The third episode builds on the quality of the second, lies are uncovered, more questions are asked, and the complexities of the case are heightened. I've been critical of TV in general recently for lacking good quality mysteries, The Sixties and Seventies audiences loved clever, twisty mysteries, the likes of Francis Durbridge. Innocent manages to confuse the viewer, this third instalment was loaded with twists and turns, it seems everyone was lying.
Lee Ingleby definitely stole the show, a fantastic performance from him, the scene where he got to meet his daughter was great, excellent acting. The question is, is his character guilty or innocent? Ahead of the finale, my money's definitely on him being guilty, with his brother involved, but we'll have to wait and see.
This shows the benefit of having a drama transmitted over consecutive nights, much easier to follow, much easier to get into. BBC and ITV take note, viewing habits have changed, nobody wants to wait a week for an episode.
Loved it. 9/10
Lee Ingleby definitely stole the show, a fantastic performance from him, the scene where he got to meet his daughter was great, excellent acting. The question is, is his character guilty or innocent? Ahead of the finale, my money's definitely on him being guilty, with his brother involved, but we'll have to wait and see.
This shows the benefit of having a drama transmitted over consecutive nights, much easier to follow, much easier to get into. BBC and ITV take note, viewing habits have changed, nobody wants to wait a week for an episode.
Loved it. 9/10
