Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Astonishing, Breathtaking, Truly Great Motion Picture Musical!
29 February 2004
One of the most ravishingly beautiful, and most entertaining, movie musicals in history, SONG OF NORWAY is a delight to ear, eye, and intellect! This is the film that introduced me to the great Norwegian composer Edvard Grieg, and I have found hours of sheer delight in his musical genius ever since! The scenery of the film is some of the most stunning in all of motion picture history (Norway is, truly, one of the most beautiful places on Earth). The cast of this movie is superb, but the film really belongs to Florence Henderson, who gives the performance of her career! No one can fail to be moved by her poignant sacrifice for her beloved Edvard, nor avoid feeling overjoyed when love triumphs in the end and conquers all!

SONG OF NORWAY also is perfect family viewing, as it lacks the lurid and smutty nature of most of the filth that is slopped onto screens these days. In these days of Janet Jackson re-defining the term "boob tube," SONG OF NORWAY is there to remind us of a purer, more innocent day when being entertained did not equate with sexual perversion, voyeurism or entrails being dangled in front of our noses. Male or female, young or old, SONG OF NORWAY is a movie for EVERYONE! Please, Hollywood, start making movies like SONG OF NORWAY again! I rate it a 10 out of 10 (and would rate it even higher if such a rating were possible)!
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Something more than your run-of-the-mill supernatural shocker
6 May 1999
This film is often compared to _The Exorcist_ although it was released a couple of years earlier. Certainly _The Exorcist_'s notoriety (and box-office performance) have ecclipsed this film, but horror fans shouldn't miss _The Possession of Joel Delaney_! I first became acquainted with this story when I read the novel in "Reader's Digest Condensed Books" at the age of about eleven years and, yes, it certainly upset me! It isn't as overbearing as _The Exorcist_ and doesn't boast the same shocking plot elements, languages and special effects. On the whole, though, it is somewhat more subtle. The slow process by which Nora Benson comes to realize that her brother is possessed by the spirit of a dead killer is carefully developed and will certainly hold you in suspense. _The Possession of Joel Delaney_ is very much a product of its time (the early 1970s) in its focus on drugs, racial tensions and sexuality. Even though the wardrobe, hairstyles etc. do now appear dated, the film has actually withstood the test of time extremely well. This film really helped to put Perry King "on the map," as it were, and deservedly so: the young actor met the challenges of his role quite competently. As Joel, he comes across as vulnerable, appealing and somewhat shy but, when possessed by Tonio Perez's soul, he conveys malevolence very believably: his facial expressions (aided by lighting and makeup, to be sure) and mannerisms change. The Spanish-accented voice, although dubbed, is chillingly effective and the fact that it's obviously someone else's voice actually works in the film's favor as it underscores the fact that Joel's body has been overtaken by an outside force (just as Mercedes McCambridge's vocality did for _The Exorcist_). The horror genre is often held in low esteem because it doesn't treat "themes of profound significance." Aside from the fact that I think that this statement is ludicrous in many cases (although there is no shortage of really bad horror films), it is also untrue for _The Possession of Joel Delaney_. The film was viewed primarily as a social and political commentary at the time of release. This does not mean, however, that it is "preachy," for you can easily ignore the ideological implications and enjoy the film simply as an excellent example of the horror genre. For something different and offbeat, I recommend _The Possession of Joel Delaney_.
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An lesser-known and underrated Hitchcock masterpiece!
6 May 1999
It's a real shame (and also rather difficult to believe) that this film is so little-known and difficult to view. Even though it was directed by the famous Alfred Hitchcock (in my opinion, the most brilliant film director who ever lived), it has too often been dismissed as one of his "lesser works." To each his own, I suppose, but _Under Capricorn_ boasts some of the most beautiful photography and eloquent, literate dialogue to be found in any Hitchcock film. Although the plot and structure of the film are familiar (the quintessential love triangle, ala _Wuthering Heights_), Hitchcock's treatment raises it above the ordinary. The costumes and sets are actually quite lavish, and pay particular attention to the unique musical score! Hitchcock's experiments with the "ten-minute take" (with which he experimented in his previous film, _Rope_) also add to the film's interest. The film is not, of course, an artistic triumph for Hitchcock alone. Ingrid Bergman and Joseph Cotten (to name only two) are stars of the caliber that one just doesn't see anymore, and they give worthy performances. Casting Ingrid Bergman as an Irish noblewoman is, of course, rather bizarre casting against type, but this great actress makes it work. Joseph Cotten possesses the rougher qualities that his part demands, but his performance also elicits sympathy from the viewer (such as the scene where he is going to present his wife with a collar of rubies but then decides to hide his gift when she and Charles Adair comment that it wouldn't go with her gown). The other actors, mostly little-known to American audiences, fill their roles well more than adequately and the very fact that they are unfamiliar makes them easier for the viewer to see as the characters they play rather than as "stars." All in all, _Under Capricorn_ is an underrated masterpiece that is surely one of the best "costume" pictures of the 1940s. It is not for anyone seeking vicarious thrills or shocks, but for discriminating viewers who demand a coherent storyline, color photography that is aesthetically pleasing, literate dialogue and interesting casting, _Under Capricorn_ will fill the bill. I recommend it enthusiastically!
66 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed