Wrecked (2010)
3/10
Enough to keep you wondering.... but not enough to keep you entertained.
23 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Let's face it - this film is dull. I honestly think I have wasted 90 minutes of my life watching this movie. It's not that it is a BAD movie, it's more like it is one in which nobody tried very hard. But first, a defence: Adrien Brody does enough to allow us to sympathise with his character. We want to find out what has happened and who he is. The photography is pretty good too, but even a monkey can get some decent shots of a nature background.

The problems come with the story, and the six foot wide gaping plot holes that tag along with it. Firstly, it is boring. More boring than I can say. As mentioned, if it weren't for Adrien Brody's acting (which has been a damn sight better in the past), I would have turned it off. Nothing happens, and when it does happen there is no excitement, no thrill, just stupidity followed by blind luck. The worst thing about this movie is the questions that are left at the end: we find out what happened and who he is, but:

1. If he drove off the road, why does he not look for the road rather than crawling around the forest for days?

2. What happened to the guy in the cave? And if it is what I think it is, why could he not fend it off with a big rifle?

3. We see four men in the car when he causes the crash, but one man is left on the road. How did he fall out of the car, how did that kill him and how did no one see him as they were driving past?

4. In a forest full of trees and wood, he could not have made himself a crutch to help him walk rather than crawl around everywhere?

A film that leaves you with that many questions is simply not worth your time. If you want to watch Brody flex his acting muscles, watch The Pianist again. If you want to see a movie with a good story... well, you can do better than this.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed