Reviews

22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not as good as I expected it to be
21 November 2008
Just saw this today, and it just wasn't that gripping. If you've seen the trailer, you've seen the film.

I'm giving it 7 out of 10 stars because it was well-executed and risky.

Now I will simply repeat my point in order to have enough lines in the review to be posted.

Just saw this today, and it just wasn't that gripping. If you've seen the trailer, you've seen the film.

I'm giving it 7 out of 10 stars because it was well-executed and risky.

Now I will simply repeat my point in order to have enough lines in the review to be posted.

Just saw this today, and it just wasn't that gripping. If you've seen the trailer, you've seen the film.

I'm giving it 7 out of 10 stars because it was well-executed and risky.

Now I will simply repeat my point in order to have enough lines in the review to be posted.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
WALL·E (2008)
3/10
Sadly, this movie did nothing for me.
6 July 2008
I was expecting a thoroughly enjoyable film, and am sorry to say it is not even marginally enjoyable. What is all the hubbub about? Nothing about this movie charmed me. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself. I can't submit a review with less than ten lines of text, but have no more to say; therefore, I will merely repeat myself.
9 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A masterpiece of art and a thrill to watch
23 April 2007
This is easily one of the best films made in the past ten years. The human story is so compelling, noble, and deep, that you will wonder how anyone can make the junk they do today.

Cinematically, it is unparalleled. There may be a few films that are just as good, but none that are better.

Crowe is at his best here. I am not particularly a fan of him (nor a detractor), but in this role he towers as a great captain, man, and actor.

This will be a favorite of mine for years, and is destined to become one of the classics of all time. You just don't see movies like this made -- you're lucky if you get one every two to three years.

It ought to be re-released every ten years or so on the big screen. Everyone needs to know about this film. It stirs the senses and the soul, the mind and the heart. Simply stunning.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twin Peaks (1990–1991)
10/10
I still remember the night it premiered... and being mesmerized by the opening
3 April 2007
The opening credits and music grabbed me right away. That sad, cool, reflective music. The log being cut in the mill. The bird.

This is a show that you know, as you are watching it, that it is special and destined to become a classic. What a wonderful memory. One of my favorite moments in the first episode is Andy crying, and later telling the girl not to tell the sheriff. It really brought humanity to Laura's death.

Can't wait to one day own the whole series on DVD, and one summer night, start watching the episodes one by one.

Another amazing aspect of the opening episode is the many types of characters and settings involved, just within the town of Twin Peaks. The school, the lodge, the sheriff office, the lake, the railroad tracks. It was almost as if several shows and genres were evident in one episode. Something for everyone. But it still tied together so amazingly.
76 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A big, cartoony heart, it offers more on every viewing
27 September 2005
"Smile, Darn Ya, Smile," sings every cartoon creature in Toon Town, in the over-the-top second act production number as Eddie drives into town. It is a song from a 1931 Friz Freleng cartoon. The whole countryside is singing, including the trees, the sun, the flowers and the birds. It is so ridiculously happy, so infectious and outrageous, you can see how a sourpuss like Eddie would be annoyed. But it makes me incredibly happy each time I see it. It's exactly what cartoons represent in this movie -- pure joy.

It is a wonder that such unbounded silliness can suddenly bring tears to your eyes. I speak of the scene when Eddie Valiant is flipping through some newly developed photos, to find pictures of his dead brother and partner, taken before he died.

The movie does not play this scene for cheap sobs, but tenderly and humanly. Eddie shows little emotion on his face, and the music is sweet and simple. Suddenly we know what everyone was talking about when they said, "A toon killed his brother." The photos show he was more than a brother. The slow pan across his brother's desk show his whole life, just as Hitchcock did for Jimmy Stewart's character in the first scene of Rear Window. The story? Here was a business partner who had shared Eddie's successes (successes now lost in dust and drink), and a best friend who could hang out at the beach with Eddie and his girlfriend, sing, drink and have some laughs. He was someone Eddie probably didn't know how much he loved until he lost him. Now he was alone, his business gone, and his life over. He couldn't return to his old work -- Toons -- because that was the world of joy he had lost. He thought that joy had betrayed him.

The extravagance in details, especially the small ones, are what sells this movie. The sets and costumes are sumptuous. And the humor is in every line and gag. It's pretty funny to see Eddie snag a free ride on the back of a trolley car with a bunch of school boys. It's more funny when Eddie hops off and thanks the boys for the cigarettes.

The melding of the real world and the cartoon world is brilliant. Cartoons have a natural effect on their surroundings. Cartoon logic makes complete sense in this picture; when Judge Doom tries to trick Roger out of hiding with his "shave and a haircut" routine, it's hilarious because it's true, and it's suspenseful because it's true. It's perfect.

It is an homage to every cartoon ever made. The saxophone player and the dancing brooms giving a bow to Fantasia... And a swell, multi-level gag that most people miss: When Eddie takes pictures of Jessica "playing patty-cake" with Marvin, the two *really are* just playing patty-cake. What a gag. But when Roger flips through the photos, they move so quickly that the actions in the still photos become animated. What you are looking at, in fact, is the very first kind of cartoon -- the animated flip-books that once sold for a few pennies, long before the first movie was ever made. It hearkens back to the earliest days of cinema and animation. It's simply sublime.

This movie does have its flaws; it drags during the warehouse scenes, for some reason. But watch for the many sub-references to the world of cartoons, and the rich sets, the beautiful color, the flawless editing, the physical humor. The movie revels in the rich history of cartoons, bringing together characters never before seen on the same screen. Such a movie will never be made again. It is old-time cartoons' last bow. It's a marvel.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
So funny I immediately bought another ticket
1 May 2004
The credits rolled last night at 11:50 PM at the Sunshine on Houston Street in NYC.

Outside the theatre, I glanced up at the box office board: There was another viewing at 11:55 p.m. I impulsively bought another ticket and saw it again.

This is one of the funniest, most original and absurd movies I have ever seen. I feel like I can't believe I've actually seen it -- waking up dizzy at 2 PM today on a Saturday and pondering this movie.

All I remember is the wonderful music, the great one-liners, and those fanciful legs. Oh, for legs such as those!

Everyone must be forced to sit through this film as punishment for watching any television, ever.

Isabella Rossilini should be so proud of forging through the offers of banal roles and accepting roles such as this. It is not a surprise that the same actresss who allowed David Lynch to strip and bruise her in Blue Velvet would embrace such a role as Port-Huntley. If you're sad, and like beer, she's your woman!

The audience last night was howling with laughter and delight at the absurd and brilliant lines in this movie. There was so much to like about this spectacular musical.

But most of all, there were those intoxicating legs.
38 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
So many great moments in this film...
10 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers The car falling out of the sky

The shot of the beach house crumbling from one end

The innocence on Mary's face when she's high

When Stan tells Mary she's a great girl, then turns away and leaves to hide his tears.

Clementine punching Joel in the arm

Joel under the kitchen table

Joel always finding his car at the end of the block

Joel walking out of Barnes and Noble directly into his friends' house

Joel running to catch the train to Montauk

The opening music

The music during the credits, when Joel is sobbing in his car

When Joel succeeds in disappearing from the map

When Mrs. Wierziak punches Stan

Stan and Mary using Joel as a coffee table

Joel, in memory, finding his bed surrounded by sand

The amazing third act surprise of everyone getting their tapes in the mail, and the two scenes of Joel and Clem listening to their respective tapes in misery

Raining in the living room

The beer cooler falling on Carrie

Joel having to repeat his name to his boss when calling in sick

Joel and Clem deciding to give it another try, even knowing what will happen ("That's what I do... That's what you do...")

The erasing party at Joel's house getting continuously more rambunctous
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
MASTERFUL! A love letter, a warning, and a cry for help
9 November 2001
I read the review by Sage-Film-2, and I do agree that this is -- possibly -- one of the greatest American films ever made.

In its totality, it represents the human experience convincingly as complex, sublime, subtle and wonderful. The film chills us, it warms us, it chastises us, it comforts us. It is a love letter, it is a warning, and it is a cry for help. It is disturbing, dark, funny, scathing, quiet, grave and beautiful, all at the same time.

I really love the way Allen presents it in essentially two plots, the funny one with Allen and Alda and Farrow, and the Shakespearean one with Landau and Orbach and Huston. And all the family connections between characters are so well laid out.

Each time I see it I admire the singularly brilliant stroke of casting Orbach and Landau as brothers. They are so, so much the same flesh, the same blood -- bad apples falling from the same tree, but with deceivingly different lives. A pair of brothers just made for film posterity.

And the funny plot is so romantic. When I first saw the part where Allen's film lampoons Alda's character, I was beside myself with laughter. Alda IS that character (another casting coup).

A film people should see one or two hundred years from now.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Performances: Follies in Concert (1986)
Season 14, Episode 10
10/10
A tremendous collection of talent and performances
31 May 2001
This rare video has until now been selling for $100, used, if you can find a copy. Now we can own it for a song, and watch it anytime!

See this! It is a wonderful evening, and you'll never forget the thunderous ovation the ladies receive in "Beautiful Girls."
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Anagram: "Not Worth Fire Engine"
30 May 2001
Sometimes an anagram best describes a movie -- it's better than a review, right?

Rearrange the letters in "The Towering Inferno" and you'll get: "Not Worth Fire Engine."
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fascinating portrait of the man and his work
16 September 2000
It was a delight to get clips of all Morris' work. I loved Fast Cheap and Out of Control, and now can't wait to see more of his work. Super Chicken was a scream, and it was neat to see behind the scenes work.

It was followed on IFC by a film on the making of Mr. Death, The Rise and Fall Fred Leuchter, a film I also enjoyed.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quiet story of hope in the midst of danger
21 June 2000
Gossels has constructed a simple, quiet telling of a profound story. Little kids are whisked into the countryside in the middle of a dangerous war, where no one speaks their language or practices their religion, where their parents can't visit, and probably won't see them again. But in this little village some remarkable people give them love, shelter, food and education, and save their lives. Instead of being exterminated by Hitler's monstrous machine of hate, they are nurtured like little seeds until they can one day live free again, once they have escaped or outlasted the war.

One incident stands out and illustrates the story: At one point, a group of twelve or so boys is taken away from Chabannes and efforts are made to get them back. Most of them survive, but four are murdered in camps. Amongst the magnitude of millions losing their lives, this town grieves for four boys. "It was four boys too many," they say. When that statement was made during the film, thunderbolts went off in my head.

This idea, multiplied thousands of times throughout Europe, was the reason so many were saved while others perished. It is why good shall always triumph over evil: He who saves a single life has saved the world entire.

And it is why, in our efforts to never repeat this tragedy, we also have a plan in case it does: resolve to do whatever we can, even a little, to save one or two lives.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Topsy-Turvy (1999)
8/10
Beautiful and entertaining
13 December 1999
This beautiful production is warm, funny, but also substantive. The colors were so well tested and planned, you might mistake it for Techni-Color.

This is a full, rich cast and a big story. Very well documented historically. It's fun to watch a company produce operetta during this time, to see both the old fashioned methods used in theater, and also the same techniques used in productions today.

Had the privilege of seeing the cast and director at the Lincoln Center premiere. Actually got to tell Jim Broadbent how much I was a fan when I saw him the evening before at the Being John Malkovich premiere at the same location.

I'll definitely see this again when it opens. The trailer is fun, too, but the movie has its darker notes as well.

A real achievement for Mike Leigh.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Clever, original and always funny
1 October 1999
Once I was involved in the story, I was so absorbed by the story and the characters, I forgot where I was...

Where I was was Alice Tully Hall at Lincoln Center tonight, at the premiere of this extremely original and funny film.

Seeing the trailer two weeks ago cracked me up so much I went to and watched it again and again. And this morning, to my surprise, I read in the NY Times review that it would be playing tonight and tomorrow.

Boy, am I glad I showed up early and hunted down a spare ticket (it was sold out) at the New York Film Festival. Cusack, Malkovich and Keener perform wonderfully, as do Diaz and the supporting cast.

You probably know what this film is about, and if you don't I won't spoil it, but whatever you've heard, take a chance and see it. It is a winner and I predict a nomination for Best Original Screenplay Oscar, and possibly some acting awards for Keener, who turns in a first rate performance.

A strange inner life takes over the story, and it truly challenges the viewer to think about the strangest and even profound questions of reality, love, existence and life and death. But mostly it was goofy, surreal and very clever.

What a treat it was to see the actors walk the red carpet, pose for the cameras and whisper to each other on the way in to the show. And it was a privilege to ask the writer questions in person at the panel afterwards. I'm definitely joining the Society and will make sure I see more films this way. It is a great evening out.

(While Mr. Malkovich walked down the carpet, I got a few laughs from the crowd by yelling, "Malkovich! Malkovich!" Those who have seen the movie will understand.)
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The true-life Chaplin connection
3 March 1999
You will read many comparison's in these reviews to Chaplin's "The Great Dictator" (1940).

This is not a coincidence. Benigni has described "Life is Beautiful" as an homage to Chaplin's film, which he has seen many times.

In fact, the number on his prison camp uniform is the same number on Chaplin's uniform in "Dictator."

I was charmed the first time I saw this movie, and knew of course it was a masterpiece, but on second viewing the film had much more power. I took my mother, who loved it, and now want to see it again. A lot of little details can go by if you're not careful. See it again if you have a chance.

Benigni's generous love and affection have such power. I truly feel sorry for the poor louts who think it is a "comic treatment" of the Holocaust, or that it uses the Holocaust as a "backdrop" for comedy. This is simply not the case.

I rearranged the letters in "Life is Beautiful" to create the following ironic anagram: "Lie a bit, if useful."
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alice in Wonderland (1999 TV Movie)
6/10
Except for Martin Short, a spectacular yawn.
1 March 1999
One hour trimmed from Hallmark's "Alice in Wonderland" would have picked up the pace and resulted in a masterpiece.

Martin Short saved the show with his instant-classic performance as The Mad Hatter. He stepped right out of the creepy illustrations in the original book, and, with a few subtle alterations in his face, came to life. This is what makes a star a star.

He was absurd, he was funny, he was impertinent and entertaining. It was as if he was born to play this part. And, all the while dithering, fussing and spewing forth inanities, he was still our Martin Short. It was really exciting, and with his performance in "Merlin" he could well be on his way to being the king of the TV movie. He is money in the bank for any studio and I hope he's making a fortune. Except for his performance, this production would have been a spectacular yawn.

First, the spectacle: The book was creatively interpreted by the design team; they added refreshing touches of originality and still preserved the spirit of the original book drawings. Two-toned checkerboard grass; giant pop-up books that came to life; double-sided anti-gravitational stairs in the style of Max Escher; beautiful white rose bushes painted red -- there was so much to enjoy. If only NBC could hang on to the set and refilm it...

Yawns-a-plenty were in store for us. Here's a clue for filmmakers: If you only have two hours worth of good material, adding one hour of filler equals three hours of boredom. No, you don't get a kind-of-exciting piece. This is the nature of entertainment: Two plus one sometimes equals zero.

The Tweedle-Dums (the actors don't even deserve to have their names mentioned) were boring and an insult to Lewis Carroll and the acting profession. It looked as if the director had just that day given them their blocking and put them through the paces of filming. There was no energy, no enthusiasm. It could have been so much more.

Richardson did fine as the queen, but the pacing killed her. Her economical movements and precision-speaking would have been a nice counterpoint to a fast-paced story, but through no fault of her own, it was a little flat. There was a lot to like in her character, and I hope she has a chance to play the role again one day.

Tina's Alice was okay (I don't want to be mean to a kid) but I would have preferred a no-name actress with a more quirky attitude and that famous freaky-frizzy hair.

This broadcast was an example of NBC's new "appointment television" strategy. It's meant to get jaded TV viewers to make long-in-advance appointments to see shows like this. It worked for me; I had a long-standing appointment on Sunday.

Next time I'll have a back-up appointment as well...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ready to Wear (1994)
10/10
Witty, scathing, and a delight!
18 January 1999
It was truly exciting to see `Ready to Wear' in the theaters when it first came out. Seldom do films delight and amuse us at this level. But this is like a Woody Allen film: either you love it or hate it. Since the story is too complicated to explain (and the best thing about this film), I'm sticking to mostly non-plot aspects in this review.

One of the challenges in your first viewing will be this film's utter lack of exposition. You will be asked to board this train while it is moving; in fact, you will need to leap from track to track. The story is not unfolded as much as it is thrown at you in pieces. Two minutes after you are tossed into a conversation (already in progress), you will be asked to join another. Unless you have a mind as competitively poised as a super-model, you'll miss much of the movie the first time.

Don't let the immersion in the world of fashion fool you into thinking this is a movie `about' fashion. Fashion is merely a backdrop, a setting for Altman to play his scenes. That he so thoroughly masters his subject is merely a tribute to his intelligence and sophistication.

Like Milos Forman in `The Firemen's Ball,' Altman has created a wonderful menagerie of human foibles with which to lampoon us. Our pettiness, our lack of shame, our corruption and our low regard for each other are portrayed so truthfully and cleverly that we don't notice who is the real subject of the satire. We smugly assume it is the fashion world on trial.

Even the opening credits were fun - what a collection of personalities (all stitched on garment labels)!. Every casting decision was a good one; every performance was satisfying. The only thing funnier than Danny Aiello in drag, is watching him being told he looks like Barbra Streisand. And the only thing funnier than that is realizing it's true.

While we're trying to figure out a murder, we are also being dazzled by the constellation of world stars of all kinds parading before us. That Altman dared to attempt such a feat (the group photo at Versailles alone must have been a challenge) is not half as astonishing as that he pulled it off. But the stars, too, are merely a backdrop to funny stories and situations. No one but Altman could make an Elsa Klensch cameo so surprisingly hilarious. The interview about the pouf skirts was just plain funny. But will most of the audience appreciate it? `I doubt it.'

Another delight is Altman's pervasive references to clothing, so dominant you will miss half of them. A cab driver, identifying a murderer, tells the police `all white people look alike.' How does he tell them apart? `By their clothes.' Film is confiscated from a fashion shoot, because the murder suspect was inadvertently captured in the background. But his face was cutoff in every shot. `We don't know what he looks like,' the detective complains. `But we know what he was wearing.' Every conversation, every plot, each detail is so thoroughly self-referencing to fashion; but mostly, there are dozens of funny moments. Even the red herring of murder is based on our mistaking an innocent fashion item for an omen of death.
40 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Rare movie-magic; emotional & surprising
8 January 1999
Rarely do I want to see a tear jerker, but it is so authentic and powerful, it is one of the best films of its kind!

Be patient; this movie is in no hurry to show itself all at once. If you are patient, the payback is worth it.

Also, watch it alone if you're uncomfortable showing your emotions in front of others. It can bring even a hard-hearted SOB to tears, if he gives it a chance.

Ms. Blethyn's performance is brilliant. Immediately after seeing her, I knew she would receive an Oscar nomination. Imagine a dancer trying to remain on the verge of dancing and falling down for a full hour... never quite dancing, never quite falling down, but always on the edge. This is what Brenda did with her almost-weeping, not-quite-weeping voice. A real feat of acting. Except for the actual breakdowns of sobbing, which were simultaneously hilarious and sorrowful, she maintained the wonderfully quirky character voice throughout. (Her transformation throughout the picture was also very believable.)

The telephone scene (I don't want to spoil it) was a masterpiece moment of emotion and perfect timing captured on film. So much history and pain is evident in Blethyn's sobbing. It is hard to imagine anyone else topping her.

Also, see the note under Trivia about the two actresses meeting (unless you don't want to spoil the surprise).

A fine film (there's a lot more to say) and the best cry I've had in years (only one better: Sling Blade).

Rent this tonight, and watch it quietly, patiently, and alone...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A rare look into the mind of a comic genius
20 December 1998
Like the previous reviewer, I too laugh out loud every time I see this. I watched it again today on Comedy Central and laughed continuously.

Kaufman must have been one of the truly funniest, most inventive comics of his day. He operated on so many levels, and satirized the entertainment culture, its idols and himself. Who else could wow an audience with an Elvis routine and then shyly accept their applause with such a silly "Tank you berry much."?

It's a lot of fun to hear Zmuda, Williams and the others describe how Andy played with his audiences, and hooked them in to his premise so cleverly. It must have really been something to watch.

One of the ideas bandied about in this movie is whether Andy was sincere about wrestling, or simply playing his audience for laughs. To hear Williams and Henner discuss it, you would think Kaufman was at least partly sincere.

Kaufman no doubt had fantasies about being a wrestler. I think these fantasies propelled him to choose this venue for his act. But I think it was an act, and I think that's where his fantasy ended. Perhaps it was too difficult for his friends to see this; they were just too close to him. What do I know, I've never met any of them. I just think that Andy must have been one of those people who decided that performing was too much fun to turn off, and just behaved bizarrely even around (or maybe especially around) others in show business. What better way to prove your genius then to fool the best of the best?

I think Andy was playing his hick Memphis audience like a cheap fiddle. He must have sat in his hotel room, looking at their simian, neandrathal faces, and absolutely laughed his butt off. The way they grimaced at his antics and condemned him, they must have thought professional wrestling was a morality play. If I were him, I would have gotten a big kick out of it.

Of course this was an act. It was performance art by a master. He could make professional comics embarrassed to watch him; why not convince a Memphis audience he was sincerely behaving like a spoiled, obnoxious Hollywood cretin. His lawyer, after all, was Zmuda. It took me a few viewings to catch that.

The close-ups of faces in the Memphis crowd are priceless. You have never seen so much backwater, shallow-end-of-the-genepool, jutting cranial ridges as in this audience. You know how so many comedians just happen to mention the scary hick southern towns they have to play? Well, this crowd is proof that those comedians aren't lying. Those people do exist, and the highlight of their lives is driving into town to watch wrestling.

I'm looking forward to seeing Man in the Moon. I hope it's not a disappointment. With Carrey being directed by Forman, I don't think it can lose.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A sweet, charming & funny film
20 December 1998
Woody Allen needs to make more movies like Broadway Danny Rose. It is clever, witty and always entertaining.

So many favorite scenes: the helium-induced, squeaky-voiced gun-shooting chase; the pathetic Holiday party; the menagerie of losers Danny represents; the stupid, wiggle-assed rancorous little bitch played by Mia Farrow.

One of my favorite things about the film is Allen's choice of a narrator, a group of show-biz comedians and agents sitting around having lunch. There's so much affection in their derision of Danny, and of course, affection for Danny by Woody.

This film takes Allen's love for New York and features one slice of it, his love of show business, especially the old New York that none of us will ever experience first hand. But we feel as if we have experienced it authentically, including its tastes, smells, sounds and feelings.

Truly one of Woody's most pleasurable and underrated films. I can't find it on video anywhere (probably out of print) so I'd appreciate it if someone would tell me where I can find a copy.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cats (1998 Video)
9/10
Many original cast in a very fine made-for-TV production
3 November 1998
"Cats" was featured on PBS' "Great Performances" last night (11/2/98). I recognized many of the voices from the original London cast and some new ones -- all splendid. I assume it is the same production featured here.

A very fine job was done adapting the stage musical to television -- it has special opening titles, exquisite make-up and costuming, and wonderful filmography. I can't say enough good about it. The cast was delightful; every word was understandable. Elaine Page reprised her Grizabella (character who sings "Memory"). The orchestra was great, and lighting was absolutely fantastic. Watch for lightning to flash from Mr. Mistoffeles' paws; stars to shine like moonbeams; and a magnificent stairway to the Heaviside Layer.

If you have trouble appreciating this musical, I recommend you read the entire "Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats" by T.S. Eliot. If his witty, inventive lyrics and brilliant insight into the world of felines does not do anything for you, don't bother with the musical. If you love words, wit and clever verse, then this is for you. Eliot quite remarkably poured his observations of cat behavior into human terms by establishing "cat archtypes" which cat lovers will recognize (The Gumbie Cat, who sits and sits and sits on anything flat; The Rum Tum Tugger, who is always on the wrong side of every door; Macavity, who is never to be found at the scene of a crime). Do not look for heavy plot; there is none. Instead, "Cats" is more of a revue -- loosely connected songs staged with just enough story to hold them together. (The lyrics are fun to read all by themselves; look for them on-line.)

Some songs are missing (e.g., The Ballad of Billy M'Caw) and at least one re-written (Mungojerrie and Rumpleteazer) but the production does not suffer. A real treat to finally have the longest running musical in Broadway history available for anyone to see at home.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Postman (1997)
A welcome alternative to Il Postino
30 October 1998
Costner should be congratulated for taking an obscure Italian movie and making it accessible to the masses. I heard raves about "Il Postino," but I can't stand subtitles so I skipped it.

I jumped at the opportunity to see it in my own language, English. I was delighted that they cut out all that annoying poetry!

I'm sure the Academy wanted to give "The Postman" an Oscar, but that honor had already been stolen by the imposter one year earlier.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed