captain_robert_april Reviews

Snakes on a Plane (2006)

A Review on a Website or How the Disaster Pic meets the MTV Generation

[7/10 · 17 August 2006]

Snakes on a Plane is the height of truth in advertising. It is a hearkening back to those disaster pictures of yesteryear in a way that the new Poseidon should have been. You have a seemingly impossible situation that seems far fetched and odd, a group of people who would never be in the same place, and then they all band together so that some of them will make it out. Think about Towering Inferno or the original Poseidon Adventure... now add a bunch of modern mentalities and you have Snakes on a Plane. It is a popcorn enjoyment film that will undeniably exist in a few cult classic collections, and yes, I enjoyed it for what it was... a disaster flick trying to ratchet it up a few levels and bring in younger audiences.

I saw a 10:00 preview showing at the local Cinemark on Thursday night, and I must admit that this movie did entertain the audience... there was laughter, some applause, and a few jumps. The movie did the job I wanted it to do. Its not the Cider House rules, and its not Pulp Fiction... but its good for those who want truth in advertising and a movie that provides what the title says. It follows its own logic, its own ideas, and its own idealism, but that is why we suspend belief for these movies.

Overall, this is the new type of disaster film... the Towering Inferno, the Poseidon Adventure, and those countless Airport (insert year here) movies were our parents, and now we have a movie inspired by years of Mountain Dew marketing ad extreme-ism and hearkening back to those grand disaster films of yesteryear. Its a fun ride... come see the next generation of disaster flick... and have a sense of humor.

The Pink Panther (2006)

Its got the panther and its in the pink...

[8/10 · 10 February 2006]

The newest update of a classic does not assault my senses like I thought it might. While it is true that Martin is not Sellers, the good thing is Martin does not try to be Sellers! In a day of all too many updates and sequels, I assumed this might not flow well, but I had faith in Steve Martin and the other cast to do this movie justice and they managed to not only do it justice, but actually get a few honest hard laughs from the audience. In the theater I had the chance to watch it in, people of diverse ages, from 10 to 60 or more, applauded at the end of the film.

While it is not the laugh riot for the ages, it is entertaining and unique. A movie that is slapstick without ending up being parody a la Scary Movie or Hot Shots. In all honesty, will I be first in line for a sequel? Probably not, but I think the spirit of this film is far better than the three previous franchise additions made after Sellers' death... and should a sequel come along... well, I'll definitely catch it eventually.

Inspector Clouseau is just too great a character to forget and this movie contained enough magic to keep the character going forward in a new age... besides, if Bond, Ethan Hunt, and all the others keep making it, shouldn't the premier French inspector keep coming around.

Give it a shot... you might just like it and even if you don't, it is harmless and entertaining enough for all the Clouseau fans around you.

The Dukes of Hazzard (2005)

It was as it was suspected to be...

[7/10 · 2 September 2005]

Dukes of Hazzard as a movie gives me everything I expected from a loud Hollywood remake of a television show and even a wee bit more. It featured the true star of the movie, the General Lee, in all her flashback glory. It avoided the cliché of seeing how many people it could cameo from the original series (a la Starsky and Hutch) and instead just gave us a few quick, if predictable and jerky car chases.

The fact it is a movie version of a 70's television show meant I expected sufficient changes, but they did not go too overboard. You can argue that they had to change significant parts of both characters and also that they could have better cast them, but as I've said, the true focus of this show and others like it (Knight Rider, Viper, etc) has always been the car. Sure, Luke and Owen Wilson might have been more believable, but, well, let's face it, this is based more on being comical and it flowed better to have two comedic actors in this movie.

I am not defending this as a great film, but I will rate it a solid rating because it was what I knew it would be. It's not Shakespeare or even the original. Its a comic retelling of the original Dukes of Hazzard just as Starsky and Hutch was a comic retelling of that duo. Much like comparing spin offs to other shows, it must be rated on its own merits, and it gets the job done on those merits. Will I be first in line for a sequel? No... but I wasn't first in line for this enjoyable, lightweight, unintellectual romp either. But I had fun with it for being what it was... a movie about two guys, a girl, and a car named after a Civil War general. Scripts like that are never too intense, but it was enjoyable for what it was and I'd watch it again.

In short, it avoided some clichés and gave me a few smiles, so while it isn't Citizen Kane, its also not Manos the Hands of Fate. Its definitely influenced by its director, and while Club Dread wasn't my cup of tea, Super Troopers style antics carry over nicely to this film.

Not perfect, but close enough for now.

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003)

... just precious

[9/10 · 17 December 2003]

The final installment packs an expected wallop and sums the film series up with expected bedazzlement and intrigue. It is perhaps all too expected due to Mister Jackson's previous ability to impress us with his work. Still, the movie did have a few flaws... mainly being that there was a lot of "just take our word for it" in our film, such as when Saruman is said to be a prisoner in his tower, powerless and Treebeard is put in charge of him. We assume he's up there glowering down, but we never even get to pan up to the tower. This reoccurs a few times when we just have to assume something worked out. Is this a major flaw? Of course not... the epic is a success... a rare event in these days. Perfectly watchable and then some!

Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003)

The pirate film has returned

[10/10 · 20 July 2003]

The pirate film has returned, and Errol Flynn would be proud. Pirates of the Caribbean is simply a fun film to watch. Johnny Depp is particularly over the top which makes Captainb Jack Sparrow stand out that much more as a legend in his own time (and mind). Geoffrey Rush is his usual great self, and plays dignified evil to the bone. Outside the acting, Verbinski continues to use imagery which is simply fun to look at. Much like in "The Ring" he has some visuals which really pulls you into the movie. The script never lingers too long without coming back to life and it seems like the cast generally enjoyed the experience which comes across in their dialogue and word play. In the end, this film may be 2.5 hours, but it feels like so much less, and it accomplishes something most films don't. You leave saying, "I would watch a sequel to that."

Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)

A Step Towards Treks Remembered

[10/10 · 22 December 2002]

We will skip the usual summary and begin a description of how this film does and does not work. First, this film is a far improvement on the previous entry into the franchise, Insurrection. The effects are fun, the movie gallops along at a brisk pace but tosses a few bones to us groveling fans as long as we do not blink, a la Gunian's appearance, Wheaton's brief cameo and the referal to manuever "Kirk epsilon." Even the uninitiated can attend the film for its action elements and will enjoy it in much the same way that they might enjoy XXX. Indeed, it harks back to previous Treks often and this is how it begins the slow Trek back to, hopefully, what will make this a series of movies again and take away the Franchise feel. Then, what is there negative to say about the film? Star Trek has never been about action, it has never been about being XXX or Bond. Star Trek has been about wonder, about awe, about understanding. In the motion picture, a true sense of awe at V'Ger could be felt as it "devoured" the Enterprise. Star Trek 2 created awe in the acts of Kahn, but also in the effects of the mysterious genesis device. Trek 3 had the awe of a powerful friendship that defies regulations and even death. Trek 4 had time travel and awe of our own, real world. Trek 5 had the friendship of 3 and the power of faith and deception. Summaries could continue, but it seem with First Contact, a great film in its own right, the awe turned more toward the action genre and away from the science fiction elements. To me, seeing Spock mindmeld with V'Ger is much closer to Roddenberry's intention than seeing Picard drive a dune buggy across a planet while Worf shoots at aliens we know nothing about nor do we know why they are shooting. We know V'Ger is looking for the creator, but we do not know why these industrial level aliens would open fire on people getting body parts. Admittedly, this is a good film, and, also admittedly, I am an original series fan above all else, and I do think this film is great and recommend everyone go see it as it is one of the better films overall, but my reservations come in wondering where the awe and shock of the franchise went and why it was replaced by action sequences and battles. Indeed, there is awe, but it comes from (SPOILER) seeing two ships collide. Not quite the awe of seeing V'Ger reach self realization. Still, its getting there... to steal and alter a line from the motion picture, this film shows hope that the "human adventure may begin again." So, to sum up the review, if you want a better film than Attack of the Clones, which has no character development, no noticeable revelations, etc., than you must see this film. If you want a great action film, hit the cineplex now. If you want to see great actors at work, this film delivers. If you liked all the previous Trek films, then you should see this. If you like science fiction in general, James Bond films, or any other film where adversaries are clear cut, then this film is for you. Though if you want to see a film of ending awe and hope for humanity, then I suggest you consider 2001 or Star Trek: The Motion Picture or something of that ilk.

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002)

It Starts, It Ends, and In Between Magic Happens

[9/10 · 15 November 2002]

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets is more than a continuation on a familiar theme, its an improvement and a redefinition of that theme. Like the Wizard of Oz's follow ups, I was worried this one could not live up to its magnificent predecessor. Luckily, I erred. This film is truly great. It has all the fun of the first and more. The story has Harry returning to Hogwarts, older, smarter, and edgier, and thus the film is darker and more gritty, as Harry faces the fact that he might yet have no small amount of darkness in him. Though this is lamentably Harris' last film, his Dumbledore is remarkable and is one of his finer works (and that is no small task in and of itself). Though it is not without flaws (Where did Branagh go? Rickman as Snape occurred all too little in this one, though his screen time was remarkably well spent). This film is fun, smart, and actually heartening... Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid and a well placed phoenix truly touched the audience I saw this film with. It looks like the Potter franchise is here to stay... and that looks to be a good thing.

My Big Fat Greek Wedding (2002)

Greatly Enjoyable

[10/10 · 8 September 2002]

I can keep this review short because this film is simply and purely enjoyable. It is not weighted down with the need to know humongous back stories, but rather the backstory can be found within our own day to day apprehension about our own world and predominantly our own families.

This film is a true comedy, not a comedic spectacle with juvenile humor (except, where of course, it is very appropriate). The film truly shows the coming of age story does not always have to be about teens. It is truly a comedy and truly worth watching. Similar to the Royal Tennenbaums. Highly recommended!

Donnie Darko (2001)

Beautifully surreal with true elements of greatness

[10/10 · 21 May 2002]

Donnie Darko is an amazing work of cinema on a few different levels. First, the story touches upon so much without seeming forced or edgy. Donnie is, at first glance, your average slacker high school kid, which means he deals with peers who do not like him or understand him, homework which he finds ill suited to his reality, and his first attempt at a relationship. Other than those elements, Donnie deals with delusions or realities involving a giant evil version of Harvey the Rabbit named Frank who claims to be time traveling. Instantly, Donnie's world becomes surreal, but we can all still understand his world, even be part of it. Thats the joy and danger in this film... it would be just as easy to live in his world because it is our world, just out of order. Moreover, the movie keeps pulling you onward with new developments, the characters are all interesting and real, and there are true life moments of sadness and humor. Also, what cinched this for me is its ability to appeal to the film expert or the "fanboy" of pop culture. Ripe with allusions and scenes from movies such as Evil Dead, Martin Scorscese films, and even E.T., The Extraterrestrial, Donnie Darko is one film to watch and bound to be a cult classic a la Cemetary Man.

Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002)

An Epic of Suspected Proportions

[9/10 · 17 May 2002]

Star Wars has returned to the screen and this film is truly epic, but in ways that fans and even casual viewers expected. It is without a doubt a marvel to behold, despite stretched dialogue, a slightly forced romance, and some occassional moments when things seem out of character for most characters. Still, the film holds your attention well and will appeal strongly to fans of the franchise or even to casual movie goers. An improvement on the Phantom Menace, but still slightly lacking that element that made us cheer on Luke despite the odds... maybe, however, this is because we know where Anakin is heading, where the toher offered an element of surprise. Regardless, this film holds water, it functions, and is truly fun to watch. What it lacks in new concepts and character development, it more than makes up for with a fast few final minutes climaxing in setting up what will no doubt be a free for finale in episode 3.

Tales of Terror (1962)

An enjoyable trip that arrives with few reservations

[9/10 · 19 November 2001]

An excellent film which seems made for the cast that is in it. Each tale excels with Price's presence and I was sad to see the movie end. While not quite as good for Price fans as "Last Man on Earth" or "Pit and the Pendulum," it also is not quite as surreal and comedic as Price, Lorre, and Karloff were in "The Raven." Definitely worth watching and is a great film to introduce younger audiences to possible interpretations of Poe as well as Price, Lorre, and Corman. Recommended

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001)

Magic of screen and heart make this film a success

[10/10 · 18 November 2001]

When I first heard of Harry Potter catching on, I believed it to be a fad and grouped it with Pokemon and that ilk of marketing genius. When, however, I stayed with an associate and could not sleep, I was handed the book and told to read it and see for myself. I did and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. The film captures the book well enough and deserves a lot of the same merit. It seems like the actors were grown for the adaption of the book and they were very easily believable. This film may be family fare, but it is also a lot of fun to watch. Its plotline may not be Shakespeare, but its better than 90% of all thats out there and if you were at all excited about the pod race in Star Wars: A Phantom Menace, then the Quidditch scenes in this film are made for you. To be honest, this film did, for me, what Star Wars: A New Hope did and what I had hoped Star Wars: Phantom Menace could do, it made me believe in something fictional and applicable to my real life. To be honest, Luke Skywalker and Harry Potter aren't too far apart, both are the underdog, trapped children of circumstance beyond their control who achieve great deeds and still remain fresh faced and likeable. The reason Rowling's magic may be more likely to last in sequels than Lucas' did in prequels is because there is a certain heart in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone missing from Phantom Menace. Rowling did what Lucas once did, she makes us believe in the Power of the Heart and Columbus, through casting and great effects, captures what Rowling did with text in vibrant, sometimes over the edge cinematography and graphics that never become too much, but never leave much to be desired. Casting was flawless right down to the never fallible John Cleese as Nearly Headless Nick. Once, Superman made us believe that a man could fly. Star Wars showed us the magic all around us. Now, Harry Potter shows us the magic within ourselves and lets our spirits fly. A true joy to watch and well worth a second or third look at least.

Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (2001)

Absolutely hilarious for fans, very amusing for general audiences

[10/10 · 25 August 2001]

Kevin Smith has long since been deemed friend of those of us who spew pop culture allusions, pose pop culture questions, etc. but also have a great deal of knowledge. Behind the various body jokes, there is something beneath this film's cover that appeals to people. Jay and Silent Bob are back, but this time they are different too. (Possible spoilers) I mean, Silent Bob actually snaps and yells at Jay. In a world where we all observe our own friends make stupid choices, this was very real, and yet hilarious at the same time. It seems this time that, while outwardly mocking Hollywood and Hollywood audiences, we have a statement on limits expressed by this film. (Or I could be interpretting it completely wrong, and Kevin Smith will mock me , but who knows.) Anyway, as the user comment at the top says, this film is absolutely hilarious if you're familiar at all with Smith's works. Its a cameo fest of old familiar faces and some more recent ones. The soundtrack is even appropriately new and old, equally quirky. This film, however, is determined to create new fans, showing itself as a testament to Smith's ability to use crude humor and pop culture to make everything too funny.

The movie appealed to me in a way I did not expect it too, even coming off as sickly romantic at times, a la Buffalo 66 (but in a different way) or, more true to life Free Enterprise. However, Kevin Smith has found one thing that Free Enterprise (even with Shatner) has yet to find, a rabid fanbase and the ability to generate new fans constantly with films such as Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back. Snoogans and a rating of 10 all around.

Shadow of the Vampire (2000)

Great Concept Film

[10/10 · 3 February 2001]

One knows what one is getting when one watches this film. The "surprise" that Max is a vampire is obvious by the title, but this plays a far more important role as an examination of cinema. The lines of dialogue dealing with "Do we really need the writer?" ring through in a tongue in cheek commentary on films often too bogged down by special effects and an ignorance of the writer's wishes and vision. Moreover, this film gives a unique peek into what filming used to be and parallels the obsession of other perfectionist. This film then is similar to other films in the same way Moby Dick is similar to other novels. Its not for everyone, but it is a piece of art examining something of the human experience and going for a rather visceral response. It is art, and whether or not you like it, you must admire its form and ability to hit on most cylinders if not all. This film falls into that small press run genre which includes Boondock Saints. It is a film of high worth which may be ignored or abused by those seeking the wrong thing, in this case, horror.

Snatch (2000)

A Fierce Joyride of Coincidence

[10/10 · 21 January 2001]

This film is a very visual form of every great O. Henry story. While not quite as well put together as "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels," this film has got it where it counts and rolls very well onto the screen as a celebration of the unexpected and how coincidence and mishaps affect us all, even the makers of the best plans. A fun, fast film, not quite the same enjoyment level as the Guy Ritchie's film which proceeded it (Lock, Stock...) but better than most of what airs in the U.S.A. Ritchie proves that he is most decidely the fresh blood american box offices need, along with Troy Duffy, whose excellent work, Boondock Saints, should be viewed with Ritchie's films as a new approach to Noir. The entire cast make the film fun, and it is great to see Vinnie Jones return as a merciless hitman. A great cast, some fun turns, and an all out joy to watch. Can we get some of this stateside, moviemakers, other than the excellent aforementioned Duffy?

Finding Forrester (2000)

Sometimes the greatest teachers are not in the classroom

[10/10 · 16 January 2001]

This film is a great exploration of how one event can effect so many. It is about the triumph of friendship and family over old pains. It is also a very unique film in that there are so many like it, yet it stands on its own as a film. Overall, this is perhaps one of Connery's best films that did not involve action. Connery plays the wounded artist well and the rest of the cast exemplify what perfect casting means. This was a great film and an experience best shared with friends and family of all ages. This film is an education in humanity, plain and simple.

The Conqueror (1956)

A swing and--- a foul on the play

[4/10 · 9 January 2001]

At its heart, the Conqueror really wants to be a great film. Its got big name directors, big name actors, and an epic story. And in the pit of its heart, it wants to be a great film, but then again, in my heart, I want to be a thrice published novelist contemplating my fourth book which will surely garner me a nobel prize for literature. As expected, then, what it wants in its heart, much like what I want in mine, just is not going to occur in reality. Wayne not only is miscast, be he seems woefully unsure of the heroic aspect of his character, which is fitting, because Kahn was not a hero. The cast in and of itself are good actors, but their characters are underdeveloped, lackluster, or just plain wrong. The movie is worth a watch to those who love John Wayne, B-movies, or epics of any porportion, or to those looking for a good movie with which to play Mystery Science Theater 3000.

Highlander II: The Quickening (1991)

An acceptable movie, a failure as a sequel

[5/10 · 5 October 2000]

There is some fun imagery in this film. The characters of Ramirez and Connor getting shot to pieces and then comparing wounds was almost laugh out loud funny! The scene where Ramirez drives the fan blade back up and tells Connor about the magic in life before disappearing... very reminiscent of the relationship of Obi Wan Kenobi and Luke in Star Wars. A great effect and an acceptable movie for viewing, but what it most definitely is not is a Highlander film. I love the chemistry between Connery and Lambert, and it was great to see them on screen together, but this should not have been called Highlander. It just did not work as a Highlander film. Perhaps as a new movie series, it would have faired better, but it is one lame sequel. The acting is great, the sword play is fun, the one liners abound, but... its not a Highlander film. I enjoy it as a stand alone, but not as a Highlander film. As a movie, a 5 out of 10, as a sequel a 2 out of 10.

It Came from Outer Space (1953)

Classic 3D Sci Fi Horror from the Early Days

[10/10 · 25 September 2000]

The classic days of 3D sci fi horror are in this film. The days of the red scare, and the non-red screen. Later clumsily imitated by films like Space Children (which got ripped by MST3K) this film ended nicely with the aliens leaving and no one having died. A nice fallback for classic sci fi horror fans, who grow weary of the "lets see how much blood we can splatter on the screen" approach. Well worth the watch to all those who are die hard science fiction fans.

8MM (1999)

Goes for the throat one second, the heart strings the next

[10/10 · 17 September 2000]

8MM is not a stylistic feast or a tour de force. It is, however, a very great movie. Why? Simple, this film is how Joel Schumacher should have done his Batman films. Nicholas Cage plays an all too human hero in the role of Tom Welles. He's not perfect. He smokes, lies to his wife, and worries how to put his kid through college. He, like many of us, thinks his world is grim and gritty enough as it is. Then, when he is asked to investigate an old film, it quickly spawns a chaotic fall into an all too living "dead case," which claims a great toll on the character. Some would say this film offers nothing new, and, if you feel that way, so be it, but it does offer reinterpretations. Joaquin Phoenix portrays Max California, the stock character of the "violator of social norms with a heart of gold." Working in a seedy business day in and out has worn this character down, he knows too much to be able not to be dark. Phoenix captures this in his darkness of character but his purity shines through. Overall, excellent actors and a script which could be looked on as a man falling down. The film goes for the throat and heart and pulls it off well. The viewer feels for all the characters in some way, theres no set villian. In the end, everyone gets ripped off in some way, monetarily, socially,physically, or emotionally. Fair warning though, the film does make some viewer's angry. It did me, but that was half the enjoyment of this film. How well it played the audience. So, if you liked any films like Just Cause, Falling Down, or Bringing Out the Dead, this film works on some of the same levels. How long can any one person fight? How far should we go to punish the guilty? When does something become wrong? One would think Schumacher would have made his characters and his Gotham in the Batman films at least half as seedy as he made the back rooms and characters Tom Welles deals with, and, if you have seen this movie, you know that would have been a more Burton-esque Batman. Overall, 8MM gets one of my highest recommendations, but I would watch it before I bought it. Its worth a watching, but its not everyone's cup of tea.

Highlander: Endgame (2000)

To quote the film, "A Whole New Ball Game."

[10/10 · 3 September 2000]

Is this film a Citizen Kane or Star Wars? No, but its not a Manos: The Hands of Fate or a Highlander 2 either. Does this film excel at explaining the continually complex continuity of Highlander (like how is it that Connor was the last Highlander at the end of the first film and now there's a billion of them again?) No, but it does tell a solid story. Does it offer any explanation of the alien theory seen in Highlander 2? No, just a denial of that in the beginning? So what does it have? A great story, some great fighting scene, and some familiar heroes pop up to give us a lot of fun. Does it have any links to the other movies? Not really, but it is a "whole new ball game." This may just be the first inning of it too, but, even though I enjoyed this film, I may not be around for the other innings because of the ending of this one ended some of the magic of this series of movies for me. It still stands that there can be only one, and for this series, this is the best one since the original.

Mitchell (1975)

Of the Joe Don Baker films, I say this is one of Baker's best... and thats not much to say.

[4/10 · 14 February 2000]

To be honest, this is one of the best Joe Don Baker as the protagonist films, and thats not saying much. Mitchell stands far above Final Justice, but that still puts it far below most other films. Baker stood tall in Walking Tall and in his two James Bond film appearances, but most his others leave the viewer somewhat sour. Perhaps Baker is far too type cast as the sluggish cop who is one step behind, but it seems to suit him, but the scripts for Mitchell and Final Justice should have been avoided by him and everyone else. Still, given the choice, this beats Final Justice, but is below the somewhat respectable Walking Tall.

Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)

Manos, the Hands of Fate actually hurts.

[1/10 · 14 February 2000]

Who created this thing? It might have faired alright as a silent film in the 1910's, but this is pure drivel. I saw it first as a version of Mystery Science Theater 3000, then had the misfortune to see it without it. This thing insults every form of intelligence out there! Seemingly hours go by without anything happening, which would be fine if it built suspense, but the only thing that causes suspense with this lemon is waiting for it to end or for yourself to go blind... which is a toss up with this one. I recommend watching the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version, but don't watch the original. It just hurts too bad and may even kill brain cells.

Brimstone (1998–1999)

Better than X-Files! And a really human story

[11 January 2000]

This show showed the greatest amount of promise. It was a more realistic form of X-files with a focus more on the supernatural than the alien. Why was it better? Moments of dark comedy was one reason. The devil pops up in a cafe with Stone and orders " a big piece of angelfood cake." I almost fell out of my seat, laughing. But, it wasn't all dark comedy... some episodes mirrored "Its a wonderful Life," such as the one where Stone was visited by the other angel, one of the non fallen variety. Horton and the rest of the cast put on a marvelous show. The way the two characters played off one another was excellent, allowing the devil to be evil, but at the same time, full of trickery. He is afterall, the Lord of Lies, right? It was just a well rounded show, full of surprises, like Ash's true alliance. It had romance, drama, dark comedy, action, and mystery. It was intelligent, which, of course, means it could not take the Fox line up. I place this show above X-files because it advanced, while it seems X-files is still about Mulder believing and nobody else buying it.

Sleepy Hollow (1999)

Finally, a horror movie that would make Karloff and Price proud.

[10/10 · 26 November 1999]

Excellent film all around. Sleepy hollow is equally scream and laugh, reminiscent of the horror films of old. Christopher Walken is ghoulishly evil playing a movie version of the headless horseman very reminiscent of the classic Frankenstein film's monster. Unlike some horror films, who try to be overly important or be deep, this film just takes you along for a ride, being careful to let you make a few calls. Also, it doesn't slip into the slasher film either. thats not to say there is not gore, but its not senseless "see how much blood we used" gore. Its more of a "why did I get involved in this and how do I stop it gore." Its a 10 out of 10 in my book. Made me feel like I was watching the classic actors in the old Universal films one more time! Great fun!