IMDb user comments for
A Knight's Tale (2001) More at IMDbPro »

Filter:

Best Chronological Prolific Authors Loved It Hated It Hide Spoilers:

Page 1 of 61:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Index

610 reviews in total

---

115 out of 134 people found the following review useful:
Entertaining, 3 February 2005

Author: Daniel Kahn from Canada

This comment is to counter those who have issue with modern rock and other time problems being in this movie. This movie was designed to entertain. It was NOT a historical piece and nowhere does it claim to be one. This is the story of a boy who aspires to be more than what society set out for him. The movie uses odd references to history's great figures and humor to bring its story across to the viewer. So I say that, for those of you who cannot enjoy a piece of entertainment due to its well placed use of anachronisms, I strongly suggest you stay away from any of Shakespeare's works. (Not to say that this movie was on level with Shakespeare...) The makers of "A Knight's Tale" set out to entertain, and did so dutifully.

---

109 out of 126 people found the following review useful:
Could've been an absolute bomb, but somehow magically works perfectly!, 30 April 2001

Author: kergillian (kergillian@hotmail.com) from Montreal, Canada

this film is ridiculously unbelievable, thin on plot, shamefully predictable, historically inaccurate in so many ways...yet it all works! The combination of modern music to medieval setting should be awful, but no, it works! The costumes are totally wrong for the period (on purpose I'd hazard to guess - at one point Angelina Jolie lookalike Shannyn Sossamon is wearing a hat & dress outfit that looks startlingly similar to a costume Julia Roberts wore in Pretty Woman...) but it works! Heath Ledger is an Aussie (what happened to the black hair he had in 10 Things I Hate About You! I didn't recognize him!) and Alan Tudyk is a Texan, so their accents should have tanked! But they didn't, just a few slippages a la Mel Gibson in Braveheart or Jonny Lee Miller in Hackers...

This film is funny, fast-paced (certainly didn't *feel* over 2h...), well constructed, hilariously tongue-in-cheek (From the We Will Rock You opening scene to the Nike swooshes on the armor I couldn't stop laughing!) It certainly has its problems (including some *horribly* cheezy lines - most on purpose but that doesn't make them any less horrible! and an evil Hollywood ending - including a Bravheart-like scream of defiance in the final joust that made me cringe...) but those problems are overcome by sharp wit and consistent amusement. The actors were obviously enjoying themselves, and the action was beautifully blended in with the rest of the film. None of the jousting scenes were too long (like, say, the race in Phantom Menace...) and all were shot in such a way as to make them really exciting!

And I have to laud Paul Bettany who was an incredible and incredibly amusing Geoffrey Chaucer...even though he looks eerily similar, IMO, to Thom Yorke...)

Kudos to anyone who recognizes Laura Fraser (the blacksmith) from Man in the Iron Mask...

Overall: A great watch. I went in expecting little and came out extremely satisfied. Not the best film of its kind, but a head above most. And the blending of contemporary style and music and characterization with the medieval story/setting is really well done. It really shouldn't but it does work! 7/10.

---

92 out of 111 people found the following review useful:
A surprisingly, wonderful hit!, 15 May 2001

Author: Sam4226

As soon as I saw the fans singing and clapping to "We Will Rock You" I thought "this is not very realistic". Of course, that was when I had gone in expecting a film like Braveheart or The Patriot, with real historical lessons. A Knight's Tale was nothing like either of those. After you get past the first one or two scenes, everything really grows on you. The humor is, yes, cheesy at times, (the Nike armor) but I still laughed. Chaucer was great, the villain was definitely evil, and the jousting/action scenes were very well done. Put all that together with some other funny sidekicks and a little romance and you've got a pretty good flick. Definitely a must see more than once, and a must buy video/DVD when it's out!

---

92 out of 115 people found the following review useful:
The one truly satisfying film of 2001, 27 December 2001
Author: coolman_35m (coolman_35m@yahoo.com) from Hanover, PA, USA

In the year of the lackluster blockbuster (ie Pearl Harbor) and horribly disappointing hype-fests (ie Planet of the Apes) Brian Helgeland's "A Knight's Tale" shines bright. What makes the film so amazing is that the story isn't particularly fresh, the lead characters aren't particularly original, and the "special effects" aren't particularly special, yet Helgeland delivers a romping action comedy that delivers on all fronts. This is fusion-theater at it's best. The audience is believeably transported to the 14th century despite myriad references to the modern world. We're assaulted by the action and drama, yet cradled by the humor and emotion. Most importantly, at no point in the film are we brought back to reality; the characters are that charming and believeable. Even the villain has certain endearing qualities. Not enough that we don't still want to see him kicked swiftly in the groin, but we aren't totally put off by him, either. Think Travolta in Swordfish, or Pacino in Scarface. The men we love to hate.

It's difficult to lay a finger on what most gives this film its weight. I'm tempted to say it's the cast, because it's a collection of relative unknowns who manage to take their characters and completely make them their own. Bettany's Chaucer is wickedly impressive, Tudyk's Wat is a scream, Addy's Roland is almost squeezable, and Sewell's Adhemar is completely vile. The only "star" in the film is the little-known Heath Ledger, who brings a time-worn character to the screen with some kind of fresh perspective that has us cheering from the moment we're introduced to him. There are no Travoltas or Pacinos, and amazingly enough this film is all the better for it.

Throughout the screenplay Brian Helgeland, who not only directed but wrote and produced, gives us humor, sentiment and adrenaline in just the right measure. The lead characters really aren't new, but they are somehow fresh. And the supporting characters, while assembled according to formula, aren't formulaic in any way. Their emotion, approach and sensibilities are quite unique. Even the most predictable minor character (Edward the Black Prince) is oddly touching and powerful, despite the fact we know exactly what we're going to get with him.

The music is vibrant, and its usage is terribly original. The cinematography is at times lacking (the lighting is off quite badly at points, as the "Stocks" outtake presented on the DVD will make clear), but even my jaundiced and jaded eye honestly didn't notice until the third viewing of the film. Honestly, I was too riveted to pick up on it. I was IN the 14th century. What did I know from lighting?

Costuming is first-rate, the dialogue is precious, and though some of the humor is forced, by the time we get to those parts we're already too entranced by the rolicking good nature of the film to even care.

In short, this is a low-budget, minimal star-power action adventure comedy romance that borrows all the best elements of The Three Musketeers (BOTH major versions), The Karate Kid (of which I am much reminded) and An Officer and a Gentleman. It is quite a feat. The highest mark of respect I can give a film is to actually purchase it (it goes against my grain to own a movie when there's a Blockbuster on every corner), but I had "A Knight's Tale" in my collection the day it was released...and this after having paid to see it three times in the theater!

Yes, it's been a disappointing year for Hollywood. But "A Knight's Tale" proves that all is not lost. Rent it, buy it or steal it, but SEE it!

---

56 out of 63 people found the following review useful:
More accurate than you might think, 15 August 2003

Author: bhirschi42 from Lake City, Fla.

The first time I saw A Knight's Tale (on cable, missed it in theater), I had the same reaction as many of you - Queen? David Bowie? In a movie set in the middle ages?

But I stayed with it, and I'm glad I did. Once you get past the glaring anachronisms (put in the film on purpose, of course), you find the movie is actually quite true to its period.

The presence of Chaucer in the film, combined with some of its details, leads me to suspect that Brian Helgeland has read "Chaucer's Knight" by fellow filmmaker Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame). The book deconstructs the knight in Chaucer's "The Knight's Tale" in a totally unique way -- he is seen NOT as the flower of medieval chivalry (as most scholars have interpreted him), but as a mercenary out for nothing but money and blood. The character in the film Chaucer would have written about, then, is not Sir William Thatcher (Heath Ledger), but Count Adhemar of Anjou (Rufus Sewell).

The part of the film in which this connection "clicked" for me was the scene where Count Adhemar is called away to his command in a "Free Company" -- a particular stain on the reputation of knighthood which Jones talks extensively about in his book.

Jones' book made use of extensive research into medieval history, and Helgeland's film obviously does, too.

Chaucer was a master of satire in his day. Helgeland's use of modern conventions in a period film is a conceit of which - I believe - Chaucer would definitely have approved.

I gave "A Knight's Tale" 9 out of 10 - it's not perfect, but I like it so much, I try to watch it every time it comes on (it's been on HBO and Cinemax pretty regularly for the past several months). Check it out!

---

92 out of 137 people found the following review useful:
If you want to watch a serious film, don't watch this!, 8 August 2004
Author: Al from Liverpool, England

Totally unbelievable.

Chronologically, historically and geographically incorrect.

Full of innumerable inaccuracies and made up of a cast who talk as though they are not from the same continent, let alone the same country! What more can I say?

I tell you what I can say, I thoroughly enjoyed it!!! I laughed from beginning to end and was enraptured by the sense of friendship that these people displayed.

I only wish we could all be like them!

I loved it.

---

46 out of 58 people found the following review useful:
Absolutely unexpected pleasure. Light-hearted but satisfying on many levels, 10 July 2005

Author: mstomaso from Vulcan

This wonderfully uplifting little film has a great big heart, good humor, and a classic message about love and honor, and the rarity and preciousness of those who practice both with style. I went to see this with my spouse and a good friend of ours because THEY (the spouse and the friend) wanted to see it. I am a non-fan of comedies, and had been annoyed by the stream of trashy Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court films that had been coming out since the 1980s. My spouse had also informed me that I would be seeing Jousting performed to Bachman Turner Overdrive. My reaction was to reach for the nearest bottle of hard liquor. I didn't need it.

I've now seen this film about six times, and though I can't say that I see something new in it every time (it's just not that complicated), I can say that I have enjoyed it each and every time. The characters, though relatively uncomplicated, are very lovable and the casting is quite excellent all around. Before Brokeback Mountain, William Thatcher was Heath Ledger's most memorable role. He's a poor boy from London's Cheapside who wants to change his stars and to become an honored knight. Travelling from tournament to tournament with his fellow indentured servants, his liege passes on, and William seizes the moment - taking his armor and his horse to become Sir Ulrich Von Liechtenstein of the Gelderland.

He is joined by the other now-free indentures, and eventually, by Chaucer and a female Farrier played by the wonderful Laura Fraser. Eventually, William falls in love with a princess and is challenged by a rival for her affections with a lot more experience, money and political clout. The love story, which could have easily become a distracting annoyance, in fact, comes to dominate and drive the story very nicely.

Special kudos to Ledger, Alan Tudyk, Rufus Sewell, Paul Bettany and James Purefoy for their awesome performances. And extra special kudos to Director Brian Helgeland for pulling off an impossible task - taking a fairy tale, making us want to believe it, and yet retaining some wonderful elements of silliness often missing in the fairy tale genre. This would make a wonderful romantic living-room double feature with The Princess Bride.

Recommendation: Definitely worth seeing.

---

36 out of 42 people found the following review useful:
Makes Braveheart Look Historically Accurate, 15 November 2002

Author: Iok from Hiding Behind The Sofa

I first saw "A Knight's Tale" by chance. A few of us had decided on an ad hoc visit to the local cinema and selected "A Knight's Tale" simply because it sounded the least "teen" movie on the bill. We slapped down our cash and took our seats.

The movie began...

A crowd of peasants are assembled to watch the jousting. And they're singing "We Will Rock You."

My initial response was "God, this is going to be bad."

But as the movie continued, it suddenly dawned on me - I wasn't hating the movie at all! On an intellectual level, I should have been booing and throwing stuff at the screen but there's something about the sheer verve and energy of "A Knight's Tale" that just drags you in on an emotional level.

A clever script with many modern references, a good cast of likeable characters and a fantastic soundtrack (the reveal of "Golden Years" is particularly good) all add up to make "A Knight's Tale" one of the most entertaining mainstream movies I've seen in a long time.

Normally I hate "popcorn" movies - not because I consider them "low brow" or an insult to the intelligence, but because they're shallow, tired and lack soul. Yet "A Knight's Tale" is different. No, it won't change your life and it won't make you ponder your place in the universe. But it will entertain you.

If you're looking for an "old fashioned" good vs. evil movie with a twist, or your copy of "The Princess Bride" is wearing thin, check out "A Knight's Tale."

8/10

---

30 out of 36 people found the following review useful:
Jousting With A Modern Take, 15 July 2006

Author: ccthemovieman-1 from Lockport, NY, United States

A story about jousting but this old knight's tale is anything but old because it mixes in satire of today's modern sports-audience age with some funny bits. Those include the overly dramatic public address announcer (boy, that's even more so since this film came out), rock music blaring out as the contestants do battle, etc.

The main characters are nicely varied with distinct personalities. Shannon Sossamon, however, was not quite up to leading-lady status and hasn't had a choice role like this since, either. I would have rather seen her "assistant" in this film, or the blacksmith woman, be the lead. Anyway, even though it's a bit long at 132 minutes, it's still entertaining most of the way, with some of the funniest bits at the beginning. However, it's just as much a romance (with Heath Ledger as the male lead) than a comedy.

What also is good is the sound and visuals in here: all high-class. The lance hitting an opponent made an interesting sound each time. The surround sound in here was good, too.

It's a film most people would like, and I recommend seeing it.

---

25 out of 39 people found the following review useful:
Rags to riches, love conquers all, never say quit, go for your dreams...., 24 July 2002

Author: helpless_dancer from Broken Bow, Oklahoma

Fun little tale of a dirt poor lad willing to go all out for his lady love, his honor, and to prove he is as good as any other warrior. Plenty of laughs from a zany character or two and a grand adventure with plenty of old world jousting, pageantry, and costumes. Loved the way the producers wove hard rock tunes and today's lingo into the show's fabric and made it seem, usually anyway, as thought it fit that time span. Cool flic.

---

---

Page 1 of 61:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Add another review

---

Related Links

Plot summary	Plot synopsis	Ratings
Awards	Newsgroup reviews	External reviews
Parents Guide	Plot keywords	Main details
Your user reviews	Your vote history