SHOP STARGATE...
IMDb >
"Stargate: Atlantis" Critical Mass (2005)
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips"Stargate: Atlantis"
Critical Mass (2005)
Overview
TV Series:
"Stargate: Atlantis" (2004)Original Air Date:
5 December 2005 (Season 2, Episode 13)Plot:
The Trust, a Goa'uld terrorist organization, has planted a bomb in Atlantis. full summary | full synopsisUser Comments:
Doctor acting a little outside his remit moreUS TV Schedule:
| Tue. Sept. 9 | 5:00 PM | SCIFI | Critical Mass | #2.13 |
Cast
(Episode Cast overview, first billed only)more
Fun Stuff
Soundtrack:
Beyond the Night moreFAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more
Message Boards
Discuss this title with other users on IMDb message board for "Stargate: Atlantis" (2004)Related Links
| Main series | Episode guide | Full cast and crew |
| Company credits | IMDb TV section | IMDb Action section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |


*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Just thought I should point out that the statement the Dr makes in this episode: 'I took an oath to preserve life' seems to neglect the fact that a Dr is also there to alleviate suffering.
Although I realise it is dramatised, a Dr would not go against a patient's wishes, when a patient refuses interventions and is fully competent.
The episode really rushes the ending and takes a real knight's move in concluding who the traitor was and also in getting the information. It reminds me a little of the bad writing often done in '24' when trying to quickly end an episode.
I would be interested to see whether the writers of both are close companions in the world.
I do see the point of the episode is to get across that tough ethical calls that need to be made in isolated environments, under pressure and with no back up from superiors, in order to protect others. However the writing muddles this and trys in some way to squeeze other ethical dilemmas into the story, such as the old lady dying who could be saved by the doctor!!!
I a not big fan of series 2 based on most of the previous episodes so far