Share? (2023) User Reviews

Slow burn but does make you think, even if just a little.

[ruble-huff · 5/10 · 21 November 2023]

Share? Surprised me. I almost turned it off several times due to its inane stupidity. I would call it satire more than a thriller. There isn't all that much thrill to it, but it takes very clear jabs at social media, social media addiction, and caricatures. The visual effects were laughable, the characters were stereotypical, and I didn't find any of it particularly funny or even really sci-fi related apart from the use of computers that were big in the 1980's.

I have seen far worse movies, though. This indie film was simply shot; the camera never moves. There are no shaky-cam shots, jump scares, explosions, or lens flares.

I'm actually glad for that, because they have enough trouble managing actual fire.

A lot is left unexplained but as this film seems message-focused, most people will just glaze over the lack of clarity.

Sadly, in my opinion, the film also blew its landing. People gained power and promptly abused it, as everyone knows they would. I won't spoil it for those who choose to watch it. I'll just say that it ultimately disappointed me.

Ho Hum should have been a short

[anthonyiaclaims · 4/10 · 22 March 2024]

This is just cube redone as a bunch of people in separate rooms. The only difference is most of the people are supposedly happy being prisoners. I guess that makes it original... The main character is ok but boring. No way people are paying to watch him fart.

It was hard to stay immersed in the movie, your mind wanders as it drags on and on. It should have been a short on Black Mirror. The yoga chick is the only one worth watching.

This was a tight budget, 1 camera same rooms over and over, Crappy TV monitors. Whole thing reeks of cheap.

I would not recommend but it isn't awful, just boring.

Very unique

[ricardopoyle · 6/10 · 4 March 2024]

Honestly, I thought this was a pretty good film, at first I thought it was going to be cliche, and boring especially at the start because it's quite goofy but it turns into a good idea.

My only flaw with this movie is I feel like there's a lot of time not doing really anything, and it kind of just takes up the movie, if this film had more budget I guarantee it'd be 8+.

Therefore, I still recommend it, it was entertaining, just a movie you put on with 1 or 2 other people, not to watch with family or anything but just to relax and take in.

Overall, I really enjoyed watching this with my girlfriend, as it was a new idea we haven't seen, it reminded me of Nasubi, a Japanese sweepstake contestant who was "held" captive and was make to send out sweepstakes to live for 15 months in isolation.

Surprisingly good.

[talllguysf · 8/10 · 23 December 2023]

Did you know that social media fosters toxic relationships among its users, who only gain clout and/or material gains by performing inanely for each other? In this fundamentally unbalanced type of community network, individuals are complicit for as long as they allow themselves to be seduced by the illusion of power-wow! That's the sort of asked and answered wisdom at the heart of "Share?," an ungenerous techno-satire about an unnamed man who wakes up in an unfurnished cell with only a computer monitor for company.

There's a little more to this sketchy sci-fi parable, all about a wary cipher, #000000014 (Melvin Gregg), who learns how to not only survive, but maybe even game his prison's live-streaming camera network, which connects imprisoned users through their respective computer monitors. But only a little. "Share?" ostensibly has a dark sense of humor, too, yet even its jokes point a lazy finger at viewers.

"Share?" is only 70+ minutes long, and it shows. We see the movie's world through the unblinking eye of #000000014's computer monitor, the one he also uses to broadcast a live video stream from inside his grey brutalist cell. Why is he there, and who's keeping him? That's an irrelevant mystery, according to co-writer/director Ira Rosensweig and co-writer Benjamin Sutor. Rather, we're supposed to focus on the patternmaking logic that leads #000000014 to figure out how to get attention from unseen viewers and earn points that he can convert into amenities, like food, clothes, or an inflatable mattress. #000000014 spends a lot of time peering into and through the camera frame since it's presented as a monitor. His computer seems pretty basic, given frequent prompts like "Share?" and "Good food?" It's almost as if social media and technology only grant its users' limited agency, maaan.

A Fresh Take on Sci-Fi with a Minimalist Twist

[tim_d3 · 8/10 · 4 February 2024]

• If you liked the movie "Cube" or "Buried" you might want to check this movie out. It feels like a black mirror episode to be honest. It's definitely sci fi with an invisible commentary surrounding social media. It's a movie definitely not for everyone.

• It's has a fresh take on minimal , as few as possible actors and settings, type of movies. I love these type of movies. Be aware that the movie takes place on only 1 camera, meaning 1 camera angle.

• Melvin Gregg who plays #000000014 , actually does a great job. Decent acting and his screen presence kept me engaged and glued to the screen. He comes off as likable and has a kind heart.

• The first 15 minutes are definitely a mixture of, ' I hope this movie is good?', 'I hope the main actor can act with the material he's been given?'. The answer is yes on both.

• It instantly reminded me of Cube but with the whole spiel/layer of Twitch (the live streaming platform) permeating the movie.

• The soundtrack is a bit quirky at first but It really grew on me. I now hum it involuntary. 'dud' - dud dud dud.

• I have to admit , I really enjoyed this movie. It kept me guessing. And the character developments with its twists and turns were actually not bad. I am very happy I stumbled across it and gave it a try.

Unique and disturbing movie

[toonarly · 10/10 · 4 February 2024]

Think of being in a form of full immersive whole body facetime in a single windowless room with no way out, you arrive with no knowledge of how you got there or why, Everything you do is voluntarily "shared" to get "likes" to recieve benefits to either "buy" stuff to make your room better equipped, or to get better foods and drinks as well as clothing. Every "player" starts the same in thier basic underwear with nothing else and they must figure out how to use the interface to find others and get the perks, or find a way out. There are "glitches" which when used can wreak havok or sooth, but to use one, you take a chance as to it's actual beneit or terror. There is a punishment for non-compliance as well which can be deadly. Looks very much like what a tyrannical global government would do to keep the people under control, monitored and eliminate undesireables at the same time and it could all be run by AI. Quite terrifying if you think it out...Nothing questionable, partial nudity, some foul language and some graphic terror. Enjoy!

Share addiction?!

[bendewald-810-54944 · 9/10 · 9 February 2024]

...might have been a better title. I appreciated this familiar thriller set in the near future, or now? It's easy to imagine or as the filmmaker not so subtly points out IS happening to us now. I could personally relate to the thrill of getting clicks and putting off more important things in my life but for what? Are we really living when we operate in this kind of void?

I also appreciated the simplicity of the setting and system by which the filmmaker brings us into this bleak and sterile world fulled by external forces, a faceless and relentless pressure to produce more and more and more - but for what? I'm looking forward to more films by this up and coming director writer.