Puccini (TV Movie 1984) Poster

(1984 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Strange But Fascinating Experiment
jkdrummond24 March 2003
Warning: Spoilers
This film is actually three films in one: The story of a rather terrible trial that came upon the Puccini family, and a VERY stagey setup for the third aspect of the film which is *possible spoiler here* a production of Puccini's last opera TURANDOT being put together by the Scottish National Opera. *Another possible spoiler*: The story of the opera, to a degree, matches the unfortunate problem the Puccini family had to face.

The actual "film" aspect of this is quite well done indeed. The always remarkable Robert Stephens plays Puccini with all the verve and larger-than-life personality that is wonderfully like that of the composer, and when he has to "take stage" in the "theatrical" bits to segue to the preparations for the opera, he handles it with aplomb and complete believability. The preparation of the Scottish National Opera for their production may fascinate some, and bore others into the ground.

I've only been able to give this 7 out of 10, because, by and large, the production values are rather wanting in this, and, though I think the actors, all of them, and the people involved in the rehearsals for the actual opera, are doing their level best, the camera work sometimes isn't very clear at all, there is more than a little confusion of direction (in the sense of mise-en-scene) and occasionally everyone looks, well, rather sloppy: There is a distinct possibility that they were trying to communicate some of the more squalid aspects of life in early 20th century times, but, for this viewer at least, it didn't work.

A final note of "historical" interest: The role of Tonio, Puccini's son, is played by a very young Rupert Graves a year or so BEFORE Merchant Ivory picked him up to play Freddy in A ROOM WITH A VIEW. He is only in something like three scenes but in one of them, he delivers an astonishing performance in one so young!

If you like opera, and are fascinated (as I am) by production work and behind-the-scenes goings-on, I think you'll find this fascinating. If not, you'd probably best give it a miss.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fascinating but imperfect
TheLittleSongbird25 August 2011
I love opera and Puccini's music, and I like a lot of these actors here, so of course I wanted to see Puccini. I found it fascinating and interesting, but it wasn't perfect by all means. The camera work could have been cleaner and sharper than it was, the pace was rather leaden at times and the production sequence despite the wonderful voices and music was rather amateurish in how it was staged. However, the scenery and costumes are lovely, and the music is gorgeous. The trial sequence was interesting too, the writing was overall good and thoughtful and there is a good cast with the likes Virginia McKenna, Rupert Graves, Peter Woodthorpe and Ronald Pickup in support and Robert Stephens in a larger-than-life and believable lead performance. Overall, imperfect but I found it very interesting. 7/10 Bethany Cox
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unwatchable
dierregi30 June 2022
Within the first five minutes the audience has plenty enough time to learn that Puccini was a vain, boisterous, cruel womaniser... or maybe it's just the flamboyant interpretation of the lead actor, whom I do not know and don't care even to check his name.

Just when you think you have enough of Puccini and his provincial world that should be Tuscany, but looks a lot more like England, the scene cuts to modern times, to a choir rehearsal of one of Puccini's operas...

Weird and useless to the plot and then back again to the past, with three old gossiping men who fill the purpose of providing the background story of Puccini, wifey Elvira and their stormy relationship, followed by an ugly, jealous confrontation at the table between Elvira and maid Doria, during which Puccini just pretends he's not there. What a gentleman... but more of the bouncing forward is to follow.

However, by then I had enough. Even if I like some of Puccini's music, this is definitely one of those cases where the creator and his opera should be kept separated, especially when the creator is unpleasant and his story narrated in such an unappealing way.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed