Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
This Movie is About....
27 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This excellent movie is clearly about the stupidity and loathsomeness of the human species and the self-inflicted extinction that it will eventually receive and deserve as the inescapable JUSTICE inherent in EXISTENCE.

When Klaatu attempts to explain the workings of the space vessel to Bobby, an ignorant yokel, typical of American stupidity, exclaims "keep going mister he's fallin' for it!" laughing in his ignorance.

When Klaatu begins talking REALITY as a response to a reporter's interview question, the reporter gets uncomfortable and cuts him off then moves on because no one wants to hear REALITY or TRUTH, but rather let's remain ignorant because ignorance is bliss while we go over the cliff into self-inflicted Extinction.

When the army kills Klaatu, they feel the problem has been solved because that's the way humans, especially American's, deal with a problem. Shoot it, kill it, problem solved!

When Klaatu at the end states "pardon me for being blunt" it's because he's appalled at the stupidity and ignorance he's found among humanity and has to throw REALITY in their face because they don't deserve anything better and his tone betrays his futility in attempting to reason with swine who fail to see the pearls thrown to them for their benefit, pearls that will be wasted in the cesspool that is Humanity.

The movie is clearly a statement about the pathetic qualities of Homo Sapien as played out against a Savior that's arrived hopelessly attempting, in a wasted effort, to save them from their pathetic selves.

In the 1950's Exxon researched that global warming would eventually threaten human existence but they buried the memo and kept it secret because quarterly profit was more important than the demise of Humanity. That says it all! That's who we are, that's what we do, we kill, lie, cheat, all in a pathetic grubbing for money.

That's what this movie is about and what it reveals.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Most Graphically Erotic Scene that Should Be More Controversial
6 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Although much controversy attaches to Xuxa's near seduction of the 12 year old boy (and she does lay naked on him in one scene), the really interesting scene that should truly be much more controversial is the boy's fantasy while he masturbates as he imagines having sex with the character played by Matilde Mastranghi. It may only be his masturbation fantasy but the scene was actually filmed with the boy and Mastranghi both completely nude and he's laying between her legs as if they're actually (and who knows?) having sex. She has her legs around the boy's body as he's humping her and she's embracing him. Xuxa's encounter with the boy was not nearly as graphic!

Xuxa's pedophile encounter with the boy achieved so much controversy because she later became hostess of a children's program which naturally clashed with the image she later promoted. And she drew attention to that pedophile scene by attempting to remove all copies of the movie from circulation. Her attempt to remove the movie from circulation backfired because of the notoriety and made her more controversial.

Marcelo Ribeiro, the boy actor, when later interviewed as an adult said that Xuxa was pretty, but "wow, Oh my God!, Matilde Mastranghi what a very womanly woman!" It seems that as a boy he was quite impressed by Mastranghi's womanly charms since he commented about her with such glowing enthusiasm many years later as an adult.

In his first movie, "Eros, the God of Love" when he was 11 years old, he said he couldn't control himself and they taped his genitals to hold down and hide his erections in the sex scenes. He didn't have any tape in the "Love, Strange, Love" because he claimed to have learned how to control himself. But he also said that "on a movie set many things happen that could be awkward." Yes, I'm sure that as he lay completely nude on Mastranghi (a woman that impressed him and it seems turned him on), with their genitalia obviously touching in some manner, something "awkward" may have happened.

This should be the really controversial scene!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Insider (1999)
10/10
Great Movie and Why it Failed Commercially
14 September 2021
This is an excellent, riveting movie based on true events and yet failed at the box office, failed commercially. It failed because it's about Honor and Prostitution and the American population no longer knows the difference between those values or cares, which is worse. Prostitution, hypocrisy, deception, betrayal, these are the current reigning mores of American society along with profits at the expense of human life. In the America of the 1930's or 1940's, this movie would've been a smash hit success. Those days are gone from the United States. How sad for great creations like this...and for us. Prostitution can be defined as selling ones honor cheaply and the US, it's government and population, do it every day.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
War & Peace (2016)
9/10
Great Production but One Glaring Flaw
6 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The character of Helene Kuragin must be played by an actress who is a womanly woman, a woman who causes every eye to turn and look when she enters a room. In the 1956 version she was properly played by Anita Ekberg who is, like the character, a stunning, shapely beauty. In the book Tolstoy describes Helene as a bosomy, fleshy beauty who flaunts her beauty ostentatiously such as showing up at the theater with her "breasts exposed" in Tolstoy's own words with all eyes looking at her. Helene Kuragin should be played by actresses such as Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield or today by someone like Christina Hendricks, all imposing, statuesque, women with hourglass figures who could never be confused as "boyish." In this adaptation, alas, Helene is played by a beautiful but ordinary Tuppence Middleton, who looks like a matchstick compared to the fictional description of Helene. No man, not even a gullible Pierre Bezukhov, would cough up his untold millions, his fortune for such a mousy, little girl. And so this production is not believable in this relationship. Helene Kuragin must look like a woman who could lead any man by the nose and marry him for his fortune before he can ever come to his senses. This production falls flat in this instance and fails to make that connection.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mission: Impossible: The Code (1969)
Season 4, Episode 1
Strip Search Diversion
19 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Much of the episode is a story with bare bones that seems disjointed. Lynn, played by the beautiful Alexandra Hay, acts as a red herring carrying information that is peripheral to the story. Unluckily for her she is detained by an all male security force who perform a strip search and who had forewarned her to avoid "much embarrassment by giving up the info or the search would be "very thorough." As she sits nude just covered by a towel, one of the men declares "it's not in the clothes." Whereupon their leader orders "continue the search" which could only mean a body cavity search. Luckily for her and before they "continue the search" he finds a lens case in her purse showing the info is in her contact lens as opposed to...elsewhere...and calls off any further search of her body. Alexandra Hay is wonderful as the nervous, embarrassed nude female fidgeting with wide eyes expecting the worst.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mission: Impossible: The Exchange (1969)
Season 3, Episode 12
8/10
Tantalizing Strip Search episode
17 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The Exchange is an excellent episode of Mission Impossible TV as so many are but this one is a bit different with Cinnamon Carter, played by Barbara Bain, getting caught as a spy and undergoing interrogation and torture while the team plan her release. Prior to interrogation her clothes are removed by a tall female guard while two men are standing nearby watching. We first see her blue blouse removed assisted by the female guard exposing the straps of her brassiere. Then the men are in the camera view while we see the tantalizing shadow on the wall of the female guard undressing Cinnamon as the men look on. The tall female guard towers over Cinnamon and unfastens her skirt and then we see Cinnamon taking off the skirt which is then taken by the female guard so she's left in a half-slip, it appears from the shadow on the wall. Then it seems she's grabbing at her waist, at the slip to remove it as the camera turns to a man's eyes watching her undressing and implying that the rest of her clothes, her underwear comes off as the men look on. How humiliating!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed