Change Your Image
lynchfilmlover
Reviews
911 Ripple Effect (2007)
What Went Down With Building 7
As a collector of various informative, so called, conspiracy films, this is one of the better ones. Albeit most tread the same ground, of course, each film has their own merits making them worth watching.
This one, with some good merits has some down points too. More on that later. Directed and co-written by William Lewis and co-written and narrated by Dave von Kleist, this, I believe was a video released on the internet coming from the same makers of the film 9/11: In Plane Site. I will review that film in the future.
Kleist comes across very good and professional as you would expect. However, the last twenty minutes of the film are basically a recap of what we have seen. This means, not only could the film have been shorter but also the narration begins to become monotonous. Don't get me wrong, there are big gaps where there are no narration and just talking heads, it is just that the film could have done with hidden narrators in the same ilk as the Loose Change series, another round of films that I will review at a later date.
The films main chapter points include discussions about the following areas: The possible pods under the planes, whether the towers collapsed or were controlled demolitions, where the plane wreckage was at both the Pentagon and Pennsylvania and various others things. Notably the first chapter regarding pods was dropped from subsequent editions of Loose Change. It is still worth a discussion due to the suspicious, if ambiguous, appendages on the underside of the planes and the light flashes seen milliseconds before both planes hot the towers.
It does have a good section of propaganda and gives good proof with some interviews showing that the person being interviewed wasn't allowed to speak and also were belittled and spoken over.
Other good sections include a brief discussion on the freefall collapse of World Trade Center 7. One thing that stands out for me is the BBC airing the fact that WTC7 feel, twenty minutes before it actually fell! There is commonly accessible footage of the new report and as she is conveying the collapse, the building can clearly be seen still standing behind her. It doesn't however show footage seen in other films where the next time they go over, the signal is suspectly pulled. This can be seen in other films.
As a postscript, one of the big surprises is the song over the end credits by Martin Noakes. The song 'WTC Building 7', with the right promotion could easily be a hit as the music and lyrics are outstanding. Even if you don#t want to watch the film, search out the song.
I would assume that as this is a lesser know, though credited as one of the best 9/11 films out there, and the fact that til now, there were no reviews, most people who have an interest will have probably seen In Plane Site or my favourite, the Loose Change series. Having said that, search this out. It is a good add to your knowledge of questions needing answers regarding 9/11
Gravity (2013)
Must Be Seen As Intended
I had missed this on initial release but due to the Oscar nomination, my local cinema gave it an extra week of a 3D run. I had heard and read so much that this film is the one made for 3D. up until now I had avoided 3D and had only seen the Doctor Who 'The Day of the Doctor' at the cinema in that format.
The film very much goes straight into the story with a scene that is a continuous 13 minute take. Straight off the bat the 3D effects are startling and I have to agree, from the offset, I have to agree that this is a film you must see that format. Sadly I am imagine that seeing this on DVD in the future, in 2D, will lose so much. In fact the effects in this are simply astounding, groundbreaking and totally breathtaking. The depth of the dimension is a joy to behold.
This is a 90 minute film and you would wonder how the story would stretch over that time. Trust me, it does. It is pretty much a disaster movie from start till end. The only criticism is that there really is no character development. All we really know of Dr Ryan Stone is the brief mentions of what happened to her daughter. Having said that, the story and imagery are the principal factor here, not the character. For that reason the film would not be a 10/10 for me.
I must agree with a fellow reviewer who mentions Lumiere's 'Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat' (1895). This film is groundbreaking. Even rare cinema goers are understanding the need to have seen this as it is intended. Some of the audience I talked to prior to showing were attending there very first modern 3D film. I hope that it is looked back upon in the future up there with the likes of 2001 and others.
Sandra Bullock excels. She is in practically every scene. George Clooney is surprisingly annoying and I didn't warm to him at all. There are not many films where the cast list is so low and that is one of the pluses of the film. It feels like the whole 90 minutes is one take, of course that is impossible but that is how seamless this film is! Interestingly I found Stone's attempt to contact someone for help a but unsettling as is was very weird. The person she is contacting, obviously has no idea what the hell is going on and who she is. Sadly within the film we only see her side of the conversation. However, on researching after the film, a short 6 minute film shows the conversation from the other point of view where you see the Greenlandic Inuit fisherman who intercepts Stone's transmission. Aningaaq as he is called is a self-titled short written and directed by Gravity co-writer Jonás Cuarón. I will reviewing that on here at some point in the near future.
There are many hints towards rebirth in this film. Also, the end of the film is a metaphor for the evolution of the human, progressing out of the amniotic fluid to being on all fours, then stood but curved and finally stood erect. In fact you can also say that the beginning of the film depicts the pinnacle of human achievement and end with the dawn of mankind.
I am so glad I saw this as intended and I urge anyone who can catch it in cinemas before it is too late, to see it in all its glory.
Supergirl (1984)
Not So Supergirl
Well, what can you say about Supergirl?. Made after the first 3 successful Superman films, you would think it would also be a success. Sadly, that wasn't to. It made major losses. In fact the opening titles alone cost $1. Having said that, despite how poor this film is, it is still better than the awful Superman IV: The Quest For Peace.
Unfortunalty it doesn't explain itself to well to begin with. I have read theories that Argo City was a moon of the destructed Krypton. Hoever, this film places it in 'innerspace, an 'other' dimension. In fact there is many a mention of teaching the children of Argo about the sixth dimension. That is why a leap of faith is needed as to why the Omega Hedron and Supergirl come out of the lake. Now, I am all for having to come to your own conclusions but I believe that thus could have been explained better. Equally so, the argument for Argo City to be placed in an inner dimension is that in that in Spuerman, Kor-El's journey from Krytpton to Earth sees him age from being in nappies to being to being a pre-teen boy but in this Kara hardly ages on the journey.
Cast wise, there are some big names in the film that just don't hit the mark. Faye Dunaway over does her part and to be honest, after a while, the limits of the script mean you even get tired of seeing Dunaway's face being especially lit. Helen Slater, just about pulls it off as Supergirl for one reason only. She plays the naivety to a tee. In fact the moment when she is first kissed and they way she reacts and is shown to feel these feeling for the first time is incredibly touching, albeit too brief. Visually she looks perfect but despite the naivety she just acts so wooden. I do understand her journey and that may account as to why she plays it so badly. The only time she fits the bill acting wise is near the conclusion for the film where she appears as a confident, hard edged and, briefly, excellently played Supergirl.
Other cast members include Peter Cook, who I love, but is just reading the part to get paid at the end of the day. Mia Farrow is completely underused. Maureen Teefy is good as Lucy Lane, but pairing this films poor reception with her turn in the universally panned Grease 2 means she didn't really make any other films of note. Chrispher Reeve was due to reprise his role as Supernman but pulled out at the last minute. There is a nice touch when we see the picture of Reeve when the Superman theme briefly plays.
Jeannot Szwarc directs. He directed one of the most underrated films of all time, Somewhere In Time. There is nothing spectacular here from him apart from a few scenes namely the runaway truck sequence and romantic journey of Supergirl.
There is a monster which really is out of place and totally unexplained really and seems to leave a lot of the film empty and badly scripted. With a vast array of versions: 124 min (international) | 105 min (theatrical) | 138 min (director's cut) | 150 min (original cut) | 89 min (Video Version) and this review bring about the international version, one can only wonder what the missing scenes could have added to the film.
All in all, it is an acceptable film but it just lacking in so many ways. Theo only thing or notoriety coming from the film is Jerry Goldsmiths excellent theme. Worth a watch but only if you are a fan of the whole franchise. It really isn't that good at all.
The Death of the Incredible Hulk (1990)
Don't Make Me Angry
I was old enough to be a fan of the original television series of 'The Incredible Hulk', though it seems a distant memory. There is nothing specific I remember but the end credits with Banner walking away or hitching a lift coupled with the beautiful piano music. stick mostly in my mind.
This is the third and final TV movie following on from the TV series. First came 'The Incredible Hulk Returns' which although nostalgic at the story continuing, it was quite laughable with the appearance of Thor. Then came 'The Trial of the Incredible Hulk', which I haven't seen for a long while. It featured Daredevil and from what I remember, it is that much cop either.
Now we come to this instalment, 'The Death of the Incredible Hulk'. This is a completely different kettle of fish. Gone are the usual opening titles and the first scenes see Bill Bixby's Dr David Banner (Bellamy) apparently a cleaner with a submissive perhaps with learning difficulties. It is uncomfortable viewing for the usual Hulk viewer as it is out of character. Watching the film soon shows you why he is acting like that.
The film itself is basically about the fight to make a perfect soldier, both to end all wars and to use within wars. This is probably classed as one of the last Cold war films. It is a simple good versus evil tale.
The tone is quite different from most Hulk work and Bixby, looking tired plays it to perfection. It is one of the few occasions where Banner reveals who he is to people. In fact, the scene where Banner see a video recording of The Hulk for the first time is moving. Hardly and dialogue, however the facial expression says it all. During the film Banner comes close to getting the cure he so desires.
The final scenes of the film are actually very moving. Especially for those who have followed the Hulk. (I have never seen the two new Hulk films, to me The Hulk is Bixby and Ferrigno and always will be). I had heard/read that The Hulk feel from a plane and died but what did happen came as a little surprise. As he clambered into a plane a gunshot goes off blowing it up. Now, we do see a conscious Hulk falling a very long way. Now I have read that he had survived a fall like this in the TV Series. However, you must question that perhaps being at ground zero so to speak of the explosion was enough to kill him. He was fully conscious though. It must be said the music used as he falls "And Something Ends' is truly beautiful and fits perfectly what is about to happen.
The stand out moments happen here. Firstly, during the music we see The Hulk talk! He mouthes the name 'Jasmine' who he had fallen in love with during the film. Sadly, we don't hear it as it is during the music. Then we see Banner say 'I am free'. Whether The Hulk within him died, then, he died as well or The Hulk died because Banner was dying is an interesting talking point. Either way, it was moving yet sad as Banner never got a chance to live without this demon.
One omission is that of Mr McGee. How poignant and touching would it have been to have him at The Hulk's death. Perhaps seeing for the first time what this creature had made Banner into and how it affected his life perhaps would have been a good resolution.
As a footnote, this wasn't meant to be the last film! The 4th in the series had two working titles: 'The Revenge of the Incredible Hulk' & 'The Rebirth of the Incredible Hulk'. The storyline would have seen The Hulk revived with Dr David Banner's mind. To me, I would have loved to have seen this. But due to Bixby's sad passing just three years later it never came to be. In hindsight, this ending now fits perfectly.
For those of you thinking of rewatching the TV series, make sure you make you way through the episodes and then end with this. A truly moving journey and highly recommended.
An Adventure in Space and Time (2013)
I Don't Want To Go
In the middle of the celebrations for Doctor Who's 50th Anniversary, came this docudrama about how the series came to be. It spans 1963 to 1966. It begins, as we see at the end, with Hartnell's post final scenes. The Tardis then metaphorically travels back to 63.
Though it is a film about Hartnell, it must be said that this is also the story of Verity Lambert and Sydney Newman. Played wonderfully by Jessica Raine and Brian Cox. But it is David Bradley, who gives the performance of his life as both the 'First Doctor' and William Hartnell. He comes across initially as a bitter man, disillusioned by the typecast roles he kept getting. In fact, I was worried that the portrayal of him may cloud our love of him. I need not to have worried. The way the story progressed and the obvious love Hartnell had for the role of the Doctor not only on screen but in public, was heartwarming.
It was wonderful to see William Russell and Carole Ann Ford play characters within this. It must be said that a number of other Who Illumni were featured too. Mark Eden, Nicholas Briggs and Jean Marsh to name but a few. Also, and it had been rumoured, a lovely touch was, near the end, seeing Bradley's Hartnell look across the Tardis console and see 'Eleventh Doctor' Matt Smith. A really wonderful nod to just how much of an institution Who is and how long it would last.
Back to Bradley though, as I said, the progression of the story shows what a wonderful man Hartnell was. It was great to hear a mention of his part in Brighton Rock, a film everyone must see as a classic of British film. Some scenes of note that stand out include, when Hartnell is clearly beginning to get the onset of his failing memory, it was moving and very hard to watch. The clear love he has for the roll comes across and this needs to be put firmly at the door of Mark Gatiss who wrote it. Though Bradley really does bring it alive. One scene, which will be remembered is of Hartnell breaking down after being forced to quit. His line "I don't want to go" and subsequent tears, bought me to tears too. Interestingly Tennant's same line when he was about to regenerate, saw me in floods too.
The recreation of the Tardis looked beautiful and the attention to detail was astounding. The Daleks have never felt and looked more sinister since the Tom Baker era, I would say. So plaudits are deserved there.
It must be added that this was more aimed at an older audience, not so much for children. The post watershed airing, the use of the word p**s and the fact that today's generation will not only have a limited attention span but their interest in Hartnell's era may not be suited the fast paced current era of young Who fans.
This really is a wonderful docudrama to watch and I highly recommend it to any older Who fan. It really is a trip of nostalgia and a reminder how close Who came to not being continued. Equally so, it is a telling reminder that Doctor Who was William Hartnell. There were no regenerations as we look back from today's point of view. It really does show how heartbreaking it was for Hartnell to have to give up. It is also sad to document is decline into illness.
If you haven't seen it already, search it out. It really is that good!
Bloodhounds of Broadway (1989)
I Surrender Dear
This is a film I have wanted to see since it came out. It was my belief that the film went straight to VHS, with no cinematic release. Having read the notes here on IMDb, I now see it had a limited release.
From memory, the film was not very well received. The cast is quite diverse. We see Randy Quaid, Madonna, Jennifer Grey, Julie Hagerty, Rutgar Hauer and Matt Dillon, to name just a few. It must be said that both Grey and more so Hauer are greatly underused.
The film start badly with a musical number with the main singer clearly singing something completely different. This is listed as a musical but it is far from it. Looking at the credits, there are four listed: I can only remember two! Having said that, the duet where Madonna & Jennifer Grey sing 'I Surrender, Dear' is really a stand out moment. Even then, there voices don't quote fit the song, until the last note where they combine beautifully.
The one thing that makes this film fail for me is that the 'music' soundtrack in the first twenty minutes and occasionally throughout, is way too loud. I had great difficulty hearing what the actors were saying at times. I know the answer would be to bring up the subtitles but sadly I was watching this on a obscure UK channel called 'Movie Mix'. It really did make me lose interest early on.
Another thing I feel worked against the film was that, as the opening titles were in black and white, I feel the film would have worked better as period piece if it had stayed in black and white. Though there are certain shots that work in colour, there are not enough. Even the fake snow was annoying. At one point you could clearly see that it was just foam! It irritated enough that you could even picture the sound effects man, faking the sound of walking in the 'snow'.
I must say as the film moved into its latter stages, I did find it slightly more interesting. When I worked out what the hell was going on and finally could hear the actors, I did start to care for the characters. I guess I should take into consideration that this is the first film I have reviewed here that I have never seen before. Perhaps this needs another viewing, though I am not going to rush to do that.
As I stated earlier, Hauer was underused. Grey didn't seem to fit at all. At one point when she is confronting someone gives the look that she is about to fall into another character completely and quote something from Dirty Dancing. Madonna was wooden to begin with but grows likable as the movie progresses. I could go on but the film just doesn't come together that well. By the time it does, the film is over.
Interestingly, there is a film of the same name that was made in 1952. Though it has no direct link to this film. They are both based on four different Damon Runyon stories. As a footnote, yes this is worth a watch but with the subtitles on!
Berth Marks (1929)
Pottsville
This short film means a lot to me. When I was young, my family would watch the likes of Harold Lloyd and Charlie Chaplin. My Grandad specifically likes Laurel & Hardy, who we had a one or two videos of. This, by far, was his favourite and mainly for one scene! More on that shortly.
Berth Marks was made and released in 1929. It is the second sound film made by Laurel & Hardy. On some reviews on here it is stated that it was the first. This seems to be incorrect. Interestingly there was also a silent version made for cinemas who were not yet wired to show talkies! According to the book, 'Laurel & Hardy: The Magic Behind The Movies' by Randy Skretvedt, it was later reissued in 1936 with a music score added to introductory scenes. This is currently the only surviving version and was subsequently included on the 10-disc Laurel & Hardy: The Essential Collection DVD set. I have a the single film on DVD running at 20 minutes.
The film opens with Stan and Ollie trying to meet at a railway station, they keep missing each other. When they finally meet, they ask a conductor as to whether the train they are about to catch stops at Pottsville. What ensues is the funniest moment of the film. The conductor mumbles a list of incomprehensible words while Stan & Ollie look on with confusion. Ollie asked him again and as the conductor walks of listing the same incomprehensible list, finally in the distance we hear him shout, "..and Pottsville". Now as stated before, my Grandad adored this scene. He could watch it again and again. Every time he would laugh out loud with tears streaming down his face. A wonderful memory that, as he passed in 1997, stays in the forefront of my memory.
As the film continues, we see another great scene which plays off screen for the rest of the film, until the pay off at the end. We see passengers mistakenly assuming that the person stood behind is riping their suit. The complete orgy of people fighting at the end is a joy to see.
Now to review this as an adult is difficult. The film means so much to me and by no means am I putting the film down, but one has to be honest about the rest of the film. Equally one must take into account that sound was still a new medium.
The rest of the film sees Stan & Ollie really struggle. It is clear that they are having trouble with the newly invented talkies. Most of the second half of the film has them both entangled in each others clothes in their berth. They both seem to ad-lib, for effect, and it makes that section feel very disjointed.
There really isn't that much else to say about it. I haven't seen that many of their films but from memory I remember in other films, there was more slapstick than is on show. By no way is it a criticism, it is rather a acceptance that they were on a learning curve.
As a footnote, according to Wikipedia: Several train sequences (included a few not used in the English release) were used for foreign language releases versions of The Laurel-Hardy Murder Case in 1930. Laurel and Hardy released three different versions of The Laurel-Hardy Murder Case combined with Berth Marks for the foreign language market. In German, French and a the Spansih version which lasts for 49 minutes.
Despite it's failings, this is still a much loved short for me and very much worth a watch. Especially if you want to follow on from this with their later films, to see how they developed from silent to talkies.
Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)
Hailing Frequencies Open
I sadly missed this on the big screen but thankfully it still looked fantastic on the small screen. I got the DVD on the day of release and I had avoided all message boards revealing who Benedict Cumberbatch was playing. Then I read the back cover of the DVD and it reveals exactly who he was! I didn't really like the first five minutes but I understand it was essential to the plot. The USS Enterprise, underwater! Really? Due to breaking the Prime Directive and lying in a log entry, Kirk loses his Captaincy to Pike who soon after gets killed. This is a shame as i felt Pike was a strong connection to the Pre Kirk Star Trek pilot 'The Cage'. It was interesting to hear 'Section 31' be mentioned from Deep Space Nine. Also there were some models on Admiral Marcus's (Peter Weller) table: Including the Phoenix from Star Trek: First Contact and the NX01 Enterprise from Star Trek Enterprise.
Other things of note that happened differently on the Prime Universe: Praxus, the moon of the Klingon home-world, Kronos, is seen having exploded within the film. This, interestingly didn't happen until Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. Also great to see Dr Carol Marcus, played by the gorgeous Alice Eve) The film, which of course, is the second movie in the reboot/continuation of Trek (12th in all), is pretty much a sort of remake of Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan. Cumberbatch is evil as Khan. There are lots of nods to II and the surprising juxtaposition of what happens with Kirk and Spock near the end is both wonderful, a surprise and yet obvious! In fact one wonders if they couldn't have ended it there and made Star Trek (XIII): The Search For Kirk! That really would be a copy to far! I do like the fact that they can tap into established stories from Classic Trek but lets move it on now.
The ending set everything up for a new dawn for Star Trek. In fact you could have made a new TV series right from the end, where they start their 'Five Year Mission'. Hopefully we can have a good space story next film. Which there will be of course. There was already a third to be made but considering Into Darkness Made the most money of all Star Trek films, there is a long way to go yet.
One point to mention is the crashing of the USS Vengeance into San Fransico Harbour and the panic of the people looking up at the destruction caused did remind me of 9/11, Possibly those scenes may have been shot if this was ten years ago.
Peter Weller gives a great performance as Admiral Marcus. Bones seems to have lost something he had in the first film. Pegg's 'Scotty' isn't quite on the mark yet. This maybe due to me being a fan of Pegg in other films. Spock, of course, shines played by the brilliant Zachary Quinto. Also great to see Leonard Nimoy make another cameo as Spock Prime. This came as a pleasant surprise. We didn't see as much of the Enterprise as last time but she still looked gorgeous.
All in all, this is a great film. Better than the first I would say and I am very much looking forward to the next one. Though I would also call for a new Star Trek TV series to start now. Trek has never been more popular and even if it's set with cadets or a distant starship, now is the time to boldly go there!
Equally, what should the next film be about? I would like to see 'The Borg' involved. Controversial decision maybe but I would love to see modern day technologies take on them. Hopefully they can be as scary as they were wehn first introduced in Star Trek: The Next Generation's 'Q-Who' where they were genuinely frightening.
Exciting times, indeed, if you are a Trek fan.
The Karen Carpenter Story (1989)
Rainy Days And Mondays
I have seen this film a number of times now and although it has major faults, it really is the music and the unique beauty of Karen's voice that steals this film. The soundtrack, as you would expect, is breathtaking. I loved The Carpenter music and both Karen and Richard were so far ahead of their time that to lose her at such a young age was such a tragedy.
It begins with Karen's death. Bringing the harsh reality and reminder that this doesn't end well. It then moves into Karen at 13 and Ruchard 16, i believe. It tells the story of how Richard was supposedly the family favourite and he will become a star with Karen seemingly brushed aside by the family. The family plays a part in both of their future illnesses of both, i believe. By Richard's Mum giving him the sleeping pills that he became addicted to throughout the film and the old fashioned way that it is portrayed that the Mother just never said "I love you". Yuu really have to see this film to see how profound this possibly or even must've affected Karen.
It is interesting, in hindsight, to read that Richard Carpenter, who had major involvement in the this, and the music side of the film, says he hates it now. He is quoted in the notes of the 35th anniversary CD that most of the dialogue is fictitious. He also states a number of inaccuracies. Apparently both Karen and Richard never collapsed in real life. Equally, the scene at the end when Karen's Mother finally says "I Love you" never happened. It was put in to give the film a happy ending, despite was death following. Putting these things aside though, it is a film worth watching.
Cynthia Gibb plays Karen well. She comes across as a sweet, naive yet troubled girl who seems to be innocent through out the film. Of course her anorexia comes from peer pressure, being in the public eye and the fact that Karen never believed she was good enough for her parents. Though once again, i always thought the "chubby little sister" quote was true. However after research is was actually Richard that was quoted as chubby.
I must say that it really is a lovely film, if you can call it that considering how it ends up. Their story is so wonderful from early talent show wins through to songs at the top of the charts. So many of the original songs are here. When Cynthia sings the opening line of "All of my life" but out of key and then Richard changes it, i defy you to not have your breath taken away by Karen's stunning vocals kicking in.
The film also tells the story of their demons. As already mentioned, Richard's addiction to sleeping pills and of course Karens battle with anorexia and bulimia. It is tough to watch at times as we all know this all, albeit with the unreal buts put in, really happened. It is quite a short film and it does skirt over things very quickly at times. For instance Karen's marriage and subsequent divorce is played out within five minutes. Though once again i urge you to find a better use of a song when "Masquarade" is used over these moments.
Remembering that this is based upon what really happened and taking into consideration, as stated, how Richard feels about this film, it still is a good watch. Cynthia Gib is so wonderful that at times it is hard to picture her not being Karen, she really does play it that well. The already mentioned end scene with her Mother telling her she loves her is really beautiful, even if again, it didn't happen.
The film also gives the impression that Karen did not record any solo material. She recorded a solo album in 1979, though it was not released until 1996.
I am by no means slating the film for the inaccuracies. I adored The Carpenters and still listen to then to this day. It is a shame that so called biopics have to change the facts so readily and thus making those facts go into the public domain.
Having said that, this is a wonderful film to watch. At this stage it has never been released on DVD or VHS. if you see it listed in your television guides, catch it. Enjoy the beautiful vocal tones of Richard and Karen, maybe even add some of their albums to your collection.
Léon (1994)
He's Venus As A Boy
Leon is another film i haven't watched for years but when i originally saw it, i really loved the film. Of course i am reviewing the original cinematic/DVD release. For your information, Director Luc Beeson classes this as 'The Director's Cut', as it has many scenes deleted from the original test showing. I believe, two years later, Beeson re-edited all of those scenes back in. Apparently 25 minutes extra. That version, confusingly, is known as 'The Director's Cut', though Beeson, keeping in mind his view of the naming of his Director's Cut, calls this 'The Internatinal Cut'. Confused?
This is a really enthralling film which keeps you emotionally involved throughout. Yes, it is a violent film in places but that is not what the story is about. It is about finding yourself and who you are. Taking root and allowing people in, when you weren't able to before.
Natalie Portman absolutely shines in this. Havig been cast at 11, now 12, she is totally believable as Mathilda. It must have been tough to pull off some scenes at such a young age. Whilst Jean Reno is wonderful as Leon, it is Portman's portrayal of the character dealing with the loss of her abusive, uncaring family, while grieving for the loss of her 4 year old brother and her subsequent journey of revenge and finding herself just like Leon, that makes her performance so strong.
Now, it must be said there are elements of an undercurrent of a possible sexual relationship between them both. Early on Mathilda shows signs of holding herself in certain way that shows a possible move into puberty. Take a look at the scenes of her hanging over the staircase for this. It is clear that as the film develops there is a growing love between them. Look out for Mathilda sleeping with the pig oven glove on the first night. A subtle moments, easily missed. However, the way Reno plays his character with a few learning difficulties, naivety and his reluctance to accept anything outside his comfort zone, the sexuality elements do not come across as dirty at all. There really does seem to be a developing true love between them and it is touching to watch at times. Apparently, The International Cut has more interactions between Mathilda and Leon, which i haven't seen yet. I must also add that the original script, which is available online, does have them making love. Again, reading the script does put it into context as to how she feels towards Leon and why she feels the need/want to make love.
It is clear that anything outside of Leon's job and he is lost. That is the beauty of this film, with all its violence and profanity, and equally so the fate of Leon itself, it really shows the development of what one person can give to another.
Gary Oldman's deserves much credit too. I won't go into detail about his character but i will say he is damn good. Watch out for the "Ev-ery-one" line, which i can imagine, if watched on the big screen in the cinema must have reverberated half way around town! A mention also to the character of Tony. We never really get any in depth explanations about him. He clearly is underhand, always keeping Leon's money and then only offering Mathilda $100 to last a whole month. The way he would say things and his mannerisms certainly suggest there is a lot more to him that meets they eye.
There are so many stand out scenes in this film, all subtle, that it is hard to pick any individually. The film pretty much grabs you from start to end. It is a funny juxtaposition really, you find yourself caring so much for a killer!
The soundtrack is equally as subtle and helps too by not being overpowering. The end titles have Sting's 'Shape of my Heart' which actually fits perfectly. The other piece of music within the film is the sublime, 'Venus as a Boy' by Bjork, which on first hearing/watching seems a strange choice. But on closer inspection he budding sexual overtones and growing feelings of the song match the way Mathilda was beginning to feel.
All in all this is a good film. You care about both off the main characters. The final scene with Matilda finally telling the truth, albeit, so way out there and the planting of Leon's 'best friend' to take root, gives you a wonderful sense of knowing Mathilda will be fine and has found herself and where she wants to be. Equally, albeit dead, Leon's plant taking root, metaphorically gives you that same feeling.
I will be searching out the 'International Version' just to add to the story but i would suggest the viewer seek out the original version as, having not seen the other one, the story seems to the point and well contained as it is.
As a final point, as a David Lynch fan, i found one or two shots reminding me of Lynch. Maybe that is just me and believe me that is no criticism. It just struck me when watching.
This is a film not for everyone due to the violent content but if you want to submerge yourself in Beeson's world and watch a film with some depth of emotion, then this is the film for you.
The Time Machine (2002)
What If
It is hard to review this without referring to the classic, albeit with some flaws, 1960 Original cinematic version of 'The Time Machine'. I adore that film but that review is for another day, do forgive one or two mentions though.
Here, HG Wells' Great Grandson, directs this mediocre remake. This film could have been brilliant with the right screenplay and direction. Sadly it lacks in many departments. Don't get me wrong! I love anything to do with 'The Time Machine' and this isn't awful. It is just not great! Guy Pearce's Alexander Hartdegan isn't very likable from the offset but the film does take an interesting path to begin with. Hartdegan goes to the park to meet with Emma, his girlfriend to ask her to marry him. Sadly, they get mugged and she gets shot and killed in the fight. The film then goes forward four years to 1903 and this is where the film begins to rush a little. Though Hartdegan is an inventor, we all of a sudden get a reveal of a time machine. Now i can understand an inventor taking four years and mulling over changing the past but there are so many questions at that point. How does the machine run? On what? What materials? It certainly looks out of place that someone could source that type of material in the early 1900's. Silly points maybe but it felt very rushed.
He returns to 1899 to meet Emma earlier in the day at the park on the day of her murder and saves her life. Remember, he would already be at the park later wondering where she is. Sadly, she gets killed again, but this time by a runaway horse. Alex soon realises either time or God is putting things right and he can't change the past. It seems, though, that he only tries once! Of course the paradox is that if he saves Emma, he wouldn't build the time machine so how would he saved Emma. This is a nicely paced section it must be said. A couple of mentions here. One for Sienna Guillory who lights up the screen as Emma. It is such a shame we didn't get more airtime of her or the possibility of multiverses/timelines caused by Alex's actions. Also, there is a nice cameo for Alan Young, who played Filby in the 1960 version.
Alex then goes into the future to try and find the answer to why he can't change the past. This is where the film falls apart for me. First of all he stops in 2030 and visits a holographic library internet played by Orlando Jones. Call me fickle but Alex asks him about time travel and he quotes The Time Machine book written by HG Wells and the 1960 film. Now how can this work? So, the book and the film are about a man who builds a time machine and travels to the year 802,701 where he meets the Eloi and the Morlocks. Just by chance then Alexander Hartdegan builds a time machine and travels to the year 802,701 and meets the Eloi and Morlocks. You get my point. He could have just read the book! In fact, the book was published in 1895. I find it hard to believe that a University lecturer who has an interest in the mechanics of time travel hadn't read the book by 1899. Can you imagine travelling into the future and having an adventure that is fictional! I rest my case.
On arriving in 802,701 Pearce's portrayal does get more likable but i just can't find a liking for Samantha Mumba's Mara or in fact Omera Mumba character at all. I have read review liking her portrayal but she is no Weena of the original. At least she played the naivety of the Eloi people well.
Again, the film is rushed. The destruction of the Moon in an earlier stop off rendering the Earth mainly uninhabitable is hardly mentioned apart from the split in the species. In fact, it can be reviewed in a paragraph. Mara is kidnapped by the Morlocks taken underground. Alex visits Vox the hologram, who is still working. He tells Alex how to find the them. Alex goes off and tries to be a hero.
This is where we meet an Jeremy Irons as the Uber-Morlock, who basically explains that Alex can't change the past as we already know it would create a paradox. Irons is very good and extremely creepy and once again is such a shame he was underused. I won't bore you with the details of what happens between them at the end but i will mention that it causes a time distortions in the future. Again, it is not even touched on as to the after effects of that.
All in all, this film is worth watching, especially for those who are fans of the book. Though it is far from that story. There is a nice nod to HG Wells at the end where his picture can be seen in the hallway of 1903.
The only actors/things who come away with any credit for their performance is Mark Addy's rendition of Filby and Irons deep portrait of his character. The Time Machine, itself, looks spectacular. In fact, it was, at the time, the most expensive prop ever made for any film! A special mention should also go to the nice score.
It does raise some interesting questions about travelling into the past. Though the film never really gives you the feeling of or in fact the answer to Hartdegan's "What If" question.
Do watch it, but maybe a few years after watching the classic original.
Starter for 10 (2006)
Fingers On Buzzers
This is a really nice film. I have just seen it for the 4th time. Set in 1985, it begins, however, when Brian is younger. Sat in front of the the TV with his Mum and Dad watching University Challenge. It sets up exactly what sort of person Brian is and what he wants to become. Mark Gatiss has an astonishing likeness to presenter Bamber Gascoine in these scenes that it seems you are watching the actual show!
Action, soon moves to '85 and we learn that Brian's Dad had passed away 9 years earlier. It is here where the great soundtrack kicks in. Alright, a few of the songs came out after 1985 but we won't quibble too much about that. There are some great songs throughout the film from the likes of The Smiths, Echo & The Bunnymen, Tears For Fears, New Order, The Undertones, The Style Council and many more. There are at least four songs by The Cure too. All of which work well in the film. I very much like the allusion to how terrible it would be to become the sort of person who plays Kate Bush, then we here Brian listening to her very softly in scene on New Years Eve, with Rebecca.
James Corden makes a brief appearance once or twice in the film. Dominic Cooper's journey as Spencer and how it affects other people plays well. Catherine Tate, even though she is only a few years older than James McAvoy in reality, comes across as a very lovely character in playing Brian's Mum. A special mention also to the wonderful Bendedict Cumberbatch who shines as the bitter, obnoxious yet likable Patrick. His journey is more subtle in the film but he becomes a better person too.
Rebecca Hall and Alice Eve play, ironically, Rebecca and Alice, and here is the great subtleness of this film. Alice comes over very sweet and you find yourself loving her character to begin with. She is the archetypal blonde bombshell. She is, however, clever enough to answer the good questions on the quiz team and once again that is the subtleness of the film. McAvoy isn't your typical geek and Eve isn't your typical dumb blonde. Her character plays out as a bit of a reckless, sexual and fickle girl but very intelligent. You can't help being drawn to her in certain parts of the film. Rebecca is your alternative, political activist, sensible thinking and, i must say, very very attractive girl. Both in natural beauty, intelligence and personality. You, again, find yourself falling for her as well, but for different, better reasons!!! This, by the way was Hall's first feature film.
The film follows the trials and tribulations of sorting a team for the filming of University Challenge, Brian's rising yearning for Alice, then Rebecca then Alice again. His studies suffer and he seems to get lost on his journey.
Without going into too much detail, when Brian returns from Alice after the debacle of staying for New Year, he meets up with Rebecca and the scene when it is approaching midnight, and with only two minutes to go she asks him how they can waste time as they sit side by side on his bed, the tenderness and beauty of her approach to kiss him, and how they kiss, is really touching and feels very real.
There are so many moments that are really lovely in this film like the importance of Brians' Dad's jacket to Brian, his learning curve about who he is and his journey, to name just a few. The moment on the date with Alice when he cries, talking about his Dad, on original viewing was a emotional moment, but having recently lost my Mother, i found this now very upsetting, yet beautifully played. The song "The Hurting" by Tears For fears works perfectly as Brian makes the earth shattering mistake with the question, near the end of the film. His shame and how he feels is really emphasised by that song. A great choice.
The message of the film is as simple as this: No matter what mistakes you have made, it is what you do next that matters. You can't lock yourself away forever when you make a mistake or something bad happens. Having been struggling with grief lately, i gained the realisation that this is happening to me. It made me realise that the only person that can put things back on track, is me! It is funny how life experience can alter you feelings towards a film and can change what affect it has to you on later viewings.
Once Brian, having shut himself away for a long while, faces his demons and returns to Bristol University, the first thing he does is search out Rebecca. Bumping into Alice on the way he quickly tells her it is not her he is looking for. Then, when he find Rebecca, and they talk, the sincere way he asks if she can forgive him for all his mistakes, the way she tells him he already knows the answer to that and the wonderful way they kiss once again, is just so beautiful. I have to say is one of the the most beautiful kisses i have ever seen on film. The way they are pressing themselves into once another and the way their lips touch and the gorgeous smile Rebecca gives as they kiss is really moving. It is like no one else matters and no one else is around them, even though they are surrounded by hundreds of people.
This is a great, feel good movie. It won't blow you away but it will make you smile. A film i will watch again and again. Perhaps in a year it may have even more profound effect on me, when i am back on the road of my journey.
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)
God Almighty
As with most of my reviews at the moment i have seen this film a few times before, though i have tried to avoid it. It had always been the worst Trek film in my book. However, having watched it for the first time in ten years today, it is actually tolerable and possibly pushes 'The Motion Picture', alongside some of the TNG films, as the worst.
The basic premise if the film is that Spock's half brother Sybok, seeks to find God. I guess as another reviewer has stated, maybe in 100 years this film will be looked upon as a classic but, my word, present day makes it a poor film.
The comedy of IV: The Voyage Home was subtle and funny but in this it seems forced. I have to say though, there are a couple of laugh out loud moments mainly coming form McCoy. On the other side of the coin McCoy gives one of the most emotional performances of the film during the moments when he regrets the death of his Father. Apart from that there is a lack of caring for the crew. Something seems to be missing, it really is hard to put your finger on it.
There is a lack, dare i say it, nearly no confrontational moments of the film. It is more of a thinking film, like The Motion Picture, really. Thank the lord the re was some aggression and cliffhanging moments in the next film The Undiscovered COuntry.
Scotty, Uhuru and Zulu are totally underused. In fact you could have had the film without them and it wouldn't have made much difference. A note however to Scotty's "I know this ship like the back of my hand" line. Kirk, doesn't really feel like the Kirk we love, maybe this is down to him having to concentrate on directing.
Having said all that, it is watchable. It has no baring on the rest of the films however. You could easily miss this one out if out wanted.
Considerng this featured the maiden voyage of the Enterprise A, it is sadly not even really touched upon, and there is no great fanfare moment that sticks in the memory like the TMP Enterprise refit reveal.
There are some cringe-worthy moments, like a hint of romance between Uhuru and Scotty and the evil laughter of Sybok at the start of the film. You grow to like Sybok in the film as his character never really is/becomes a baddie and his redemption at the end of the film is touching. Anything that takes away from the moments when you are watching the so called God, helps!
Great to here the TMP Jerry Goldsmith theme once again but the overall soundtrack doesn't stand out at all.
To be honest, you will be glad when the film is over. Leave it a decade then watch it again and it is a nice trip down memory lane! Rumour has it that the poor performance of this film nearly killed the franchise. Thankfully it did continue but in the order of things, this could be deleted out of the series and no one would mind.
Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979)
Captain's Log
I am reviewing this from the point of view of Star Trek: The Motion Picture - The Directors Edition which was released on DVD in 2001. As many Trek fans may know the original film ran way over time and wasn't finished to the point that Director Robert Wise wanted it. In fact the film wasn't completely in the can on the day of the premier! Wise got to show his version of how he wanted the film to be. Though this edition really won't have to much difference to what a review of the theatrical version would be like.
In the late 1970's Star Wars had been such a success and at the same time a new TV series called Star Trek: Phase Two went into preproduction and was way down the line when at the last hour a decision was made to turn the pilot for 'Phase Two', and episode called, 'In Thy Image' into a cinematic film. The Motion Picture was the result. I can imagine for any Trek fan, to have seen their favourite TV show from the 60's on the big screen must have been epic.
The film starts, unusually with an overture. I must admit that Jerry Goldsmith's score all the way through is beautiful. Especially during the big reveal of the USS Enterprise. There are incidental touches of Alexander Courage's original theme if you listen out for them a few times during the film.
Looking back in hindsight this film is so narrative heavy and completely action-less if you compare it to the likes of 'The Wrath of Khan'. Of course that is an unfair comparison as without the profits of this film there would never have been, albeit much less budget, Wrath and others.
I love the fact that the main players were all given their moment, that is all well and good. However, the story really doesn't get started from the V'Ger point of view until about 30 minutes into the film. I read another review on here stating that the film could have been 90 minutes and still told the same story. What we have here is a film over two hours which has no pace whatsoever.
Don't get me wrong the premise of the film is excellent. In fact William Shatner has since written a novel stating that this could have been the origins of the Borg and that the machine planet Voyager 6 ended at could have been the Borg home planet. Of course this is not Canon but worth a mention for the Trek viewer to make his own judgement.
Star Trek on the big screen is epic. In fact i will go as far as to say that no other Star Trek film has come close to the special effects and grandeur of this film. It is just shame that it loses something in the plodding storyline. There are some wonderful moments to point out, though. Persis Khambatta's Ilea is beautiful in this and it must have made her cry having all her hair cut off for the part. Decker is a good Commander to Captain Kirk. As stated before, The Enterprise is simply stunning. The 2001 version of V'Ger also really makes a difference as you see it as a proper vessel and how it looks, which was a bit lost to the viewer in the original version. Goldsmith's score makes the film to be honest. The main title theme would later be used for 'Star Trek: The Next Generation of course.
A couple of scenes miss the mark though. I find the wormhole scene, where the audio is slowed down, a bit out of place. Though the 2001 special effects at least make the asteroid exploding look like a proper explosion and not as poor as the 1979 version. Equally i find the first 30 minutes in general a bit slow. Not that the film picks up in pace really. Though, i guess the final ten minutes are exceptional. The uniforms are also bland, colourless and horrible looking. Thank the lord they reverted to some colour in them from Wrath.
Kirk, isn't the Kirk of the original series. He won't find that until Wrath. Spock is Spock and has a number of emotional moments. Bones has his comedic elements just like in the original series. Scotty, Chekov, Uhura and Sulu are just along for the ride and underused which is surprising considering how long the film is. It was great, however, to see brief cameos from Nurse Chapel and Yeoman Rand.
The Motion Picture is a hard one to review. I am a major Trek fan and love almost every aspect of Trek. Sadly, this just about misses the boat, but also makes you want to get on the boat in the first place! It is like an old friend that you haven't seen for years and you are unsure if you want to invite them in or join them for the drink. You will be glad you did though as at some point the film becomes like a comfortable best friend! When viewing Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and especially Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, you will be friends, forever. After Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, you will be married. Having said that, by Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, you will be divorcing. Hey, they are reviews for another day.
All in all it is a good film, if you really have the time to invest in in and ponder the bigger question within it. If you are not a Trek fan, start with II: The Wrath Of Khan. That begins a wonderful trilogy played out in III & IV, where the film franchise of Trek really finds its feet.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992)
Welcome To Twin Peaks
I am writing this after watching this film for about the 50th time. I was a huge Twin Peaks fan and this is of course a prequel to the show, though there are elements of a sequel about it too. The film was rated 18 so was free from the constraints of the TV Show and it shows. There is no humour and the film is dark, very dark.
The first half an hour takes place away from the town of Twin Peaks and concerns the murder of Teresa Banks. Two FBI agents are sent, played by Kiefer Sutherland and Chris Issak and they play right into the Peaks mythology and feel right at home while feeling uncomfortable too. That is the whole essence of the TV show and the film. The duality of it all. The list is endless: Twin Peaks. Black Lodge and White Lodge. Bobby and Mike, twice. Madeleine and Laura. The Double R Diner. Good and Evil. Even Heidi being too busy to jump start the old man features twice in the TV episodes. I could go on!
The Twin Peaks section starts after that and we see Laura Palmer alive for the first time which is a treat. In many parts of the film Sheryl Lee looks so beautiful as Laura. Especially during the burst into fire scene. Of course, a lot of the film you see her tragic descent into what would be her death. The last seven days build to a climax which i will touch on shortly.
Some of the film misses the mark slightly. No disrespect to Moira Kelly as she gives her version of Donna Hayward but it is hard to except it is the same person initially. To her credit she does have some touching and wonderful moments. Berated by some is the CCTV scene with David Bowie. Now the original plan was to make this 3 films and they would have developed Bowie's Phillip Jeffries and 'Judy' at that point. Sadly as we know that didn't happen and will leave non TP fans wondering what the hell was going on.
There are some real stand out moments though. The One Armed Man approaching Laura and Leland at the traffic lights is amazing and equally hard to watch at the same time. The nightclub scene where the audio is quieter than the music and lasts for about ten minutes is also up there. Thankfully it is subtitled as amazingly in the original UK DVD release they didn't have time to put them in and we were all left wondering what the hell was said. Only in recent years have i got the new version with the right subtitles and do note, there are major plot developments regarding Leland, Laura and Teresa in that section. Laura's descent is heart breaking. Lee plays the character, having been sexually abused from the age of 12 to then, in this film, finding it out it was her own Father but then discounting it later, so movingly. She has confirmation that it is her Dad in the last day and those 24 hours, knowing what we know as a viewer of her upcoming murder from the show, this tears the last pieces of our hearts to shreds.
In the show Leland seems unaware of BOB's possession and his actions but what makes this a very tough film to take at time is the observation here that he knows what he is doing. "I always thought you knew it was me" is very telling as well a few others occasions that i will let the viewer observe themselves. As a fan i come at it as a possession and of course with all the elements of the Black Lodge that is plain to see but the daunting and uncomfortable notion that just maybe Leland was aware and wanting to abuse his daughter, once again, is tough to watch.
Just as the original footage for the film is nearly 5 hours long until it was edited for cinema release, there is so much i want to say about the film that i am leaving out. What i will say is Laura's murder is one of cinema's most amazing moments, beautifully filmed, epic, gruesome and truly heartbreaking. Angelo Badalamenti's score is second to none and really makes the film and the cinematography in places is a work of art.
Watch the TV series first, then come to this film. Do not have expectations as the film leaves you with more questions than you get answers but that is great cinema, making the viewer do some of the work. The greatest TV show ever, but not the greatest film ever. It will, however, leave you with images and memories you will want to revisit one day.