Anything this long and in three parts runs the risk of descending into pathos or melodrama, but CARLOS remains interesting throughout. The portrait of the famous terrorist is neither flattering nor harsh and, indeed, different viewers may come away from the film admiring or despising him. The different terrorist operations Carlos was involved in, far fewer than you may think, are not overly dramatic and are filled with the problems, messiness and failures that real life provides. The scenes (particularly the action ones) are alternately attractive and gritty with the latter group; e.g., hostages held overlong in a airplane, almost supplying accompanying stench. The assortment of terrorists from various cultures and countries is a disaffected lot believably drawn - and then trapped - into their choice of lives. Especially attractive is the portrayal of the politics of the various countries and covert agencies as we learn (before Carlos and his fellow terrorists do) that self-interest, not idealism, is always the driving force.
My only criticism is minor: The terrorists, as well as all involved, drink like fish; e.g., Carlos has booze in his hand for a substantial part of the film. At least five cases of Johnny Walker is seen consumed! Bit too heavy on the product placement?
My only criticism is minor: The terrorists, as well as all involved, drink like fish; e.g., Carlos has booze in his hand for a substantial part of the film. At least five cases of Johnny Walker is seen consumed! Bit too heavy on the product placement?