It wasn't bad. But, there's still way too much room for improvement. Especially, in the plausibility department!
Take the scene where Steve is fired...for the first time.
If this had been a Christmastime episode of LAW & ORDER: TOS, the plot would/should have had him go straight to the D.A.'s office to inform them about the fraudulent lawsuit his ex-employers were about to knowingly aid and abet. In cases like that, the shield of client confidentiality instantly ceases to exist!
He would/should have then gone to the ACLU so he could have one of _their_ lawyers file a pro bono lawsuit against his ex-employers for wrongful job dismissal. Of course, if this had been an L&O episode, the latter would probably have had Steve murdered! In the hope it would suppress his two-pronged counter-attack.
It would/could have definitely suppressed half my disappointment in the plot holes. In other words; Stanton67 was wrong. You would definitely be better off missing out on this particular movie.
Take the scene where Steve is fired...for the first time.
If this had been a Christmastime episode of LAW & ORDER: TOS, the plot would/should have had him go straight to the D.A.'s office to inform them about the fraudulent lawsuit his ex-employers were about to knowingly aid and abet. In cases like that, the shield of client confidentiality instantly ceases to exist!
He would/should have then gone to the ACLU so he could have one of _their_ lawyers file a pro bono lawsuit against his ex-employers for wrongful job dismissal. Of course, if this had been an L&O episode, the latter would probably have had Steve murdered! In the hope it would suppress his two-pronged counter-attack.
It would/could have definitely suppressed half my disappointment in the plot holes. In other words; Stanton67 was wrong. You would definitely be better off missing out on this particular movie.