Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A slick, brilliantly made, important cultural document.
30 January 2005
Review by: Todd David Schwartz, Arts & Entertainment Correspondent for "The Paul Mitchell Show," a newly launched, nationally syndicated talk radio program. INSIDE DEEP THROAT gets Four Stars (highest rating). DEEP THROAT, released in the early 1970's, is considered the first major porn film. It became, to say the least, quite a "cause celeb." This documentary, INSIDE DEEP THROAT, explores the impact of the film on society, and shows how sex, culture, politics, and morality all collided to explosive effect. INSIDE DEEP THROAT is an utterly fascinating cinematic experience, amazingly thorough, ceaselessly entertaining. I grew up during the time depicted in the film (over 30 years ago), but for those of you young 'uns who weren't around then, this will prove particularly eye-opening. The filmmakers were able to gather an impressive group of big-names to throw in their two-cents worth on the subject: Norman Mailer, Camille Paglia, Erica Jong, Dick Cavett -- names, again, that may be unfamiliar to those of you who weren't around during the time of DEEP THROAT's release. My only complaint about the film (an admittedly minor one) is that the filmmakers don't spend more time delving into allegations made by Linda Lovelace (DEEP THROAT's star) in her book ORDEAL, where she essentially claims that she was forced at gunpoint to perform in the film by her husband/manager Chuck Traynor. ORDEAL is quite a juicy read. It was originally released by a major publishing house, but has long been out of print. INSIDE DEEP THROAT certainly mentions the book, and shows how Lovelace did a turn-around and became an unexpected spokeswoman for anti-porn feminists. But the documentary generally leaves unexamined just how accurate ORDEAL's claims may have been. In the documentary, Hugh Hefner pontificates grandly about DEEP THROAT's cultural impact. NOT mentioned in the film is the allegation Lovelace makes in ORDEAL that, at the height of her popularity, she was invited up to the Playboy Mansion where Hef tried to get her to have sex with a dog, while people stood around and watched. Rather exploitive of you, Mr. Hefner, is it not? (Assumimg the allegation is true.) Also in the book and not mentioned in the film, is Lovelace's wild sexual relationship with entertainer Sammy Davis, Jr. Not only did Davis have Lovelace demonstrate her deep throat fellatio technique on him (according to Lovelace), but Davis performed fellatio on Lovelace's hubby Chuck Traynor! I would have personally liked to see the film examine the book's allegations a little more closely. As it is (and as I indicated earlier), the film IS impressively thorough with the information it does provide, and it's presented with tremendous flair. INSIDE DEEP THROAT is rated NC-17 for a reason: The film includes an explicit scene from DEEP THROAT of Lovelace performing the fellatio technique for which the porn film was named and for which she became famous. Including this scene was a smart and important choice on the part of the filmmakers. It would have been a cop-out to have people sitting around talking about one of the primary reasons why DEEP THROAT became a must see, without actually showing it.
37 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The most shocking, over-the-top serial killer film EVER made!
30 January 2005
As the Arts & Entertainment Correspondent for "The Paul Mitchell Show," (a newly launched, nationally syndicated talk radio program) and a lover of so-called "genre" films, I give MURDER-SET-PIECES Four Stars (Highest Rating). Why? Because it's an absolute thrill-ride of a movie, guaranteed to upset many and scare the living crap out of most! It's easily the most aggressively deranged, unabashedly violent, and EROTICALLY CHARGED horror film ever made. I tell people: It's the perfect "date" movie -- if your date happens to be Charles Manson! It's an instant -- deeply twisted -- classic. The fact that so many people seem to be repelled and offended by this film tells me that the writer/producer/director, Nick Palumbo, has succeeded mightily! One of the unique aspects of the film is the way it shows the killer having sex with his victims (everything in the film is simulated -- it sure ain't porn). This is what MOST serial killers do: Have sex with their victims (sometimes AFTER they're dead)! And so it is very realistic for the film to portray this. Hollywood is very hypocritical: "They" say violence is A-Okay, even nudity and simulated sex (to a limited extent) are acceptable. But GOD FORBID you should combine violence AND sex! To Hollywood this it totally UNacceptable! I say: Well, that's TOO BAD! I love and respect the fact that filmmaker Palumbo has dared to break the rules! Most movies today (including "genre" films) are so damn formulaic and predictable. Sure, this film is absolutely not for everyone. But if you enjoy being JOLTED, if you enjoy being DISTURBED and SHOCKED, this is a GREAT film! It also happens to be a film with a very strong anti-Nazi message. The serial killer embraces Naziism (in fact, he's a blood relative of an original member of Hitler's Third Reich). The fact that this guy is so SICK and DERANGED shows, to my mind, how screwed-up the Nazi mentality is and was. Everyone always talks about how evil Hitler and the Nazis were, how evil Neo-Naziism is today. Well, forget the talk. Actually SHOWING what a lover of Naziism is capable of doing is so much more POWERFUL and DISGUSTING than mere words. It really makes your blood run cold! As a Jew, I appreciate this aspect of the film. So yes, there is sex and nudity, and even child murder! But this is not "fantasy" horror like PHANTASM or NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET. Palumbo is attempting to portray real life and really going for the jugular. The movie is unrated for a reason. But unrated or not, remember, my friends, what you're seeing are actors and special make-up effects (very excellent make-up effects). In other words (to borrow the promo line for Wes Craven's LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT): IT'S ONLY A MOVIE! IT'S ONLY A MOVIE!
14 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed