Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Spider-Man 3 (2007)
6/10
Disappointed. Too many chefs spoil the soup.
5 May 2007
First the disclaimer. I have been a loyal Spiderman fan through the 80s and 90s when I was growing up, and have been fervently awaiting the third installment for over two years. Some of my favorite movies are the Evil Dead trilogy and Darkman, so I also have nothing but respect for Raimi. So what I say in this review comes with a heavy heart.

There are two types of people who will see this movie, people who know the story (me), and people who don't (my wife). Both will be disappointed. Now, the movie is not really that bad, but in comparison to Raimi's the first two outings with the Spiderman franchise, this movie reeks of other franchises past failures at a third installment (for those that don't know, see Superman 3 and TMNT 3 for perfect examples.)

At first glance, it's tough to see why this movie doesn't work. The special effects were incredible, the direction was top-notch, even the acting was pretty darn good, for a comic book film. But the story suffered from too many characters. The main focus in on Peter's internal struggle with a creature from space which essentially turns him evil. Great idea for a story, it's easily the biggest of Spiderman's comic book arc, besides the Green Goblin/Gwen Stacy story, and it's chock full of emotion. But the characters who play into it have no characterization, the audience gets no feeling from them.

First, the goo. I know all the stories of it, both comics and cartoons, however, there is nothing in the movie to explain it, so non-comic book fans have no idea what or where this stuff comes from, or what it does to Peter. James Franco's character, Harry, does enough 180s to make even a figure skater nauseous (or maybe that was his acting), while Thomas Hayden Church, who plays Sandman, arguably the best actor in the film, has almost zero characterization and plot, despite having the most special effects. Due to this, all the extremely pivotal plot line events and scenes in the film feel weak, unemotional for the audience, and down-right cheesy (even if you leave out the 15 minute long homage to Saturday Night Fever). The other character, Eddie Brock/Venom, played by Topher Grace, feels like such a farce. His motivation for hating Peter Parker is a stretch of the imagination so big that it's glaringly obvious, even in a movie with unexplained black alien goo.

This movie left so much of the story unexplained it is highly confusing, unless you know the story going into it. So, sadly to say, this movie was created with solely fans in mind, and even they, due to how poorly characters are handled, walk away feeling disillusioned and disappointed. This movie has everything, except feelings.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Punisher (2004)
7/10
Classic revenge brought to our generation.
26 January 2006
This movie came onto the scene with very little fanfare. It isn't a CGI powerhouse. There's no Matrix/Kill Bill style fight scenes. But what it lacks in modern trends it more than makes up for in a good old fashioned revenge plot. Touting a story that would have been fit for a Clint Eastwood flick like Outlaw Josey Wales or Hang 'em High, the Punisher takes the viewer on journey into the soul of a gritty vigilante. Thomas Jane plays the lead role to perfection, his voice acting is incredible. Although this isn't your daddy's (or Dolph's) emotionless Punisher. He is much more cerebral here than in most of the other media he has popped up in, and more human, but not any more humane. Using the tried and true style of fist fights and pyrotechnics this movie keeps the character rooted in his all too mortal persona. The supporting characters turn in equally descent roles, the likes of John Travolta worked well, although nothing outstanding. No doubt about it, Thomas Jane ran away with this one. He's just a normal guy doing super-normal things, with a lot of gunfire and explosions to boot. If you are in the target demographic (Male aged 17-30) you will definitely enjoy this film. If not, proceed at your own risk.
30 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed