6/10
not hi hi coca lorum. not I cocolorum. but...High! High! High! Cockalorum! Sing 'Waterbabies' Fanz Sing!
19 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
High! High! High! Cockalorum! La La la la la la! look 'Waterbabies' fans. if you want to put this movie up on a pedestal as a High! High! High! work of art, then you should know your 'Waterbabies' facts.

i thought this movie was pretty good. i can't say i know the entire iconology or pre-production history of 'Waterbabies' like some of it's enthusiastic fan base, but i did think it had a lot of quality for a kiddie flick. good production values, a good cast, and high! high! high! standard hand drawn animation. can't say i ever heard of this film when i was growing up, but there was more to it than i would have guessed. i mean it had culture, it was based on Charles Kingsley's classic poem for babies.

some people attacked the hand animation as being bad. come'on. anyone who knows good hand drawn ani. can look at this and tell it wasn't cheap. even the character design preceded stuff like 'A shark's Tail'.

this movie was not ghastly or butt clenchingly bad, like some 'Waterbabies' haters would have you think. it was just gnaw on the chipmunk really weird. it did kind of freak me out a bit (i was really high! high! high! however) and the numerous reps of 'High Cockalorum' did make me want to run from my TV screaming. but this movie had high! high! high! production standards for a kiddie flick.

basically 'Waterbabies' was about believing. in waterbabies that is. i mean they could exist couldn't they? maybe they're like loch nessie or that big foot thing. i personally think they are related to sea monkeys. sea monkeys are real right? i saw sea monkey's with me own eyes when i was little so i know they exist. i think i'll have another doobie and contemplate this. 'Baby' fanz sing! high! high! high! Cockalorum!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed