2/10
Non-scientific hyperbole with a narcissistic twist
6 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I give this two rather than one star because it familiarizes people with the victims, in a sense. It keeps their memories alive.

A huge hole in this story is the ending, in which the Sheriff states that DNA proves it's most likely Hart as the killer. However, everyone knows that when DNA is presented, it is always detailed with the odds of it NOT being the person (as only an example, "1 in 75 billion that it is not that this person"). There is no science explained with this DNA. And it appears ( this documentary is also confusing, and has several contradictions) that the OSBI tested that DNA, and they are biased in that they initially, in 1978, stated Hart was the killer.

{As an aside, I think he probably was the killer}.

And that actress, chenowith or whatever, she is terrible. "Coulda shoulda woulda:" how flippant and disrespectful.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed