I have read this book many times, and I really like it. Believe me, I understand creative license when making a movie based on a book, but honestly, they could have made this movie without the book at all. Other than the basic synopsis---husband and wife heading for divorce only to find out their daughter is getting married, so they decide to postpone telling their kids until after the wedding---And the main (movie) characters' names, they might as well have just written their own story.
1. This movie was based on a faith-based book. John and Abby may have stepped a bit away from God in this title (although it is clear that He is calling them back to Him), but Nicole and Matt definitely did not. Their faith is strong. None of it is shown in this movie. Although, there is one scene in which they are leaving church and talking in the parking lot. In the wedding scene, of course, the Pastor does mention a scripture verse.
2. In the book, John's relationship with Charlene is MUCH deeper than it is depicted in the movie, and Charlene has definitely made her desires for him known. In the book, they are making plans to be together after John and Abby's divorce. In the movie, John seems oblivious to even the minimal flirting coming from Charlene until close to the end of the movie and then he apologizes to Charlene if he had given her any indication that they were more than just friends. Charlene replies that he didn't.
3. "Pops" is much sicker in the book than in the movie, and in fact, during the "love her" scene, John and Abby are having a hard time figuring out what he is trying to say due to the severity of his stroke. He actually ends up dying shortly after his stroke, but before then, he lives in a nursing home battling Parkinson's disease.
4. They barely touch on Kade's report on the eagle, which is a big part of how John starts looking at Abby in a different way. And of course, there is nothing in the movie showing how John and Abby are remembering scripture in relation to their relationship, and their problems concerning it.
3. There are important characters in the book that were not even mentioned in the movie. At the same time, there are characters that are made more important in the movie that are only slightly touched upon in the book. Where are Matt's parents, Jo and Denny?? They were important characters in the book for many different reasons. In fact, Jo is the reason that Abby makes the scrapbook for Nicole in the first place. Then, of course, there is Jo and Denny's reconciliation (they divorced after Matt was born), as well as both of them becoming Christian and growing in the faith.
Abby's editor?? He is only mentioned in the book as an editor she keeps in touch with via e-mail. In fact, she has never met with him face to face, but is definitely having an emotional relationship with him--so much to the degree that she is planning a trip to New York after Matt and Nichole's wedding to finally meet him. Yeah, the movie makes it out like she was innocent, but in the book, she definitely has her issues too. Oh!! And John and Abby have a younger son named Sean. They also had a daughter that passed away a few months after birth (Hayley Ann) that is brought up a lot in the book. Abby's sister is only mentioned briefly in the book (Abby is talking to her), but in the movie, they have made her an important character. John's coach friend?? I have no idea who he is, but he ends up getting together with Abby's sister. That whole story line was only in the movie.
There was never really an attempt on either part to try to work things out until the very end of the book. Really though, even if I had only seen the movie and not read the book, that scene with John and Abby at the dock, was poorly written too. John looked like he was attempting reconciliation with Abby at first with the flowers, the note and the license plate. Yes, Abby was late, but how did he not see from the start how sorry she was? I mean, for someone who seemed to be making such an attempt, to not even give her a chance to explain---especially after she told him that something really good had happened to her?? That was just heartless. And then for him to respond that the good thing that happened to him was that he saw that they weren't going to work---that whole scene just seemed so far-fetched. Of course, that's pretty much how it goes with Hallmark movies anyway, isn't it?? There is a misunderstanding and the one person is truly sorry trying to explain, but the person that supposedly loves them refuses to hear them out. Anyway....
I could go on, but I think I have made it clear how much of a disappointment this movie was---at least if you have read the book it is based on. People can say "well, they didn't want all of the "faith stuff" in the movie" but really, why did they even bother to, theoretically, base it on this book? And the thing is...the people who would have been most drawn to this movie at first would have already been fans of Karen Kingsbury anyway. Even if someone didn't know who she was, the movie would have been better if they had stuck closer to the author's original intent rather than take such a huge amount of "creative license". I mean, if you don't want to make a faith based movie, than don't base it off of a faith based book. And if you like the book, then don't take such license to change it into something barely recognizable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink