5/10
mixed-up mess, really
23 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Starts off as what appears to be a soft-core relationship drama. Takes a darker tone from the 42 minute mark. Yeah, lotsa nudity, a very undressy movie, but if you're hoping for something lascivious, this is far from it, and you will be sadly disappointed. Go to Vivid Video to find what you're after. The stories there are just as flimsy.

Just what the hell am I doing here? Just passing through the "Dangerous Babes" box-set, another item with an unsuitable name. Yeah, this movie is named after a character that turns out to have precious little to do with the eventual story- line. Anne Saxon struck me as looking like a mature version of Michelle Trachtenberg, Dawn in BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER. I suppose I'm the only one to notice her face...!

I didn't really follow the story. I couldn't. The sound quality is inconsistent, and many sentences I couldn't figure out. In one instance, where John Saxon talks on the phone, revealing what happened to the drugs, the sound is booming, in other places, what is said is virtually inaudible. I think the sound mic men were kinda maybe a lazy lot.

It shouldn't have been called THE SISTER-IN-LAW. Actually, it seems as if they were filming that movie and then turned it into a completely different movie altogether.

Why is Anne Saxon only in this? She came out of nowhere then, took a very naked part, and disappeared... Did it ruin her career, did she get only bad script projects after this, did it shatter her illusions, what?

I suppose there are other reviewers here "shaking their heads" about all the nudity. Might be a corny-filmed red paint bloodbath scene at the end, but, point is, though, nudity and good sex is something beautiful, while a gory end is not, so a big raspberry to all who criticize only the nudity.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed