Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Problematic and uneven - but worth watching
8 January 2023
The Pale Blue Eye is based on a book by Louis Bayard in which a retired NYC police constable is asked to investigate the death of a cadet at West Point. It is 1830, and Landor, the investigator is assisted in his work by Edgar Allen Poe, a cadet at the institution.

The acting was generally quite good, with exceptions. Highlighted by Harry Melling as Poe: courtly, sometimes flamboyant, relishing the companionship of a kindred spirit, eloquent and erudite, with a fine approximation of a Northern Virginian accent ("aboot" for "about".) An Oscar-worthy performance.

Christian Bale's portrayal of guarded, haunted, grief-stricken investigator Landor earns highest marks as well, as do Timothy Sprawl and Simon McBurney for their performances as West Point's Colonel Thayer and Captain Hitchcock. Robert Duval also delivered a fine, if brief, performance in the role of Jean Paget; scholar of the occult. Christine Gainsbourg delivered a solid performance as pensive and insightful Patsy, a barmaid.

Other actors delivered generally acceptable performances. The weakest performance among male actors was in a most demanding role, that of Dr Marquis, Academy physician. As interpreted by Toby Jones, Marquis seemed self-assured and pedantic, and failed to display credible signs of the unimaginable stress of heading a dysfunctional family deeply engaged in bizarre and criminal practices.

Unfortunately, neither Gillian Anderson nor Lucy Boynton were able rise to the level of credible characters. Anderson as Mrs. Marquis affected an accent of indeterminant origin and operated at only two levels of emotional intensity: 1) slow idle and 2) scenery-chewing. Lucy Boynton as her daughter exhibited the same range.

The gray, Gothic, granite old campus of Westminster College in Western Pennsylvania provided a highly credible vision of what West Point might have looked like in the early 19th century. A nearby historic inn and other stone and wooden buildings in the area were convincing as structures in the mid-Hudson Valley. Desaturating the few colors in the midwinter palette of the snowbound Northeast was an excellent decision. One critic has described the result as the defining representation of West Point "Gloom Period." Using candlelight in nighttime interior scenes is a good artistic decision but requiring as many as 7 candles on a small table to adequately illuminate two people in a pub strains the limits of credibility.

Civilian costumes seemed appropriate to the period. Uniforms were authentic, except for the modern cadet full dress crest on the shakos worn by officers. It was not used at West Point until the 20th century, circa 1927.

Background music was unimaginative, seemingly incessant, and ineffective. One is reminded of the famous line from Amadeus: "Too many notes, Mozart!" The simple solo bass glissandos accompanying the Netflix trailers are far more effective in imparting a sense of mystery and dread.

The screenplay itself was most problematic. Bayard's book gives the reader pages of detailed explanations of the motivations and emotions of all the principal characters. The complexity of the plot does not lend itself to condensation. The motivations and behavior of principal characters Landor, Poe, Thayer, and Hitchcock are well documented in book and film. Those of the Marquis family are murky at best in the book, and nearly unintelligible in the film.

I was fascinated by that portion of the film that focused on Poe's personality, his life as a cadet and his relationships with others - Landor, Lea, and other cadets. I also enjoyed observing Landor's conduct of the investigation, and finally understanding his tragic backstory, and his motives. Neither the book nor the movie adequately explained the actions of the Marquis family.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Outfit (2022)
6/10
Once is enough.
21 March 2022
I have a fixed, but subjective rating standard for films: A: One that I greatly enjoyed, plan to watch it many more times.

B: Enjoyed it, might watch again C: Once was enough D: Once was a waste of time "The Outfit" is a solid C. It's Le Carre's "The Tailor of Panama" meets Hitchcock's "Rope." As Leonard, an expat British bespoke tailor (or "cutter") in mid-century Chicago, Reylance does an excellent job of acting - a reprise of his Colonel Abel character in "Bridge of Spies" - an intelligent and articulate yet tight-lipped man with much to be tight-lipped about.

Leonard is tailor to the local mobsters, and his shop has become a letter drop for mob communications.

Someone has been recording information about mob operations and providing it to the FBI and a rival gang, and one of the tapes is the McGuffin that drives the plot forward.

The supporting actors and production values - the set, the costumes, the cinematography - are all quite good - but overall the film suffers from some serious deficiencies. First, the entire film takes place in the confines of Leonard's shop - a claustrophobic setting more suitable for a theatrical stage play than a contemporary film. A second problem is the "talkiness" - the number and duration of speeches required to explain the basic plot and the many complex twists that inevitably ensue.

Finally, that characters deliver such orations at moments of crisis - often at gunpoint - poses a challenge to one's ability to suspend disbelief.

It's a well-made film with some good acting but some serious screenplay deficiencies. I'm glad I saw it, but I don't want to see it again. It's a C.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A terrible disappointment
2 October 2021
The Sopranos TV series was a masterpiece, and obviously a tough act to follow. TMSON is a dogs breakfast of Disconnected vignettes with no unifying theme. A few moments of gruesome violence, separated by extensive periods of tedium. Fahgedaboddit!
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Roma (2018)
3/10
Brilliant cinema. I hated it.
29 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen most of the Oscar nominated films - HATED "Roma" - an autobiographical film by a guy who grew up in an upscale household in Mexico City in the 70s with three generations of women (grandmother, mother, sisters) a housemaid and a female cook. Great cinematography. Great acting. Applied to a hyper depressing story. Only men in the film are an unfaithful, absent husband and a violent psycho boyfriend who threatens the life of one of the maids - who is pregnant and loses the baby in a long graphic scene in an emergency room. My advice: skip it, unless your life is lacking sufficient drama.
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Overlong and Pretentious
13 October 2018
An overlong, pretentious homage to Agatha Christie (Ten Little Indians) Steven King (The Shining) and the TV film Helter Skelter, "Bad Times at the El Royal" is a generally tedious, disappointing, and ultimately gory portrayal of "unlikable people acting badly," my personal worst form of cinema. Individual performances by Jeff Bridges, Cynthia Erivo, Dakota Johnson, and Jon Hammx are brilliant, and some production values are excellent, but many of the quick cuts between past, present, future, and contemporaneous events are ill-conceived and anachronisms abound. Why are 1960s songs on a Juke box played on 78rpm records? Why is an impoverished singer driving a mint-condition classic 1951 Studebaker in the 1970s? Evidently filmed in British Columbia, "Bad Times" so far detached from objective reality as to be allegorical, if not incredible - requiring far too much suspension of disbelief and tolerance of gore to be enjoyable.
122 out of 285 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dean (2016)
10/10
An Inspired and Touching Treatment of Recovery from Grief
21 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
According to the New York Times reviewer, "Mr. Martin's take on grief is facile." As one who, with my son, is still processing the recent death of his mother, my wife of 50+ years, I take exception to Mr. Genzingler's glib assessment of Mr Martin's oeuvre. I found "Dean" to be a profoundly insightful representation of the ways in which some of us try to adjust to life without a loved one. Attempting to fill the void in one's life with another living person is a natural step in the real process of assuaging grief - not a "facile" plot device. Other critics seem to fault Mr Martin for failing to inhabit his established comic persona in the role of Dean, the grief stricken son. Yet to me, his characterization was extremely realistic, as was Kevin Kline's subtly nuanced portrayal of a man past mid-life attempting to build a bridge to a new life over a deep and enduring void. I admit I'm not familiar with Mr Martin's previous work as a writer, cartoonist, actor and comedian. But based on the quality of his innovative work on this film alone I would rank him as a creative genius and "Dean" as one of the best films I've seen in more than a half-century of movie going.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Libyan Litmus Test
17 January 2016
The fact that 13,000+ users of a popular movie review site have given 13 Hours an 86% favorable rating while only 50% of the "Top Critic" reviews on the same site are positive highlights the fact that there is more to this film and viewer reaction to it than the objective merits of the screen writing, acting, directing, and cinematography that dramatize the events that occurred in Benghazi three years ago.

Depending on one's preconceived notions of what transpired in Libya (and in Washington) before, during, and after the attacks of September 11-12, 2012, the film is either a badly edited, misleading, jingoistic, paean to machismo, violence, and racism, with inadequate character development and misrepresentation of facts – or a moving and realistic docudrama, based on factual first person accounts by members of the unit who participated in the events - a heartfelt and well-crafted tribute to the courage and honor of a small group of skilled mercenaries whose heroic performance of duty in battle amid the fog of war was exemplary, despite ineffectual local CIA leadership and an off- site chain of command that was unresponsive to desperate requests for readily available special ops and tactical air support.

The film is ultimately a litmus test of one's political orientation. That orientation is unlikely to be changed by the film. Those who think that the Benghazi incident is settled or "at this point, what difference does it make?" will find much to criticize – and are probably unlikely to attend. Those who think that there are substantial and inexplicable differences between official accounts and what really happened on the night of 9/11/2012 in Libya and Washington may expect to find much to admire, just as did the 20,000+ spectators who attended the premier of the film in Dallas last week rather than stay home to watch the State of the Union address.
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No Escape (I) (2015)
9/10
Life or Death for an American Family in the Non-Western World
28 August 2015
An extremely well-made survival film in an alien urban setting about the potential threats to Westerners in the non-Western world. Owen Wilson does a brilliant job of reprising his "Behind Enemy Lines" role as an American frantically improvising escape and evasion from a hostile group intent on killing him in a foreign country - this time raising the ante by adding his evident love and concern for the lives of family: his wife (the awesome Lake Bell, who displays a spectrum of emotions that realistically covers all the bases: love, fear, uncertainty, doubt, panic, and an adrenaline-charged act of raw courage) and his children, also realistically portrayed by Sterling Jerins, previously seen in World War Z, and and the uncredited Claire Geare. Pierce Brosnan wears his role as a world-weary but heroic clandestine operative like an old shoe, and the Asian actors with speaking roles do a highly credible job as well, in this realistic, yet allegorical film about the threat to Western lives in a non-Western country where a hotel is attacked, the American embassy is burned and the embassy staff are slaughtered, and Westerners are assassinated in cold blood by militants.
14 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
NCIS: New Orleans (2014–2021)
5/10
Where are we?
25 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Sad to say, as a fan of both NCIS and the charm and culture and cuisine of N'awlins, I'm VERY disappointed in NCIS New Orleans. I'll admit my opinion is biased by the 11 years I spent in the military, which gives me certain expectations about organizations like NCIS or Army CID, where they work, and the people - civilian and military - that work there. I have two major problems with both NCIS NO and NCIS LA. First, there is no sense of "place" in NCIS NO or NCIS LA. NCIS HQ in Virginia is a well defined brick building, and Gibb's house is Gibb's house. The NCIS (Virginia) office space is a well-defined "bull pen" with dividers, and team members have assigned space in a realistic office setting. There is an elevator between lower levels of the building (Abby's lab and Duckie's domain,) Gibb's team space, and the Director's office. There is a video teleconference room, an interrogation room, and other realistic looking work spaces. I almost believe I could show people around the building - BUT in both NCIS LA and NO - there is no clearly defined team work space that looks like anything I've ever seen in a military organization - people wander about giant lofts or industrial sets with no evident connection to their work - to include the Navy O-6 (Captain) commanding USN operations in the city! Does Pride offer breakfast to his team in his office (an industrial loft) or his residence (also an industrial loft?)I just can't suspend that much disbelief. Is there a kitchen in the office or does he hold team meetings at home? Quien sabe? They might as well be on the Good Ship Lollipop. The second problem is, Gibbs as Special Agent in Charge has set the bar VERY high. From the very first episode, the guy exuded "command presence," as does Rocky Carroll as Director Vance. Nobody on either NCIS LA or NO has that quality - and if it's not demonstrated at the onset of a command relationship, it's unlikely to emerge later. Again, I just can't suspend enough disbelief to take either of the spin-offs seriously - but I LOVE the old original NCIS (with a few minor reservations.) Aside from these issues, the NCIS N.O.production values are excellent - but the plot twists in the opening episode created another challenging level of disbelief based on improbable coincidences among the victim, the NCIS team, and the perpetrator. Sayonara, NCIS N.O.!
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boyhood (I) (2014)
7/10
Noble Experiment, Sadly Disappointing (SPOILERS!)
19 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Like many of Richard Linklater's films, Boyhood will will continue to inspire controversy and enjoy notoriety for many years to come. All serious film-goers will see it and discuss it. Many will love it. Some will not.

As a member of Richard Linklater's Austin Film Society I was predisposed to like this film a lot. The uniformly rave reviews from festivals and major media film critics set my expectations at the highest level.

I loved the director's earlier, pioneering masterstroke of experimental technique, Waking Life, and his uncanny ability to bring complex, fascinating characters to life on the screen, as in Bernie. I'm not a big fan of his slacker films, but Boyhood bore the promise of what I saw as the best of Linklater's filmography: applying an unprecedented and challenging creative methodology to a story about the evolution of characters over time. Wow!

My wife warned me that I was setting myself up for disappointment. She was right. The film turned out to be a lengthy, disappointing, mockumentary about the evolution of a slacker.

The production values were uniformly good, earning an A for effort, but the narrative line meandered aimlessly as moderately interesting characters aged, a C at best. Overall, a B minus. (7/10 stars)

Over the course of 12 years Mason, a thoughtful, energetic, and charming little boy turns into a passive, whining cipher who walks like a zombie. His mother serenely makes innumerable bad life choices but unexpectedly implodes as her youngest leaves for college, while his estranged father evolves from slacker to relatively responsible adult - about 10 years too late to have any redeeming value to his son. Linklater's daughter, Lorelei plays Samantha, an almost unremittingly insensitive and obnoxious child, even as a twenty year old.

The principal adult actors, Arquette and Hawke, as well as the supporting cast of step-parents, friends and relatives did a highly professional job, portraying complex, multi-dimensional characters who grew and changed over the course of the film. Sadly, the ostensible focal point of the exercise, the boy, devolved into another irresponsible slacker.

According to a local interview with the director, Lorelei asked early on if her character might be allowed to die, ending her participation in the creative endeavor. Perhaps she anticipated the lack of universal acclaim for her father's most recent effort - a noble experiment, but to some, a disappointing result.
57 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bernie (2011)
10/10
A Brilliant Film!
5 May 2012
Last Friday a theater full of cinemaphiles (in what one old codger in the film calls "the People's Republic of Austin") LOVED it! It was Jack Black's best performance in the most demanding role he's ever attempted. Shirley MacLain was brilliant in developing a complex character in what was almost a non-speaking role. Supporting players, the funeral director, the broker, the sheriff, were first rate - but the major character in the film is the Greek Chorus, dubbed "The Gossips" by director Linklater, comprised of a score of actors and local townspeople who narrate the reenactment of real events in a docudrama, combining interviews that have the look and feel of modern Reality TV with techniques that were used in the earliest silent films, like the use of title cards to indicate the passage of time and the shifting focus of the story. A brilliant job by Linklater in creating a noir comedy like "What's the Trouble With Harry?" while sustaining a clear trace of the human tragedy and sadness that underlies the story. WARNING: Don't miss the opening! It's a grabber!
60 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Long Way Down (2007)
10/10
A documentary of a real travel adventure
6 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
As a follow-up to "Long Way Round", the video account of their earlier, disaster-prone 200X reality TV experience circumnavigating the globe Eastward from London to NY on BMW motorbikes, Ewan McGregor and his friend Charley Boorman undertook another "reality" ride in 2007 - a 16,000 mile trip from the northern tip of Scotland to Capetown, South Africa. Dubbed the "Long Way Down", the series showcases the riders as they make their way across Britain, France and Italy, and then, after a ferry ride across the Mediterranean, southward in Africa with stops in multiple countries, including off road campsites, villages, and UNICEF facilities in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia, Namibia, Botswana, and finally South Africa, visiting 18 countries in all.

They made the trip across Europe and Africa in 2007, and the 8 reality episodes began on American FOX Reality TV at the beginning of August, 2008. The DVD set is now available as well.

Let me get one thing clear up front - I HATE almost all "reality" TV! Watching, phony, role-playing people in phony role-playing situations under artificially induced stress and conflict is an idiot's art form.

Who will be the last fat person off the island, or who will the Playboy bunny date, or who will the bachelor millionaire hook up with are questions in which I have ZERO interest.

But as an ardent motorcyclist, watching two by now very experienced long distance riders plan for and execute a long and adventuresome trip through the unknown is BRILLIANT! I initially saw a 2-hour High Definition "Director's Cut" of LWD covering the entire trip that was a one-time event in selected movie theaters on July 31st. It was awesome! The first theater I got to (20 minutes early) had a few dozen motorcycles parked in front – but the theater was sold out. Fortunately I was able to get to another theater where a few front row seats were left and sat down for one of the most smile-inducing films I've ever seen.

Several hundred bikers from all walks of life – from hairy "outlaws" in leather to button-downed BMW riders in Topsiders oohed and aahed, and laughed and shouted in unison as Ewan and Charlie confronted the challenges of long distance riding in conditions that ranged from ideal (mild weather, good roads) to extremely bad (skin soaking downpours, hellish heat, knee deep mud, rutted trailways or powdery sandstorms).

Helmet-cams were used to great effect to impart the visual sensations of riding – and helmet microphones captured the kind of spontaneous comments that all riders make to themselves or their riding companions when confronted with the beautiful, the bizarre, or the bad that one frequently encounters on two wheels.

Riding from North to South, the riders also had many opportunities to interact with people from all walks of African life - from the highly westernized to totally non-Western tribal people. The DVD set also captures the vast diversity of the African landscape like no other travelogue that I've ever seen. Although Ewan and Charlie had a team of "fixers" in Land Rovers and security escorts on call for much of the trip, it was still a unique travel adventure for all concerned.

All in all, the 2 hour film and the DVD set are both wonderful condensations of an 85-day trip, full of real adventure - probably better classified as a documentary of a real travel adventure – like climbing Everest, or riding the Tour de France – than as a mere "reality" series.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Venus (I) (2006)
1/10
Overburdened with obscenity and without a trace of authenticity
3 March 2007
One of the several sad things about the so-called comedy-drama "Venus" is that Peter O'Toole (as Maurice, a cadaverous and pedophiliac dirty old actor) gives the world a definitive portrait of a character to whom the description "looks like death chewin' on a cracker" might be applied – albeit while chewing on the appendages of a young laddette of ill-defined character played by Jodie Whittaker.

While the broad intended themes of "Venus" seem to be May-December romantic attraction; the Pygmalion-like uplifting of a downhearted young woman by a caring mentor; the nature of mature love; the healing effects of time; and the eternal nature of eros – the finished work seems disjointed and populated by poorly developed characters behaving oddly.

A horrid and distasteful mish-mash of bad intentions gone worse, the script is the product of Hanif Kureishi, the Anglo-Pakistani boomer (born in 1954) and "cult-novelist" whose oeuvre - largely characterized by a broad spectrum of explicit sexual activity - runs the gamut from interracial gay love story (My Beautiful Laundrette) through the reportedly autobiographical tale of a man who leaves his wife and children (Intimacy) in favor of an anonymous fellatrice (live, on camera!), to more recent work exploring trans-generational sexual attraction (The Mother – between a woman in her 70s and her thirty-something lover – and Venus – thankfully avoiding any explicit sex between a 70-something man who is near death's door and the rather ill-defined young woman in her 20s in whom he takes a prurient interest.) As one in the eighth decade of his life, I can assure others that Mr Kureishi offers no meaningful insight into the nature of aging, the aged, or their sensuality. The actors do a workmanlike job of trying to breathe life into an abysmal script (act, Peter, act!) – but the lighting is Stygian, the screenplay improbable, the continuity irregular and the dialog – other than the gratuitous obscenities - forgettable.

In sum, Venus is an abysmal melange wherein "Lost in Translation" meets "My Fair Lady", with a heavy dose of Mr. Chips as played by Claire Quilty.

If you're looking for fascinating insight into the nature of love, sexuality and redemption as written by a brilliant British author go see Edward Norton in the current production of the "The Painted Veil", adapted from Somerset Maugham's story.

For an overblown exercise in geriatric farce – overburdened with obscenity and without a trace of authenticity – see "Venus".
12 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Archangel (2005 TV Movie)
9/10
Among the greater pleasures of Archangel is the opportunity to see Daniel Craig at his best.
16 December 2006
Archangel, an excellent action/adventure story, was filmed in Moscow and Latvia and originally produced as a two part BBC-TV series. Unlike many US adaptations of serialized TV shows, the transition between the episodes is seamless and the ensuing two-hour drama stands in good stead as an integrated whole.

The result is an outstanding motion picture. The cinematography is impressive, the plot is fascinating, and the acting, by both supporting actors and principals is first rate - including what may be Daniel Craig's finest recent performance.

Filmed under what were obviously frequently challenging conditions of rain, snow and cold, Archangel manages to capture the bitter chill and desolation of the countryside in winter as well as the grit and grandeur of Moscow.

As the plot unfolds it relates the tale of a Western historian, Kelso - played by Craig - who attends a conference in Moscow only to discover a mystery and a conspiracy dating back to Stalin's death in 1953. His life in danger, Kelso teams up with a young Russian woman, Zinaida - brilliantly portrayed by Yekaterina Rednikova - to solve the mystery and attempt to foil the plot.

Although the story line sounds generally similar to "the Da Vinci Code", Archangel more credibly dramatizes a profound conflict in values between traditionalists and progressives - in this case, in a society where socialism was once the opiate of the intelligentsia. In that respect it is much like the earlier Russia House, which starred Sean Connery as the western visitor enmeshed in a dangerous conspiracy and internal conflict in the former Soviet Union.

To one who lived through the cold war, Archangel does a marvelous job - integrating current events with flashbacks - of depicting the complex ways in which the Russian people did and still do react to Stalin - a proved mass murderer - with fear, with hatred, with admiration and respect, and even with love.

The story doesn't require too extreme a suspension of disbelief, and the portrayal of the Moscow streets and Russian people, rural and urban, powerful or impoverished, opportunists and petty bureaucrats, progressives who long for change and traditionalist who seek a return to an earlier era, is quite realistic.

One of the greatest pleasures of Archangel is the opportunity to see Daniel Craig at his best. He brings wit, charm and intelligence to the role of Kelso in a way that he was either unable or not allowed to do in either Casino Royale or Munich.

Craig is obviously a very talented actor - and in Archangel, delivers a performance that far outshines his work in Casino Royale - as well as that of the other Bond - Sean Connery - in a similar role in the aforementioned Russia House.

All in all, a great way to spend two hours - and I'd watch it again.
32 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Long Way Round (2004–2010)
2/10
A wasted opportunity
17 February 2006
I've been a motorcyclist for over 40 years, and I've done my share of long distance and international touring. For several years I planned a "round the world" trip – but funding and family limitations never made it possible. As a result I'm profoundly envious of MacGregor and the opportunity he had to do his great adventure trip with corporate support, weeks of time, and a staff of full-time associates to put it together.

I hated the resulting video, which I saw as a 7 episode DVD. It was painful to watch how ineptly the escapade was planned and executed –the timing, the routing, the packing, the staffing, the provisioning, the execution, and even (sad to say as the current owner of 3 BMW motorbikes) – the choice of rides.

The planning was inept, the provisioning inappropriate, and the timing ludicrous.

Not since Napoleon marched into the Russian winter has an Eastward expedition been so poorly timed. The bogs, marshes, and raging rivers that turned much of the trip into a hellish experience relieved by long truck rides could have been avoided had MacGregor traveled in the dry season (summer, early autumn) rather than the wet season (spring, early summer). How stupid can one be?

It may have been great "reality TV" (which –if there is such a thing – is oxymoronic), but as a documentary about adventure touring on a motorbike, as seen by an experienced motorcyclist, it sucked!
7 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ripley's Game (2002)
10/10
Excellent acting, great locations, taut plot line, marvelous cinematography
19 December 2005
It's a shame - and a sad commentary on the American movie industry - that this film was never released to theaters in the US. It's one of the best "foreign intrigue" films ever made - with moments of suspense intermixed with absolutely dark comedy - and the scenery and architecture of the Veneto is magnificent!

John Malkovitch is at his best as a more mature, deadly, poised and serenely confident Ripley - the amoral killer in pursuit of life's finer things - played by Matt Damon in "The Talented Mister Ripley". As Ripley, Malkovitch has achieved his life's goals - he lives in an elegant Palladian Villa in Northern Italy - surrounded by art and beauty and music - but his refined taste and elegant manners are a thin veneer over a constantly simmering cauldron of potentially berserker violence.

As the victim of rudeness displayed by a young expat Brit, Ripley decides to see if the young man can be corrupted - and the film proceeds to document the evolving relationship between the two protagonists as the action moves through Germany and Italy. The final scene, a concert filmed in the Teatro Olympico in Vicenza, is one of the most striking musical interludes ever captured on film.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed