Review of She

She (I) (1965)
5/10
It's okay....but the 1935 version is more fun.
21 October 2011
I have seen both the famous 1935 version of "She" starring Helen Gahagan as well as this 1965 version with Ursula Andress. And, while the '35 version is rather infamous as a bad movie (being named to a list of enjoyably bad films by the guy who came up with the Razzie Awards), I think it was much more enjoyable. This 1965 remake, unfortunately, is a bit talky and stiff. However, for fans of Hammer films, escapism and the films of either Peter Cushing or Christopher Lee, it's still worth seeing.

It's interesting that John Richardson receives fourth billing, as to me he was the lead in this film. He doesn't realize it, but he's actually been ordained to become the courtesan of a crazy lady (Andress) who has achieved immortality. The problem, however, is that she is completely amoral--leading a society in a lost city where SHE is to be obeyed--even when she is cruel and capricious--which she frequently is. Yet, oddly, Richardson is drawn to her and feels a sense of destiny--that he MUST have her and join her. Along for the ride is Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee plays her high priest.

The film is pure escapism. Yet, despite the sets and costumes, the film seems to be a bit dull--and spends too much time talking and talking. Now it isn't a bad film--just not all that memorable.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed