"Penny Dreadful" Resurrection (TV Episode 2014) Poster

(TV Series)

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A brilliant show
wiseguy23314 March 2021
The dialogue is exceptionally good. It's poetic and ornate but it also serves a purpose. I love listening to them talk. Quotes like "We have been brutalized with loss. It has made us brutal in return." It's a gem of a line but also serves narrative exposition -there is not true good or evil here only purpose.

People complain that they are acting too serious or dramatic. This is a British period piece. It's based of gothic Victorian 19th century literature and is not modernizing it to assuage manic American attention spans.

You go to any episode of any show that has a few reviews on IMDB and someone will complain that show is boring. Boring is the most subjective opinion. A slow pace for some can be reflective and others boring. A fast pace can be overused action tropes and for others exciting. Boring or interesting can be the difference between watching it after taking too much caffeine or too little.

It's a immensely complex to weave together this many famous story lines and come up with a new cohesive narrative. They are succeeding. And that's not negated just because you find victor frankenstien to be too young or some other detail you feel the need to over-focus on.

It's not a 10 because I get all the rest of their motives but Ethan's is unclear. The rest have been relentlessly traumatized. Would Ethan put himself thru this for money? His back story is likely not fully told but I didn't buy his motivation in this episode. He has a sick girlfriend who he just met who needs medicine. That's not enough.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Penny Dreadful: Resurrection
jackDee-5656522 March 2021
I liked the episode, it progresses well even if it seems to be slow burning, the acting still holds up and is well written, still very much enjoying the show after three episodes
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not as good as what came before but still offers some enjoyment to be had
maxglen3 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Out of the first 3 episodes this episode is the most divisive, on one hand it has some of the best expository scenes involving Frankenstein and his monster, in fact all scenes the two share are as riveting as the show gets but everywhere else this episode falls short. We get an absurdly long sex scene, even for this show's standards and the storylines and acting are the definitely the weakest so far. Although we do get some nice foreshadowing involving one Mr Chandler. I'd say without the Frankenstein stuff this episode is a strong 6 but with it I'm gonna give it a strong 7 or a light 8 because it was truly delightful to watch.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The first-born wants a wife!
Wirefan12215 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Victor Frankenstein's flashback shows his early life's interest in the questions of life and death. Another one reveals the history of Victor's first monster that he created. It tells him about how cruel mankind can be and what a tough road he has had after Victor abandoned him. We get to see how Alun Armstrong (always a delight to see him in a show) as actor Vincent Brand 'rescued' him and gave him a job working as a stage rigger in the local theater. All he wants from Victor is a wife.!?

Vanessa and the gang head to the zoo (she had a vision of Mina again) where they have an encounter with some wolves. They almost fight them but Chandler convinces them not to. Later they pick up a 'child' eating some dead animals in one of the zoo cage areas. Apparently werewolves are next to be introduced.

A few uninteresting side plots so far: Frankenstein's creature story line is somewhat ridiculous and not compelling at all at least for me.

At least there is no Dorian Gray in this one. Not sure how he fits in to the whole plot but his smugness is very annoying and his scripted lines also bore. No Vanessa do not fall for him!

Like other series I will let this one go for the first season but so far it's not looking like very compelling watching.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh my God, what did I just watch?
puzgolac31 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Although I marked this as having spoilers, they are minor and not related to the main plot (as if I could give away spoilers concerning the main plot in a show that shows almost no plot to the viewer).

After two bad episodes comes this one, and it is completely terrible. The pace of the series is painfully slow, yet this episode wastes half an hour to give us every unimportant detail about the private life of the Frankenstein's monster. Every detail, that is, except for the important ones. How did Frankenstein make the monster alive? We don't know. Why is it immortal now? We don't know. Is it a corpse of a previously living human; and if so, how come it doesn't remember it's previous life, like monster 2.0? We don't know. How did it find Victor after he just disappeared? Unclear, but apparently it was super easy, barely an inconvenience. Instead of answering any of those questions, let us have a detailed look at the monster's job as a stage hand, because that is what everybody is interested in. And then, after being forced to listen to the monster speaking pompously as if it were the king of England addressing the Parliament, we are treated to it's motive: it is horny and wants a girl. Great.

The acting is terrible and completely over the top. There is a scene at the beginning with Victor and the monster screaming which is supposed to be meaningful, tense, grave or whatever, but it made me laugh because it was so ridiculous and badly done that it became farcical. And it seems that in every scene the actors try so hard to look intense and supercool, yet they only manage to make you uncomfortable by acting so badly. Additionally, Victor Frankenstein looks like he's still in high school, yet apparently he is not only a doctor (meaning he has presumably graduated from university) but also has a huge experience in experimenting with bringing the dead back to life. He lived fast, that one.
3 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed