18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
...not so hot...
26 February 2005
Farhenheit 9/11 is a good film for those of you who dislike George W. Bush. Personally, i'm not a huge fan of his accomplishments, but Michael Moore is one of the worst documentary directors. He's excellent at persuading, by leaving out the other side, but as for his credibility? He has none. Michael Moore makes some very valid points in this film, but he says NOTHING to support the other spectrum, nor does he even acknowledge it. The only TRUE evidence that Michael Moore gave to you is a grieving mother, longing for her dead son. It's worth watching/renting. In my opinion, the war wasn't justified, but before you make a final verdict on whether to scorn or praise George Bush...see another movie.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Latter Days (2003)
surprisingly touching...
17 November 2004
I'm not going to go into my entire life story here, but I will tell you that i'm a straight person, so it may seem a little odd that I'd like to watch this movie. I work at blockbuster video and I was running movies one day when I came across a movie entitled "Latter Days." This was intriguing to me because I grew up in a mormon household (but am no longer a firm believer). I read that back and was instantly intrigued. I have much respect for both the mormon community and the gay community, so watching this was something I had been anticipating for a while. I was quite curious how the director would portray the life or a mormon who is hiding his sexuality. All in all, I have to say that this movie is definitely worth watching. There have been some negative comments posted about the quality and about how the dialogue didn't seem to flow amazingly well at times, but I didn't notice anything. I was so wrapped up in the plot and the portrayal of the movie that I didn't notice much of anything that was bad. Most of the people that have left comments on here have been gay, so I assume that most of the people watching this movie would be gay males, and if that be the case, it can become very poignant and heart wrenching at times. I know what it's like to be shunned from the people you've grown up with, not exactly how aaron does, but I have a definite feeling and this movie went straight to my heart. As for recommending this movie, I am all for it. Whether you'll enjoy it as much as I did really jumps from person to person, but I say that you should go out and rent the movie just to make sure.
194 out of 210 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
spectacular
23 May 2004
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington is the classic story of an American Hero. After the death of the senate, they strive to search for a new candidate, yet not an honest one. Who's ever heard of an honest government official? They're looking for a guy that is a puppet. A puppet in the puppet master's show…they search for a coward that will do anything to be in and stay in the senate. Ironically, they find quite possibly the only man with true morals, Jeff Smith (Jimmy Stewart). Without going into too much detail about the movie, it must be said that the cast was brilliantly chosen. Jimmy Stewart is such a spectacular actor and can light even the darkest of a character. The fact that he's portraying an honest, caring man does him even better. Every line is sincere, full, and alive. He has such talent and grace on the set. He was born to be an actor, and this movie was lucky to have him. Jean Arthur put on a magnificent show. She was sheik but tough, distressed, but strong. In addition to the acting, the plot was solid…flawless and catching. It got very slow and drawn out at times, but nonetheless, it was amazing. Frank Capra didn't go wrong in making this film. All in all, this film is definitely a keeper and very recommended. Having an overall score of 8.4/10 stars, this viewer doesn't disagree. A solid 8 for an astonishing movie.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Godfather (1972)
10/10
pure genius
21 May 2004
`The Godfather' is quite possibly one of the best movies made in history. This film has been quoted/mimicked time and time again, even in a Rugrats (the famous children's cartoon) episode. Why would this movie be quoted so much if it wasn't so amazing? It wouldn't be. All the hype made about this movie really isn't understood until you actually watch the film. It's a classic that can't be described.

I suppose it's illustriousness could be arguable either way, but most viewers find this movie riveting and engaging. One could understand how someone could find this movie dry, especially in the beginning. If you're not familiar with the plot at all, many things could be missed the first time around. It starts out at his daughters wedding, and from there, all the events can easily run together and cause a vast amount of confusion within the viewer. If you stick to it, promises are that the movie does get better…immensely.

There isn't one single thing that makes this movie so remarkable. It could be that it had a spectacular cast, intriguing plot, and very realistic situations. Or, it could be that this movie has what any great story has, a huge change in the main character. Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) is by far one of the most interesting characters through the movie. You watch every step of his moves, thoughts, actions and you see him evolve into the person his father tried so hard to keep him away from. The actual scene where he makes his huge jump could be argued, but it is often believed that this change took place at the hospital. This was his first opportunity to take charge of the `family business.'

Many details, sentences, phrases could go into this review to describe the movie. But, words could never really fill all of the emotions that you experience during this film. Out of all the classic films I've seen, this is by far the most captivating I've experienced. This film isn't recommended for smaller children, one because they wouldn't be able to comprehend as well as early adults would, and two, because there are some things that may be found offensive to a younger crowd. All in all, this movie receives a 10/10 stars for pure genius.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Casablanca (1942)
9/10
simply great
29 April 2004
Casablanca, the `All-American' film. Here is the story of two accidental lovers, a classic story line of any movie. Thinking of a love story you think simple sappy love, yet Casablanca is no where near simple, nor sappy.

Being made in 1942, this film isn't your everyday movie with sex, alcohol and more sex. It actually contains a thing called (GASP!) dialogue to reveal how a character is feeling or to explain a situation. And yes, this does get quite long at times, causing any viewer to become quite confused and on the verge of sleeping. Taking this into consideration, a younger viewer would not appreciate this movie as much as an older viewer would.

Getting used to the ambiance of the movie is the hardest part. After that, you may find yourself at the edge of your seat wanting to know more and more of what happened to this couple, Rick and Ilsa. Rick, a `tough, New York American,' isn't the type of guy that would come off as sympathetic or capable of love. Yet, as the movie progresses, you realize that he was once a lot happier and certain events have hardened his heart. Ilsa happened to come into his life at the wrong time, causing her to choose between Rick and, we later find out, her husband. The movie goes on and, once again, in Casablanca, Rick and Ilsa are reunited. Other than just a love story, people don't really realize that this was also about the political issues going on in 1942, causing people to be able to relate more to the movie then than anyone would be able to now.

Being loved for the past 62 years, this movie is an amazing classic. A great movie for anyone to enjoy and love. I would give this a 9/10 because it is simply great.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
great fun
16 April 2004
Some Like it Hot is a wild and adventurous comedy that anyone can enjoy. Having a plot of two musicians that are looking for a gig once their previous club was raided; they witness a mass murder by the boss and his henchmen. Desperate to flee for their lives, they take a job as two women musicians in a girl's traveling band.

Who other to be in the girls traveling band than Marilyn Monroe, the sexy, seductive, cute and spunky sex icon of the 50s. This, on top of the absolutely hilarious plot, makes for one great movie. Playing off of Marilyn's sexuality, the whole movie is basically based on the Joe and Jerry's attraction and yearns for sugar, yet, obviously, it is out of the question.

Having a very well casted crew and the perfect idea, plot, and quite a hilarious ending, this turns out to be quite an enjoyable movie. Obviously, being based a lot on sexual desire, you may not want your children to watch this movie, but it is very gratifying to any audience of a slightly higher age. If you have heard any positive things of this movie, you have heard right. The only great movies are the ones made in the good ol' black and white days. Overall, this movie receives a 9/10 for everything within it.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
another dramatic love story
8 April 2004
Teens, pressure, new situations and trouble. This is what Jim Stark (James Dean) seemed to always run into.

In going through high school and moving over and over, Jim stark is repetedly trying to avoid being like his father...a chicken. Him and his father don't really seem to have the best father son relationship, it actually seems to be quite destructive and nonexistant. Looking up to his father, he never really gets anything that he needs. Love, affection, trust or safety. Just once Jim just wishes that his father would stand up for himself, but he just can't seem to be man enough to do it.

On his first day at Dawson High, he sees the girl that he fell in love with, Judy, while taken to juvenile. for drunkeness. His eyeing her gets him in a lot of trouble with her gang and her boyfriend Buzz. This, like most, has a classic love story wrapped up in all the drama. One night while on a chicken run, Buzz accidentally dies. Oddly, Judy shows no emotion and seems to be quite taken with Jim and his sincerity.

This movie is a wonderful classic and huge for it's time. It's got and amazing plot and has an uncanny way of relating to teens and bringing out emotion. This movie is great for anyone, and especially great if you love dramatic love stories.

All in all, this movie gets a 10 out of 10, not only for it's perfect casting, but for everything else, as well.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Quite possibly one of the stupidest movies ever made
9 March 2004
Dr. Strange Love…quite possibly one of the stupidest movies ever made.

Made in attempts to be a `comedy,' the reason for all the hype is nowhere to be found.

With all the aspects totaled together, this includes plot, dialogue, etc. this movie comes about 40 bricks short of a load. Having very few entertaining parts and hardly any entertaining content at all, this film hardly qualifies as tolerable. Now you're probably thinking something along the lines of `Well, then why has it been voted the 13th greatest movie of all time?' I have two words for you…Sigmond Freud.

This movie wasn't just your everyday movie with dry humor and a boring plot…it relates back to Freudian Psychology. If you've never studied Freud, you'll realize this guy was about the biggest nut job in the world, but uncannily accurate.

This movie is all about phallic symbols and sexual dominance when you really get down to it, which was, naturally, what Freud was all about. You're probably thinking this is very odd and a bunch of bull. Well, all there is to say is that if you're planning on viewing this movie, study a little bit of Freudian Psychology before hand and you'll understand the only outstanding aspect…symbolism.

Now, as to whether or not you'll like this movie, the only thing to say is that it depends upon your preference. Some people view this movie as dry, dull and boring, while others view it as entertaining and witty. It's hard to tell who will think what.

Personally, I gave this movie a 5/10…Why such a high score? Solely for the few entertaining parts and the very intriguing symbolism it possesses.
5 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rear Window (1954)
8/10
Slow, yet amazingly good
1 March 2004
Rear Window, made by the famous Alfred Hitchcok, has a variety of opinions about it. Many say that it's amazingly wonderful and other just say that it plain sucks. You can easily sway either way, depending on preference.

This may not be as exciting and interesting as psycho, but it definetely has the excitement and suspense. Though the begining is lacking everything and is very slow, the ending makes up for it by far.

The entire movie takes place in one room, an attendent of an apartment

building who's back is facing the rear of other buildings, creating a court yard. While on leave from work, the main character is snooping into the other people's windows and gets a crazy idea.

This is the entire movie. Very slow in the beginning, just introducing the characters and creating a plot, the movie gets exciting when the action starts to happen.

Depending on how long your attention span is depends on whether this

movie is worth while or not. If you can't sit through an hour of drawn out building of a plot, I would not advise that you sit through this movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Psycho (1960)
9/10
is it mystery? is it suspense? no! it's PSYCHO!
20 February 2004
Alfred Hitchcock, born in 1899, is known as the `Master of Suspense.' Becoming a director in 1925, he has been entertaining people ever since. One of the classics, and probably close to the most widely known, is Psycho, made in 1960.

Now putting into fact that they didn't have much to work with concerning special effects in those times, this movie may not be the most frightening ever. But, special effects aren't what Hitchcock was all about. He was a man of mystery and always wanted to keep tension between the viewer and the film. He could create the perfect scene by moving the angle of the shot just one certain way. Filming techniques and plot seem to be his forte.

In Psycho, one method that Hitchcock used to create a dramatic scene is the placement of the camera shots. For instance, in a "get away," he would film the character while they were in a car, then show a scene out of the car. He repeated this same idea, coming closer to their face every time it re-entered the car...so close that it almost makes the viewer uncomfortable.

Another aspect of Hitchcock's movies that makes them very memorable are the sets and the way that the characters move, talk and act. For example, a character may stutter, fidget, or talk fast when presented with certain situations. With sets and designs, he always tried to play with the look and feel of a scene. The mansion that was used in this movie created a very mysterious aura around it. This could be because of the placement, which was, on top of a dark hill with many ascending steps. It could also be because the lighting was always dim and never really showed the details, creating wonder and mystery.

Obtaining an overall 8.6/10 stars, this movie is clearly brilliantly made, being loved by millions. With drama, suspense, a good plot and a great director, you've created a masterpiece.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic Christmas
28 December 2003
Christmas time…the one time of the year when you can get any present that you want. If mom and dad fail, there's always one sure-fire way to get your present…Santa Claus!

So much eagerness and chaos during the Christmas season with parents decorating and preparing for Christmas day and all of the children building up all of their anticipation and excitement for one special present they've been dying for.

But in little Ralphie's case, `you'll shoot your eye out' is all he seems to be getting.

In the movie `A Christmas Story,' there is a little boy named Ralphie Parker who lives with his parents and his little brother Randy. As the Christmas season rolls around, there's only one thing on Ralphie's mind…the Red Ryder BB gun. His dream toy and only desire. He wants so badly to possess such a precious object.

The movie is based upon Ralphie's desire for the Red Ryder BB gun and his plot as to how to get someone to buy him one. It also throws in a few comedic scenes around in the process. A few are; one, with the neighborhood bully, Scut Farkus, and his little toad, Grover Dill, chasing Ralphie and his friends around before and after school, and, two, good ol' `triple dog dares' that result in having Schwarts getting his tongue stuck to the flag pole at their elementary school. Also, another classic point in the movie is the conflict between Ed Bumpus' blood hounds and Mr. Parker.

Made in 1983, this movie has been great for 20 years. Known as one of the greatest Christmas movies, `A Christmas Story' can be enjoyed by families at Christmas, or any time of the year, all over the world.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Seriously...it's unreal
16 December 2003
Warning: Spoilers
*Spoiler* When most people think of Christmas, they think of Santa Claus, lights, presents, Christmas trees, Jesus Christ, Mary, Joseph, etc. But, do you ever stop to think of the things that you're given? How much you're blessed? Not often. Yet, `It's a Wonderful Life' isn't like the common `happy go lucky' Christmas story. It brings out the fact that you should maybe stop and think of what you've been given…how much God blesses your life, no matter how `rich' you really think that you are.

The main character in the movie `It's a Wonderful Life,' George Bailey, grew up in a small town with his father and little brother. Ever since he was a small boy, he'd wanted to get out of that town, so he got a job and saved up enough money to go to college, planning to travel the world. Yet, unfortunately, his father ended up dying around the time that he wanted to go to college, forcing him to take over the building and Loan Company that his father owned. So, he gave the money to his brother who then went to college instead. Eventually, he married his wife, Mary, and had four wonderful children. But, as he found out that $8,000 was missing and he could possibly go to jail, he kept thinking about how horrible his life was…how his house was drafty, he had too many kids that he couldn't support and give wonderful things to, he didn't have a lot of money, he never went to college, etc. So there's an angel who comes down to get his wings and shows George what his life would be like had he not been born. Needless to say, he realized that he touched a lot of people's lives and also realized how much he loved his family, how wonderful his children were and how grateful he was for his life as it had previously been.

Clearly, this movie is very wonderful, because it was voted #26 of 250. It takes a lot to jerk emotions out of the audience and that's exactly what this movie did. It made you a variety of emotions.

This movie not only found every emotion that it could, but it has good plot and a good moral. It contains every aspect that a great movie should possess and watching this movie would be worthwhile to anyone of any age.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
good, squeaky clean fun!
11 December 2003
First and foremost, let me say that if you're selective about your taste in movies, and you happen to be someone that is into action, action and more action…this movie may put you to sleep.

Miracle on 34th St. is focused on fun with your family and having faith in the wonderful things that you used to enjoy as a child. You could say this has a `cuddly' feel to it, and is a perfect example of Christmas joy.

Made in 1947, this stars Maureen O'Hare as Doris Walker, Natalie Wood as Susan Walker, Edmund Gwenn as Kris Kringle and John Payne as Fred Gailey.

The movie starts out with Kris walking down the streets of New York, while the people are starting to decorate for the Christmas season. He notices the annual Macy's parade and heads over to see the floats in preparation.

Noticing that the Santa they have hired is drunk, he goes to inform to the head director. After finding her, he discovers that it's Doris Walker.

Kris ends up filling in for the Santa and, since he did such a good job, he gets hired as the seasonal Santa at the local Macy's location.

When Doris returns home, she discovers that her daughter, Susan, is with her neighbor, Fred Gailey, watching the parade.

Doris is a headstrong woman who doesn't believe in fairy tales, nor `childish myths,' such as Santa Claus. Suzie, being her daughter and under the influence of her mother, also is a firm believer in fact and doesn't have faith in such things. So, from the moment Kris discovers there's no sight of Santa in their minds, he attempts to make a believer of Doris, Suzie and the rest of the world. Miracle on 34th St. is a good, wholesome movie that everyone can enjoy, yet doesn't have any of the unnecessary cussing, violence, or sex scenes that you see in the movies today, which makes this classic spectacular.

If you enjoy Christmas and the good cheer that is attached, you'll love Miracle on 34th St. It's a `feel good' movie that anyone of any age can enjoy over and over again.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Fun
27 November 2003
Steve Martin and John Candy put on a good show in the movie "Planes, Trains and Automobiles."

This movie is the story of two characters, Neal Page (Steve Martin) and Del Griffith (John Candy) who meet coincidentally while Neal is struggling to catch a cab for a 6pm flight in New York City, just days before Thanksgiving. Del ended up getting the cab and, with a layover at the airport, they reunite when they discover they were both trying to catch the same flight.

Going from a layover to a cancellation from snow, they're forced to stay in the city until the next available flight. Del notifies Neal that he should probably make reservations at a motel and promises he'll hook him up with a room in the same motel that he'll be checking in at.

When they show up at the motel, there's only one room left, so they ended up having to share.

This comedic drama is carried on throughout the movie, while this odd couple tries to find a way back home before Thanksgiving dinner.

"Planes, Trains and Automobiles" was overall a great comedy that had good humor and just the right amount of comical tension/build up to make the movie extremely enjoyable.

The rating for this movie is "R," signifying that this movie may not be appropriate for audiences under the age of 17, which is, infact, true in this case.

One of the only inappropriate aspects, but a large one, is the language. If you take offence to crude language, this movie isn't for you. Even though the language is mainly in one scene, the scene uses extreme words repeatedly as an exaggeration and portrayal of how frustrating traveling can be, especially on the holidays.

If this is you, you may not feel that this movie is as enjoyable as others. But, for those of you that don't take offense to things such as language, this is a thoroughly entertaining film that's good fun for holiday, or anytime, watching.

"Planes, Trains and Automobiles" is a comic relief that many can relate to with all the holiday chaos and frustration. So, if you're looking for a good laugh, you can pick up this movie and enjoy a favorite American past time...laughing at others in their comic portrayal of frustration and pain.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Searchers (1956)
5/10
another western...
24 November 2003
There have been many westerns made throughout the history of the movies. You have your cowboys and Indians chasing each other, exciting chase and fight scenes and some sort of a plot or another. What was just described is your typical western movie. Yet, `The Searchers' didn't seem to follow this generality of movie making.

Although there were many negative things about the movie, it stepped away from the `norm' and that is a very positive aspect to the film.

The opening scene has a door opening, and the story begins. `The Searchers' is a tale of a tragic event, which causes a little girl, Debbie (Natalie Wood), to get taken away from her Uncle, Ethan (John Wayne), and brother, Martin (Geoffrey Hunter), among her immediate family. Once Ethan and Marty notice that Debbie was missing, they take off by horse and search for her for years to come. This is about the extent of the plot. Doesn't sound very exciting, and well, to be honest, sometimes it really isn't. The movie didn't necessarily make you lose interest in it; it was just slow and very repetitive sometimes.

`The Searchers' seemed to skip from scene to scene very abruptly and it would introduce characters into a new scene without even mentioning them, leaving you to wonder where they came from and how they got there.

`The Searchers' seemed to often skip from idea to idea as well. There would be something happening in one scene and there would be questions coming up in your mind, such as, `why are they going there?' or `where did that come from?' For example, in one part of the film, Ethan and a few others went out into the desert on horseback, and while they were leaving, Mrs. Edwards went after them saying something to the extent of `no Ethan, don't go!' Yet, it doesn't explain why he's leaving or what he's leaving for.

Overall, the movie was rather confusing, yet at the same time it was still very well done.

Another issue the movie had was the acting. Half of the acting was tolerable, but the other half wasn't even nearly close to that. I think the worst actor/actress in the entire movie was, one of the daughters, Lucy. She was random and she had no expressions. Harsh, but her acting talent was non-existent. John Wayne and Geoffrey Hunter are about the only ones with any talent in their body, so it seems. So, as discussed thus far, there are problems with acting and the portrayal of scenes and ideas. Though, the cinematography of the movie was wonderful. The sets were well done and well placed, while the costumes of the characters were also portrayed very well.

`The Searchers' had perfect music, as well. It's been said that, in plays, `a good pit is never heard.' Well, the same idea goes for movies. If the musicality of the movie is just right, nothing will stick out, and that is exactly what happened in this movie. It was placed at the right times and it never stuck out, giving the movie just the right zing to it.

So, in short, `The Searchers' is lacking in acting ability and plot, but the overall feel of the film is what makes the balance perfect and is what makes it become a great film. Possessing the title of one of the best westerns ever made is one name that should stay with `The Searchers.' Even though the movie is slow at times, it is definitely worthwhile to watch. Opening with a clever beginning scene, it does just the opposite in the latter, so with a door closing, the plot has finally wrapped and the film has ended.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hannah, Her Sisters and their drama...
23 November 2003
`God, she's beautiful.' It starts with a caption and begins the odd tale of a semi-dysfunctional family.

Hannah's one of three sisters, the other two being Lee and Holly, that are so alike yet so different at the same time. Hannah was previously married to a hypochondriac, Mickey, yet things didn't work out and the marriage ended. Meeting her new husband, Elliot, it introduces us into the movie when her and Elliot are working on their 3rd year of marriage.

Little does Hannah know, Elliot is developing a thing for her sister Lee. Lee is a free-spirit type of girl who lives with her boyfriend, Frederick, whom she is very much in love with.

Then there's Holly. She's a scattered woman who just got off of cocaine, struggling to find a career with her friend April.

This is the basic foundation of the movie's plot. From the beginning to end, it unravels the string in which the characters get caught in, in their attempts to survive problem after problem.

`Hanna and Her Sisters' is a good-hearted comedy that's focused around their thanksgiving gatherings, as a family, and the constant problems and drama that happen in between.

Even though this movie may not be appropriate for some audiences, for the majority, it is an odd comedy that's good for any time that you want a movie of constant drama and fun.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Citizen Kane (1941)
10/10
Citizen Kane...the genius of all movies
16 November 2003
It starts at the ending and then makes its way from the beginning to the end through multiple viewpoints. Not a very odd concept in 2003, but in 1941, when `Citizen Kane' was made, this was a very rare and not well thought of way to make a movie.

`Citizen Kane' appeared to be very ahead of its time with the structure of the story to the lighting effects/shadowing used throughout it.

`Citizen Kane' is the story of a small boy that is taken away from his parents (with the permission of his mother) by a businessman and the story of his life after that.

Growing up with his birth parents, he didn't really have a lot going for him except the love of his parents. Yet, when he grew up with his new `family' he had the chance to inherit many different things, yet he chose a small newspaper, called the Inquirer.

Among the millions of dollars he was already worth, his newspaper started to become big and the movie portrays his adventures in relationships with him and with others throughout his life.

When the director (Orson Wells.also the man character of the movie) and creators of `Citizen Kane' were making the film, they almost wanted to give up because they though no one would want to watch the movie, nor would they like it. Yet, in reality, `Citizen Kane' became known as the best movie in history and the influence of every movie today.

The movie is very unique in many ways and it's uniqueness pays off in the end.

You may be skeptical of the power and influence of this movie during the first half, but as long as you pay attention and put thought into the movie, it comes out as one of the best movies you've ever seen.

Once you've watched this movie, you'll have an entirely different perspective on movies and when you get out of them in general.

`Citizen Kane' is a bizarre, though provoking movie that some may not like, but as long as you're someone with the ability to think for yourself, you should thoroughly enjoy this movie.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible doesn't even begin to describe it...
15 October 2003
Many movies have been made throughout history. There have been excellent movies, decent movies, bad movies and terrible movies. Well, the movie `They died with their boots on' falls under terrible.

`They died with their boots on' was supposed to be based on a true story of a `heroic' soldier, George Armstrong Custer, and his `last stand.' Though, as you watch the movie, you discover that the movie isn't historically accurate at all.

There were one or two parts that actually happened in the historical version of Custer's last stand, for example, that he met his wife Libby. Though, that seems to be about the extent of the historical accuracy in that movie.

Even though this movie was made in 1942, the `special effects' of the movie seemed to be lacking, as well. There were a couple of scenes that were impressive for the time of the movie, but most seemed fake and not well done. For example, the owl in the `Romeo and Juliet' scene looked more like a child's stuffed doll than a living animal.

There are things that wouldn't happen at all, but since Hollywood got a hold of it, it was blown way out of proportion. For instance, the fact that Custer just showed up in the training quarters of the Army dressed as a colonel and not even signed up properly. Also, while they were fighting at Little Big Horn, the Native Americans came and, according to the movie, charged at us. We shot at them and instead of attempting to fight back while injured or just falling off their horse, the entire horse came down with them to give it the `dramatic' effect.

There are many different things could be said about this movie, but to be brutally honest, continuing with this review would be a waste of time. It wasn't necessarily a `bad' movie. It was good in the sense of entertainment value, but it became terrible once you were informed that it was supposed to be based on actual events. In watching this movie, by the second half, it made you pray that every second of film that was played afterward was the last.

So, overall, for entertainment's sake, the movie was decent. But, for any sane viewer of this movie, their last comment would most likely be, `The best part of the whole movie was the ending.' Not because it had a surprise, wonderful ending, but because it was the end.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed