Strange Days (1995) Poster

(1995)

User Reviews

Review this title
287 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The Most Underrated Of Cyberpunk Noirs
gogoschka-111 February 2018
Probably one of the best big-budget sci-fi films to never reach a big audience. Written and produced by James Cameron and expertly directed by Kathryn Bigelow, this film is more noir than actual sci-fi - although the sci-fi elements are important. With a great cast and an amazing atmosphere throughout, this is one not to miss for fans of thrillers, film noir, sci-fi and especially the subgenre knwon as cyberbunk. 8 stars out of 10.

In case you're interested in more underrated masterpieces, here's a list with some of my favorites:

imdb.com/list/ls070242495
107 out of 126 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the best (and also most underappreciated) films of the 90's
tdh_fbi24 August 2018
"Strange Days" is a unique science fiction and mystery film. Set in Los Angeles during the last two or so days prior to the new millennium, the cast is helmed by Ralph Fiennes as the charming, brave, but shady Lenny Nero. Lenny is a former LAPD officer who loses his job for mostly unknown reasons. He then becomes a black market hustler who sells people's recorded memories for profit. For the most part, these recorded memories are either violent or sexual in nature.

Angela Bassett does a great job complementing Fiennes' "Lenny" character in her role as Macy, Lenny's close friend who makes a more legitimate living as a limo driver and security specialist. Lenny and Macy soon become embroiled in a murder mystery involving corruption within both the LAPD and the music industry. This seemingly ever-deepening mystery also involves Lenny's other close friend, Tom Sizemore's character "Max". Max is a private eye who, despite seeming to be very well-intentioned, is just as shady as Lenny. Juliette Lewis rounds out the cast as "Faith", Lenny's troubled and devious rock singer ex-girlfriend.

Besides the awesome and well-acted performances, what made this movie stand out to me is just how on the nose some of the background references are in it. References to an economic collapse, increasing gas prices, and strained relations between the police and minorities make this a very odd foreshadowing of the actual real-life future.

In conclusion, great acting, a very deep and interesting storyline, and great cultural references make this a very highly recommended film.
68 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What a great movie!
tpaladino26 March 2011
I had no idea this film even existed until it showed up in my Netflix 'recommended' column, and I decided to give it a shot after reading some good reviews on there. Wow, am I happy I did.

This was a truly fantastic sci-fi thriller, with intense action and a truly engaging story. The characters were very well constructed and had a lot of substance to them, and of course the acting was superb. Who knew Ralph Finnes could play such a good lowlife?

Set in an alternate (but totally recognizable) Los Angeles of 1999, the world has seemingly gone completely to hell, due to rampant poverty and class/racial tensions which are pushing society towards an all-out state of anarchy. The authorities are barely maintaining order, despite resorting to draconian measures to try and keep things in check. The director does an excellent job of painting this picture for us through fantastic environment and background shots which effectively build the tension and make us fully believe what is happening.

In this world, they have invented a type of virtual reality which allows an individual to record everything they are seeing and feeling directly through their brain, so as to then be played back later through someone else's brain, which allows the user to then see and feel exactly what was recorded without any danger (other than possible addiction). So needless to say a huge black market has sprung up to provide people with recordings of all kinds of illicit, criminal and sexual activities that they'd never actually get to experience in the real world. The plot of the movie builds from this technology.

However, other than this particular device and general state of social affairs, the alternate 1999 is pretty much identical to our 1999 (very much to it's credit). No flying cars, no wacky fashion, no aliens, no laser guns or anything like that. It was a great decision by the filmmakers to not bite off more than they could chew in that regard, as it would have distracted from a very solid story.

The films weaknesses are few, but are there nonetheless. It was a bit long... although I'm not usually one to complain about that kind of thing, so long as the time is necessary to tell the story. In this case an argument can be made either way, though I personally feel they could have lost about fifteen minutes or so (but to me it's a minor issue).

The director also felt the need to very quickly explain the origin of the virtual reality technology through a throwaway line of dialog, which really added nothing to the plot, and honestly made no sense; they said the technology was originally developed for the FBI so that informants wouldn't have to wear a wire, which is just dumb. The device is WAY more cumbersome and easily discoverable than a wire transmitter. How about saying that the military invented it to train soldiers more realistically? Or just leave it alone... true virtual reality is a technological holy grail. I don't think anyone questions why something like that would be invented in the first place, even if it's purely for entertainment.

Additionally, in my opinion, a couple of the 'bad guys' could have had their motivations fleshed out a tad better, but that is a also very minor quibble.

Beyond that, the look of the movie is quite dated, which could hinder the enjoyment for some people. The 1990's did not age very well to our eyes, and this movie is VERY much a product of that era. If you lived through it, you know what I mean. Younger viewers may not fully get the social and cultural allusions that this movie is built upon (Rodney King riots, 90's hip hop culture, rave clubs... things like that)... just something to keep in mind, although if you did live though it, you'll appreciate the depth that these references add.

But really, I can't recommend this film highly enough. It's a completely under-appreciated piece of work, and one of the best sci-fi thrillers out there.
68 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terrific science fiction offering.
barnabyrudge17 May 2003
Strange Days is a truly astonishing science fiction offering, part scripted by James Cameron and directed with relentless panache by maverick lady-director Kathryn Bigelow. It presents a depressing and bleak, yet worryingly probable, view of the near future, and hooks its story threads upon the impending millennium eve celebrations. Although December 31st, 1999, has been and gone since the making of this movie, it is a credit to the makers that this film still offers a plausible viewpoint about where the world might be at in the next decade or so.

Ralph Fiennes seems initially miscast, but soon wins over the audience as Lenny Nero, a sleazy racketeer who sells "memories" captured on some form of disk, similar to virtual reality but recorded from real experiences rather than computerised ones. He is desperately trying to get back with his ex-girlfriend Faith (Juliette Lewis), but she doesn't want him as she has hooked up with a music producer named Philo (Michael Wincott). Lenny acquires two disturbing tapes, one showing the rape and murder of a woman, the other showing a racially motivated slaying, and before he knows it he is on the run from the culprits who want to kill him before he exposes their crimes. The only person he can trust is his best friend, lady bodyguard Mace (Angela Bassett). To complicate matters further, his ex-girlfriend Faith seems to know something about the disks, and may either be involved in the crimes or at great risk from those responsible.

Bassett is the real star here, in the role of a lifetime as a morally strong and physically stronger heroine. Lewis plays the same old white trash girl she has played many times, but at least she has the experience to bring total conviction to the role. The production values are incredibly high, especially the party at the end which seems to realistically convey an entire city celebrating in the streets. The plot unfolds slowly, but this is a strength rather than a criticism. Each new development slots into place beautifully, and the audience is given time to get into the characters and the situations (which, in too many movies, we are not allowed to do since the pace is often too frenetic).

Strange Days is challenging and aggressive and frequently disturbing. It is also inventive and exciting and ingeniously staged. It is simply a terrific science film which any devotee of the genre absolutely must see.
141 out of 191 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Engaging, but Uneven
diffusionx3 July 2000
Strange Days is an interesting film, with a great premise. It also happens to be well-executed, for the most part. The LA of the future (well, future back when it was released in 1995) is quite dystopian in nature, and Strange Days manages to present all facets of that using Taxi Driver-influenced car rides through the city while observing the chaos on the streets. In many ways, Strange Days manages to create a real-life and convincing future, and it feels like a true place, with things going on independently of the events in the movie, rather than feeling like a movie set.

Atmosphere aside, though, the movie has many strengths. The plot is intriguing, and it flows quite smoothly. A lot of the dialogue is really quite interesting and gives the movie a nice feel (not to mention the actors do a pretty good job with the material). The characters are three-dimension and interesting. While the beginning parts were somewhat disjointed (at least in terms of plot), they did serve as an excellent setup. When the movie was its best (during the middle parts) there is a frantic sense of urgency that really drives the picture along. It's a very entertaining movie, and it managed to form an emotional link with me - always a good sign.

Unfortunately, it kind of goes downhill after that. Strange Days ends up resorting to awfully cliche ideas, complete with plot elements seen a million times in movies before. All of this mars what could have been a real classic film. It's too bad that Cameron and Cocks had to resort back to this, since the movie has so many strengths and so many great things that it could have built on. While the movie is still above average, it just isn't as superb as it could have been. Nonetheless, Strange Days succeeds on many levels and is well worth watching.
61 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Retinal Fetish...
Xstal25 September 2020
'Memories were meant to fade' and some years after its release this has become a little diminished and less visible, especially as it attempts to forecast a technological future that even today is somewhat ambitious.

Always tricky predicting what's to come, although this does foresee with great clarity abuse by those in authority against the same classes and races that are so disenfranchised today - but maybe that wasn't such a big gamble to take. If I had a crystal ball I would foresee the same continuing for another twenty five years and quite probably in perpetuity.

All in all a reasonable variation on a theme you have seen plenty of before and will continue to do so if this is your bag.
24 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Are we impressed yet?"
The_Movie_Cat12 January 2000
The answer being, of course, yes I am impressed.

What a thoroughly enjoyable film Strange Days is. Fast-moving and occasionally violent, it's not high art but then neither is it dumbed-down fodder and it has much to commend it. The central plot revolves around an ex-cop (Fiennes, doing a - to my ears anyway - convincing American accent) peddling FBI technology on the black market. The SQUID technology (Super conducting QUantum Interface Device) electronically absorbs information from the central cortex and allows users to experience the thrill of another's sensations - be it murder, sex, robbery, etc. Of course, this central idea, while fascinating, does derive pretty much directly from a Twilight Zone episode. Were this a "classic" Zone episode from the b/w era, then people would have picked it up straight away and the game would be over. As it is, the inspiration comes from one of the colour Twilight Zone episodes which had even less viewers than Strange Days and so the movie can rest assured it is safe in obscurity. (Give up? Okay, it was episode 23, season three, 1989, "The Mind of Simon Foster". I'm an anorak, I know these things).

But whether such were intentional is pretty much irrelevant as the magpie technique of this film takes from many texts and builds something greater than the parts. One of the two greatest science fiction films of the 90s - the other being the excellent "Twelve Monkeys" - both have built-in sell-by dates by fixing their time period in a very near locale. Hence while the supposed date of Monkeys is long past at 98, this film now becomes a historical document as of New Year's Eve 1999. But then does it follow that we will stop watching 2001 in 2002? Hopefully not, and Strange Days is one that too deserves to be revisited in years to come.

The reason why I commend it most is its rewarding political stance. The development that gets adhered onto the "Squid" plot directly references the beating of Rodney King. Such contemporary referencing may again date it as quickly as the '99 setting, but then we also have Angela Bassett as a very empowered, yet caring black woman. Note how she and Lenny have exchanged traditional gender roles in this film, yet this feels not like some "macho woman" schtick but genuine characterisation. Lenny is a likeable, wisetalking street peddler who spends the film as a human punchbag. Gone is the cliched jaw-breaking action man role for him, instead his only retort to violence is "I'll give you my Rolex". This sense of, if you like, PC-ness, can also be evidenced with the lesbian couple kissing as the year 2000 breaks, or the (one scene only, admittedly) appearance of a disabled man as a central character.

However, the boundary-pushing elements of this movie are tainted by the appearance of Juliet Lewis in the film. A capable actress, her only role appears to be as a receptacle for various men's sexual needs or to gratuitously expose her breasts on multiple occasions. This is a great shame, and a pity that a film which has such high intentions in almost every other area should fall back on unfortunate portrayal.

The dialogue is pitched just about right without being particularly clever, though occasionally it stalls. "You're like a goddamn cruise missile, targetted on making it", Fiennes tells Faith (Lewis) at one point, managing to keep a straight face. Later, Bassett must endure having to say "These are used emotions. It's time to trade them in" and not use her gun on the scriptwriter. When the credits do roll, it's perhaps no surprise that James Cameron was the co-writer, as its slight perfunctory, by-the-numbers stance often reminds one of the machinations of "Titanic". Tom Sizemore as Max is every inch the one-dimensional Cameron "character", while plot twists sometimes feel heavily engineered. Maybe Jay Cocks is responsible for the script's more "human" feel, with particular note going to the moral debate of whether or not to expose the LAPD's murder of an influential black rapper. The two leads debate (internally, as well as verbally, a first for a Cameron movie) the implications and the possible consequences of such an action. Despite its flirtation with the mainstream, Strange Days is a film that dares to pervert the traditional course of Hollywood into a future that is worth seeing. Perhaps predictably, it made little impact at the box office.
141 out of 195 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"It's pure and uncut, straight from the cerebral cortex!"
classicsoncall6 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
With SQUIB (Super Conducting Quantum Interface Device), we have a heightened version of virtual reality in which the wearer of the unit experiences pleasure or pain as if he were taking part in the scene he's witnessing. The images presented are from real life rather than simulated, and often create a visceral response in the participant, which is one of the reasons the technology has gone black market. The stuff Lenny Nero (Ralph Fiennes) deals in goes by the name of 'wire tripping', somewhat of a misnomer unless you consider the makeup of the headpiece worn by the user.

The film has a futuristic feel even now, though the way distant future of 1999 was only four years down the road from it's release date in 1995. I have a particular fondness for New Year's Eve 1999, because that was the last day I served in a job that I really came to dislike. I'd say hated but I enjoyed most of the people I worked with, so that's my only reservation. So I like to say that I began the New Year, new decade and new millennium self employed, though sticklers would point out that the new millennium didn't begin until the first of the year in 2001. But it's a moot point for most people and easy enough to get away with.

Juliette Lewis surprised me in this film, not so much in the portrayal of her character Faith, but in those night club sequences in which she sang. The trivia section for this film states that she did her own vocals, and if that's the case, I have to wonder why she didn't take up performing as an adjunct to her movie career. I thought she conveyed the raw emotion of Janis Joplin, who remains to this day as my favorite female singer. Maybe it was the setting and the way Lewis was captured on camera, but I thought she did a tremendous job.

The other surprise was Angela Basset in her role as Lornette 'Mace' Mason, limo driver and part time bodyguard for Lenny Nero. Her buff physique made her actions scenes look credible, though I didn't quite understand the fascination she held for Lenny as a romantic interest. Yeah, he was an ex-cop, but conducted his life pretty much as a sleazeball whereas she had a touch of class Lenny couldn't aspire to. But then again, it takes all kinds.

As for the story, it got rather cliched after a while, with events ratcheting up once the clip surfaced of the two corrupt cops (Vincent D'Onofrio, William Fichtner) murdering rapper Jeriko One (Glenn Plummer). The twist I was expecting didn't happen though. I was pretty sure that Commissioner Strickland (Josef Sommer) would turn out to be at the top of the bad guy food chain, but that wasn't the case. The inevitable ending for Lenny's 'best friend' Max (Tom Sizemore) wasn't one of your more original outcomes, but did prove once again the old adage that it's not the fall that kills you, but the sudden stop.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sizzling Sci-Fi/Action Thriller
The_Core15 October 1999
"Strange Days" literally has something for everyone. Science fiction, violence, peace, romance, comedy, tragedy, action, you name it -- it's in this film, and it's done with class and intelligence. I agree that this one is destined to become a cult classic. However, be prepared for one of the edgiest, most violent and emotionally exhausting films you've ever seen (the first three minutes of the film make it very clear what you can expect from the rest). There are at least five climactic scenes toward the end, which must break some kind of record. After the movie's over, you may feel like you've just been cooked in a vat of boiling oil... but luckily, you'll be perfectly well-done, not burned to a crisp. 10/10.
131 out of 196 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strange Film
claudio_carvalho2 November 2017
In 1999, Los Angeles is racial war zone with the army and LSPD and SWAT officers fighting Afro-American people. The former cop Lenny Nero (Ralph Fiennes) is a dealer of illegal recording in CDs that gives the memories and sensations of the recorder to the user. He buys the recordings from the supplier Tick; he misses his former mistress Faith (Juliette Lewis), who was a hooker and now is a singer; his best friend is the private eye Max Peltier (Tom Sizemore) and the limousine driver Lornette 'Mace' Mason (Angela Bassett), who has unrequited love for him. Two days before the turn of the century, the black rapper Jeriko One (Glenn Plummer) is murdered. The hooker Iris (Brigitte Bako) seeks Lenny out but there is an incident and they do not talk to each other. However she drops a recording into Lenny's car while he unsuccessfully tries to meet Faith at a night-club. However her boyfriend Philo Gant (Michael Wincott) does not let them talk. When Lenny learns that Iris was sadistically raped and killed, he gets involved in a sick scheme and discovers dirty hidden secrets.

"Strange Days" is a strange action film with a weird story. Lenny Nero is a complete loser and non-charismatic character. Angela Bassett and Ralph Fiennes do not have any chemistry. Despite the confused screenplay and the flaws, the story is intriguing. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Estranhos Prazeres" ("Strange Pleasures")
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Cameron wrote and it shows
Rammstein-224 January 2000
Yep. It sure shows that Cameron has laid his hand on this film. It has a superb plot, great timing and a spectacular ending - one of the best ever, I might add.

Just about everything you see in this film adds to the momentum. Just look in the background. There is always something going on, someone getting arrested or stealing something or burning something... all of it enhances the doomsday feeling you get when watching.

I also find Fiennes' acting just short of perfect. His face, his gestures and his entire being reeks of the sordid life his character leads. To cast him was genius. Lewis, Sizemore, Bassett and Wincott perform excellently as well - but it's really Fiennes that just makes this film happen.

Do you want to see something unusual for a change? Do you long to see a believable sf-story for once, even despite the fact that the events of the film took place in 1999? And do you yearn for a sensational film made to make you really feel something? See Strange Days.
90 out of 137 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wasted premise
skepticskeptical21 January 2023
Strange Days begins with an intriguing premise but swiftly descends into an over-the-top Raspberry awards-worthy caricature of itself. The Blade Runner ambiance is undeniable but unfortunately the quality of Strange Days is much lower as it aims to be both serious and satirical, entertaining and morally repulsive. Is it a psychological thriller or is it an action flick? Is it a denunciation of the nihilism of contemporary society or a celebration of freedom?

I presume that this work is listed in books of Cult Classics because it is so extreme and so weird and so excessive and then finally winds down with a happily ever after romantic ending. Really? Like a garbage pizza complete with pineapple and anchovies this work will induce indigestion in anyone with taste.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ugh
funkyfry23 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
There are some promising aspects to the set-up and the plot, but it doesn't hold up for the entire film. The whole big revelation at the end is not a worthy compensation and much too obvious. Fiennes' character work is fine but the way the character is written makes him generically likable in a Spielberg kind of way and it put me off. Fiennes and Bassett just do not have any chemistry; I appreciate that it was pretty daring for them to have an inter-racial leading couple, but these particular actors didn't have it together. Bassett is one of those characters created in a petri dish by action movie screenwriters -- the single mom who takes care of her family and is also an expert at martial arts and killing people.

As the movie proceeds at its agonizing pace towards the obvious and overblown ending, you can't help but suspect that the producer Jim Cameron probably planned to direct this film but bailed on that because he could tell that it just did not have the fundamentals of a good film. But much of the ephemeral stuff attached to the movie is equally onerous. I never saw the appeal of Juliette Lewis as an actress, but this film not only put her past her ability in that department but exposes us to not one but two solo performances of her bland alterna-rock singing. Combined with the weak flow by the supposed superstar rapper Jeriko (Glenn Plummer) that would have seemed stale in the early 80s, the movie is very terrible in terms of the music. In fact the strangest thing about the movie really is that it is set in 1999, so that it was outdated almost the moment when it came out. Yet it promised crazy technological advances in that 3 year span, not to mention riots and craziness that never happened on 12/31/99. So again, you have to think that the movie was supposed to be made in the late 80s or the early 90s and that it just took forever to produce it, to the point where they just pooped it out at the last minute. And that's about all you can say about the movie in the final analysis. Horrible supporting performances from Lewis and Tom Sizemore, mis-cast leads in Bassett and Fiennes playing characters far less interesting than they're capable of, a pointless and hackneyed cyberpunk story -- it's a major dud.

p.s. not sure if anyone mentioned here, but the original script title for "Blade Runner" was "Strange Days." Perhaps that was an homage, I don't know.
60 out of 100 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of my all time faves!
DJ Inferno15 March 2001
Unfortunately, this film failed at the box-offices, although it´s one of the greatest masterpieces of the 90s. The first time I saw "Strange Days" was about five years ago, and then over and over again. If you think Ralph Fiennes is only able to play sensitive and problematic characters watch this: it´s his most unusual, but one of the best performances in his career - a performance of a coolness you only would expect from Samuel L. Jackson. Angela Bassett is one of the toughest women cinema has ever seen and Juliette Lewis, Tom Sizemore, Glenn Plummer, William Fichtner - every single role is casted perfectly...

"Strange Days" is thriller, drama and big city ballad in one piece. I can´t remember any movie that reflects the philosophy of life of Generation X better than this one. Lenny deals with the "Squids" which are the experiences and emotions of men saved on a mini disc. Emotions as a product, a drug - a compensation of modern life for the growing loneliness and anonymity. The only possibility for weak persons like Lenny to feel real. A movie like "Fight Club" wouln´t have been possible without "Strange Days"; other releases like "The Cell" or even Scorsese´s "Bringing out the dead" copied the incomparable make. Although this film is older than six years it hasn´t lost anything explosive effects, what is connected with the video clip style this movie has, which gives "Strange Days" a touch of being ageless. The two most brilliant scenes are the opening sequence - the robbery in the Chinese restaurant - and the showdown down in the streets at the millenium party. Also the soundtrack (Deep Forest, Peter Gabriel, Skunk Anansia, Strange Fruit...) is one of the best I´ve ever heard, what makes "Strange Days" an unforgettable experience for every watcher. (10/10)
113 out of 154 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange, Imaginative, Underrated Film
MadReviewer10 May 2001
Warning: Spoilers
`Strange Days', one of many films made in the mid- to late-1990s that chose to dabble in `the near future of the year 2000', not only still looks good in the year 2001, but holds its own as a darn good film. A mix of `Blade Runner' film noir and uncomfortable realism, `Strange Days' has the audacity to tackle some disturbing topics and to actually tell an interesting tale in the process.

Lenny Nero (Ralph Fiennes) is a black market peddler of VR films - memory implants that are downloaded directly into the brain, allowing a person to vicariously sample someone else's experiences. The VR chips are like drugs, as people find the shared virtual experiences far better than those they find in their own lives. Lenny, who's both dealer and addict, is jarred back into reality when one of his friends is killed in vicious fashion - and the experience is captured on a VR film. Lenny comes to believe that his ex-girlfriend Faith (Juliette Lewis) may be next on the killer's list, so he begins his own search for the killer, partly to prevent anything bad from happening to Faith . . . and partly to impress Faith, and possibly win her back.

Visually, `Strange Days' is terrific - it's hard to see how this film could be better in that department, even if James Cameron had directed the film himself. Some of the shots are astounding, such as a point-of-view clip of a man running along a rooftop and jumping to his death, then another simple clip of a woman on a date . . . it's part of a VR film `sampling', one that gives the audience a taste of why the characters in `Strange Days' think the films are so real, and so voyeuristic. Combine that with the way other things are filmed in `Strange Days' - the close-up look of Lenny's face as he samples past memories through VR films, the utter sweeping chaos of a riot as shot from high above - director Kathryn Bigalow creates a film that's visually mesmerizing. The designers and special effects guys really went to town, and should be given full credit for creating an outstanding, memorable look for `Strange Days'.

Ralph Fiennes is awesome as Lenny - he's scummy and underhanded enough to keep himself from ever being a true hero, but he imbues Lenny with enough affable charm and backbone to make him likeable nonetheless. The rest of the cast falls short of Fiennes' great performance, though - Angela Bassett is decent as limo driver/armed muscle Mace, but Juliette Lewis is forgettable as Faith (and considering that she's supposed to be the love of Lenny's life, that drags the film down), and Tom Sizemore is more annoying than menacing as villain Max Peltier. The story, while highly original, is uneven as well - certain plot points get abandoned for no reason, and sometimes the characters' motivations really don't make any sense at all, save to advance the story into the next scene. The quick pacing of the film and its imaginative look help to gloss over these weaknesses, but they're still there, just the same.

Inventive and daring, `Strange Days' is a solid movie, falling short of true greatness only because of the awkward execution of some brilliant ideas. Still, it's very entertaining, and definitely worth viewing, especially if you're a fan of sci-fi films. Grade: B/B+
40 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great sci-fi thriller that hasn't aged badly
vithiet30 December 2018
Besides the amusing "futuristic" 1999 this movie hasn't aged badly at all. It is a still a great sci-fi thriller and also benefits from very good acting performances.
26 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Delightful
killercharm24 October 2021
The movie that a opened my eyes to Ralph Feinnes's comedic genius. Didn't care for him much before this flick. It's got a wonderful vibe to it, this movie does, this great near-future street mood. It is a little destroyed by some of the wincingly bad hipster drug outlaw lingo, but, well Ralph is such a good sniveling junkie that...what's not to love. A former cop who had a life has now lost everything because he has become a dealer of black market addictive films in which images are fed directly into the brains of the audience directly from the subject's own brain, conveying emotion awa image. A new technology that has become the illicit drug of choice.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ahead of its time
twistyo27 October 2018
In a world before everything was recorded this movie predicted the world we live in 2018. Except there was better music in the movie.
23 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Has great potential to be a marvelous film, but fails
limau8 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Too many films have the potential to be a truly great film, but just somehow fail to achieve the greatness, becoming instead something that just avoid being thoroughly mediocre. This film is a good example of this kind of films.

The film is stylish, depicts a violent and seedy world with simmering ethnic tension well. The climactic New Year Eve scene is excellent, a a scene that might be beautiful and joyous which then erupts into violence and a bloody riot. But somehow the whole film doesn't gel. There are many intriguing ideas simmering underneath but that aren't exploited fully or just felt misdirected, and the plot lacks a tightness in logic or coherence. The film is also excessively long - it meanders a little too much, some scenes are too long (and some unpleasantly so, like the murder of Iris), and a full 30 minutes can probably be trimmed and the film might be better for it.

A big problem is that Ralph Fiennes is unconvincing as an ex-cop turned peddler of dubious ware. He doesn't have that look of toughness, slightly seedy world-weariness or street-cred required for the role, instead looking like an Englishman somewhat lost in LA. When the lead actor doesn't convince, the rest of the film tends to fall a bit flat, and accentuates all the other problems one sees in the film.

Verdict - could do better.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Experience
kosmasp12 April 2020
High tech ideas and invasion of privacy ... oh and racism. Topical you say? Well Things could not get worse one might think, but then again you never know, do you? Strange days, especially during a pandemic. And while I had seen this before it was nice to refresh my memory for the review and for myself.

With VR, I guess we have something that comes close to this "experience" that you have here. The complete immersiveness is missing, but thinking about how the "experiences" are recorded you may not want that anytime soon anyway. There are flaws here and the one idea concept may lack tracktion at times - but overall the suspense is there and the movie is working on many different levels (social commentary most of all).
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cameron Vs Bigelow
Theo Robertson21 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
!!!! MILD SPOILERS !!!!

I can imagine Kathryn Bigelow and James Cameron marching into the excutive offices with a movie idea . One of them pitches an ideas driven movie about virtual reality while the other pitches an old fashioned character driven thriller about a couple of corrupt cops wanting to get hands on evidence that will implicate them in a crime . The studio exec stratches his chin , can`t decide what movie he wants then has a sudden brain wave of merging the two plots into the same movie .

That might have happened , it might not have happened but watching STRANGE DAYS I had the gut instinct that somewhere along the line someone had engineered the two above plots into the one movie . All through the running time I felt there were two screenplays trying to escape . Needless to say STRANGE DAYS starts to collapse under the weight of its ideas . There`s also several more unnecessary sub plots such as racial politics , rising crime levels and the mechanics of the music biz which by the end don`t feel like they really belonged in this movie . Not only that they also add to an overlong running time

I awarded STRANGE DAYS 6 out of 10 . What stopped me from awarding it lower marks is the amount of kinetic energy director Bigelow has infused into the film , it`s by no means an unwatchable thriller despite its flaws and with a cast featuring Fiennes , Basset , Lewis , Sizemore , D`Onfrio and Fitchner at least there`s some well known character actors on display . Saome complained at the time that Cameron should have directed the movie instead of Bigelow , but there`s not much wrong with the directing unlike the script which was written by Cameron

How`s this for a VR plot . A corrupt state frames a heroic and noble subversive by implanting memories of sexual abuse into the minds of children thereby framing the hero and jailing him as a child molestor . A deeply disturbing and adult premise for a sci-fi drama , and one that had been done before in the opening episode of BLAKE`S 7 . So you see the rather weak premise of STRANGE DAYS in comparison ?
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Strange Days........and a WOMAN directed this?!
shortround839116 April 2009
I guess James Cameron made action films better for all of us. Not just for the audience, but for the actors and the people involved in the movies too. He even smashed the gender barrier in the world of action movies and gave us the toughest females ever (Sarah Connor, Ellen Ripley, Helen Tasker, and Lindsay Brigman). And in 1995 he wrote up a screenplay that had a really fascinating story about the impending millennium and he called it "Strange Days". But instead of directing it, he decided to hand over the directing duties to his ex-wife Katheryn Bigelow, who made "Point Break" a few years before. And I've gotta say, women have really earned their place in action cinema, and we owe it to good ol' James Cameron.

Strange Days tells the story taking place at the turn of the millennium from the 1000's to the 2000's and from 1999 to 2000. And due to the fact that it's a science fiction film, it features an outlawed device called SQUID that people can use with inserted discs to see, feel and experience an event that someone else already recorded. And a former cop named Lenny Nero (Ralph Fiennes) who is now a hustler and seller of this device frequently uses the thing that he devotes his life to in order to experience the old memories of his ex-wife. And two other sub-plots emerge when he gets a disc that reveals corruption in the LAPD and another that shows a serial killer stalking, raping and murdering women. And it all finally converges at the end.

Two years after playing the heartless Nazi Amon Goeth in "Schindler's List", Ralph Fiennes shows a completely different side of him in here. His character Lenny Nero is basically a vulnerable, weak guy who happens to be a lying, deceiving and vain hustler and due to his occasional silliness, it's almost impossible to see the negative aspects of his personality. He's also quite stubborn and a fool for love since his ex-wife chose fortune and fame over him. And Fiennes was perfectly cast here due to his skill of conveying several personality traits into a character. Also, his character is somewhat unique since he isn't really as macho and he seems to be more feminine due to his clothing style of silk and spandex. And we all know we can't keep ripping-off other movie characters to be make a profit, and "Strange Days" does the opposite. It does what it should do to get originality.

My favorite acting performance in here was, without a doubt, Angela Basset as Mace. We all know that James Cameron constantly puts tough female characters in his films, but Mace in "Strange Days" takes the cake! She serves as Lenny's bodyguard and provides a couple cool fight scenes. Mace used to be an average woman and then her husband got arrested and when he started doing time, Mace completely changed and became more masculine, kinda like Sarah Connor between the first two Terminator movies.

Tom Sizemore, who is a Bigelow regular, is great as Lenny's best pal and Juliette Lewis is great as Nero's ex-wife and she provides a realistic portrayal as the hot woman who wants nothing but money and could care less for morality and love. She also does some great singing in a couple scenes when she's performing with her band. And the dirty cop Steckler played by Vincent D'Onofrio before his Law and Order days, is played flawlessly and he's a pretty scary guy and he's willing to do anything to cover up what he and his partner did (although I'm not gonna tell exactly what in this review, you'll have to watch and find out).

"Strange Days" has got it all; action, science fiction, suspense, and romance. The SQUID things were really something cool, original and creative, and it would be even better if it was really invented someday. This isn't really as action-packed as James Cameron's movies tend to be like, since it's got a different director, but the vision of Los Angeles is just remarkable, there's arson fires and riots packed in almost every scene and its just horrifying. Even though it hasn't happened yet, it makes you think and it makes you worry, especially if you're foolish enough to be living in LA.

And remember, a woman actually made one of the greatest action adventures of all time. Katheryn Bigelow, we salute you.
55 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Excessive nonsense.
=G=10 April 2001
Someone should tell Cameron that movies which try to out do themselves can't. That's the dialectic of an audience with one hand clapping. "Strange Days" is a bloated, overwrought flick with a silly action cum nonsense sci-fi thread, a weak story, excessive excesses, and implausibilities every few hundred frames. But, hey, that don't mean it ain't a great flick. After all, that's what Hollywood does best. It's the fact that when the end of this 2.5 hour mind numbing movie finally arrives, we don't care if the good guys win or the bad guys win because we're too busy yawning and sighing with relief. Recommended for film junkies only.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Big Mess
timinminn6626 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I finally saw this movie for the first time on late night TV, and considering that it was written by James Cameron and directed by Kathryn Bigelow, it's big disappointment. She directed the very good Point Break, but seems to lose her way here. The movie doesn't really know what it wants to be - cyberpunk noir? standard murder mystery? love story? end of the millennium apocalyptic cautionary tale? It tries a little of everything and doesn't really do anything that well. One of the main problems is that none of the characters we're supposed to like are very likable and the rest are just excessively weird and annoying (i.e. Philo Gant and his goons) for no apparent reason. Overacting is rampant, as the characters are constantly in situations that strain the limits of credulity. For example, the whole scene where the cops shoot Jeriko One borders on laughable. There were just a lot of scenes where the characters' words and actions did not seem to make sense. The movie seems to try to compensate for its lack of narrative cohesion by being as kinetic and loud as possible, which wears on your nerves after awhile. And what's with the whole New Year's Eve party thing at the end? It's the end of the millennium, great. But people are going nuts, the cops are going nuts, people are getting shot, stabbed, dying, etc., and nobody really seems to take much notice. I could go on, but suffice it to say that the movie is a big, disjointed, mess of different parts.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed