a very, very funny but touching story. both lovers dreamed about making a family but they both fail. rather they became succeed on other things. i can't express my feelings about this film. you must watch this and you will be able to know why. it is a mixture of comedy, drama, fantasy and a romantic love story. Winona's family have a series of deaths caused by a certain disease called lupus. all of Winona's female relatives; from her ancestors, to her great-great grandmother, great grandmother, grandmother and mother died before the age of 25. only Winona survived the 25-age limit. however, there is a doctor wherein he diagnosed the health of Winona and he didn't saw the result because there was an earthquake after the test and he died.
3 Reviews
films have flaws, but my only u is a GOOD film
giopotes12 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
BONG: ano'ng Tagalog ng six? MANG RAUL: anim. BONG: eh... ng sex?
directed by Cathy Garcia-Molina starring Vhong Navarro, Toni Gonzaga, Benjie Paras, Dennis Padilla, Arlene Muhlach, Janus del Prado, Kitkat, Empoy Marquez, Beauty
Although Jologs (2002) proved Vhong Navarro as a real actor, My Only Ü (a movie made in celebration of Star Cinema's 15th Anniversary) contributed more impressions to me.
My Only Ü is a romantic comedy-drama and arguably one of Star Cinema's best. Unlike Vhong's caricature films D' Anothers (2005), Agent X44 (2006) or Supapahlicious (2007), this one's serious. It has a well-crafted screenplay (that would remind you of classic Hollywood romance) and the story never left its characters despite of the millions of jokes and funny acts shown.
The film starts with Winona Aunor (Gonzaga) walking towards the end of a roof. People in the apartment (a friendly neighborhood like in Gagamboy) witness this and each have their own reactions: she will jump, mamamatay na ehh or she won't because she will still live for two days.
It's Winona's family curse: to die before reaching the age of 25. And in the story, Winona's 25th birthday is not until two days.
Bong Garvilla (Navarro) to the rescue. Winona lives after her 25th birthday and starts new goals - including a job in Japan.
But there's another twist. According to their dead local doctor (Paras, still very comedic), Winona has an illness called lupus. Bong is the only one who knows this and he didn't tell it to anyone. He just protects Winona in every way he can to let her survive and he does everything just to keep her from getting to Japan.
Winona learns about this eventually and she blames Bong for hiding it all from her. Bong was hospitalized after tiring days of looking after Winona and here's another twist - it's not Winona who has a disease, it's Bong.
In the (tragic or happy?) ending, the two died in a car accident.
Things to see and love in this film are plenty: Vhong Navarro giving Winona a planner, Winona's finger jokes imitated by Navarro and Paras, Janus del Prado's ngongo, Kitkat and Empoy as a quarreling couple, Arlene Muhlach's portrayal of a poor mother with many children, Padilla's words of wisdom as a father, the friendly neighborhood you'd wish to have, Kasama kang Tumanda by Toni Gonzaga, cameos of Zanjoe Marudo and John Lloyd Cruz, the hilariously frank screenplay, Cathy Garcia-Molina's direction and the whole movie itself.
What I loved most is Vhong Navarro's sad but creative and funny Bong Garvilla. I can smell a Gawad Urian Nomination again. People loved him in his Jologs character as a suicidal hopeless-romantic. If they won't love him again here, they're numb. I also love Toni Gonzaga's tired-of-the-help Winona, who's pinched every morning by her blind dad (Padilla) just to let the people know she's alive.
What about the brilliant supporting cast? No one in that background dares to steal the movie from the romantic leads. In stead they became the rainbow... colorful, pretty and different from each other.
BONG: anEEEm!
directed by Cathy Garcia-Molina starring Vhong Navarro, Toni Gonzaga, Benjie Paras, Dennis Padilla, Arlene Muhlach, Janus del Prado, Kitkat, Empoy Marquez, Beauty
Although Jologs (2002) proved Vhong Navarro as a real actor, My Only Ü (a movie made in celebration of Star Cinema's 15th Anniversary) contributed more impressions to me.
My Only Ü is a romantic comedy-drama and arguably one of Star Cinema's best. Unlike Vhong's caricature films D' Anothers (2005), Agent X44 (2006) or Supapahlicious (2007), this one's serious. It has a well-crafted screenplay (that would remind you of classic Hollywood romance) and the story never left its characters despite of the millions of jokes and funny acts shown.
The film starts with Winona Aunor (Gonzaga) walking towards the end of a roof. People in the apartment (a friendly neighborhood like in Gagamboy) witness this and each have their own reactions: she will jump, mamamatay na ehh or she won't because she will still live for two days.
It's Winona's family curse: to die before reaching the age of 25. And in the story, Winona's 25th birthday is not until two days.
Bong Garvilla (Navarro) to the rescue. Winona lives after her 25th birthday and starts new goals - including a job in Japan.
But there's another twist. According to their dead local doctor (Paras, still very comedic), Winona has an illness called lupus. Bong is the only one who knows this and he didn't tell it to anyone. He just protects Winona in every way he can to let her survive and he does everything just to keep her from getting to Japan.
Winona learns about this eventually and she blames Bong for hiding it all from her. Bong was hospitalized after tiring days of looking after Winona and here's another twist - it's not Winona who has a disease, it's Bong.
In the (tragic or happy?) ending, the two died in a car accident.
Things to see and love in this film are plenty: Vhong Navarro giving Winona a planner, Winona's finger jokes imitated by Navarro and Paras, Janus del Prado's ngongo, Kitkat and Empoy as a quarreling couple, Arlene Muhlach's portrayal of a poor mother with many children, Padilla's words of wisdom as a father, the friendly neighborhood you'd wish to have, Kasama kang Tumanda by Toni Gonzaga, cameos of Zanjoe Marudo and John Lloyd Cruz, the hilariously frank screenplay, Cathy Garcia-Molina's direction and the whole movie itself.
What I loved most is Vhong Navarro's sad but creative and funny Bong Garvilla. I can smell a Gawad Urian Nomination again. People loved him in his Jologs character as a suicidal hopeless-romantic. If they won't love him again here, they're numb. I also love Toni Gonzaga's tired-of-the-help Winona, who's pinched every morning by her blind dad (Padilla) just to let the people know she's alive.
What about the brilliant supporting cast? No one in that background dares to steal the movie from the romantic leads. In stead they became the rainbow... colorful, pretty and different from each other.
BONG: anEEEm!
Not Only Me
charliekoon30 January 2009
The film is horrendous. I cannot think of an adjective to better articulate my dismay with this creepy crappy film. I have nearly lost my Filipino sensibility with its hazy 'crude humor' which they have deliberately incorporated. What's with patola? You know, it's just baffling to me, that somehow, at this point in time, they already know how to adhere with the proper usage of comedic devices in films. This is where we are good at. What I have seen is entirely a mockery of what they have already established (Star Cinema's recent films).
My Only Ü is the story of Winona (Toni Gonzaga), who happens to have a history of early death from her mother's side. They have been cursed that before they reach the age of twenty-five, they will die. Bong (Vhong Navarro) is the caretaker of the tenement where Winona lives. He is the closest friend of Winona. He has a deep admiration for her. He tries his best to save Winona's life who is two days away from her 25th birthday. Things changed when Winona miraculously survives the curse.
The premise of the film has uncovered the contrivance I wanted to discuss further. They have integrated a device which has been used by Greek and Roman drama called dues ex machina. It is probably the idea behind the 'fantastic' or rather the insoluble plot. Of course a double usage might not be harmful and the film has gotten hold of it in the presence of Doctor Duke (Benji Paras). Obviously, the premise has something to do with the unexplained curse, which they have lethargically narrated in a very pseudo-comical way. They showed the ancestors of Winona who passed away before reaching twenty-five and has explained how they died. It is confusing though that they have explained the unlikely way they die rather than simply explaining the curse itself. Doctor Duke just comes out of nowhere to resolve the problem.
What can we do, the intractable problem in the plot line has already been completed. It is not entirely healthy to use this kind of device simply because it implies a lack of skill on the part of the writers (Emmanuel dela Cruz, Chinno Marquez, John Roque, Tanya Winona Bautista). It does not compensate to the appropriate logic of the story itself. What will the characters do? Just act out what has simply been the idea in the first place? Does it mean that the character's seemingly sparkling romance is a bit off to put it further? It is a bit insulting for me as part of the audience watching it and persuading myself with its machination. I could not simply partake of it.
The moment I sit in that theatre, I know what they have to offer and that is to entertain. Actually, there is a promise of entertainment in the film which is easily recognized. Audience might need a little participation for this as they must be willing to overlook the limitations of the film and not interfere with the approval of the premise. It is quite interesting though, but even on its entertainment aspect, the film deeply subsides.
The cinematography is irrevocably bad. It doesn't adhere to the very essence of why it was made in the first place. It looks dull at times, the color grading is a bit dark, or does it embody death? Actually it must look brighter. Nonetheless they have been proud of the fact that it is a black comedy after all. The supposed to be humor that surrounds death is a bit offensive. It tries to be humorous but it appears to be more on the scornful aspect of it. The idea has totally gone off-beam as their objective of a lighter approach towards the subject of death has not been reasonably thought of.
It is also noteworthy to define the jokes they have injected in the film. Filipino Culture is unique towards this and I have no condemnation with how ethnocentric the jokes have progressed. It is at times funny. The parody has been a very good device to extract laughter. But My Only Ü has been sloppy with the off-color humor it has projected simply because it is not hilarious at all. I never heard the audience laugh for some of its 'in-jokes'. They could have been forced to laugh simply because there is a cue that it is indeed the punch line. I have no doubts that the actors have made their very best to make it humorous. They have done it with caution and much more, with precision. But I cannot simply give away my laughter for those silly lines. Anyway, Gonzaga and Navarro have this charm in how they handled their characters. It could save the film. Actually, it is funny that we still criticize films like this. Why not? If they could have known their strengths, they could have stuck with them. I did not feel any risk on their part as they get to use a hasty device.
Garcia-Molina might have done a great job with A Very Special Love simply because it is written with grace and is confidently executed. For now, it has been a hit and miss. My Only Ü has used a device not so common to all. People die for strange reasons and at times, even if they have sickness, it is still uncommon to the general Filipino public (You should go to PGH). Tragedy still requires a logical explanation for any occurrence as well as with comedy. Even with a comedic interpolation, it must be coherent. Films must give justice to what has transpired because after they have shown it, they can't explain further what it tries to achieve.
Rating: 1/5
My Only Ü is the story of Winona (Toni Gonzaga), who happens to have a history of early death from her mother's side. They have been cursed that before they reach the age of twenty-five, they will die. Bong (Vhong Navarro) is the caretaker of the tenement where Winona lives. He is the closest friend of Winona. He has a deep admiration for her. He tries his best to save Winona's life who is two days away from her 25th birthday. Things changed when Winona miraculously survives the curse.
The premise of the film has uncovered the contrivance I wanted to discuss further. They have integrated a device which has been used by Greek and Roman drama called dues ex machina. It is probably the idea behind the 'fantastic' or rather the insoluble plot. Of course a double usage might not be harmful and the film has gotten hold of it in the presence of Doctor Duke (Benji Paras). Obviously, the premise has something to do with the unexplained curse, which they have lethargically narrated in a very pseudo-comical way. They showed the ancestors of Winona who passed away before reaching twenty-five and has explained how they died. It is confusing though that they have explained the unlikely way they die rather than simply explaining the curse itself. Doctor Duke just comes out of nowhere to resolve the problem.
What can we do, the intractable problem in the plot line has already been completed. It is not entirely healthy to use this kind of device simply because it implies a lack of skill on the part of the writers (Emmanuel dela Cruz, Chinno Marquez, John Roque, Tanya Winona Bautista). It does not compensate to the appropriate logic of the story itself. What will the characters do? Just act out what has simply been the idea in the first place? Does it mean that the character's seemingly sparkling romance is a bit off to put it further? It is a bit insulting for me as part of the audience watching it and persuading myself with its machination. I could not simply partake of it.
The moment I sit in that theatre, I know what they have to offer and that is to entertain. Actually, there is a promise of entertainment in the film which is easily recognized. Audience might need a little participation for this as they must be willing to overlook the limitations of the film and not interfere with the approval of the premise. It is quite interesting though, but even on its entertainment aspect, the film deeply subsides.
The cinematography is irrevocably bad. It doesn't adhere to the very essence of why it was made in the first place. It looks dull at times, the color grading is a bit dark, or does it embody death? Actually it must look brighter. Nonetheless they have been proud of the fact that it is a black comedy after all. The supposed to be humor that surrounds death is a bit offensive. It tries to be humorous but it appears to be more on the scornful aspect of it. The idea has totally gone off-beam as their objective of a lighter approach towards the subject of death has not been reasonably thought of.
It is also noteworthy to define the jokes they have injected in the film. Filipino Culture is unique towards this and I have no condemnation with how ethnocentric the jokes have progressed. It is at times funny. The parody has been a very good device to extract laughter. But My Only Ü has been sloppy with the off-color humor it has projected simply because it is not hilarious at all. I never heard the audience laugh for some of its 'in-jokes'. They could have been forced to laugh simply because there is a cue that it is indeed the punch line. I have no doubts that the actors have made their very best to make it humorous. They have done it with caution and much more, with precision. But I cannot simply give away my laughter for those silly lines. Anyway, Gonzaga and Navarro have this charm in how they handled their characters. It could save the film. Actually, it is funny that we still criticize films like this. Why not? If they could have known their strengths, they could have stuck with them. I did not feel any risk on their part as they get to use a hasty device.
Garcia-Molina might have done a great job with A Very Special Love simply because it is written with grace and is confidently executed. For now, it has been a hit and miss. My Only Ü has used a device not so common to all. People die for strange reasons and at times, even if they have sickness, it is still uncommon to the general Filipino public (You should go to PGH). Tragedy still requires a logical explanation for any occurrence as well as with comedy. Even with a comedic interpolation, it must be coherent. Films must give justice to what has transpired because after they have shown it, they can't explain further what it tries to achieve.
Rating: 1/5
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
