Mamet discovers cinema.
Let's face it, we need as many serious writers as we can get, even pompous mannered ones. But we all know, and now Mamet himself does, that cinematic devices have almost no similarity to theatrical ones. At least in the modern era. His movies have been better radio plays than movies.
Now he decides to get serious and channels as many great cinematic traditions as he can fit in a single film.
We have the Raging Bull, flying eye sort of movie, where the camera engages in the space of the action. Scorcese hardly invented this, but he and Stallone merged it with the fight movie.
We have the Zen visual, where the character is supposed to have some transcendental value and we "see" it in the environment he sheds.
We have the modern fold where you have a public performance that validates your existence; we have the performance fold usually a sports movie, where the good guy wins, natch; we have the movie which features movie people and the writing of the movie similar to what we see; and we have the notion of the content of the medium fighting the medium itself, here TeeVee.
Mamet chooses to use all three of the big strokes and all three of the folds. It seems a bit desperate.
I think you might be better off watching Raging Bull with Ghost Dog.
Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.
Let's face it, we need as many serious writers as we can get, even pompous mannered ones. But we all know, and now Mamet himself does, that cinematic devices have almost no similarity to theatrical ones. At least in the modern era. His movies have been better radio plays than movies.
Now he decides to get serious and channels as many great cinematic traditions as he can fit in a single film.
We have the Raging Bull, flying eye sort of movie, where the camera engages in the space of the action. Scorcese hardly invented this, but he and Stallone merged it with the fight movie.
We have the Zen visual, where the character is supposed to have some transcendental value and we "see" it in the environment he sheds.
We have the modern fold where you have a public performance that validates your existence; we have the performance fold usually a sports movie, where the good guy wins, natch; we have the movie which features movie people and the writing of the movie similar to what we see; and we have the notion of the content of the medium fighting the medium itself, here TeeVee.
Mamet chooses to use all three of the big strokes and all three of the folds. It seems a bit desperate.
I think you might be better off watching Raging Bull with Ghost Dog.
Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.