4/10
About 80 minutes would have been sufficient not the 128 minutes
8 March 2007
Here in Crete Greece there are many films shown during the night on TV so my wife and I use the users comments to decide which films to record to watch at a decent hour. Although this film only got a rating of 5.6 which we feel is the bottom end of a film worth watching the plot outline sounded interesting so we gave it a go.

Well I think that 5.6 is a bit too good a rating. 4.5 is better.

The basic story about a man who was blind from the age of three regaining his sight is fine. However about 80 minutes would have been sufficient not the 128 minutes forced on to us. It was dragged out for the sake of it with lots of valueless scenes included. Our DVD recorder automatically put markers every six minutes on a recording and after about 80 minutes we started zapping forward 6 minutes and watching for 30 – 40 seconds to keep up to date with the plot.

Val Kilmer's portrayal of a blind man was for him to smile incessantly throughout every scene, he seemed more creepy than anything.

When they enter the old abandoned building which Kilmer had not known existed before then, he was very confident for a blind man entering a new space. He steps gingerly forward without his stick in to what? Could have been an old uncover well and that would have been the end of him and the film. But luckily for him it was just good solid floor boards.

The father serves no purpose for being in this movie.

The little kid next door pops up for no good reason and gets pretty annoying.

It was OK to watch but perhaps I should have baked some bread it would have been better use of my time.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed