Having just watched this movie, I can see that it fails on a number of grounds. First criminal versus the police department idea. There are so many movies that have the local police department square off against a serial killer and most of them are better than this. Not only does his mission barely get started, but he kills people we don't know or care about. I never felt any tension in the scenes here and it was just boring.
Which brings me to one problem with this movie: the "bad guy." This movies requires a criminal who is exceptionally smart or talented with strategy. "Mechanic" was better, because it always seemed like he was 3 steps ahead of the police. Here a random guy who got brutalized by Brant played by Jason Stathom (can I call him the protagonist...because if not him then who?) and so tries to kill a bunch of police officers for revenge. It never felt the cat and mouse story because the protagonist and antagonist were not clever enough nor was the antagonist that interesting. I will say, though, that I truly sympathized with what happened to him as a result of Stathom's actions, and I hoped that this would lead to some character arc for the protagonist, which would at least give some growth to the one-dimensional characters. The final scene was uninspired and the director forgot one thing, WE NEED THE PROTAGONIST TO HAVE A CHANCE OF LOSING. The final fight is just Brant beating up and executing the bad guy. Even the final moments of the killer following Brant lacked all sense of tension or emotion. I was just waiting for this movie to end.
Which brings me to the biggest problem - Brant. What a jerk! Of course the protagonist of a movie doesn't have to be a goodie goodie, but if they do have a darker side, it needs to be fleshed out, and explained so the audience can relate. I love Godfather, Apocalypse Now, Blade Runner, and others where the protagonist does terrible things, but we can still root for them. At what point are we supposed to identify with this guy? And if we cannot identify with him, how can we sympathize with him and thus care about him? If we don't like him in the slightest then we don't care who wins at the end. Hell, even Training Day had us care about Denzel Washington, and he wasn't even the protagonist! So unless you are a person who loves police brutality, you will just cringe during the "action scenes" and be thinking "why the HELL hasn't he been arrested himself, or at the very least been fired???" Seriously we hear a little bit about him needing to 'take it easy' at the beginning of the film, and then that's about it. Not only does this movie have no character progression, but at the end, the guy is the same jerk he always was. He doesn't show regret, growth or change.
As for his bromance with the Nash, it just seemed contrived. Never did I feel like they should be friends. Brant lobs insults at this guy, and the guy laughs it off. WAIT. He told us that all the jibes he got from his co-workers caused him to burn-out and now he becomes friends with a guy who is continuing it? How does that make sense? Seriously, why would that guy have anything to do with Brant. Yeah well Brant says "I respect you" a few times, I guess to make him seem more 2-dimensional (I meant that in a positive way). But we never know WHY he "respects" him. In the end, the film doesn't spend enough time on their friendship for it to seem real. You want to see a better example of two men hating each other and then slowly respecting each other - I recommend "As good as it gets" or even "Lethal Weapon."
The supporting cast was okay. I'm sure Falls' story thread was to have Brant show her compassion and seem more well-rounded. But after that scene he is telling the bad guy he doesn't regret what he has done to him nor care. I didn't care about the gang kid because I didn't know who he was except for some racist brat that beat up (and perhaps killed) some guy and didn't want to face the consequences. And as for Falls, her motivations were unclear too. The police chief was a cardboard cutout. I guess the most human character was Nash (the gay guy), but only because of the few moments of humanity and exposition we got from him. Anyways, he was barely in this movie and Nash giving Brant the gun at the end seemed ridiculous. So now he is an accessory to murder?
What messages do we get from this film? Homophobia is okay, in fact it makes you manly. The fact that Stathom keeps bringing it up that Nash is gay, makes me wonder if Stathom's character was in the closet himself and is struggling with gay urges and beats the crap out of suspects because he cannot handle those feelings. ...what else? Violence and police brutality are okay. Real police don't need search warrants, they can steal, assault whomever they like, brutalize suspects, etc. Also, if the justice system doesn't work because it cares too much about the rights of the citizenry, then kill the suspect yourself. I was waiting for Brant to either grow up, regret his actions, seem like a real person or face the consequences of his actions. But sadly none of that came.
In the end, I wasn't looking for Shakespeare here, but the film misses a few important points. a) Give the audience something to like about the protagonist so we root for him to win and we care about him and b) make the antagonist clever enough to almost bring the police to their knees.
1 out of 3 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends