel was very lengthy, but the film could've been just as effective if cut down about 30 or 40 minutes.

That being said, this film is still breath-taking and much better than some of these 'slasher' flicks that have come out in the last decade or so. But, it does have its flaws at the same time.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Follow Your Dreams, But Don't Sell Your Soul
1 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
That is the basic morality message of the film, 'The Devil Wears Prada'. The plot revolves around aspiring journalist Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) who takes a job as second assistant to the icy tyrant Miranda Priestley (Meryl Streep), who is editor in chief of 'Runway' magazine. The job is both demeaning and demanding, but Andy takes it to ensure her future success as a journalist. But, Andy soon learns that she is sacrificing the relationships around her (particularly with her close friends and boyfriend) and her own values to further her career.

The film's perspective on the fashion world is both negative and positive. On one hand, it seems to say that the fashion business is a shallow and cutthroat industry. Women who wear a size 6 are considered fat, those who wear anything but couture are laughed at, you never question the boss, and be willing to sacrifice your interpersonal relationships to get ahead. That seems to be the opinion of those on the outside looking in. Those that work in the fashion industry see their job as important, fulfilling, and meaningful and are willing to climb the ladder of success (or stay at the top) in any way possible. Even if it means being a mindless slave or stabbing someone in the back. Where the line is drawn and what is the "true" perspective is never seems to be concrete, and it is up to the audience, like our heroine Andy, to decide what's wrong and what's right.

As for the performances, Meryl Streep is fantastic as Miranda Priestley. She's not necessarily the lead, but she is the most memorable character. Miranda is demanding and ruthless, impatient and imposing. She never raises her voice, yet everyone is scared of her. Streep is purposely and perfectly understated; both outrageously cold and subtly funny. As a viewer, you loathe and love her all at once. Emily Blunt and Stanley Tucci are both humorous and believable as Emily and Nigel ; the former Miranda's neurotic, snot-nosed first assistant and the latter the wise and lovable fashion editor of 'Runway'. Andy seems to pale in comparison to these colorful characters, but Anne Hathway does her best to make her work. She's likable, but a little too naive and pushed around by others (although thats probably the point). But her character did go through the most development, and you see Andy finally gaining strength near the end and the ability to make her own decisions.

In conclusion, the most compelling thing about 'The Devil Wears Prada' is Meryl Streep. Her character proves to be the most entertaining, with Blunt and Tucci tying for second place. However, it is a solid, yet predictable, plot with some funny dialogue. So it's worth a watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Had Potential, But Fell Short
21 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
In the wake of the incredible success of "Scream", writer Kevin Williamson decided to craft another teen slasher film, this one called "I Know What You Did Last Summer". The film revolves around four teen best friends Julie, Ray, Barry, and Helen (Jennifer Love Hewitt, Freddie Prinze Jr., Ryan Phillippe, and Sarah Michelle Gellar) who are involved in a hit-and-run on the 4th of July. When they run over the pedestrian on the road, they ditch the body to protect their futures. A year later, when they reunite over the summer, they all must face the secret they hid last year. Because someone knows what they did and is out for revenge.

When thinking about it, it is surprising that the writer of this film was the same one who wrote the wildly creative and suspenseful "Scream". In all fairness, "I Know.." is more of an adaption than an original screenplay. It is actually based off the book of the same name. I've read that book, and it was an awkward translation into a horror film, considering the book is actually quite different and more of a morality tale. In the book, the characters are stalked by the mystery man, but none of them are ever killed or even threatened with death. Honestly, this book was not supposed to be made into a horror film. Kevin Williamson is very talented, but I think he cares more about the "Scream" series (especially since "Scream 2" was released the same year as this film) and got lazy.

Another reason why "IKWYDLS" didn't work was the lead actors, Jennifer Love Hewitt and Freddie Prinze Jr. To be fair, Hewitt isn't the worst actress ever. She's had a few good roles, but is more eye candy than leading heroine. It seems like she's more suited to comedy, because she stumbles at times in this film and doesn't make enough of a emotional connection with the role to make us root for her. While she isn't winning any Oscars soon, she's better at acting than Prinze Jr., who is most of the time very stiff and forced (which ultimately effects he and Hewitt's on-screen chemistry). Every time he came on screen was cringe-worthy, and while he's very good looking, he was unfit to be the lead male.

Ryan Phillippe and Sarah Michelle Gellar, however, do a very good job with their supporting roles. As an on-screen couple, they have good chemistry and rapport (which they proved 2 years later in the edgy film "Cruel Intentions"). Also, they stand well on their own. Ray is somewhat of an arrogant asshole, and Phillippe plays him very well. Gellar manages to make her role as beauty queen with the shattered dream Helen also believable, and her chase scene with the killer is arguably the best part of the film. One has to wonder if the film would have been different and more enjoyable if Phillippe and Gellar were cast as the leads, and Hewitt and Prinze were given less screen time.

All in all, it's not the worst horror film I've ever seen(that title belongs to 1999's "The Haunting"). You might even managed to be entertained if you can turn off your brain for awhile, ignore some of the glaring plot holes, and sit through Jennifer and Freddie's awkward acting. However, in terms of horror films, there are plenty of better ones out there.
25 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scream (1996)
8/10
"What's Your Favorite Scary Movie?" Scream.
21 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Scream" remains one of the smartest and most entertaining teen slasher films ever. Why? Well, of course there's the actors. Neve Campbell definitely gives Jamie Lee Curtis a run for her money as the Reigning Teem Scream Queen. She makes the lead character, Sidney Prescott, all at once strong, smart, and vulnerable. Besides Sidney, there's ruthless and ambitious reporter Gale Weathers (Courtney Cox); dopey but lovable cop Dewey (David Arquette); Sidney's feisty and funny best friend Tatum (Rose McGowan); Sidney's brooding boyfriend Billy and his wisecracking friend Stu (Skeet Ulrich and Matthew Lillard); and movie-obsessed geek Randy (Jamie Kennedy). All the characters are distinctive and well-acted, and it really is an ensemble film.

However, it is the writing by Kevin Williamson that makes "Scream" truly special. As Billy states to Sidney at one point, "It's all one big movie. You just can't pick your genre". The film stays true to this quote. Unlike other slasher films full of clueless teens, the characters in "Scream" know they're in a movie. And if they don't, they sure do know a lot about them. The script contains several humorous, pop culture references to movies (many of them being horror films). The film takes pleasure in poking fun and deconstructing many horror movie standards and clichés. "Scream" is still a horror movie itself and often implies a few of these so-called rules. But they are often done in an ironic and inventive way. The death scenes are creative, the characters are actually smart and know how to fight back, and the plot twists are effectively surprising. Actually, it would be safe to say that "Scream" is not so much of a horror movie, but a mystery movie with blood and violence. Unlike Freddy, Michael, and Jason, the killer is never given an identity until the climax of the film. "Everyone is a suspect!" Randy proclaims. At different points in the movie, every character does come under questioning. Is it Billy, Sid's dark and angst-ridden boyfriend? Did Randy see one too many movies and snap? Or is Gale doing all of this to get another story? Anything can happen, and the final reveal is very unexpected.

"Scream" is amazingly entertaining and suspenseful on the first viewing. And the great thing is it remains fresh and continues to keep you on your seat every time you watch it. Afterwards, many teen slasher copycats like "I Know What You Did Last Summer" and "Urban Legends" were made, and two more films in the "Scream" series, but none of them are like the original "Scream".
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining Vehicle for Julia Roberts.
19 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Julia Roberts is the star in this based-on-a-true story film, "Erin Brockovich". It's a classic "David and Goliath" tale, that pits one woman against a huge corporation. Erin Brockovich (Roberts) is a single mother of three, with little money and plenty of attitude. As she takes a job as a secretary in a law firm, headed by former lawyer Ed Masry (Albert Finney), she discovers the horrors taking place in the small town of Hinkley. The water has been contaminated, and has altered the lives of these working class people. Brockovich makes it her mission to take down PG&E (the corporation responsible for the contamination) and she and Masry, with the 637 Hinkley residents, go toe to toe with the corporate giant in court.

Clearly, this is a vehicle for Julia Roberts, first and foremost. The character of Brockovich, the journey she goes on and the growth she experiences from helping people and making a difference is the main focus of the film. However, Roberts truly proves her acting skills and that she's more than a box office draw and a megawatt smile. Julia is known for taking on the "girl next door"-esquire roles. Even her breakthrough role as a prostitute in "Pretty Woman" was written as the nicest prostitute you'll ever meet. But, Erin Brockovich is a grittier character. She swears and struts her way through the scenery, chewing out those who challenge her and shocking more conservative types with her revealing wardrobe. Although she often comes off tough and provocative, it is also made clear that Erin has a warm heart. Her determination and defiance comes from an honest desire to help make her life and her kids' lives better. She also makes an emotional connection with the plaintiffs, seeing them less as clients and more as an extended family. The way Julia creates a nice balance between Erin's strong and soft side and makes her a complex character truly proves her talent. Her Best Actress Oscar was well deserved, in my opinion.

Of course, there are other well played characters in this film as well. Albert Finney makes the contrast between his Ed Masry character and Erin Brockovich clear. He's conservative, she's over the top. He plays it safe, she makes her own rules. He thinks in a more business-like lawyer fashion, while she distrusts lawyers and tends to think with her heart (which helps her relate to the plaintiffs). As Erin's foil, it is clear that these two can learn from each other and as the film progresses they do. Aaron Eckhart is Erin's boyfriend George, who begins to feel inadequate when constantly playing Mr. Mom to Erin's kids, and Marg Helgenberger as one of the standout Hinkley plaintiffs. It is Erin's show, but the supporting characters help her to figure out more about herself and the world around her.

All in all, the film is a pretty standard genre. Even the director, Steven Soderbergh, shoots in a straightforward (but visually rich) fashion. Nothing too suspenseful, as we all know what's going to happen in the end (or else the movie wouldn't be made). But, the story is entertaining and the acting is excellent. And when you get down to it, that's all most movies need.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Chemistry Carries the Movie.
18 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Before it was even released, "Mr. & Mrs. Smith" received endless publicity. Not particularly because of the film itself. But because of the drama behind the scenes. You know the story : super-sexy Brad Pitt is married to Jennifer Aniston, goes on the set of this film with super-sexy Angelina Jolie, something may or may not have happened between them, Pitt and Aniston get divorced after the film wraps, and suddenly Pitt and Jolie are a couple! Did Brad and Angelina have a steamy affair on-set that caused the eventual divorce of Brad and Jennifer? During those months of press, this question was continually denied. But, what we can tell is there is plenty of chemistry between the two leads, which makes this movie sizzle.

The plot of "Mr. & Mrs. Smith" revolves around John(Brad Pitt) and Jane(Angelina Jolie) Smith, a couple that has been unhappily married for 5 (or 6) years. They can't seem to relate to each other like they did before they were married. But little does the other spouse know that both John and Jane are secret assassins, that are working for rival organizations. And when the truth comes out, it has hilarious, action-packed and unexpected effects.

The story is pretty creative, yes. It puts a new twist on the standard "marriage issues" plot. However, halfway through the movie it wears thin and the "make a joke in an action situation" punchlines sometimes get old. But, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie milk the script for all its worth. Both of them are somewhat underrated when it comes to their acting, and more known for their sex appeal than their actual talent. They both have a great sense of the tongue-in-cheek aspect of the film (that blends action, comedy, and romance) and have a great comic rapport with each other. Their chemistry together is all at once passionate, funny, and believable. You actually can picture them as a couple. Nicole Kidman was rumored to have been considered for Jolie's role, but I honestly couldn't imagine two better actors as the leads. It wouldn't have worked as well, and the story would have dragged instead of entertained.

In retrospect, its no surprise that Pitt and Jolie became a couple after this film. The fireworks between them is the reason that this movie delivers.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Last Days of Left Eye (2007 TV Movie)
9/10
Eye Opening and Compelling
12 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Lisa Lopes, better known as "Left Eye" by her millions of fans, was 1/3 of the best selling girl group in history, TLC. Left Eye was the eclectic rapper in the group, and was often known for her rebellious behavior and quirky style. She got a lot of press when she burned down the house of her boyfriend, NFL star Andre Rison, in 1994. She rode the wave of 10 years of highs and lows with TLC, until she was involved in a fatal car crash in 2002. During the last few weeks of her life, she took her and her family and close friends on a trip to Honduras. The place where she would die three weeks later. The footage she documented in Honduras was made into this incredible documentary, "The Last Days of Left Eye".

This documentary is a breath-taking portrait of a misunderstood young woman. Some moments are captured of her in Honduras, but most of it is made up of Lisa giving us the story of her life, intercut with nostalgia like home movies, old photos, and concert footage and music videos with TLC. Through this film, Lisa is able to tell us the truth, everything she has experienced from her own point of view. Everything from her rough childhood, her rocky relationship with her father, her past alcohol problem, the infamous house-burning incident, and her ups and downs with TLC are discussed and explained both openly and honestly. This film will give you a new perspective and respect for her. It makes you feel like you knew her personally. She is intelligent, brave, spiritual, funny, and loving. She had her problems in the past, but was always working to become better and move past them.

However, one of the most striking things about this documentary is how you get the feeling that Lisa is speaking directly to you. The few frames where she stares at the camera, with her intense eyes, and the narrative style of the film makes you feel as if she's right there with you. Also, one has to wonder if Lisa knew if she was going to pass (something else that makes the film remarkable). Lisa was very spiritual. She was into astrology, numerology, and often traveled to Honduras to do her own form of "spiritual cleansing". She spoke of premonitions and deep dreams. The last week of her life she was very paranoid of what might happen to her. Maybe leaving this film behind was her way of making sure her own side of the story was heard, before it was too late. Lisa seemed as if she was reflecting on her life, had let go of a lot of things and was ready to move onto the next "phase". Physical transformation. Because as she said near the end, there is no such thing as death. Only transformation.

The loss of Left Eye was a blow to the music industry. She was creative, energetic, and had a great mind. She may not be here on earth, but this film is a great way to capture her short but remarkable life. It is truly one of the best documentaries I've ever seen, and something I would recommend to anyone.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997–2003)
9/10
One of the Best
28 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Several people have preconceived notions about this show. They look at the title and believe it's going to be cheesy or unbelievable. But, there is a reason why "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" has such a strong cult following. Because it really is an excellent show. It takes watching 2 or 3 episodes for you to really warm up to it, but once you get into it it's very easy to get wrapped up into the world of Buffy.

One of the show's main strengths is the writing. The appeal of "Buffy" is that it's multi-dimensional. It's drama, action, romance, comedy, and science-fiction. Sometimes at different times, and sometimes a mixture of any of the above. The show is also deeper than it seems, and is full of metaphors for life. It's no accident that many of the monsters Buffy faces are a part of her high school/college, places that are sometimes scarier than the foes she faces. Also, when Buffy loses her virginity to the love of her life, a "vampire with a soul" named Angel, he turns into an evil monster. I'm sure many teen girls can relate to the situation of sleeping with a guy, and after wards he turns into a different person. This is one of the many life experiences the different characters face, that often blends the supernatural and real world together. The show is not just about a girl who slays demons. It's about growing up, living life, and self-discovery.

Another reason many are so invested into this show is the characters and the great actors that play them. Every character has an arc and some kind of development that invests you into them and their situation. The lead is obviously Buffy (Sarah Michelle Gellar), a sassy high schooler who is conflicted in her duties. She is appointed to be the Slayer, help fight evil and save the world, but she also has school, family, and friends to worry about. As the show goes on, she learns how to balance the two but that doesn't mean she isn't a walking conflict. At her side, helping her fight evil are her friends Xander (Nicholas Brendon), a lovable and sarcastic loser ; Willow (Alyson Hannigan), studious, sweet, but courageous ; and her appointed watcher Giles (Anthony Stewart Head) an Englishman who's initially ruffled by Buffy's untraditional Slaying tactics. Then there's her boyfriend Angel (David Boreanaz), a "vampire with a soul", who's non-evil but often dark and brooding because of his past sins and current status. These characters also go through their own developments : Xander ponders his purpose in life, Willow explores witchcraft and her sexuality, Giles learns to loosen the reigns on Buffy, and Angel's relationship with Buffy becomes strained because of his inability to be intimate. There's also a cast of compelling supporting and recurring characters : such as Spike (James Marsters) a vampire with a similarly dark past as Angel, Oz (Seth Green), Willow's level-headed boyfriend who turns into a werewolf once a month, Faith (Eliza Dushku), a rebellious Slayer who eventually turns to the dark side, etc. The development of all of these characters make it clear that they all are on a journey, and it turns out to be a rather unpredictable one, just like life is. The actors understand this, and make their characters humane and believable (even when they're supposedly evil). Watch this show long enough and you may begin calling the actors by their character names, because they seem that real.

It's a shame that this show never won any Emmys or Golden Globes during its run. It may be seen as just a novelty show or not that deep by outsiders, but real Buffy fans know this is one of the best shows of the last 20 years or so. Don't believe me? Just start watching.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Feels Good to be Bad.
15 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Cruel Intentions" is an update of the 1988 film "Dangerous Liaisons", set in high school. It tells the story of two wicked, sex-obsessed step-siblings Sebastian Valmont , played by Ryan Phillippe, and Kathryn Merteuil, played by Sarah Michelle Gellar. Kathryn makes a bet with notorious playboy Sebastian over their virginal classmate Annette (Reese Witherspoon). If he can seduce her, he gets to sleep with his step-sister Kathryn. However if he can't, Kathryn wins his prized Jaguar. In the process of this bet, Sebastian ends up falling for Annette, against his own will. Meanwhile, Kathryn spends her time scheming against the naive Cecile (Selma Blair), who unknowingly stole Kathryn's ex-boyfriend.

The actors in this film were well casted. Ryan Phillippe gives Sebastian the perfect transformation from cold-hearted casanova to a guy who genuinely starts to fall in love. But, it is Sarah Michelle Gellar who really shines in this film. To most of the world, Kathryn seems like the All-American girl. Studious, warm, and friendly. However, it is around Sebastian that she really shows the bitch behind the Little Miss Sunshine mask. She's evil, manipulative, and openly sexual. Sarah gets so into the role, and makes it entertaining and compelling to watch. It also creates a contrast between the two leads. While they are both corrupt, Sebastian is more upfront about his dark side, especially with his known reputation as a heartbreaker. However, Kathryn hides behind a smile to almost everyone. She chooses to do her evil doings behind close doors, and when she stabs someone in the back they are oblivious or blindsided. Annette could've been just played as naive and wholesome, but Reese Witherspoon manages to give her depth. Not only is she the virgin, but she's also strong, smart, sweet-hearted, and is the one girl who warms Sebastian's heart. The other characters seem very secondary. Cecile is only there to be a pawn in Kathryn's endless mind games, and share an infamous kiss, as well as Ronald (Sean Patrick Thomas).

The film also creates a different atmosphere instead of the average "teen movie". The script is dark, dramatic, and comedic in some spots. Also, the teenagers aren't airheads, with the exception of Cecile. They are sophisticated and wealthy, and some more like adults than adolescents. The writers don't dumb down the script for teenagers, but at the same time they make it accessible for teenagers at the same time. The plot is somewhat thin, but the dialogue and acting manages to make up for that. It's enjoyable to watch the characters indulge in their manipulations, but it's also satisfying although somewhat predictable to see Sebastian change through finding love. The ending is a good example of karma (and I won't reveal it to you if you haven't seen it), and makes you feel as if there is a happy ending, even though all is not well.

I would recommend this title to many people, and it's darker, sexier, more entertaining and less predictable than the average teenage film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mean Girls (2004)
8/10
Familiar territory for many.
14 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Mean Girls" has often been described as "Clueless" meets "Heathers". But I think each film stands out as classic teen flicks of their era [ Heathers for the 80's, Clueless for the 90's, and Mean Girls for the new millennium teens]. Heathers was very dark and sarcastic, while Clueless is light hearted and frivolous. Mean Girls is somewhere in between and very much set in reality. The backstabbing, rumor-starting, clique-driven reality of high school, especially when young women are involved. This is what makes the film so funny and so popular.

Lindsay Lohan stars as Cady Heron, a high school junior who transfers from Africa. Having been homeschooled all her life, she knows nothing about what she's getting into. She is at first guided through high school by Janis and Damien, who are both sort of outcasts. She is then introduced to the Plastics, the most popular girls in school. Regina George [ Rachael McAdams ] is the leader of the clique, with her followers Gretchen Weiners [ Lacey Chabert ] and Karen Smith [ Amanda Seyfried ]. Janis convinces Cady to get into the clique to bring Regina down, since Janis has a vendetta against her after she spread a nasty rumor about her. Cady does, also angry at Regina for hooking up with her crush Aaron Samuels, but soon becomes one of the Plastics, inside and out.

Lohan does a great job, showing the transformation of Cady from a sweet-natured, naive girl to one of the mean girls herself. Rachel McAdams does often manage to steal the show. She is, as Regina, the girl a lot of people knew in high school. Beautiful, and seemingly friendly on the outside, but who's really a backstabber at heart. McAdams manages to give her depth, though, as she makes Regina the girl you love to hate or hate to love. The supporting players are also great, including Lacey Chabert as Gretchen, the girl who doesn't really have her own mind because she's afraid of not going along with the crowd.

The writing is also just as excellent as the acting. It is written by SNL writer and comedian Tina Fey, who plays Cady's math teacher. It is really sharp and witty. The clichés of high school are often played up with metaphors and creative ways, like there being a map of the cafeteria table cliques and the Plastics treated and talked about like celebrities. There are also great lines and scenes that really show what it's like to be in high school.

I really think this is a solid, funny movie. I would recommend to this just about everyone, because I'm sure many people will be able to relate or be entertained by this film, since everyone has to go through high school. It seems to be aimed more at young women, especially if they are still in or just out of high school.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Will & Grace (1998–2020)
8/10
Very entertaining.
4 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Will & Grace" had a great run from 1998 to 2006. However, it is noted that it, like almost all shows, lost its steam after awhile and became a different show. This occurred right around the time of the 6th season. The writing dumbed down slightly as the characters became caricatures, each with their own "go-to" joke [ Grace's eating, Karen's alcohol/pill popping habits, etc. ]. The chemistry was also thrown off somewhat as Leo become more of a main character, upsetting the balance of the four leads, especially Will & Grace. The show, in my opinion, remained funny despite its ups and downs.

There is a good reason all four lead actors won Emmys for their roles. They make their characters funny and believable, despite their outlandishness. Will and Grace are best friends, and both needy and neurotic in their own right. Jack is vain and rarely takes anything seriously, while Karen is both tactless and filthy rich. It is called "Will & Grace" but Jack & Karen often end up stealing the show. Whether they are both playing off of each other, making fun of Will & Grace, or just being their wacky selves, Sean Hayes & Megan Mullally play them both with amazing comedic timing and wit. All four actors are hilarious in their own right, however, and they all have great chemistry together. Stand out supporting characters are Shelley Morrison as Rosario, Karen's maid who's just as feisty as she is, and Leslie Jordan as Beverly Leslie, the very short and feminine rival of Karen who always pops up when least expected.

The show is also noted for its laundry list of celebrity guest stars, a handful of them playing themselves in tongue-in-cheek ways [ Cher, Elton John, Jennifer Lopez]. Some people complain about the countless guest spots, but I don't think it takes away from the show, especially since the show has a few pop culture references every episode.

"Will & Grace" is a show that can be enjoyed by most. Yes, the two lead male characters are gay, but its still a show one can find funny, regardless of sexual preference. It was at its best for the first 4 or 5 seasons, but its a great show despite the slump it fell in the last few seasons. And even during that slump, I believe it remained entertaining.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Like You've Never Seen Her Before.
2 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Truth or Dare" is a documentary that follows the escapades of pop queen Madonna and her backup dancers during her infamous 1990 Blonde Ambition World Tour. Some of her performances from this tour are included, and are filmed in color, while the moments she is not performing are filmed in black and white.

Madonna is famous for constantly reinventing her image, and this Madonna is quite different from the Madonna of today. This was before the two kids and the African baby adoption, the second marriage to Guy Ritchie, and Kabbalah. This is the Madonna of 1990 : bold, controversial, sexual, artistic, and constantly pushing boundaries and limits. Her Blonde Ambition tour was a spectacle, full of elaborate choreography, costume and set changes, religious themes, and sexuality. Whether you love or hate her, one look at this movie does not question why she is one of the most successful female artists ever. She is no doubt a visionary, very driven, charismatic, and an energetic performer.

Everyone knows Madonna the performer. But, Truth or Dare gives you a peek at Madonna the person. Some people have painted a picture of her as a cold-hearted bitch. There is no doubt that Madonna can dish out some diva attitude when she wants to. She sees herself as the boss, and anyone who tries to step on her toes better watch out. Plus the BA tour was very demanding, with back to back dates and non-stop sets. I'm sure you'd be quite stressed or frustrated in that situation as well.

But her critics don't really take the time to point out her good qualities. She has a great sense of humor & can be very caring towards others, like her family and her back up dancers, whom she regards as her family. She sings "Happy Birthday" on stage to her father, waits for hours for her brother to show up backstage, and promotes unity between her dancers. This all seems like very genuine behavior to me. In one scene, a few of her family and friends note how impatient and demanding she can be. But she does seem to gain the people around her's love and respect.

Yes, Madonna is very smart and a master at manipulating the media. So she did have control over this project and what was seen and what wasn't. But I give her credit for being brave enough to show the good & bad of her, and being unafraid to face criticism for it. In my opinion, nothing in the film was too appalling. The infamous "laugh" when she discovers her makeup artist was drugged and raped was a nervous reaction, and she did immediately apologize after wards. Madonna has often taken flack for her image, and it could just be the fact that some people don't know how to handle a strong-minded, ambitious woman.

I recommend this film to people who like Madonna, cause if you don't you probably won't appreciate it or like it. There's great concert footage included as well, which fans will especially enjoy. It's also a great snap shot of the past Madonna. Whether you agree with her actions or not, she's always compelling and interesting to watch.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scarface (1983)
9/10
Yes, it is worth the hype.
2 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A definitive classic, "Scarface" has remained relevant and entertaining to fans, 25 years after its release. It tells the story of Cuban immigrant Tony Montana, played amazingly by Al Pacino. Tony is reckless, defiant, charismatic, and hungry for success in America. He and his friend Manolo come to America, and become involved in the drug dealing business. After a couple of lucrative deals, and dethroning a drug kingpin who backstabbed him, Tony climbs to the top of his empire. He has the money, he has the power. But soon, his decisions affect everything and everyone around him, endangering him of losing it all.

Those who say that this film is not "worth the hype" are wrong. It is a very lengthy film, clocking in at a little over 2 1/2 hours. But it is worth it. It takes time to allow this story to unfold. One can't go from ex-convict refugee to wealthy drug lord completely overnight. It is a wonderfully written story. From the beginning, you can see the lengths Tony is willing to go to get what he wants. He doesn't feel guilt over killing a Communist to obtain a green card, or doesn't slow down when his friend is murdered in a drug trade gone bad. He just keeps going. Coming from humble backgrounds, Tony has outrageous goals he wants to achieve, such as owning a tiger and stealing his boss's girlfriend Elvira, and building a family with her. However, he proceeds to get these things, because of his bold and driven attitude. But, the film is also a morality tale. The ways in which Tony lives and gets what he wants are illegal, immoral, and unhealthy. The attitude Tony displays often gets him into trouble. This is what ultimately leads to his downfall.

The cast of characters are played by talented actors. In the lead role, Al Pacino shines as Tony Montana. He is all at once funny, charming, violent, and brash. He could be considered the bad guy, but he has a way of making you like him. However, you know eventually he will meet his downfall, which he does. Michelle Pfeiffer also stands out in her debut role as Elvira, the bored drug-addicted housewife. On the surface, Elvira seems cold and distant to those around her. But, as the film goes on, you can tell she is a good person who is just caught up in the storm going on around her. Steven Bauer,who plays Manolo, is a great, more light hearted counterpart to Montana and Mary Elizabeth Monstrantonio also does well as Tony's spunky and sweet natured young sister Gina, who eventually gets corrupted by his world, despite his efforts for her not to be.

This film has found great popularity among the youth of today, especially those in the hip-hop community. I think its because it speaks to the ambitious dreams of those who come from humble beginnings. Some people want it all, the so-called American Dream, and will do whatever they can do obtain it, such as Tony did. But the question this film poses is : When you get it, are you actually happy? Was it all worth it? "Scarface" speaks to the morals in all of us, and is a more complex movie than some give it credit for.

And it is definitely in my top 5 movies of all time, by the way. Bias or not, I recommend this to almost anyone, because it speaks to a lot of people. Just as long as you don't mind a lot of profanity or violence, or go into it with great expectations, you should be pleased.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed