Al Gore made several daring and outlandish predictions in his 2006 movie, go see it, the 2006 version. It was interesting, made a few points based on sound logic and fast forward to 2017, none of those predictions came true. He talked about Florida and Manhattan being underwater, the glaciers to be a thing of the past and if it came true, he was a prophet, but now it just feels like he is getting rich off these initiatives, and most people have covered his own usage and carbon footprints so I don't have to point out the hypocrisy. In his 2017 movie he said well you know there was a flood in a statue in a park in Manhattan during a Hurricane so the prediction was justified. Really? Its bogus and comes off as disingenuous.
The other thing is, the oceans are warming up in a manner that hasn't been proved to be man- made, and we need to address that, but he has put his focus on Carbon Dioxide emission (the basis for a Carbon Tax). However, humans contribute a very small percentage to that, and that is not the main problem gas for GH effect and the global temperatures aren't increasing significantly since the late 90s. He is creating a fake argument when there are real problems that are not addressed at all. He also hasn't addressed the problem that electric cars are emission friendly, but pollute the environment significantly when you extract the vast amount of raw resources needed to make those things. Silicon, silver, other raw resources extractions are very polluting and could even surpass the pollution of making gasoline cars and this is not addressed. I am not saying build 6 litre engine and go crazy, I am saying electric cars may be less of a solution than an efficient 1.5 litre car. These prospects are completely shut down and we keep stripping the mines for resource to build electric cars and somehow that is the only solution to global warming.
Do you see how weird that is? It is completely plausible that this man has no clue what warms the planet, it could be the molten core, it could be the position of the Earth relative to the Sun, but he has taken just one factor (CO2) and exaggerate his own impact when expedient and then blaming humans for things that are outside their control, and not addressing real problems. I like that he bring the conversation to the issue in 2006 but honestly, his inaccuracies and wild assumptions make him a potential liability for the need of true environmental understanding and change.
22 out of 72 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends