Change Your Image
LeiChing
Reviews
Baak fan baak gam gok (1996)
Philosophy refuted on unethical grounds
Comic based reference, author Lau Wankit First copy printed 1988, by CitiComics Cameo, Lau Ying Kit 2013
Heavily biased romantic prophecy deployed by the psychiatric services with subject control at academic institutions based on loosely distinguished characters that are set on counter egos with picturesque delusions. Economic mess need discipline across academic, business, social and family situations.
The comic novels of Hong Kong had little censorship for children and teenagers. Youth literature was influenced by citi and witi comics, chaired with Ae Hong, cross influenced by the popular music industry with his girlfriend, later wife, Vivian Chow, on the front cover of Yes Magazine.
Vivian Chow had long black hair and might have been the spin-off celebrity from the comic's focal, Cherie (勵懲), spun from the confectionery manufactured by the Ferrero brand, now withheld from the Hong Kong market. The magazine contained delusive psychological tests that limited the teenagers' normal sense of friendship and companionship.
The ethical problems risen from the distribution with regards to local and international youth were:
1. The copies were available to purchase by young children not even teenagers despite the adult rated content that ought be outlawed
2. The commercial media and product spin-offs became propaganda to local youths with little choice different from the surround news stations and broadcasts
3. The psychiatric profession had abused policy limiting youths from otherwise knowledgeable attainment
4. The fantasies of the authorised team had unfair advantage commercially secluding trial figures without formal consent to complete the series, linguistically pressurising the plaintiffs to enactment with lateral policy
5. The etymological coining of psychiatric definitions to be contrasted with criminology and sociology
6. Children were raised not with normal regular non-reference and other out of context preoccupations
7. There is a normal aversion from the familiarity of characters that means the philosophy refuted on unethical grounds.
8. The censorship in Hong Kong should discern and discipline the doctrine that the community suffers from across academic, business, social and family situations where seen.
Broken Flowers (2005)
Innocent unless proved guilty, so why ask at all
Film starts with woman asking man about a past that she did not have to know, and a dubious right to discuss with the man's friends. So you end up watching the film and feeling sorry for the guy strung along by his mates. If they had a future, then the discretion of his past was down to those who took part in it, pregnancies or not? The film became a pandora's box forced open without control of his own time, nor the audience's. When relationships break, 'second chances' are from those future encounters with different sets of preferences and scenarios not shared with everyone. There might have been reasons for those in 'the past' to choose not to share time further, and it was for the 'three of them' to respect that, yet - it's a small world for crossing paths.
Bridget Jones's Diary (2001)
Cooperative Bambi-esquire Harassment
One of many films that ought be on censorship.
About woman's thinking and private space and lawyers that overstep their duties.
Of the many commentators on Bridget's life in the film, most were capable of performing their psychological commands on themselves.
If the theme of the film is 'it is normal for people to get married and have children', the persuaders has not yet led by example.
No wonder Bridget lives alone.
The only space she has to be the authority of her own life was destroyed by readers she did not permit to see her records, except if she did happen to die in the apartment, then became mauled by dogs which will be difficult to tame thereafter.
Irony between choosing man or dog as best friend and whether she can fend off either in a fight.
A woman's worst enemy are not the men before, but the approaching man and what he had discussed with the men before.
Lost in Translation (2003)
'Presence'
S.J. drifts from set to set unsure what to do with herself (or rather, the crew not sure what to do with her) and so was set up with numerous 'strangers' who also knows that, contrary to Dorothy, nowhere is home: not being missed makes you unselfish, being written allover with no sense of attachment makes you a survivor, having some moral ground makes you a loser(?) waiting to be tripped-up, but if you do not tolerate this, your children (if you can convince anyone to have any) is still going to be next by the sheer social force of 'wisening up the kids so they do not get picked on'. Thereby completely sterilising all encounters into roam-antic friendships for the sake of comfort and good hospitality (and why be the cause of any suffering when the medical bill is to be borne by children?).
Fan yi cho (2000)
Can't blame a girl for not wanting to cook
Film is a health warning as noodles are not that nutritious, standing in the rain gives people colds (seriously do the directors not care?), scented oils breathed in high concentrations cause drowsiness ('therapeutic' or 'placebo' effects worthy of debate), hairdryers can burn, building sites with no harness risky and dangerous (as was encouraged).
After some initial sentiment, film becomes 'person aility assessment' when 2 persons get together in order to get some slack: but let's be honest, cooked excess can be frozen to counteract 'family size' packaging economy and one is mindful that both can learn more real science beyond common sense.
Higher rating as is acceptable to dreamers without too much headbang but the falling from the sky onto a balcony? One only understands if one has tried to fly as a child when confused by holistic 'angel' drawings that aims to stop children pretending to be birds. Advice is to teach them the meaning of 'dew wire' pronto.
Clueless (1995)
Not cute
A 'mirror-movie' where dressed-up teenage (or younger) wannabes try to imagine ('keeping it real') or worse, outsmart, how their imaginary friends will behave thereby pre-judging thin air, each other, and ultimately themselves.
Cannot tell whether 'assigned partners' are naive, possessive, mutually willing, or socially enforced through 'overlaps'.
Persons using oneselves as test subjects derides point of evolution and worse, when they use one another for experimentation, 'retribution' and 'respect' is merely retaliation (not so much revenge unless animals get hurt: who can tell? and what can you do about it?). There is some sense of characters knowingly wasting time or 'sacrificing their wisdom' on the brink of satisfying 'teach a lesson' mentality: it is one thing for a person to ask for advice, quite another for social cornering a person to deliver something they do not want, do not need or find harmful/hurtful.
Very much over-aged persons playing 'mummy and daddy' and telling of their own derogation from innocence, which every individual owns in abundance but knows is useless in abandance.
Closer (2004)
Whatever
Petty much 'porn' with the sex edited out (because it never happened?) then some losers trying to weave some feeling or sentiment out of:
1) water 2) bits of paper 3) exposures on chemical paper 4) 'wife' 5) truth 6) sex or the prospect of 7) pretty much gap-filling
Interesting use of pole-dance and fluorescent wig, wonder how anyone who investigates bodily balance can ever 'get it up' after the scene.
Unfortuate misinterpreted split personalities, accurate depiction of depression as being inter-personal as opposed to self-inflicted.
Sad for Alice as there was not so much a 'revenge sex' (is that ever possible?) as 'sympathy sex' (again, might not be possible but illustrative of vanity) or pretty much a 'head bang' (if one can sink low and be petty about it).
Good attempt to free an otherwise prisoner of conscience from a life of deceit. By freeing the 'prisoner' their captors were not truly free until they are assured that Alice's innocence was never tarnished but has developed depth of understanding.
Only useful part is where any losing of temper (controlled or otherwise) shows the real prisoner as the inability to admit the whole truth in the vain hope that they were actually 'helping someone'.
How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days (2003)
Rape by Con-duct, no. of culprits unclear
Unfortunate (link also to Closer) attempt to 'tease' 'competitive' mentality between two characters, with no regard for 'secret' third option to not take part, especially with 'cushy' desk job at threat.
Cannot tell whether characters are in fact baby-sitting one another, amusing or merely conning siders for, well, nothing.
Petty accounts of small past events blown out of scale in effort to cure insecurities on the reality of not being able to completely map any other person's psyche.
Sad reality of persons trying to help in vain, created uncomfortable situation where Anderson(from girl's perspective) is forced to adapt to a select stranger in a gang fight of one/two (depending on how naive Anderson/guy is perceived to be).
Do not show it to children who might believe the whole thing was a good idea.