I have only been compelled to add one previous review and that was for "Inception", which I felt insulted its audience by assuming most of us were so stupid that we couldn't grasp the science of the movie.
I feel exactly the same about this movie which I watched for the first time last evening. There are a number of faults with this film that crop up in other American movies of the past few years:
1. An over-reliance on first-person narrative, which went on for far too long and could easily have been solved by having the cast simply "act it out". The dialogue would usually be classed as "cool and snappy" by those who appreciate this ind of thing but for me, the delivery was much too quick(thank goodness for subtitles!). Ms Chastain's performance was all delivered with nair a gradation of timbre and as odten happens nowadays, some lines were almost whispered........this is the new norm for "intense". 2. The gambling terms and oft-used metaphors in character's dialogue again assumed the audience would like it for being "clever" but it meant absolutely nothing to me. 3. Everything was too slick and smooth, hair styles, clothes and settings were made to look oh-so-perfect, with not even a hair or quiff out of place. The viewer felt he/she was actually watching a group of people "act out" scenes and situations, rather than coming over more natural. Indeed, the film may have succeeded better if the approach had been rougher.
I was expecting some kind of information at the film's conclusion about what happened to Molly Bloom later in life but I guess the director felt it might spoil the ultra-slicknes of the production.
Perhaps if Martin Scorcese had directed the movie, or conversely Paul Greengrass, the results may have been more to my liking.
1. An over-reliance on first-person narrative, which went on for far too long and could easily have been solved by having the cast simply "act it out". The dialogue would usually be classed as "cool and snappy" by those who appreciate this ind of thing but for me, the delivery was much too quick(thank goodness for subtitles!). Ms Chastain's performance was all delivered with nair a gradation of timbre and as odten happens nowadays, some lines were almost whispered........this is the new norm for "intense". 2. The gambling terms and oft-used metaphors in character's dialogue again assumed the audience would like it for being "clever" but it meant absolutely nothing to me. 3. Everything was too slick and smooth, hair styles, clothes and settings were made to look oh-so-perfect, with not even a hair or quiff out of place. The viewer felt he/she was actually watching a group of people "act out" scenes and situations, rather than coming over more natural. Indeed, the film may have succeeded better if the approach had been rougher.
I was expecting some kind of information at the film's conclusion about what happened to Molly Bloom later in life but I guess the director felt it might spoil the ultra-slicknes of the production.
Perhaps if Martin Scorcese had directed the movie, or conversely Paul Greengrass, the results may have been more to my liking.
Tell Your Friends