Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Similar to the first, which is not a bad thing in the slightest
3 May 2009
Wandering Ginza Butterfly 2: She-Cat Gambler reviewed by Tim Irwin

Along with the first Wandering Ginza Butterfly movie, Synapse Films has released its sequel. Once again the transfer is clean and neat, and the subtitles are once again very well done. And once again, the sequel is basically the same movie as the first time around, but with Sonny Chiba added to the mix and gambling taking the place of hustling pool.

Nami (played again by Meiko Kaji), is once again wandering around Tokyo and the surrounding areas. She's a professional gambler, following in the footsteps of her wrongly murdered father. She's still a tough cookie, and still quite beautiful. Her first act is to save a girl sold into prostitution. She rescues her and takes her back to Tokyo to work as a hostess (without the sex) at a club run by an old friend of Nami's. She also runs into a no-good gambler thug and helps him out, putting him forever in her debt. Then she runs into Sonny Chiba, this time playing a character named Ryuji (like the first movie, but not the same character). He runs the only other prostitution ring outside of the Aoshida Company, which is the evil corporation of Yakuza this time around. But he's a nice guy and very kind to his girls.

In any case, things go okay until Aoshida starts muscling in on the club and Ryuji's racket. It doesn't help matters that he might have had something to do with Nami's father's death. Eventually everything ends up in another orgy of violence and destruction.

Up until that point, though, the film is again basically a Yakuza drama. This time, though, there's more comedy thrown in, even some slapstick stuff with Chiba and the no-good gambler. There's even a little more nudity, though most of it is still in pinups on the walls. The violence, however brief it may be, is a fair bit more bloody and spurty than the previous entry.

I wasn't sure if it was supposed to be a sequel or a prequel, since some events line up in both films, such as Nami's father being dead. In the end I decided it was more like the Yakuza Deka films, also starring Chiba, where from the first to the second we basically get the same characters in slightly different situations. It's almost like alternate universes where the same people exist yet get into different trouble.

No matter, I still quite enjoyed the film. It's nice having the thirty plus years since its release to appreciate the two almost as companion pieces. Chiba adds quite a bit this time around, as his presence always does. The directing has a few more stylish flourishes that Kazuhiko Yamaguchi must have learned between the films. Kaji is once again wonderful as the same character she almost always plays. She's tough and independent, a wanderer in the rough streets of Tokyo. She's pretty but able to handle herself, not taking any crap from anyone. Plus, at the end of the film it's all slicey-dicey goodness.

This film is perhaps a little better than the first one, but as a sequel it doesn't have quite the same effect. Since both films are 86 minutes long it's no problem watching them together; a double dose of Kaji never hurt anyone. Well worth watching.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A worthy addition to Meiko Kaji's filmography now on DVD
2 May 2009
Wandering Ginza Butterfly Reviewed by Tim Irwin This is the first time this film has been released on DVD and I am quite excited. It's one of the many movies that the Toei Company made in the early 1970's about the Yakuza and various gangster activities in Tokyo. It features Meiko Kaji, the star of numerous franchises during the 1970's. She was not only Lady Snowblood before Uma Thurman and Quentin Tarantino came along, she was also in Stray Cat Rock: Sex Hunter and other films from that franchise, and she was Prisoner 701 in the Joshuu series. Not to mention the various Kinji Fukasaku films she starred in.

And now the folks at Synapse Films recently put together this transfer and presented us with another one of Meiko's films. Be careful going into it, though, because if you're expecting something like Yakuza Deka (with Sonny Chiba, who starred in Wandering Ginza Butterfly 2 with Meiko) you might be disappointed. This is a Yakuza film, to be sure, but it's more of a drama than an action or gangster movie.

Meiko is Nami and is again in prison. Same name, same story as the Joshuu films, but no matter. This time she's just been released after three years hard time. She heads back to Tokyo to meet up with her uncle, who owns a billiard hall and taught her how to hustle pool. She gets involved with a local semi-gangster, Ryuji, who hooks the various sex clubs up with hostesses. Since she's rather attractive (and tough) she soon becomes one of the best hostesses around: pretty enough to attract clientèle and mean enough to make sure they pay.

But of course the Owada clan is muscling in on the Ginza neighborhood, and soon the club's owner finds she is being bullied into selling the club to Owada or forfeiting it outright. This is when Nami gets a chance to pay back the kindness shown to her by Ryuji and the club's Madam.

There is quite a bit going on in the story, including several side plots having to do with Nami's past and how she ended up in prison. The first 75 minutes of the film are almost solely concerned with these flashbacks and her current hostessing. This is not a bad thing, but if you're expecting geysers of blood at every turn you might become slightly bored.

Then, in the final ten minutes, the film erupts in an orgy of violence. It's almost like the recent films of Takeshi Kitano, where everything is calm and peaceful before exploding in brief and brutal violence. The main difference is that here the small amount of violence follows the same style as Lady Snowblood, with the slashing and stabbing. One might also expect a fair amount of sex and nudity, much like Female Prisoner #701: Scorpion. However, almost all the nudity is discreet and only present in pinup posters on a wall.

From a production standpoint, Wandering Ginza Butterfly is very similar to other Japanese gangster films from the same time period. There are moments of stylish directing, such as the camera that searches the background until it finds the one person it wants to portray. Other than that everything merely exists to push the story along. Kaji has the physical presence and beauty to convincingly play Nami, and the other actors also turn in fine performances.

From a DVD standpoint the transfer is very well done. The Japanese mono soundtrack is present with optional English subtitles, and the picture is very clear and crisp, especially for an older foreign film.

This is definitely worth catching, especially for those hardcore fans of Meiko Kaji. Keep in mind, however, that it's not one of your standard pinky violence flicks; here the blood and nudity is kept fairly well under wraps. Regardless, it's short, sweet and climaxes with a payoff worthy of any fan of the genre.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wandering
2 March 2004
Not that great. Sure, only five other people have voted for it at the time of my writing. Maybe they were all in it. Anyway, it gets lost after a fairly strong first portion, then deteriorates, falling away from its main themes, and then goes nowhere for far too long. Mediocre. It starts out focusing on the patients themselves, then goes on to talking about what they are doing. Doesn't exactly give them all equal time, and doesn't tell us enough background. We have little idea of what plagued some of them, which would have enabled us to sympathize more with them. Uneven, even for a documentary. Only worth watching for extra credit in a psyche class.

6 out of 10.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Phantom Empire (1987 Video)
3/10
Hahahahaha!!!
8 January 2004
This is hilarious. A classic camp movie, it's just awful in every way. The acting is half a step above terrible, the soundtrack is horrendous, and the directing is barely mediocre. Yet it was still fun, for me at least. The plot alone was enough to watch it. It should have been called "Attack of the Amazon Women from Outer Space Who Have Robots and Who Fight Underground Cannibals and Capture Normal People." Absolutely hilarious. Enjoyable if you're a fan of campy films, but still just a 3 out of 10.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bound (1996)
8/10
Cool
2 January 2004
This movie is very cool, quite well shot and directed by the Wachowski's. The writing is also above average, and it makes for a very interesting film. But the unrated version. Why? Only a few seconds were added to the sex scene, and nothing in it would warrant an NC-17 rating, so I suspect they were too lazy to send it in to the MPAA, and also lured by the mystique of "Unrated." Anyway, very enjoyable, it makes me wish the brothers would do more movies. 8 out of 10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Camp Blood 2 (2000 Video)
1/10
Wow
1 January 2004
This is terrible, absolutely terrible. About the worst acting ever. My friends and I thought it looked promising at first, as it looked the way our films may look, but if they turn out anything like this please shoot us. The directing, while not abysmal, was barely mediocre, and everything proved this a horrendous disaster. Amazing. It is almost as bad as Final Stab. Never watch either one. 2 out of 10.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bully (2001)
5/10
Okay, it's time to write a review...
16 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Now that I have finished the movie and read through the assorted materials and links on IMDB, I am ready to write my own review. It will be split into two sections, the first a look at the artistic content, the second my personal feelings. If you don't wish to read someone else's opinions, please skip part two. Spoilers may follow.

To start with, this film is indubitably very interesting. Several teenagers gang up on the neighborhood bully and decide to finish him off. Clark successful directed it, all except for the one scene in which he puts the camera in the middle of their group, and decides to turn it around and around. It's unfortunate most of the actors/actresses were rather new to the game. Their performances suffice for the most part, but at times their amateurism seeps through. I don't think I can really complain about the script, as it is based on a true story, so I will leave that for part two. It seems as if Clark were trying to make a point through shocking his audience, just as Aronofsky did in "Requiem for a Dream", but the comparison would be a crime to make, as "Requiem for a Dream" is a masterpiece, and "Bully" seems as if it wants to make a point, but can't quite decide what it is or how to make it. As a final note, the fact that it was filmed in 23 days is quite astonishing.

Please skip the following section if you are likely to be offended.

Now, did I like this movie? No. I hated it. I abhorred it, I detested it. I did not like a single one of the kids, except for the hit man, but I didn't really like his acting. I felt a bit of sympathy for Marty, and extreme hatred for Bobby, especially with his sexual violence toward women, and also toward Marty. I didn't like Lisa's acting, and didn't really care for her character either. Also, I couldn't stand Donnie, and although Heather was hot, I didn't much like her either. The reason for this is probably because they are just empty shells of people, having had their brains eaten out by their constant use of drugs. Such emptiness and hollowness really bothered me. Another aspect I didn't like was the way it bothered me. Not quite disturbed me, just really bothered me. "Requiem for a Dream" and "A Clockwork Orange" disturbed me, but in a good way in that it made me ponder the questions set before me. This movie seemed to just show these dead people walking around and smoking and dropping acid and getting in on with whomever whenever and wherever for no real reason. By the way, it definitely would have been rated NC-17, thanks in no small part to the sexual violence and constant nudity. I also didn't like the script. It seemed to focus for a bit on the kids and their depravity, then for a bit on the bully, then for a bit on their murderous actions, then for a brief moment on the consequences. It never really seemed to focus closely on one aspect. To conclude part two of this review, this movie bothered me greatly, and I despised it.

To finish this review, I will attempt to give the movie my rating of it. Based mostly upon the artistic talent presented, but without ignoring my personal feelings towards it, I give it a 7 out of 10, or, to be more exact, a 6.7 out of 10.

P.S. Does anyone in Florida wear clothes?
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great fun
3 July 2003
I just saw this movie, and had a great time. Once again, The Terminator is back, along with an extremely hot T-X, played by Kristanna Loken. Great action scenes, raw violence, and more than adequate acting carry it very well. Not as original as the first two, but still comes up with creative fight scenes. A fair amount of amusing dialogue is also present. Overall, very enjoyable, and quite well made. I would recommend it to most people, and give it an 8.6 out of 10, or 9 out of 10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
28 Days Later (2002)
8/10
Enjoyable
2 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
"Possible Mild Spoilers Ahead: Proceed with caution."

I just saw this film. After greatly liking Romero's "Night of the Living Dead" and "Dawn of the Dead," I was expecting a slight twist on zombies, from what I had read in reviews and so forth. And that's what I got. Quite scary, rather tense, and greatly atmospheric, the movie, filmed on digital video, succeeds in packing a punch. However, it was this same filming that irritated me. Unlike the calm, almost peaceful directing of "Rosemary's Baby," "28 Days Later..." insists on constantly flashing images at us. So quick and fast, it plays almost like an MTV music video. It greatly bothered me, unlike "Lola Rennt," which used the same technique masterfully. Nevertheless, I still greatly enjoyed it. Being a fan of horror films, I wasn't disappointed. The girl with whom I saw it didn't particularly care for the ending. But, I ask, how else can a zombie horror film end? The other endings they filmed are also possible, with Jim dying and so forth, but the best way, in my opinion, is to leave it to the audience to imagine them being rescued. In conclusion, it's not the best horror or zombie flick, but does add a new dimension to zombies. However, this was slightly offset by the directing, which irritated me constantly. In purely technical terms, I would give this a 7 out of 10, but with my bias toward this genre, my final score is 8 out of 10.

P.S. Why the male nudity? And so much of it. Is that something British?

Oh, well.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Worth watching? Of course.
15 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers may be present. Reader Discretion Advised.

After reading several reviews of this film, you may wonder if it is worth your time and money to see. The answer would have to be an emphatic 'Yes.' Is it awesome? Amazingly so. Is it good? Yes, but not great.

To start with, the action sequences alone are worth everything. One scene in particular, in which Neo fights a multitude of Agent Smith's, may well be one of the most spectacular scenes in cinema history. I couldn't keep my jaw from dropping throughout.

In addition, one of the best car chases ever, if it can be called that, is also amazingly spectacular. Jumping from cars onto other cars and destroying all of them was fantastic.

Other fight scenes, including ones with hand weapons, unlike "The Matrix," are similarly amazing.

Now for some moderately bad news. The story is far from good. It seems convoluted at times, and at other times contrived to be more confusing and "thought provoking" than it may really be. Some of the dialogue consists solely of characters speaking with large words, which, even if understood, fail to convey any true meaning.

In addition, the sex scene is a little lengthy, and, while I believe it is necessary to show the consummation of Neo and Trinity's relationship, seems to detract from the film.

In spite of these errors, "The Matrix Reloaded" is fantastic to watch, containing the best fight scenes ever. The previous honor belonged to "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon," but this far eclipses everything it did.

In conclusion, it is well worth watching, and, but for a few story and script flaws, would have been a great movie. Without the special effects, the most I could give it would be a seven. However, with them, it earns an 8 out of 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ring (2002)
9/10
Outstanding, as well as scary
31 October 2002
A very well made film that I enjoyed greatly. Scarier (if it is possible) than The Shining and Psycho. Creates a tremendous atmosphere of intensity and fright. Do not go alone. One fault, if it can be called one, is the lack of levity to release built up tension, but if you let yourself be scared, you will have a lot more fun. It also has a rather good ending for a horror/thriller movie. Altogether a wonderful experience, rating a 9/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed