Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Deacon (2018)
10/10
Dark and grit, a 90's throwback
28 February 2024
I realized something while watching this film, and then watching the director's cut. It's not really about catholicism or religion. It's actually a story about evil, and how it corrupts. The use of a deacon as the antagonist just gave an interesting layer, kind of like how Dexter was. Once I saw it through that lens, I could see a lot of subtleties in the performances. I liked how nothing is in your face about what it was trying to be, and at the end of the day it was entertaining.

I prefer the DC because I feel like the score was more in line with the tone of the film, as much as I appreciate the classic score to the original. Both are unique and different, yet house the same principle about evil in modern society.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ahab (I) (2020)
10/10
Really cool!
9 January 2022
Saw this on YouTube. I enjoy good spy films, and this short ranks among that class. I wish it were longer and explored what all is going to happen.

The cinematography was probably my favorite, seemed like the choices were very solid and clear, but kept the action moving along. Director Tyler Hickman has a lot of unique works but I really think he grew with this one.

I would enjoy seeing this develop into a series or a feature!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ruin Me (2017)
7/10
Fun and interesting!
9 January 2022
Two things stand out most to me for this film.

The first is the concept itself. We live in an age where people crave the experience as opposed to the viewership. Granted movies and games are still what people seek out, it seems to be growing toward total immersion. Ruin Me takes off from that concept and twists it in a way that intrigues. Some of its execution was flawed, but from a technical stand point, the film works if you're into horror.

The second thing was the performance of Chris Hill. While I enjoyed the cast as a whole, he managed to put forth a genuine character that fit the mold of the concept.

If you like horror, this is a good one to check out.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Last Time (2006)
9/10
The closer you look...
17 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
~Possible Spoilers herein~

The Last Time represents a dramatic character reversal, inevitably a character study, as opposed to just another independent feature.

From the get-go, you don't really like Keaton's (Ted), the cocky, sarcastic, ambitious, and, worst of all, always right salesman. He knows all about his trade; what he's doing, and how he's doing it. Each moment we spend with him, however, we come to understand his nature. We dig to find his personal flaws, that which built the man portrayed before us.

In the opposite, we have Fraser (Jaime), a green salesman who was big news in his small town, then comes the big city. We've seen this formula before, true, but Brendan has always been able to lose the veracity of himself in his character. You could compare this to the way he interviews, and his commentary on The Mummy DVD. In fact, you tend to feel sorry for him in this particular role.

Finally, you have Valletta (Belisa), a housewife in complete support of her husband, going so far as to move to the big city with him so he may accomplish dreams so grand (hopes to start a family notwithstanding).

This is all well and fine, but think when you watch of how you feel toward them in the beginning versus how you end up feeling about them.

Ted turns out to be a very brilliant, but troubled, individual who's sole purpose in this job is not to crush others but actually to make as much money as possible. He was a professor, you see, highly successful at it due to his intelligence, but not altogether wealthy (a reason his wife decided to up and leave him). This chain of events propelled our man to move to the big city and prove his worth in this world. He attacks the forefront of sales under the disguise of confidence, but the soul of pain. Taking what he wants seems a primary motive, at first, until he meets Belisa, who renews in him that sense of purity and living. Though they begin and live an affair throughout, it would seem as true love. Ted, finally, is able to open up to someone and give his personality, not that guise that has guided him to her.

Which brings us to Belisa, who fronts the lie of a happy housewife. Her Jaime is focused on doing his best, but is failing miserably. So, his work stalks him in his personal life, hitting her full swing with the loss of love, and a renewed seek of interest. Enter Ted, that sure-of-himself professional who takes charge where needed. Thus, we begin the affair.

Back to Jaime, who we define as weak and afraid throughout. Someone, like I said before, we feel sorry for from the beginning primarily because we have all been there (starting out and not altogether sure of how). His lack of interest in his wife causes her to run to the arms of another man, and it seeps through as he knows she's going behind his back, but never to whom. He finds a fatherly figure in Ted, think of a son attempting all he can to win his father's respect, but never learned enough to do so. With the guilt of the affair, Ted feels sorry for the young man, and so assists him in any way possible.

This, again, is a fairly typical formula, but as I said, each character takes a complete 180 near the end.

We find Ted a poet by heart, and actually feel sorry for what happens to him. We find Jaime a conniving opportunist who knows full well how to manipulate others, and Belisa becomes the embodiment of (if this were a spy novel) a femme fatal.

I will not to spoil how this comes to light, as not to be the purpose of this review.

My intent is to give potential viewers a fair realization of what The Last Time is truly about, not what the surface will have you believe. If you walk into this thinking the overall production will be spectacular, disappointment will ensue. The music is not very well synthesized, the cinematography is average at best (but gets the point across), and the dialogue could've used a bit of strengthening.

However, the direction is remarkable, the characters believable and full circle, and the story is superb in terms of originality. Keaton and Fraser deliver Ted and Jaime in such a way that you forget they are acting after only a bit of time (in my opinion, Keaton begins in character and never ends, whereas Fraser had moments of similarity to his other works {although quite remarkable, nonetheless}), while Valletta gives a rich performance.

And, as I preemptively mentioned, all of these characters (including the supporting players {Daniel Stern especially}) oppose their first impression, which is how life really works this day in age. Actions govern personality, and vice versa.

Rent this when you are ready to watch a character study, along with clever storytelling, not when you want to see overly dramatic play upon your TV screen. For that, I recommend you start watching Lifetime or a good percentage of movie channel (HBO, Showtime, etc) original series.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Why I hate this game.
11 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
All right, let me start by saying I love the original RS for the 64. The graphics were new, the ships were really fast and cool. The missions were a challenge, but you had a strategy to come up with. The computer didn't tell you every step of your mission, you could wander and explore.

That's the first thing that's wrong with RL, everything you do is under a timetable and controlled by other people. I mean, shouldn't you, as the leader, be telling people how to handle each and every mission?

And speaking of missions, why do they intersperse the original trilogy with completely made up crap? Never mind.

I was so waiting for this game when I heard they were going to allow you fly through the asteroid field from Empire Strikes Back. I think anyone who is a fan of the films wanted to do this. So, they give it to you. It's the stupidest level in the game. You start by flying through the asteroid field with ties chasing after you, and your whole objective is to get farther into the field while shooting the ties. You have to kill them all to get ahead. Hey, remember how many Han killed when he was in the field? None, they all had poor piloting skills compared to him. I just wanted to be able to dodge the asteroids as they came at me, but instead I have to use my automatic aim guns to kill ties behind me.

That was the biggest disappointment, you have no control over your flying, everything is sluggish. All except for the A-Wing, probably the fastest and most maneuverable ship in the entire fleet. But, oh yeah, didn't Han say the Falcon was? Anyway...

You finally get to the Battle of Endor. Here is the ultimate level, you get to destroy the death star, everyone's first instinct is to pick the Falcon and be the leader. But, of course, you get there and have to do stupid pre-chosen strategies like finding (not to mention deciphering the difference between) the tie-bombers. This is impossible in the falcon, by the time you have spotted one group the frigate gets destroyed. The only way to get passed this part is to pick the A-Wing. After this you have to attack the star destroyers and that's a real stupid chore. This game makes you feel like you're the only one defending the rebel alliance.

After you frustratingly get through that 'fun' fight, you get to the death star. And here, you might think 'yay! I get to destroy the death star', and again, like in the Asteroid field, you have to do some tedious thing while narrowly getting passed the tunnels of impending doom. Your mission is to protect the ship in front of you, remember that from the Return of the Jedi? It's so moronic because if you pick the falcon, you'll die because you're not maneuverable enough, but if you pick the x-wing, you have to keep locking and unlocking your s-foils. So it's a choice to either kill the bad guys, or try to catch up to Lando, who apparently doesn't know how to maneuver. Thus dying in the process.

The bonus stages aren't even worth aiming for as each level just gets more and more frustrating. It makes me feel the way I did when I saw the new three films, upset and in need of killing something. Lucky for me, Smash Bros Melee exists.

I hope with the Wii they come up with something a lot better and have the original trilogy levels to full capacity. I'm going to sell this game the first chance I get.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Outbreak (1995)
9/10
Terrific
25 April 2004
When I first saw this movie, I was ten, and even then I liked it. The script itself housed very funny one liners, particularly form Spacey's character. But I was amazed at how fast the film itself moved. In the first, you are following these scientists going to Africa to find a virus outbreak. Next thing you know, you're watching a helicopter go head on with a plane.

First comes the acting. Dustin Hoffman is stupendous as always, Rene Russo plays Robbie with realism, Kevin Spacey makes for a good humor man, Cuba Gooding Jr. pulls off the green man trying to earn respect, and being a bad-ass at the same time. As always, Morgan Freeman is wonderful. Any role I see him in is a role I remember. He's always different, too, neigh does he ever repeat in characterization. Sometimes he's funny, sometimes he's incredibly serious. Last but not least comes Donald Sutherland, one of my favorite actors to date. He can jump into the shoes of any character, including the general trying to protect a secret he knows he shouldn't. One actor whom I particularly enjoyed watching was J.T. Walsh. It's a great shame he died, I liked all his stuff from Breakdown to Pleasantville. He is only in Outbreak for about five minutes, but he has one of my favorite monologues in the history of film. He commands attention as he speaks.

Next comes the story itself. A very to-date story. A one all can relate to because it could very well happen. A virus from Africa makes its way here and begins infecting all, without a cure. I liked that there was a hero aspect in Sam Daniels. he was the tracker, the hunter, the curist. Coupled with the story comes the dialogue. Rich, under-appreciated, funny, and serious all wrapped into one. As I said before, the monologue for Walsh is brilliant. Many lines are etched into my mind, and are often used in conversation. Too bad no one knows what I'm saying.

I'm a bit surprised this film didn't bode too well with audiences. Mayhap they didn't want to see what could happen, who knows? My only complaint is character endings. You insinuate what happens to McClintock and Ford, also Sam and Robbie, but we don't ever see Casey again. I could infer that he dies, but he could very well have survived. I wish there was a way to know.

Finally comes Wolfgang Peterson's remarkable direction. I've been a huge fan of his movies since this movie, including Air Force One, Enemy Mine, not much for Perfect Storm, but his upcoming Ender's Game should be good.

At the end, I felt a certain sense of relief and wonderment. But I have to say the soundtrack is rather exquisite. I have always liked James Newton Howard, and though the cd is short in time, it's a time I cannot forget. Particularly the end theme when it's chopper vs. plane time. What a song, keeps me in suspense every time. I like songs that are taken for film trailers as well. It's still too bad not a lot of people know about this movie.

9 out of 10
98 out of 134 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Event Horizon (1997)
10/10
Astounding
18 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
To this day, I would and always will rate this film as the best horror flick of all time. Make that, scariest film of all time. Either way. When I'd first heard of Event Horizon, I was in sixth grade going on seventh. I liked Sam Neill's stuff ever since Jurassic Park, so I went for a ride in this movie, expecting he would be the brave hero.

Spoiler Alert

I was mistaken. What I received was actually one of the best performances a villain can give. Sure, he was the scientist in the beginning, but ultimately went mad due to so many things around him. I could imagine no other person, to this day, that could fill Neill's shoes as Dr. Weir.

I'll start with the movie itself. Terrifying, if you really try thinking about it. Not just sitting down to fall asleep to something, although I can't imagine why you'd choose this one. I love the way the story starts out, where you're in an already scary environment, space. Like no other horror, space is finally being used to great extents. Thus being the setting for what would become truly horrific. You start with a basic rescue operation, move to the site, and get trapped with these poor people. The thing that intrigued me the most was that these killings were based on a fear.

Peters' fear of her sick child, Justin being afraid of being alone, Weir with his deceased wife, and Miller with his dead burning friend that he left behind. All of these heroes were pre-scarred, much like in real life, we carry around all this emotional, and sometimes physically draining, baggage. Event Horizon reflects that.

It just so happens they are also on a ship that ‘tore a hole in our universe', and led itself to Hell. I loved that concept, one of the unknown. We fathom the unknown as humans. A black hole especially. One must come to ask themselves what is out there, and what if we were to tamper with it.

Next, I must say the acting is brilliant. Sam Neill stepping up to a different type of role, and slamming it out of the park. I was truly creeped out to see him tear his own eyes from his skull, then blow up the only chance of escape with pilot still inside, and finally to play surgeon on the ship's medic. Ironies, you'll note. It was Smith's, the pilot's, fear of getting out of there that caused him to blow up with the vessel. It was a medic's job that got himself killed. This was also the first time I had ever heard of Lawrence Fishburne. Great stuff, though. He accurately portrayed a broken man trying to help his entire crew out, even if it meant giving his own life just to save one of them.

A final note on the direction. It took Paul Anderson a lot of courage to take on a project like this. Did you know that it was a book? A great book as well. His adaptations to almost impossible imagery were astounding. Let alone his instincts on casting. All in all, you can't get any better than Event Horizon. So, before you start criticizing its gore ethic, think about the story itself, Hell is involved. Make sure you've researched a film of this genre enough before complaining about certain inequities. Science fiction must be studied, not viewed upon a single time, then cast away.

10 out of 10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Smith Experience
17 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Let's look first at this whole trilogy. Matrix was great, by far one of the coolest films of our time. Visually stunning, story well thought out, even the acting was good. You have to admit Keanu Reeves nailed this part. Then came two. And then three. I have already discussed two, so I'll just skip over to this monstrosity.

Spoiler warning-

Neo wakes from his cliffhanger dream inside the Matrix, without attachments. So, they trapped his consciousness? Dear God. So then, he needs to think about what he must do. Only to come to the simple conclusion he must confront the head honcho. Wow, took him a long time to figure that out. So, those pesky humans race back to Zion, a trip that usually takes a few hours, takes them near eternity? Please. So Neo gets half way to his destiny, only to confront a Smith, and eve when he says Mr. Anderson, Neo is still confused. Holy crap. Then comes the climactic conclusion, which I will not spoil here.

There are so many bad things to say about this movie, I hardly know where to begin. First off, the characters. I found that I stopped caring what happened to them about twenty minutes into it. With exception to one, I will come to that momentarily. I didn't give a flying crap what happened with Morpheus. In fact, half way through I was rooting for the machines to just end it.

Which brings me to a major complaint I have. The war scene, way too long. It was like they were trying to duplicate LOTR: TTT battle scene. I was actually falling asleep, and again hoping the machines would just hurry up and win. It was inevitable anyway. Humans had nothing. Why didn't they use the electroguns on the killer robots? Then, just in the nick of time comes Morpheus and the gang. But, do they really help the situation? No. Just delay longer.

The only pay off this film has to offer is a character to which I absolutely loved. And that was Agent Smith. He is the reason I give this such a high rating. For those few moments, any moments with Smith, I was energized. His dialogue, the articulation, the anger towards the end. The asking of why. I loved it. Both Hugo Weaving and Ian Bliss did an amazing job. Hugo, at least, should win a best villains award. I was literally creeped out when his army came after the Oracle.

Otherwise, this was a complete waste of time. If you liked Smith in the first, see this for just that. Skip all the other crap, because that's what it was. I left the theater feeling like I had wasted money, wasted money on the Matrix. When the first came out, I saw it several times just to try and understand it. Then, it becometh a ruin. One thing it was though, was better than Reloaded.

6 out of 10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
WHY???
24 February 2004
Oh why did they have to make a sequel, much less two. They pulled the impossible, I like to call it the Mortal Kombat Effect. The first was awesome, then it spiraled down in the second.

Seems to me like the directors were just trying to fit as much special effects and Neo pulling his Superman act rather than focusing on the real point to the story. They should have actually explained certain things and given the movie an ending, rather than pulling that cliffhanger crap that so many typical science fiction movies tend to do. And what was with the 'celebrating humanity' scene. It's like they just thought, lets see if we can get away with an orgy/sex scene and see what people think.

Even the acting was blah. Neo was twice as confused as he was in the original, though then it was understandable, now just irritating. Carrie making herself into just plain old, the action hero, and Morpheus going biblical. Why?

The only redeeming factor of this monstrosity of a film is that of the acting and character of Agent Smith. Hugo Weaving is the only reason this film succeeded in my mind. At least they were thinking when they brought him back and with more cynical remarks and cool entrances. Not to mention Hugo is a fine actor indeed. Having seen this and LOTR only further made me believe in his character. Sadly enough, I was rooting that he would kill everyone in the end, that's how bad this movie was.

See it to put a weird spin on the Matrix, a classic to this day, but don't see because you want enjoy a movie for the evening or afternoon or morning. It is not a good movie. Actually, I take that back, see it only for Smith, just listen to some music while you watch the okay action sequences and blank acting.

5 out of 10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Matrix (1999)
10/10
Complex to whole new level
24 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
It isn't very often that a good science fiction movie is conceived. There are those, eh it was okay, or those not bad types, but this definitely ranks among the greatest.

First off comes the very concept of it. Warning: Spoilers.

Neo is a man living in a world he doesn't believe in. He is soon awakened by Morpheus and the eventual love interest Trinity. This is the basis for the story, but it goes deeper than that. You have Agent Smith, a program within the Matrix, which by the way took me two viewings to figure out, that is out to restore order to the programming.

Tidbit number one, the story itself. Phenomenal is one of the best words to describe it. You have a classic idea of a society of the future trapped and blinded by that trap, just living a normal life. But it toys with the concept that not all of us would accept the world we are given, much like the Truman Show. There is only one other film I would compare this to, and would put above, and that is Dark City. Moving on, The Matrix houses an entity of disbelief and human emotion.

Each character has their own history that we somehow learn all about. First and foremost is Neo, played very well by Keanu Reeves. I must say that I have always liked the guy and his films; Chain Reaction, Speed, etc. Now, he flawlessly plays a character on edge and constantly learning how to defeat certain evil. Bringing us to the nemesis of Neo, Agent Smith. I had never seen Hugo Weaving's work prior to this, but absolutely loved his performance. Playing an entity who wants a level of freedom that humans have and take for granted.

Next comes Morpheus, played by a great film actor Laurence Fishburne. Whose work in Event Horizon gave me chills and thrills. He plays sort of the father figure in this sci-fi. Teaching Neo what he must know to help bring the human race out of near extinction. Last, but certainly not least comes Trinity, the love interest and major butt kicker. Carrie Anne-Moss is another actress I had not heard before this film, and I must say that I search for her name when thinking of movies to see. It's what brought me to Memento and Red Planet. But I was amazed that she could portray both an action hero and a serious individual, not! But this seems to be the trend in a lot of Hollywood films. The woman hero is either strong with no emotions, or too emotional with no strengths. Not so anymore, but I think Carrie helped to break the barrier.

Definitely a must see for not only all science fiction fans, but for a whole generation, for this represents a 'could happen' scenario. One way or another, I found myself leaving the theater, and still watching the credits, thinking about what it all means...

10 out of 10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How to spell crap
19 February 2004
GODS AND GENERALS, or should I say monologues in general? I went into this thinking, the first Oscar worthy film is about to be viewed. I walked out, four hours later, going completely back on that thought. I believe my eyes and ears were bleeding just so I could figure a way out of this festival of crapola. There are no words to describe it, wait, let me try: Disreputable, horrid, horrendous, ghastly. No, that can't even sum it up. For one, the same cut scenes were used more than three times in a given action sequence. Then came the acting, ugh. How can they call themselves actors? With exception to, and this is why I give it what it is, Jeff Daniels and Mira Sorvino. With their one scene together they managed to save, at least for me, my reason for wanting to leave, for the hope that they would come back. As for action, you can see a bullet hit the same place twice, which is physically impossible due to, you know, the chaos theory. Unless the marksman in those days were just that good, which I highly doubt. This movie should be burned, every last copy of it, and frame of actual film that was wasted in the process of creating this moronic tale.

Oh yeah, and for dialogue? None, the characters just sort of talked to themselves. I could swear Jason London was asleep half the time. Right, and making the south look like glorious Gods when they tried to, I'm not a historian but can guess from what I've learned, beat and killed blacks, and enslaved them, yet they were mad out to be goodfellas. Ugh, don't even think twice while at the video store to see this unless you're planning to end your life soon and want a reason to do so.

1 out of 10
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mortal Kombat (1995)
10/10
Superb
19 February 2004
In a world where video game based films are around the corner, mind you you not good ones, this one stands out as one of the best. Mortal Kombat gave to players of the game a thrill they could not only understand but go along with. I found that after watching this movie I remembered specific details from the game I never thought of. First off, the action. Watching fighting like this, in a time pre-Matrix to life, gave me a want to be these characters. I don't know about you, but this was one of the last great films that I wanted to be a character from. For me it was Johnny Cage, others have different opinions on fighter choice.

Anyway, back to the movie. Second comes the valiant efforts of each of the actors. Particularly on the side of Linden Ashby, it's a crying shame you don't see this guy in action films these days. He is an untapped resource. Next comes the ever great, fighter not actor, Robin Shou. He has a humbleness to himself that not everyone can achieve, sort of a Bruce Lee of today. Bridgette Wilson also starred in this fine adaptation and brought not only impervious beauty, but also a dramatic sense. Her quest for revenge made for a great character history, as with Shou.

Then comes Christopher Lambert to play the ever shocking, forgive the pun, Lord Raiden. Though he never fought a single true battle, he didn't have to. I felt satisfied to see that not everyone was out to prove something.

Finally comes the expert directing. I don't care what anyone says, Paul Anderson is a genius when it comes to adaptations, aka Resident Evil, especially video game adaptations, and here's why: He plays these games like all of us who go out to see these films, whereby he knows what is to be expected. Keep making them Mr. Anderson, you do a fine job. All in all, one of the better action films, but one of the best video game films in existence.

10 out of 10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dark City (1998)
10/10
A Dark Classic
18 February 2004
The problem with science fiction anymore is the increasingly unoriginal concepts that are up and coming. Instead, remaking or reinstating old classics. Not so, the case with Dark City. Probably one of the most overlooked films of our time, Dark City tells the tale of a man who wakes in a world with no memory of what is going on around him. In essence, we are in the same boat. He goes through searching for clues and trying to survive the touch of the Strangers, a race that houses more purpose to these people than they could possibly know. With the help of their human doctor, they conduct experiments. Our hero jumps in to not only understand them but to free us all. Your first thought in seeing this movie is probably, 'Wow, how similar this is to The Matrix.' With exception to the fact that it came out before The Matrix ever graced it's previews, there are similarities. I have said many times to people, this is how the other two should have ended up. Hey, if your going to take something, may as well take it all. Anyway, moving on. Dark City is brilliant. The action sequences alone are suspenseful, and to this day I watch and pick up new things. Note that there are spirals throughout all of the film. Also, the acting. A good sci-fi must perpetuate good acting in order to sell this fiction as a possible reality. To start, Rufus Sewell, a fine thespian indeed. Not only does he sell the newborn man, but he also makes you feel a certain sense of sorrow for him. Next on the plate is the ever great William Hurt. I can say that I've only seen a handful of films he's been in, but anytime I do, he is phenomenal. Dark City is no exception. He plays the inspector, bent on finding a killer but realizes the case has nothing to do with this life. Next comes Kiefer Sutherland, a fantastic choice for this film indeed as the Igor mad scientist. What you come to find out is that he is helping the enemy because he has no choice. The work Kiefer does with his voice takes you to a different thought process of who it is, making you feel sorry for his character more than Sewell's. Fourth down the line comes the lovely Jennifer Connelly, now an academy award winner, and rightfully so. She shines as much as she can in this sci fi feature where she plays a smaller role than people think. And last, but certainly not least, comes Mr. Richard O'Brien. He redefines what the term evil villain means. His vocal work, though not sure if it's his voice or an imitation, is superb. I can't go a day without thinking of high pitched voice as he spouts the line "We use your dead as vessels", and then a snarl. All in, one of the better films in history, I would definitely place this on my top ten list.

10 out of 10.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jurassic Park (1993)
10/10
The best film of all time?
12 February 2004
The answer to that question is yes, yes, sixty five million times, yes. There are no movies that can begin to match this great gold of a film. First off, the adaptation. IF you haven't read the book, you're missing quite a lot. It only enhances the greatness of this film. Like, for example, the effects. Yes, on this day, it looks cheap, but remember that most Bond films, when they first appeared, look cheap even today, but we love them all the same, because they inherit a classic value. Beside that argument, I think they still look fantastic. Every time I watch this movie, I think wow, how did they do it?

Secondly, comes the acting. You have Laura Dern, Jeff Goldblum, Richard Attenborough, the late Bob Peck, need I go on? But the best of all, comes with Sam Neill. He is, in my opinion, one of the greatest actors living, and is completely underrated. When I read the novel, I pictured exactly what Mr. Neill brought to the screen in a ten-fold great performance as Dr. Alan Grant. All of these actors and actresses made the film even better. It wasn't just dinos running around killing people, but also the drama in the mix.

Finally, comes the directing by the remarkable Steven Spielberg. Only a genius like he could take a great novel and turn it into a cinematic epic. The unique camera angles, the suspense to keep you thinking about what is about to happen, everything down to the last line spoken. He created a film that our children's children's children will consider classics.

I consider it a classic even now, and for all time, nothing will come close to Jurassic Park.

10 out of 10.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Breakdown (I) (1997)
9/10
To Break down...
6 February 2004
One of the finest films I've seen in a long time. When I first viewed this picture, I barely understood the intricacies of its plot, let alone the greatness of both its character psyche and acting talents. That was years ago. Days ago, I found this on DVD in a store and decided to purchase the copy. Upon viewing I remembered everything. Kurt Russell, to start, being the lead and probably his best performance in a film next to Backdraft, displayed flawlessly the average man in a serious situation and what to do . He portrayed a man desperate and on the edge to find his missing wife that no one knows what happened to. I was suspended throughout the film knowing how it would end, and that's how good Breakdown is and always will be. I'd put it on my list of top twenty best films.

9 out of 10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Into chaos
24 January 2004
I'll start of by saying I never really liked Ashton Kutcher. He seems stupid, at least judging by all the film's and shows I've seen him in. However, a few months ago I read the premise of this film, and being a student of Chaos Theory, was intrigued. The actual butterfly effect is a great theory, because it's true. Anyway, the first trailer came out, then the poster. More and more I was intrigued. Then, I saw it. And loved it. I even liked Ashton Kutcher's acting. The lovely Amy Smart did, as usual, a great character who constantly changes. From the very first moment of the film, I was creeped out, but in a good way. The feeling of fear in my stomach only grew with each passing moment. Every time he would attempt to change one thing, and cause an effect that alters the course of his life and others made me actually think. Not many movies can make one think, very few in fact, but this one made me think and wonder. So, if you like to think about the movie you are watching, and be creeped out at the same time, The Butterfly Effect is your movie.

9 out of 10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed