Ridley Scotts film was of a time and place never to be recreated. How was it going to work in 2017? Honestly, you'd have to have some serious talent equal if not better than the genius of Ridley et al.
When I saw the first film, I left with a sense of something visceral, deep down in my flesh and bones, something primal, existential. I loved it. Nothing had been made like it, and nothing has come close since. This film tries to work out questions from the first film, but it utterly fails in it's attempt at depth. The story is simple enough, that's fine, it's how you tell it that matters. But the characters felt flat and unoriginal, the script was boring, the long drawn out scenes/shots were pointless, even the SFX looked terrible - many city shots looked like tiny models! I don't get it. Honestly, how can the first film from 1982 look better that one from 2017!?
Who knows why people have given this high ratings. Maybe it's nostalgia, maybe it's the bandwagon, maybe it's the kids who weren't around for the first want to feel some of the same excitement like we did. Idk. I saw it twice to make sure I wasn't missing something, but I felt the same both times.
This is my first Villeneuve film, so I'm not familiar with his style, but judging from this example I can't say I'm too impressed. He seemed too self indulgent and distracted by paraphernalia and missed the point of making an engaging story. Nice try Vil, but maybe you should go into architecture instead, you seem to love filming your bougee sets complete with water features.
Watch it by all means, but go back to the first film afterwards and remind yourself what real art on film feels like.
Btw Dune is my favourite book series, you better not mess that one up!
When I saw the first film, I left with a sense of something visceral, deep down in my flesh and bones, something primal, existential. I loved it. Nothing had been made like it, and nothing has come close since. This film tries to work out questions from the first film, but it utterly fails in it's attempt at depth. The story is simple enough, that's fine, it's how you tell it that matters. But the characters felt flat and unoriginal, the script was boring, the long drawn out scenes/shots were pointless, even the SFX looked terrible - many city shots looked like tiny models! I don't get it. Honestly, how can the first film from 1982 look better that one from 2017!?
Who knows why people have given this high ratings. Maybe it's nostalgia, maybe it's the bandwagon, maybe it's the kids who weren't around for the first want to feel some of the same excitement like we did. Idk. I saw it twice to make sure I wasn't missing something, but I felt the same both times.
This is my first Villeneuve film, so I'm not familiar with his style, but judging from this example I can't say I'm too impressed. He seemed too self indulgent and distracted by paraphernalia and missed the point of making an engaging story. Nice try Vil, but maybe you should go into architecture instead, you seem to love filming your bougee sets complete with water features.
Watch it by all means, but go back to the first film afterwards and remind yourself what real art on film feels like.
Btw Dune is my favourite book series, you better not mess that one up!
Tell Your Friends