Roadkill (I) (2024) User Reviews

Hot Chicks, Fast Cars & Violence

[gspencley · 5/10 · 7 January 2024]

I think that 5 is the right score for this movie. It reminds me of late night B movies from the 90s. You don't go into it expecting life changing performances and deep commentary. It's just fun, mindless entertainment to enjoy some popcorn with.

The big negative I will give it is the horrendous dialogue. I almost hope that the screenwriter intentionally wrote the dialogue as they did in order to simulate the B movie, made for tv style that the film was obviously going for, because the actors certainly did not have much to work with. People don't talk like that.

I will also say that in the era of streaming services where you have unlimited options for something to throw on when you're bored, you probably have better options. Still, I found it fun and enjoyable and I'm glad I watched it even though I probably will never watch it again. As a child of the 80s, it gave me a bit of nostalgia, some eye candy and a fun 90 minutes of sex appeal, drugs and violence.

If you're in the mood for that type of flick then give it a watch. If you're looking for better dialogue and something that doesn't try to feel like a budget, made for tv movie from the early 90s then you want to pass.

Fresh roadkill?

[htownklown · 5/10 · 8 January 2024]

When I first saw the hitchhiker at the beginning of the movie I thought, 'oh, cool. Dave Grohl is taking some time away from Foo Fighters and branching out into acting. I wish it had been the rock band's frontman. He could've been the secret axe murderer who is found out near the end is killing everyone with an electric guitar. The actor that actually played the drifter was a yawn at best. One dimensional. His character needed layers and wasn't given any. Not much onion to peel back.

Carmichael played the lead character and was able to give the role some texture. Once you get past the notion that this movie isn't a low budget T&A horror flick (no money in the budget for T&A), you then immerse yourself into what Carmichael's character is undertaking in her current adventure.

It didn't seem as if the LEOs (law enforcement officers) knew any cop procedures. I've watched countless hours of cop video on YouTube and these "TV" cops didn't seem realistic. I've watched perps fight with cops as handcuffs are being put on them. Sometimes it takes three or more cops to get cuffs on the criminal, even females.

Finally, I want to say the waitress gives the most authentic scream I've heard in a long time in a horror/thriller flick. Kudos to her.

Objective review

[Luv2Spooge · 3/10 · 11 January 2024]

Right off the bat, this is a low budget film probably by some new unknown writer, director, etc... However, that being said I thought the production value was really good for such a low budget film. The filmatography is perhaps the best highlight of this film and props to the camera director, camera man, and the overall film editing.

However, the audio of the film is what gave it away. Some part has no music at all when it needs it and while other parts have music, such as the chase scene, the music was too quiet or not mixed correctly with the speech audio.

Either way, they were minor issues and overall production value was great. The other thing is the acting, which was surprisingly good for this level of budget. I thought the actors, especially the minor actors, were excellent. They were convincing and fit into the film well, didn't look like people who were reading a script.

Now, you are wondering why the 3 out of 10 then? It is the Script. It started out great, a mystery and it grows. But like most indy scripts, it ran out of ideas and tries to be too flashy. I mean, without giving spoilers, let's just say there are multiple twists and stack on each other. It may seem good on paper, but it makes the story convoluted.

So what started out as a great film in a positive direction ended up a total confusing mess. The ending was just terrible and made no sense at all.

3/10.

Don't be fooled by high scorings this film sucks!

[cynet-52332 · 1/10 · 8 January 2024]

What do you get when you hire a Keanu Reeves look a like and a poundland Megan Fox? A film that sucks goats balls on a huge scale. Not based on the best hitch hiking movie ever the hitchiker of course so this is not even on the same level.

Dialogue which was written by a 5 year old and the most dire of acting on so many levels.

Not going to give any spoilers away because if you read my review you wont watch this movie and you will avoid at any costs.

Unsure why people finance these kind of films because you know your going to get your fingers burnt by a true critic and not one employed by the company churing this rubbish out.

Gave it 1 because there is no zero which sucks like this movie so go figure!

ONE OF THE WORSTS

[jeromesgabilo · 1/10 · 23 January 2024]

Honestly, I could not imagine this being shown to a larger audience. That was how bad this horror/thriller film is. I have no problem with small-budget and independent movies with limited resources, but this one was so not well-made and not well-thought of. The plot and the story were sloppy and so weak that I bet the director just finished making it for the sake of it. The characters were not interesting enough and the performances were awful and underacted. Whoever were behind this movie have a lot to learn about filmmaking. I also could not understand the run of the story. It was confusing and a waste of time.

A nice car...

[sahlgoode · 3/10 · 7 January 2024]

....doesn't make for a complete movie. Especially when you film the high-speed chase scenes at15 mph, which is pretty evident. Just watch the yellow lines. To add insult to injury, all of the chase scenes were too long. I guess to bring it up the 90 min run time.

It kind of has a poor man's "When Mikey met Mallory" (Natural Born Killers) vibe without the (for lack of a better word) romance. There were interesting bits. Enough to make me suffer through the next GD too long slow-speed chase. Danielle Harris brought a good performance considering what she had to work with. There's are plenty bloody gore scenes, which were handled nicely, a plus for viewers. I liked that the fight scenes didn't involve dance-fighting, that so many other action driven flicks have been doing for the last decade. That part was refreshing.

Overall a watchable flick with some flaws. I would have rated it higher than 3, but the car chase scenes really blew it for me.

A valiant effort at least...

[paul_haakonsen · 4/10 · 23 January 2024]

When I stumbled upon this 2024 movie titled "Roadkill", I had never even heard about it. Not that it really mattered, because I do believe in giving any movie I haven't already seen a fair chance, and thus I sat down to watch what writer and director Warren Fast had to offer.

The narrative in "Roadkill" is rather slow and monotonous, and without a whole lot of anything really interesting going on, then it was somewhat of a struggle to sit through what Warren Fast had put together. Warren Fast did attempt to spruce things up a couple of times throughout the narrative, but the efforts were sluggish and half-hearted, which ultimately didn't play out all that well on the screen. For example, the high speed chase scene, which had zero adrenaline to it and didn't feel thrilling or exciting at all.

I wasn't familiar with a single actor or actress on the cast list in "Roadkill", aside from actress Danielle Harris. However, the acting performances in the movie were actually fair, and Caitlin Carmichael (playing The Driver) and Ryan Knudson (playing The Hitchhiker) actually did carry the movie quite well.

While I did manage to sit through the entire 90 minutes that the movie ran for, this movie is hardly something I would recommend you to rush out and get a chance to watch. I am sure that there might be something worthwhile in the movie for fans of anyone on the cast list, but for a casual viewer then "Roadkill" was a pretty stale viewing experience.

"Roadkill" came and went without leaving a lasting impression on me. And I am pretty sure that before the end of the week, the movie will have been swallowed up by the mists of oblivion and gone from my memory.

I suppose the title of the movie can actually also be used to describe the overall impression of the movie itself.

My rating of "Roadkill" lands on a very generous four out of ten stars.

I have seen more interesting Roadkill

[Boristhemoggy · 2/10 · 23 January 2024]

I knew by the title it was going to be a B movie so I started watching with no expectations. However early on 2 children come out of the forest, Bakari Blocton and another boy. Their acting was natural as is true for most kids. That was the last time there was any acting in the film.

The plot was OK, female driver not what she seems, picks up male drifter also not what he seems and they have adventures. The story is an old one and nothing wrong with it, but the screenplay is shall we say...lacking? The dialogue seems to have been written by some 5 year olds and the acting is exactly what you'd expect from a B-C movie. There's not too much blood and gore but the action scenes might make you chuckle.

The props are poor, sets are poor, cinematography is poor and direction is poor. However if you love a good bad movie, and are in it for the laughs, it's not a bad watch, I've seen better but I've seen a lot worse too.

I was going to give it a 1 but I made it too just because Caitlin Carmichael looks like heaven in her jeans...

You said North

[nogodnomasters · 2/10 · 20 February 2024]

The film opens with a boy (Brody Barcellona) being forced to live in a doghouse and feed on dog food. His mom (Christina R Gregg) also Kills his puppy. The film jumps to years later in 1983 because it makes the muscle car more believable. A man (Ryan Knudson) who was the boy and is suspect #1 is hitchhiking from this location, although he looks cleaned up. He is picked up by the bare midriff hot Caitlin Carmichael. She is suspect #2 for the series of highway murders. They travel together in the South East in a car with California plates. (Who will notice? As Ed Wood would say.) Murders happen.

The eye candy was nice, but the film sucked after that. The plot was done in a fashion that proved to lack entertainment value and mystery. The cops were bad actors. No kaleidoscopes were harmed in making this film.

Guide: No F-word, sex, or nudity.

YEAH, RIGHT

[mjbg666 · 1/10 · 22 April 2024]

I watched this based on a favorable review by Robert Daniels from the New York Times. Remember when the NYT used to be a reliable source for arts and culture? Those days are apparently gone. Their so-called "genre experts" will positively review anything to fill their quotas. This piece of garbage had one thing, and only one thing going for it, that being the photography. Hence, the one star rating. Everything else, and I mean everything was about what you'd expect from a movie distributed by Uncorked Films, which seems to be a major source for Amazon Prime movies (which just one of many reasons why I no longer watch Prime movies, the others including their price increase and commercials). All the kill scenes used amateur effects (as in maybe high school quality). But the worst offense is believing that some 90 pound twig thin angry misandrist woman could be the antagonist. Another pathetic plug for creating a completely unrealistic, unbelievable and unsympathetic story of female revenge on the cruel, cruel world they are so unjustly subjected to. Just horrible filmmaking irregardless of the skewed social commentary absurdly applied in a cheap and easy way to get this dreck made at all.

Excellent American low budget thriller

[syed-ali-ehsan · 8/10 · 12 January 2024]

This movie is ALRIGHT! It's low budget no doubt and a bit amateur, but it's much much better than that. The plot was fun and intense. Lots of twists, subverts expectations. I'm sure a lot of people will write it off because there's nothing mainstream about the production, but I'd watch this over Marvel nonsense any day. I'd like to see more from this team of writers, producers and actors. Honestly, well done. This movie is what making movies is all about, despite the obvious limited resources. The lead actress is super good looking. A bit terrorizing the beginning of the movie. Set up well. Satisfied.

Very Good Intense, thriller with a independent low budget on sprinkles. Better than NIGHT SWIM for sure

[kmkevinn-64733 · 7/10 · 8 January 2024]

I actually saw this film in part due to the high ratings. I thought "no way in hell could this be such a great movie." So I saw it, to make my own choice. Here are my thoughts. This genre generally doesn't get the best ratings. Low budget, no-name actors, blow up or burn something down for real and a lot of 'implied' gore plus a few strong action scenes where it gets real. This film kept the story going, even though there wasn't the greatest transitional music ... or sound quality, in general. The story, tried and true, was told more towards the perspective of 'what are the odds that ... two serial killers wind up in the same car.' I think that thought was paraphrased from the final 'Dexter' movie, and was one of two good things from it (the other was Jamie Chung.) This film has Caitlin Carmichael, and she succeeded in being the best actor in this venture. She stood out, in that poor trailer-trash sort of 'innocence.' Yeah that type. Typical of this genre, that poor abused child survived a little road worn, bruised, battered and bleeding, but she lives to kill another day. For that, I am grateful

Conclusion: This film is an exploration of complex psychological themes, delivered through powerful performances. The complex Music/Score was a -1 pitch tone I did apperceiated myself. The opening sequence, a harrowing depiction of a boy suffering physical and emotional abuse at the hands of his mother, is particularly impactful. Offering a thrilling journey filled with intense action and a cleverly executed twist, this film is a throwback to the 1980s horror genre. Casting Danielle Harris was the cherry on top.

Terrible movie.

[mikeswanson-57438 · 2/10 · 25 February 2024]

I gave this a 2 rating and even that was being generous. The one single thing going for it is that it has a hot actress. That's it. That's all. But she can't act.

The story is terrible. It is terribly shot. I don't even think the movie was coloured. I have a thing for low budget independent movies. I will rate them higher than I would if I can tell there was effort put into it. This one, that doesn't apply. It reminds me of a movie shot by a group of high school students.

I have it a shot and didn't shut it off, watching the whole thing. But it didn't get better. It just got worse. 90 minutes I'll never get back.

[3.1] SS tripped

[cjonesas · 3/10 · 11 January 2024]

A completely and utterly crazy mess with nothing to offer. Every field is horrible in its right shallow cupboard category and it isn't just that nothing makes sense, it's the way it's presented with a writer - director playing a part in his own mischievous creation that is sometimes good and sometimes not.

Well, it's one of those times that the writing is so shallow and full of mold that even the beautiful, but crazy empty Caitlin Carmichael's character cannot save it, cause let's be honest, she's one of the main baddies and culprits.

Acting-wise, the waitress at the dining room offered the best acting and deserved way more screentime.

• Screenplay/storyline/plots: 2
• Development: 5
• Realism: 3
• Entertainment: 3.5
• Acting: 3
• Filming/photography/cinematography: 5.5
• VFX: 5
• Music/score/sound: 4
• Depth: 1.5
• Logic: 1
• Flow: 3
• Action/adventure/crime: 2.5
• Ending: 1.

I'm Not Quite Sure What I Wanted, But it Wasn't This

[bemyfriend-40184 · 4/10 · 10 April 2024]

It gets four stars, because the first hour or so was great! The characters all carried a sense of mystery, and the whole premise just drew me in. It was more nuanced than the ham-fisted, and hammy Rob Zombie films of this ilk. There was some surprising humor sprinkled in; such as the African American family standing statue still by their car, as the sheriff investigates the dead couple in the Mercury Cougar. Yes, classic cars abound in this film, which also lends a Rob Zombie retro feel to this mystery, set in the old South. Then it takes a nose-dive. There were unresolved issues.

SPOILERS!! So, did the sheriff kill innocent people in that town? The Keanu Reeves looking guy asked the sheriff if those were his victims, and he seems to say some of them were. Okay, the corrupt Southern sheriff is a typical theme. But this isn't the resolution of the film. I won't go into detail about the conclusion, but it wasn't the Bonnie and Clyde kinda thing I was expecting. Rather, it seemed like an over-the-top, slapstick comedy; and not the almost-serious drama I expected. Seen on Tubi, the free streaming site.

Mindless but with issues

[benz_98 · 3/10 · 7 February 2024]

Sometimes you just point and click and take what comes your way whether it be a pleasant surprise or a disappointment. This film had some cool surprises along the way. The quarrel I have with the flick is the lack of reality and miscellaneous scenes with no connection. She has a car that's fast as lightning and in the police car chase, they are going about 40 mph and the Ford LTD is hot on her bumper. Second, there is no way the crimes that were committed, as many as there were, could be done in such a timeframe and without any trace of blood. Third, there was no way anyone could have been in the trunk now was there any opportunity to put them in there and no way anyone could have gotten them out - not in the time allowed. It was like the director just threw in some shock value scenes to make you go "oooh!" And where did the one police come from and where did it go?

With a bit more reality, the thrill factor could have gone up a few points but as presented, the thrill factor turned into some hilarity. I will say the Hitchhiker completely perfected the "scowl" look and the waitress should have won some award for her "scream."

Dumb Film

[undextrois-490-213363 · 1/10 · 26 April 2024]

This cinematic masterpiece was clearly crafted by a visionary who simply couldn't be bothered with film school. The plot twists were so unexpected, they left me wondering if I accidentally stumbled into an abstract art exhibit. The acting? Let's just say they delivered their lines with all the passion of a room temperature napkin.

Truly, cinema has peaked. Forget B-movies, this is a ZZZ-movie. I can only imagine the director, cackling maniacally as they unleashed this cinematic atrocity upon the world. But hey, at least it wasn't that long. A small consolation prize for the two hours of my life I'll never get back.

Waste of 90 min

[majeddossary · 1/10 · 9 February 2024]

"Roadkill" falls short of expectations, proving to be a disappointing waste of time. The film's plot lacks depth and coherence, leaving audiences questioning the purpose of the meandering storyline. The characters lack development, making it difficult to invest emotionally in their journeys. Despite potential in the cast, the performances are hindered by weak dialogue and unconvincing interactions. Additionally, the pacing feels inconsistent, contributing to a lack of engagement. Overall, "Roadkill" fails to deliver a compelling narrative or meaningful resolution, making it a regrettable investment for those seeking a satisfying cinematic experience.

Unexpected plot twists and ending

[floridafilmoffice · 9/10 · 8 January 2024]

You might THINK you know what's going on but nobody really does. The cinemetography is on point amd the lingering questionsd do not ever give up the answer. ,My ONLY critique was the cartoonish/batnab style credits. There was no connection to the flim and cheapened the look of what obviously was a high dollar film. I'd see it again, wanna make sure I didn't miss somethiing/ I had my eyes covered during the first scene so I HAVE to see it again. GREAT JOB.

The action does not overtake the dialogue. While it IS mostly intense moments of not knowig who or what is doing what to whom. You can't help but TRY to figure it out. BUT YOU CANNOT!

A killer is loose on the rural roads of the Florida Panhandle

[Wuchakk · 7/10 · 12 April 2024]

In 1983, a comely teenager in a red Nova (Caitlin Carmichael) picks up a troubled long-haired hitchhiker (Ryan Knudson) and the mounting bodies naturally attract the local sheriff (Warren Fast, who also happens to be the writer/director).

"Roadkill" (2024) takes the killer-on-the-road theme of flicks like "Kalifornia" or "Midnight in the Switchgrass" and meshes it with the Southern milieu and car chases of "Smokey and the Bandit," minus the comedy. It may be throwaway entertainment that's hollow and somewhat slow burn, but it worked for me for what it is. The director well captures Caitlin's beauty without resorting to tasteless sleaze.

The film runs 1 hour, 30 minutes, and was shot in Ebro, in the heart of the Florida Panhandle, and areas nearby (Bay County and Washington County).

GRADE: B/B-

Awesome twist and turns!

[mmddll-21259 · 10/10 · 7 January 2024]

Wow, this film had a few plot twists I did not see coming! By the end of the film I was hanging on the edge of my seat and could not have imagined the ending. The actors were well picked and did a fantastic job and I really loved the vintage muscle cars. Also recognized some of the filming locations In Bay County Florida and will not look at the old Gulf station in Quincy, Florida the same way again. Do not want to give away any spoilers so will not say much more than this was definitely worth going to see in the theater. I could really see this one becoming a cult classic, well done production all around!!

Riveting

[susandurden · 10/10 · 5 January 2024]

We had the opportunity to watch the pre-premiere in PCB, before the world premiere. "Roadkill" delivers an exhilarating cinematic experience, skillfully weaving a captivating backstory throughout the film. The suspenseful scenes had me on the edge of my seat, keeping me guessing and delivering unexpected surprises. The director's prowess shines through in crafting a well-paced narrative, while the actors showcase impressive diversity in their character roles. This movie is not only well-directed but also leaves a lasting impression, prompting the anticipation of a second viewing. I loved the plot twist!

Twists and turns all around

[Iopheam · 10/10 · 25 January 2024]

"Roadkill" is a gripping thriller that stands out for its compelling performances and unexpected plot twists. Caitlin Carmichael delivers a riveting portrayal as The Driver, bringing depth and nuance to her character's journey. Ryan Knudson, as The Hitchhiker, complements her with a performance that is both haunting and sympathetic. Together, they drive the narrative forward, engaging the audience with their complex backstories and evolving dynamics. The film masterfully plays with genre conventions, delivering surprises that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. Its blend of action, suspense, and character-driven drama makes "Roadkill" a must-watch. The direction and script weave together a story that is as unpredictable as it is entertaining, ensuring that the audience is always guessing what will happen next.

A Gripping Ride Through Revenge and Redemption

[yoshi8 · 10/10 · 1 May 2024]

"Roadkill" isn't your average Hollywood blockbuster, and that's exactly what makes it such a thrilling ride. Buckle up for a white-knuckled journey fueled by vengeance, unexpected twists, and characters that stay with you long after the credits roll.

Caitlin Carmichael is phenomenal as The Driver, a woman on a mission shrouded in mystery. Her steely resolve and raw emotion are captivating, perfectly balanced by Ryan Knudson's portrayal of The Hitchhiker. Their dynamic is a highlight, shifting from wary strangers to reluctant allies as they navigate a dangerous path.

While the plot might borrow elements from classic thrillers, it keeps you guessing with its unpredictable turns. Writer-director Warren Fast knows how to build suspense, and the film's neo-noir aesthetic adds a layer of gritty charm. Don't expect a squeaky-clean Hollywood ending - "Roadkill" explores the complexities of human nature, leaving you pondering the blurred lines between vengeance and redemption.

Yes, there might be moments where the dialogue feels a touch B-movie-esque, but it somehow adds to the film's overall charm. This isn't a film aiming for highbrow awards; it's pure, unadulterated entertainment with a surprising emotional punch.

If you're looking for a film that delivers pulse-pounding action, complex characters, and a story that lingers, then "Roadkill" is definitely worth a watch. Just grab some popcorn, dim the lights, and prepare to be surprised.

Suspenseful on the edge of your seat on ever turn

[DerekMMayer · 10/10 · 26 January 2024]

This movie very good it's been a while since seeing a great film. How do I say just right absolutely everything you want in a film. This cast brings the suspense and the thrills as if you were on the edge of your seat. Great action, good actors, great scenes. I'm definitely looking forward to this productions next film. Thank you for a great film 10 stars!

I can go on and on but don't want to spoil the movie for you. But the style of film and the scenes I have to give the editing department great job.

This cast was great I wish it was a series because I would be binge watching all day.

I only wish we had a drive in theatre still, however our family made our own. For this film we dropped the screen, set up the lawn chairs. Put up surround sound with the laser projector and movie night was awesome.

Thank you For a great film!