This film is a great example of 'How NOT to produce a documentary'. Documentary films typically offer factual presentation of arguments, not blatant examples of innuendo building upon suspicion and leading to speculation. Specious arguments do not contribute to logical, reasoned and informed opinion. There may indeed, be good reason to suspect secret and/or restricted organizations, such as the Bilderberg Group, but presenting them by silly name-calling and strange assumptions proves little more than the name-caller is not very well informed.
I also note the absence of 'Goofs' category on IMDb's movie info for Endgame and agree that it ought not to be included as the number of 'goofs' clearly outweigh the number of so-called 'facts' presented in this film.
I would like to offer the producer/director a paraphrased quote from the late Carl Sagan - Belief, in the absence of compelling evidence is known as faith/truth; belief after the acquisition of evidence is known as knowledge. He may wish to gather a little more of the latter for his next endeavor.
I also note the absence of 'Goofs' category on IMDb's movie info for Endgame and agree that it ought not to be included as the number of 'goofs' clearly outweigh the number of so-called 'facts' presented in this film.
I would like to offer the producer/director a paraphrased quote from the late Carl Sagan - Belief, in the absence of compelling evidence is known as faith/truth; belief after the acquisition of evidence is known as knowledge. He may wish to gather a little more of the latter for his next endeavor.