Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Started high, ended low
2 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The Ones who live (TOWL) started excellent, I almost believed they got them out of the hole they wrote themselves into, but it ended quickly. Episode 4 introduced completely different Rick just to have some unnecessary drama and from there series quality nose-dived into absurd mess.

Episode 1 introduced some themes that I thought would be explored - self-sacrifice, living for something more than yourself, time for "monsters to fight monsters" must end so there can come life after the war on the dead, but nothing of it came to be. Instead, we got series where the moral was - Michone is always right (even when she might be wrong), Michone always knows what to do, Michone will save the day - it took days for Michone to save Rick from CRM, it took years for Rick just to cut off his hand in just another failure. In the end there was no dilemma for "heroes", they just killed everyone, and writers made it kind of justified by rushed ending. Let's not forget that the military consisted of B's, meaning that those soldiers weren't bad guys, they just were people who followed orders.

Love story of Rick and Michone was done in a cheesy way, that wasn't satisfying to look at. They acted like teenagers not like seasoned survivors of apocalypse. That combined with "Michone knows everything best" and "killing anyone who is in a way of them doing whatever they want" made main protagonists seem selfish and bad.

Rick's hand was nod to comics but didn't have any impact on his character. In comics after the prison, when Rick was on his own with Carl, he couldn't even open a can of food, he depended on his 9 years old son for that. That made a loss of hand impactful, Rick had to learn to depend on other people, there wasn't any other option. In episode 6 Rick left his prosthetic behind, why would he do that? It was just stupid.

Overall, everything was great or ok except for the writing of the show. That was one of the biggest flaws of the original show, as it transformed in something else almost every season, Rick changed his character almost every season (kill them all - we don't kill anyone - kill them all - we all can live together etc.), dialogs also were bad on a lot of occasions. TOWL also had bad dialog towards the end ("love doesn't die", "I thought I was alone, then I realized I wasn't" - some of examples). AMC never learns from their mistakes; they still refuse to hire real talent for writing the show.

By the way I returned to franchise to see Andrew Lincoln reprise the role that he was excellent in and after episode 1 I thought that this time they are making push to have Andrew in awards consideration but after the episode 6 I know that that won't happen.

They made the show too inconsistent for any major award consideration in any category.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Estonia (2023– )
10/10
Respectful
5 December 2023
"Estonia" is one of the best "based on true story" tv series ever made. It's not done like action-thriller about ships sinking or like court-drama with monologues that try too hard to be epic. No, it's respectfully done story about devastating tragedy and that tragedy's influence on society. What's the most important for me, creators respected tragedy by not making speculations about it's causes or how it went down, respected victims and their families by not turning "Estonia" in action schlock and respected us - viewers - by giving multiple points of view on these events for us to better understand why events after the tragedy played out like they did in real life.

"Estonia" is a show about conscience, about world where nothing is simple, even though it should be. We can see how blame can be shifted in every direction, while almost everyone is set to avoid acceptance of it. At some point we can start wonder: "Does those theories (explosion, submarine, other ship, military etc) about ships sinking are concieved based on some real evidence or on the basis of some loud parties that wanted to shift blame elswhere, to redirect grieving people away from them by making up false stories and false enemies?" It is important to point out that series creators do not hit you over the head with moral, but it is in there, audience must be opened to see it, audience must listen to understand the messages series are trying to get across.

I admire how series creators handled themes of the series. I respect series creators for the job they done.

Actors and crew also did marvelous job!

If I had to say just a few words about these series, then I would say: "Estonia" is a superb tv series.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointment
6 August 2020
This movie has an interesting premise. Beginning of the movie was good, but later on it lost its charm. Simply because there were never introduced the rules of what was happening. Filmmakers probably wanted it to be ambiguous, but it came across as not thought through. There is quite good buildup for the mystery of "dying tomorrow", but it has no payoff. The ideas that filmmakers are presenting to viewers aren't original or too much of thought provoking material. Overall, I was disappointed. Premise, cast, good reviews from critics - it was all for nothing in the end.
76 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Misinterpreted source material
14 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, the great things about the movie:
  • 3 lead actors did a good job, especially a male lead. Davis Suharevskis was great. His casting was a home run.
  • Locations were perfect. Filmmakers were able to show beauty of Latvian/Latgalian nature.
And now not so great things:
  • Movie was based on Gunars Janovskis novel of same name. Novel was very different in tone and ideas it wanted to tell. It was very down to earth, while movie was over the top, at one point turning into Quentin Tarantino movie. Viesturs Kairiss failed to tell someone else's story. However, thats only a problem if you have read the book, otherwise, you can still enjoy this movie as an completely different tale.
  • Director chose to make this movie about Latgale, however, the book's events took place in Semigalian side of Jekabpils. Director also chose to make movie in Latgalian. It was his artistic right, however, a lot of actors couldn't speak Latgalian. It was very obvious and distracting. Gundars Abolins was a great example of actor struggling with speaking Latgalian. Director should have had all latgalian cast or should have thought of different approach to spoken language of the movie.
  • Tone of the movie was inconsistent, as it shifted from comedy to drama without any indications of doing so. Especially towards the end of the movie.
  • Some shots were out of focus. It was distracting at times.
  • And the ending. Ending was just dumb. So dumb. I know it is nitpicking, but a boat couldn't make the trip it did. I don't mean the sea, but Daugava. It just couldn't get through hydroelectric station on river Daugava. Viesturs Kairiss added that nonsense ending, that was so disrespectful to source material.


Despite all, this movie is worth a watch, its far from being really bad. Especially, if you are not familiar with source material. However, if you have read the novel, then be prepared for something completely different.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dunkirk (2017)
6/10
Masterful cinematography
27 July 2017
Nolan's craftsmanship is outstanding. However, movie lacks captivating story and connection with characters. There are only few moments. Other wise, it just seemed like most expensive reenactment for documentary movie. It certainly wasn't what I am looking in fictional movies (you all do understand that this was fiction? Based on true story, yet fictional. Dunkirk happened, yet not like in this movie. It was a lot more messier and bloodier. In the end this seemed like big budget fan film for one WW2 battle). Tom Hardy's performance was very Bane-ish (after watching the movie you'll know what I mean), so if he wasn't pushed on by studio, just because movie needed big name to be in this big budget movie, then Nolan made mistake by casting him. Would be better with someone with no name (at least no name at the moment). Must admit that even I didn't like movie story wise, I admired cinematography. All shots and effects were outstanding, I wish there would be more movies like this every year. It was so nice to enjoy those practical effects. If there was CGI (there definitely was CGI in the movie), it wasn't obvious. Overall, movie felt original and fresh. It was great attempt from Nolan. Can't wait for his next movie.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lords of Riga (2015)
1/10
Drone shots and nothing more
16 June 2017
It's movie without any plot or message. I saw it on event of other movie, this was an opening of the night. I didn't know anything about this movie, that's the reason why I had problems. At first I wasn't sure whether it was documentary or not, because everybody in the movie is acting. They are portraying somebody they would like others to see in them, it's very unnatural. Next thing is message of the movie - there is none, those 26 minutes tells nothing about Riga or bike courier culture. There are only some scenes of them speaking on radio that are kind of funny. But that's all there is. If you do not know people involved with this movie, then you should avoid this movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed