The Oscars (2024) Poster

(2024 TV Special)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Jonathan Glazer said what needed to get said
lee_eisenberg12 March 2024
First of all, the only nominated movies that I'd seen from all categories were "The After", "American Symphony", "Barbie", "Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny", "Killers of the Flower Moon", "Maestro", "Nai Nai & Wai Po", "Napoleon", "Oppenheimer", "Rustin" and "The Wonderful World of Henry Sugar".

Jimmy Kimmel referenced Katie Britt's cringey response to Biden's State of the Union address, and later made fun of a negative comment from Donald Trump.

There had been the question of whether or not it was acceptable to hold the ceremony with terrible things going on in Ukraine and Gaza, but I guess that they felt like they had to anyway. I understand that protesters outside had caused the ceremony to delay a few minutes. However, when Jonathan Glazer won for "The Zone of Interest", he denounced the hijacking of the Holocaust as an excuse for a war against Gaza. Inevitably, some people tried to claim that he refuted his Jewishness, conveniently ignoring what he said.

Also important was when Cillian Murphy noted that, for better or worse, we live in Robert Oppenheimer's world, and he dedicated his win to the peacemakers.

As for the rest of the show, I liked it when Sean Lennon came up to the stage when a short based on a song by his parents won. John Cena's gag was a surprise, but he pulled it off. I hope that there's eventually an award for stunts.

The obviously cringey part was the In Memoriam segment; I could barely see the tributes to the deceased people over the dancers. I hope that they get that right next year.

Overall, I liked it. And remember, watch "Oppenheimer" before "Barbie"; after all, the physicist brought about the modern world, and the doll lives in it.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great winners, successful show this year. I genuinely enjoyed it. Even Kimmel was tolerable.
Horst_In_Translation11 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, lately I have stepped back a little bit on awards show reviews, but the Oscars are something else and as the highlight and closing point of the 2023/2024 awards season, there is no way I will miss out here. The show ran (without commercials) for slightly over 2.5 hours and the schedule was alright this time. It did not go longer than expected despite the host making some jokes about it. In the end, however, there was still some time left, so he mocked a former American President and also asked if anybody wanted to come on stage and still say something. Said host is Jimmy Kimmel. I still don't like him and don't think he is particularly funny, but last night he was tolerable, mostly because his material was really good for the most part. The John Cena segment was maybe the highlight of the show away from the winners, especially when he started his introduction with "Costumes" after all that happened before. I also liked the joke on Downey's career-highs and a little later the adopted screenplay reference. Towards the end, he improvised a little gag related to Emma Stone's win that had a connection to her win from a few years earlier that resulted in big Best Picture mayhem. It would have been funnier of course if he had run there and grabbed the envelope in a more physical manner instead of just telling people to keep a close eye on the envelope when the Best Picture letter would have been given out, but oh well. This is something that maybe superior hosts like Chris Rock or Ricky Gervais would have done. Would be nice to see one of those for the 100th anniversary that is not too far away anymore. Of course, Kimmel also had a few poor moments like the pre-recorded segment for the start featuring Margot Robbie or the inclusion with a guy in the audience who said there's free drinks for everybody, but oh well. All in all, his hosting could have been way worse and actually was in the past. There were other funny moments that did not involve him directly. I liked Tim Robbins' little mishap when introducing Robert De Niro. The Barbenheimer battle between Emily Blunt and Ryan Gosling was entertaining as well.

If we look at the winners, there were some close categories and almost all of those went the way I hoped they would. I am happy Japan took two Oscars in the visual effects category as well as the animated feature category. Quite a pity, however, that Miyazaki was not there. Would have loved to see his speech, even if I have to admit I could not understand anything from the Godzilla folks. Another one who was sadly not there to accept his award was Wes Anderson, but good he finally has one at least. And I do not dislike Cumberbatch as strongly anymore as I once did, even if I still think he is overrated. Of course, in terms of comedy, I must mention Nicolas Cage too here, who brought a really funny moment and did as much as he could with his short screen time. He was part of the segment in which the five previous winners announced, or rather introduced the acting nominees. I realized that I liked the ones for male lead way more than those for female lead that did not include a single actress I think that I am really fond of, but tastes differ and, as I stated earlier, Stone winning her second trophy instead of the Academy taking the political route made more than up for it. There were inclusions of politics during the show, but it was bearable. The Trump moment I mentioned already and then there was a lot attached to the documentary winners given the subject of their film, but I am not sure if the recipient was honest there in saying he would have preferred a scenario in which his movie never would have gotten made. I do believe in reality he ranks personal profit and triumph higher, but he said what everybody wanted to hear. I only liked this moment a bit because the female standing behind him was maybe the biggest beauty of the night. Or was it Becky G? Or maybe even Billie Eilish? I do have a thing for her, not gonna lie.

The latter two were of course part of the best song category. Thumbs-up there for including all the best song nominees during the show and give us the tunes, even if some of them felt shortened. Ryan Gosling definitely rocked the house with his performance and Emma Stone's outfit wasn't ready for it. Well, Billie Eilish is still only 22 and has two Oscars there. As for Diane Warren, let's not talk about it. It was already a weak year for Best Song, but they wanted to give "Barbie" at least one trophy and there was no other category where it could happen as we know now. At least, the makers cannot cry again now the way they did when Gerwig was not nominated for Best Director. I would still say that the Best Song win was among the weakest of the night. The one song that was far superior to all the nominees was Andrea Bocelli's famous number of course. He was there for the In Memoriam segment. I really love the tune and the lyrics fit this segment nicely, maybe better than any other tune and I also liked the violins. With the dancers I am not so sure, but it was alright. Maybe the camera just should have stayed on the nominees. I like that approach more in general than showing us the stage. It just brings out more emotions. What I did not like too much was Tina Turner getting the last spot. Sure she was a star and an icon, but this would have been an honor more suitable for the Grammys. She has acted, but nobody sees her of an actress as much as of a musician. Still, all in all, I am happy the goy Bocelli to perform and I think his son was with him. The standing ovation for Bocelli was also deserving.

Before some more brainstorming, let me say that I do not approve of the idea that stunt people do not get honored during the show. At least they were mentioned this time, but not in a way like the other ones coming on stage. There was also some early talk about casting directors or so being honored with an Oscar? Was not part of the show either. I think it is just disrespectful for any award show to give out awards to people and do not include them during the broadcast because it automatically implies something like your work is less worthy than the work for other categories. What else can we talk about? Oh yes, Al Pacino announced the big winner at the very end and I think he is maybe the best actor of his generation and nice to see him there. The 50th anniversary reference to The Godfather felt accurate too. Masterpiece of a movie. Still, there was a little bit of confusion with the Best Picture winner the way Pacino announced it. So, again in a year that Emma Stone won for Best Actress, Best Picture got a little messy. Not Beatty/Dunaway level messy, but still. Nonetheless, at that point everybody pretty much knew that Oppenheimer would win the big category of the night in contrast to "Moonlight" and "La La Land", even if maybe "La La Land" was also a big favorite and again Stone was part of one of the contenders, this time the challenger. As for Stone, we can say that Yorgos Lanthimos definitely has a good touch with his lead actresses. Colman was the underdog against Close, Stone also an underdog, but maybe not by as much, against Gladstone. The latter featured in Scorsese's newest that did not score a win this night, but the joke about how you can travel to where the film was set and solve a murder during the running time of Killers of the Flower Moon" was also a but funny. Films really have gotten longer these past years.

I have not yet talked about the short film categories except Wes Anderson. Not seen anything really there, so can't elaborate in detail, but from a personal perspective I am glad that the Yoko Ono animated short won (more Japan triumph there) because the filmmaker who shot the initial frontrunner "Letter to a Pig" seemed to have gotten a bit arrogant because of the Oscar nomination. Surely the current political climate here helped with the "war is over" theme featured in the animated short. Besides, it is a really fine number and I am far from a huge Beatles fan, so it means something when I say so. Let's keep going: Spielberg was shown several times and also presented a crucial award, but his funniest moment was linked to Jeff Goldblum (always a win when he is included, even only talked about), even if the speech from the two female presenters was not exactly a success other than that, but with an SNL actress and a Barbie supporting actress you should not really expect too much. There were quite a few segments when two females presented an award. Another included Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo. The latter is a Black actress I have big respect for because of her views. As for Grande, she is alright too, even if I am not sure what she is doing there on Oscar night. Still nice to look at and has aged well and her voice still sounds like the one from a teenager. Speaking of presenting duos, Schwarzenegger and DeVito were also pretty nice. They did not take the obvious route of mocking Arnie's movie or so, but with the help of Michael Keaton or rather his face expression, they came up with a really hilarious moment. There were quite a few strong men there that night: Arnie and Cena I mentioned already and these two brought some of the best moments of the night. The trio is completed by The Rock who was more on the forgettable side and his backstage handshake with Cena before a commercial break is all I remembered about him. I guess this is pretty much it then. Before the review ends, let me say that I as a German found the inclusion of Sandra Hüller interesting of course. Whose films had a really good night. Especially the sound category win for "The Zone of Interest" was not super expected. Pity though Christian Friedel was not featured more. And now I know what Americans think about German romantic comedies. Christoph Waltz was also there. Cool. Would be nice to see him in more movies again. Character limit is approaching, so that's it. Great Oscar show in 2024!
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
96th Academy Awards
Prismark1012 March 2024
Jimmy Kimmel hosted the awards and he is regarded as a safe pair of hand. As long as he did not make jokes about Robert Downey Jr. They all bombed.

Kimmel later redeemed himself with his response to an online review by a former president.

Oppenheimer was the big winner of the night. It took all the major honours. Poor Thing was the poor thing but it still won four. Barbie's Oscar went for a song.

Once again a Martin Scorsese film leaved empty handed. Like The Irishman, lots of nominations but no wins.

Here is a hint Marty. Next time make a shorter film! Actually Kimmel noted how long some of the contenders were. Did anyone think of my bladder.

Some of the victory speeches were still cloying. Seeing Twins Arnie and Danny DeVito take on Michael Keaton's Batman was fun.

A slick show but once again they messed up the In Memoriam section. I want to see the people who passed on. Not the singers, dancers or the orchestra.

As for the Best Picture presenter. Give up on getting the actor who was in that hit movie fifty years ago. It's way past their bedtime.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
When Marvin Brando consigned an Oscar to . . .
pixrox114 March 2024
. . . a representative of the original Americans a few years back, the Academy revoked this recognition of such individuals' unheralded knack of putting on a brave face, and erased Marvin's attempt to spotlight an overlooked cohort of actors as if he were just a kooky visiting Martian who did not fully understand Earthling politics. However, the build-up to Tinsel Town's "Big Night" this year promised that the one sure winner would reinstate Marvin's effort to finally right the wrongs of the Twentieth Century. Shockingly, like Lucy yet again pulling the football away before Charlie Brown can kick it, this promised restitution was shifted at the last moment to an infamous harlot in a self-proclaimed broken dress. Talk about Hollywood's Walk of Shame!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
what a night!
hsm_hsm23 March 2024
The 96th Academy Awards, affectionately known as the Oscars, brought its A-game this year. Hosted by the ever-charming Jimmy Kimmel, the show kicked off with a monologue that was both celebratory and politely humorous. The night was filled with feel-good moments, from Messi, the canine star of Anatomy of a Fall, to Da Vine Joy Randolph's emotional acceptance speech (cue a tearful Paul Giamatti). Oppenheimer, with its impressive 13 nominations, didn't quite break the record, but still snagged seven awards, including Best Picture. And let's not forget the completely nude John Cena and a Kentastic Ryan Gosling performance. All in all, a solid Oscars presentation that focused on the craft of filmmaking.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Jimmy Kinnel
David_Paulsen11 March 2024
Jimmy Kimmel's performance as the host of the 96th Academy Awards left much to be desired. While he managed to avoid any major controversies or mishaps, his overall presence felt disappointingly bland. Here's why: 1. Lack of Energy: Kimmel's opening monologue lacked the spark and wit we've come to expect from Oscar hosts. It felt like he was going through the motions, ticking off the usual jokes without any genuine enthusiasm.

2. Predictable Humor: Kimmel's attempts at humor were safe and predictable. There were no daring punchlines or memorable zingers. It was as if he was afraid to take risks, resulting in a forgettable comedic experience.

3. Emotionless Delivery: Whether introducing presenters or interacting with nominees, Kimmel's delivery remained flat. He failed to inject any emotion or excitement into the proceedings, making it hard for the audience to stay engaged.

4. Missed Opportunities: The Oscars are a platform for celebrating the magic of cinema, but Kimmel missed several opportunities to elevate the show. Instead of embracing the uniqueness of films like "Everything Everywhere All at Once," he played it safe with generic banter.

In summary, Jimmy Kimmel's hosting was like a lukewarm cup of tea-neither scalding nor refreshing. While it wasn't a disaster, it certainly didn't leave a lasting impression. Here's hoping for a more dynamic and enjoyable host next year!
10 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Whose brilliant idea was it to add dancers to the Memoriam segment in the show?
Sylviastel13 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The Academy Awards would get a higher rating if they had respected those we lost this year. Sadly, they decide to have Andrea Bocelli and his son sing beautifully onstage. The memoriam video wasn't used entirely. I could see dancers and the orchestra. It was disrespectful to those we lost at all. As a viewer at home, I didn't see the memoriam entirely. It was disrupted by distractions. Please restore the memoriam to remember those we lost.

Apart from the memoriam disaster, the awards did better an hour earlier. Jimmy Kimmel did a superb job as host. The awards moved along smoothly without showing clips in the acting categories. The presenters were fine. The show ended a few minutes earlier than usual. Sadly there were no surprises this time especially in the acting categories. Both films, "Oppenheimer," and "Poor Things," dominated the night. Ryan Gosling did well as did the other performers. I would have liked to have seen the film clips for the actors rather than five previous academy award winners to say something remarkable about a particular nominee and welcome a new member into the club.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Okay shorter Oscars with "Oppenheimer" burning the competition.
blanbrn12 March 2024
"The 96th Academy Awards" were shorter starting at 7PM and they were very funny with jokes as host Jimmy Kimmel was okay, and the awards show too was okay. Really no surprises as all the hype was "Barbie" vs. "Heimer". And "Oppen" got the edge all getting wins for best picture, director, and best actor and supporting actor. Rightfully so was the young and pretty talented Emma Stone winning best actress for her turn in the sci fi fantasy comedy "Poor Things". And a memorable treat was seeing Michal Keaton saying bring it on to Danny and Arnold as we all remember their on screen feud days from the "Batman" movies especially "Batman Returns". Overall nothing great not the best "Oscars" still it was a watch for entertainment fans and film lovers!
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Adjustments
ThunderKing613 March 2024
Date: March 12th 2024

Genre;

All genres in one, award show

Duration:

2 3 hours of watching people walk up steps.

What was this film/show/game about?:

It was about fantastic modern day movies getting awards that they deserve because no one else could do it better... Apparently.

The story and the production overview:

It was just like the 95 Oscar awards... I mean do I have say more?

Should I critique how they walked on stage?

Johnny Cena, the wrestler that I always hated had a moment. What are the odds of that?

Go away Johnny Cena.

Overall:

Same old same old. Nothing stood out

Highlight:

Nothing.

Moral:

It's not about talent. Just ask Johnny Cena.

Villian:

Hollyweird and Johnny Cena.

Rating:

Just needs a trash can.

Finals words:

Great to see modern day movies being awarded because they work hard to produce wonderful movies all the time.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
For Memory
dewlover42011 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This won't be as in-depth as usual, it'll be brief. Essentially bullet points.

I loved John Cena.

I hated Across the Spider-Verse snub.

Aside from John Cena, I can't say any other celebrities that handed out awards impressed me.

I hated The Holdovers' "in-general" snub.

But if the movie was going to only take home one award, it should've been supporting actress.

I liked Oppenheimer more than The Holdovers, but I wanted The Holdovers to win best picture. So I should be more happy about Oppenheimer's best picture win. But I'm not. (Especially since I chose Oppenheimer on ESPN's Fantasy thing, like the majority of people.)

Christopher Nolan's win was unsatisfying because, he's been nominated before and a while ago. Sure "long time coming" but sometimes if it's so long, like Leo in 2016, it just isn't satisfying. You're like "alright great, the academy figured it out finally." Plus Chris is subdued...I have to assume that's why he in general is less excited when speaking about things. He's trying to be polite and calm? (Towards the end of this speech even, he seemed to be holding back emotional expression. He should've let it out!)

It seems like every year, there's less and less nominees "in general" that I've seen or liked. (Aside from the recent uptick in blockbusters nominated for best picture, but I don't even like most of those honestly.) But this year was a particularly brutal year, because several were about events I don't want to see in a movie, or in other languages. Foreign movies are not bad, but when they're not like "Godzilla Minus One" or "Train To Busan" or "Amelie" you know entertaining and enjoyable...it can get very emotionally draining, very quickly.

I didn't make a vlog for my YouTube channel, or even film my reaction to best picture. We had a bit of a cluster, and didn't start watching until 9:00? 9:30? We definitely only barely finished before midnight.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed