Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Dredd (2012)
9/10
Excellent action
29 September 2012
Dredd 3D marks a return to the stylistic approach of older action films such as "Robocop" and "Assault on Precinct 13". It takes its subject matter seriously without neutering it to reach a broader audience.

In a dystopian future most of the Earth is covered by irradiated desert. Mankind has huddled together in large and vast mega-cities with hundreds of millions of citizens. In Mega City One the law is upheld by a corps of judges, who possess the authority to act as judge, jury and executioner in their confrontations with criminals. the best and most notorious among them is Judge Dredd (Karl Urban), who travels into the Mega Block Peach Trees along with his rookie trainee Anderson (Olivia Thirlby), who must pass his evaluation to become a judge, in order to investigate a triple murder. Peach Trees is ruled by a sociopathic ex-prostitute named Ma-Ma (Lena Headey) who is flooding the streets with the new drug Slo-Mo, and realises that the arrest of one of her men could send her empire crumbling down. So she locks down the building and sets its inhabitants loose upon Dredd and Anderson.

The film is extremely violent with plenty of gore spurting in the beautiful slow motion sequences and a very high body count. Crucially, the film does not use the slow motion mechanic so many times, it becomes tired. It also has context within the plot and world of the film itself in the form of the drug Slo-Mo, which slows the brain's perception of time to within 1%. We only ever see these sequences whenever someone has taken the drug.

Furthermore, the heavy use of practical effects and limited use of CGI gives Peach Trees a very real sense of place. It is essentially a city onto itself with 75,000 residents, medical clinics, schools and whatever other amenities the residents may need. It is also steeped in squalor and poverty. The special effects in general are of a high quality and belie the film's modest budget.

The acting is of high quality. Karl Urban is perfect as the terse no-nonsense Dredd. He wears the helmet throughout the film, which fits perfectly with the character. Dredd IS his uniform and in Karl Urban he becomes an unstoppable force of nature. Though we only see his chin, Urban still manages to clearly communicate whichever mood he is in, his mouth usually locked in Dredd's signature scowl.

Olivia Thirlby is excellent too, as the trainee Anderson. Aside from looking gorgeous, she is the emotional anchor of the film next to the seemingly emotionless Dredd, and she carries it well with a likable charm and humanity.

Lena Headey is intimidating and memorable as the enigmatic Ma-Ma, who seems to revel in the violence she unleashes. She rules over her gang through fear and intimidation and helps you buy into how a woman of her stature can have a whole block repressed through fear.

The cinematography is gorgeous. The slow motion sequences are hypnotic in their beauty, as are the depictions of urban and civil decay in this inhospitable place. The look and feel of the film, carried through by frequent Lars von Trier collaborator and Academy Award-winner Anthony Dod Mantle, are by far the film's greatest strength. I am usually not a fan of 3D, but the slow-motion sequences here really make it work. It isn't dark or murky, but rather bright and vibrant despite the dreary and claustrophobic setting.

The music is excellent too with a bombastic and occasionally furious beat that drives the action and adrenaline. Very rarely is there a quiet moment.

Finally then, there is an action film for adults. One that dares to address and even revel in its subject matter and one that, in spite of its apparent simplicity, is anything but stupid. I hardly ever go to the cinema any more, as it has gotten much too expensive. But Dredd 3D was worth my money and more. It is very apparent that this film was a labour of love. I am already planning to see it again and can only recommend you do the same.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prometheus (I) (2012)
4/10
Less than intelligent science fiction
19 June 2012
In 25 years of movie-going this film accomplished the unique feat of actually making me angry, which has never happened before.

Let me start off by saying that I did not walk in particularly expecting a horror or action film but rather a thoughtful piece in the vein of Scott's "Blade Runner", which ranks high among my favorite films of all time. I expected the "intelligent science fiction" so many other reviewers have touted. Instead, what I got was one of the dumbest and most shallow pieces of cinema I have seen in years.

For starters none of the characters are particularly likable, nor do most of them seem particularly believable. Throughout the film none of them behave reasonably but rather continue to make the most imbecilic decisions available to them. The "science" part of the science fiction is complete hogwash to a point that--together with the ridiculous plot and characters, seriously hurts the suspension of disbelief of the audience. Mine disappeared approximately after the first 30 minutes and things only got more ridiculous from there. A scene involving a surgery machine, which is heavily foreshadowed, is one of the highlights of abject stupidity. The same goes for a biologist's interaction with an alien life form.

The only positive aspects to the film are the beautiful imagery and Michael Fassbender's performance as David, which is the acting standout. Most of the others are (except for Idris Elba) forgettable, though not particularly bad as such. What lets them down is the terrible script, which unfortunately makes little use of the potential that arises from Fassbender's performance or the concept of an humanity as an engineered life form. The film's purported existential questions are ham fisted and less than subtle. They are not conveyed or discussed in remotely interesting ways. Instead, the film seems insistent upon embracing the continued idiocy of its plot and characters.

The awful script by Lindelof makes this one of the worst and dumbest films I have seen in recent memory. If you want intelligent science fiction look elsewhere. Even as a hollow and empty summer movie it fails to achieve any sort of positive standard.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average film
2 March 2004
Lightning Jack is an average Western Comedy that has a few laughs. It though a lot of the well known and established formulas and is neither better nor worse, than a lot of other comedies out there. Paul Hogan stars as Jack Kane a veteran outlaw who finds himself part of a dying breed an unable to get a decent headline. Cuba Gooding Jr. stars as the mute clerk Ben Doyle who wants to join up with Kane and become an outlaw.

The acting is average. Hogan seems to run on much of his routine from Crocodile Dundee. Some of the time though he seems to have trouble delivering his lines convincingly. Cuba Gooding Jr. is amusing as the mute Doyle but occasionally overacted to the point where it made me cringe. The chemistry between the two isn't bad, but it isn't great either. Much like the film itself.

There's nothing noteworthy about the direction or cinematography. The story moves along alright, but the script is mediocre and gives us a few completely unnecessary scenes. There is rarely any musical score to take note of, and what little there is, is average stuff to enhance the comedic elements.

The film is not a complete waste of time. Some of the jokes do hit their mark, and Hogan has charm. There are several better Western comedies out there though, such as Maverick, but if you're looking for some mild entertainment some rainy day, Lightning Jack can prove to be entertaining enough.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed