The African Queen (1951) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
307 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Out of Africa with Bogey and Kate
gaityr6 February 2002
This is one of those films whose special effects and scenery must have been astounding at the time (1951), but which seem mediocre at best today. BUT, and that's a big 'but', this does not detract from the greatness of the movie overall. The scenery truly is beautiful, for one thing--and the direction and cinematography is great.

However, what truly makes this film a classic, and deservedly so, is the performances given by the lead actors. For their one film together, Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn pull out all the stops. Bogart is crude, dirty and a low-life river-rat with a heart of gold. He gives the Oscar-winning performance of his lifetime. Hepburn is prim and prissy, but always manages to win us over with her radiance and vulnerability, as well as that core of steel and strength she lends to all her on-screen characters. He's charming, in his way; she's achingly beautiful in hers. You can't help but warm to Charlie and Rosie, and truly, genuinely root for them to get together.

The ending is predictable; all 'opposites-attract' romance adventure stories are. You know without a doubt that the sunset will be there for Charlie and Rosie to ride off (or swim) into together. But you still hurt when Charlie hurts; and you still smile like a fool when he sees Rose, and when he tries to explain her forthrightness away by jungle fever. You believe the love, and that's what the African Queen is all about.

Oh, and the gin and leech scenes, of course. Those are brilliant, as everyone else here has already mentioned! ;)
61 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The African Queen
Coxer9923 March 1999
An amazing romance-adventure classic highlighted by the brilliant performances of Bogart and Hepburn. Oscar winner Bogart's Charlie is a broken man who finds true hope and happiness in Hepburn's Rose. Rose finds love and meaning from Charlie. It's adorable to see them call each other "Missus" and "Mr. Almont" even when we know that they love each other. Even when they have their "first quarrel" near the end of the picture, we know that their lives have changed forever as a result of the other person. It's a film about true love. This is also a very funny film, which was a shock to director Huston. Bogart's stomach growling scene early on in the film is a hoot. More humor commences as both stars play off of each other wonderfully. The scenary is beautiful. No film has captured the essence and importance of nature better than this classic. This is the film that sparked other romance adventures such as "Romancing the Stone" and "Six Days and Seven Nights." Before you view those newer installments, you better check out the one and true original classic.
36 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Queen of Hearts...
Xstal12 August 2023
Charlie Allnut is the Captain of The Queen, quite dishevelled and bedraggled but he ain't mean, keeps two missionaries informed, of how the world has been transformed, it's not too long before just one will leave the scene. As they escape along the river plans are hatched, to send torpedoes to a gunboat and dispatch, on their journey gin is taken, buckled shafts are warmed then straightened, it's not long before they make the perfect match. A short sojourn into the reeds causes distraction, but not long after heavy rain causes abstraction, as the enemy is spotted, the pair remain fully besotted, just goes to show that opposites, create attraction.

Great performances, great dialogue, great film.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If some one remakes this, I'm sending out a posse.
Kayt R17 August 2000
To face a script in which most of the plot revolves around the dialogue of only two people in one location must be terrifying. Thank goodness for Katharine Hepburn and Humphrey Bogart. John Huston's adaptation of C.S. Forester's The African Queen was solid. And the decision to film on location in Africa helped develop the concept of nature as a viable character within the plot helps solidify the film. But without Katharine Hepburn, and Humphry Bogart, this film could have been reduced to a nice little travelog on the beauty and terror of African and the pretty animals living there. Within The African Queen each character undergoes metamorphosis. Charlie Alnutt grows from an apathetic man who enjoys the inside of a bottle, to a courageous man. Rosie in turn allows herself to be human, and vulnerable perhaps for the first time in her life. With lesser actors these changes would have appeared rushed, unexplained,and a dull beginning to an inexplicable romance. But it isn't. It's a captivating film. Rosie's brittle smile, Charlie's face as his vices are destroyed, these are moments of brilliance in an incredible film. I highly recommend it.

It's also worth noting that this was not an easy film to make. These performances survived crew and cast illnesses, constant mechanical errors and inclement weather. For more about the conditions it was created under, I suggest you read Katherine Hepburn's The Making of The African Queen or How I went to Africa with Bogart, Bacall and Huston and almost lost my mind. She's not the sanest author in the world, but all the more enjoyable.
118 out of 140 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love Isn't Just For the Young
bkoganbing18 June 2005
The African Queen is a significant historical film in two respects. Along with King Solomon's Mines it was the first American film to show the real Africa to the American public. Previously our ideas about Africa were gleaned from studio backlot jungles created for Tarzan films and the like. The African Queen changed all that, no cheap studio sets would do any more.

But also, The African Queen dealt with romance among mature adults in their forties. A ne'er do well river pilot on a ramshackle boat and the spinster sister of a missionary, thrown together by the circumstance of war.

Humphrey Bogart, our intrepid river pilot, makes a scheduled stop to deliver mail to the mission run by Robert Morley and Katharine Hepburn. And he breaks the news to them that World War I has started. Almost as soon as he leaves them, German troops from East Africa come to call. Bogie comes back and he finds Kate with her dead brother. They bury him and skedaddle. And while skedaddling they conceive of a cockeyed plan to help in the war effort.

To say what it is and what happens would spoil the story, but let me say this. The original opening of the film with Bogart coming in as church services are being conducted for a few hundred uncomprehending native Africans is Director John Huston's comment on the usefulness of the lives Morley and Hepburn have led up to that point. What Hepburn and Bogart accomplish by the end of the film makes up for the waste that was Hepburn's life.

But The African Queen is a great romance as well. Bogart became a great romantic star in Casablanca and he upholds the tradition here, winning an Academy Award for Best Actor. Katie Hepburn doesn't seem to miss her usual partner Spencer Tracy not a bit, the part of Rose Sayer is a perfect fit. As was remarked, they're going to have stories to tell their grandkids.

When I watch The African Queen I'm reminded of what Bogart's friend Frank Sinatra sang in one of his best ballads about how Love Isn't Just For the Young. Kate and Bogie sure prove it here.
93 out of 114 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't Take This One For Granted
gftbiloxi3 June 2005
THE African QUEEN is probably one of the most widely available films in the world, on sale in the electronics department of virtually every major retail chain, a commonplace at every rental counter, frequently seen on television. It is hard to imagine any one in the western world, especially in the United States, who has not seen the film at least once--and probably more than once. And so we take it for granted.

That is a mistake. Based on the famous C.S. Forester novel, which it follows quite closely, THE African QUEEN is the simple story of pragmatic river-rat Charlie Allnut (Bogart) and high-minded Methodist missionary spinster Rose Sayer (Hepburn) who are thrown together by chance when German troops sweep through Africa during World War I. Once safely aboard his beat-up riverboat "The African Queen," Allnut desires nothing more than to dodge the Germans until war's end; Rose, however, determines to strike a blow against the Germans by sailing the boat downriver to attack a German battleship.

There are so many fine things about this movie that they are hard to innumerate. Filmed on location in the Congo, the cinematography is remarkably fine without being obtrusive; the script, which is at once subtle and very purposeful, has a remarkably natural tone; the two stars--who play the vast majority of the film alone together--give justly famous performances; and Huston's direction is so fine that we never feel even the slightest hint of directorial manipulation. As an adventure, it has a sense of realism that most adventure stories lack; as a character study it is remarkably detailed and finely wrought; as a love story, it is quite touching without engaging in common sentimentality. And it can be enjoyed by many people of diverse backgrounds and ages without the faintest qualm.

If you haven't seen THE African QUEEN in a while (or heaven forbid never seen it at all) don't take it for granted thinking you'll catch it sooner or later. Sit down with the film and watch it with fresh eyes. You'll be amazed.

Gary F. Taylor, aka GFT, Amazon Reviewer
156 out of 200 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
entertaining but overrated
tolbs101011 February 2005
The African Queen is an entertaining film done in grand old Hollywood style, and it is probably the most conventional movie John Huston ever made. It's surprising though that people can call this movie one of the greatest of all time considering the hokey (and at times unbelievable) script and the awkward lack of chemistry between Bogart and Hepburn. Actually, that lack of chemistry creates some strangely funny moments which change the tone of this adventure story--sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse. The two are never really believable as the characters they are playing, but they are still fun to watch as a couple of stars chewing up the scenery. Bogart's Academy Award for this performance is obviously a Revlon choice in that it makes up for his being overlooked for at least 10 better performances that he gave prior to this one. Huston's direction seems to lose focus in the last 10 minutes or so and the ending is very abrupt, but overall the film is briskly paced and painless. Also worth noting is the wonderful use of African locations as photographed by master cinematographer Jack Cardiff. If you want to see a better film with similar themes, check out Huston's far superior Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison.
60 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Humor,Adventure,action,Romance and Humphrey Bogart.What more do you want!!!
anton-63 November 2001
The acting by Bogart is brilliant and Katharine Hepburn is as good.It´s exciting and VERY funny.It also have a great direction by John Huston and even if a few of the action scenes feels old and maybe some of the special effects is not fantastic Humphrey Bogart really deserved his Oscar but Katharine Hepburn is as good.The dialogue between them is wonderful.4,5/5
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some flawless performances is a strangely imperfect classic with a bizarre bizarre ending.
secondtake27 March 2010
African Queen (1951)

Humphrey Bogart is his gritty flawless best here--as funny as he gets, and as bitter, tired, and leach covered. That's enough to sustain any movie, and toss in that his friend and fellow manly-man John Huston directed, we have a brutally physical, man-against-nature and man-against-himself film. This is the Bogart of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948), where Huston and he again create a character that is as three-dimensional, compelling, repugnant, and cutting as they get. And unlike Treasure, the public and the academy responded well. He won Best Actor in 1952.

Katherine Hepburn is another story, and why she was cast for this film I'm not sure (she was chosen before Bogart, and choosing Bogart was her idea). I'll guess it's because she is so physical and fearless, a perfect tomboy in church marm clothes. She overcomes the stiffness of her part by sheer presence, but also, eventually, by her getting tough and dirty, too. She becomes less the preacher's sister and more the pioneer woman caught in the middle of World War I in Africa. She had a rough time during the location shoots, getting sick and losing a lot of weight, so some of her gaunt appearance is not acting one bit.

The arrival of the Germans in two main scenes may have seemed necessary in post war American (though a different German-inspired world war). But it enters the movie at first as a curiosity and a necessity, to drive the two characters down the raging river. The second time is near the end, and it turns the movie into a farce. It's the bizarre tone of the ending that throws the movie out of balance. The sudden lighthearted, improbable, and almost goofy turn, so at odds with the rest of the drama (even at odds with the sincerely funny humor earlier on), makes you wonder, after it's over, whether the whole movie was meant to be a kind of excessive satire. If so, I missed it, and might need to see it again to read it differently.

But taking it as a high adventure where two unlikely people are stuck having to depend on each other to survive, the movie still stutters. The wildlife shots (from the bow, supposedly) make it a Discover Channel safari at times. The home brew fix-it scenes are interesting but scarcely believable (he welds a metal prop for his boat with a charcoal fire on the beach, for starters). And the key scenes, the second most famous (after the leach scene, which is pretty amazing), are the running the rapids. This occurs several different times, and we have a mixture of actual shots, backscreen shots, and faked shots using a scale model in a studio in England, the boat and stiff dummies shooting down the water unguided and with a fast motion peculiarity. It's almost comical, and I took it as "the best they could do" for the time, and didn't let it bother me.

Now, after the end, I'm wondering if they (Huston et al) never really wanted believability to be an issue. It is more a fable, an entertainment. Yet it seems hard to reconcile with the hype and the extremes required to shoot it. African Queen does have two of the most legendary actors of their time, and it takes location shooting to a new height, and it is a spectacular idea. I didn't know what to think by the end. Was I disappointed? Yes. Was I glad to have seen it? Absolutely. Now that it's finally out on DVD in the U.S. (and Blu-Ray, both very high quality), you should see it, too.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A successful mixture of comedy, character and adventure
Nazi_Fighter_David28 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"The African Queen" was Bogart's fourth film to be directed by John Huston and his performance in it was very likely the best in his career as well as one which finally won him an Academy Award… He beat out Marlon Brando, who was heavily favored to win for "A Streetcar Named Desire."

The screenplay by Huston and the celebrated movie critic-writer, James Agee, matched Bogart with Katherine Hepburn in what amounted to a two-star tour de force in a deeply touching romance linked to adventures and heroics…

Bogart and Hepburn were delightful as they infused their personal conflict with a warmth, humor, and tenderness rarely seen in films… Mixing comedy and adventure, it was a two-character film, in which Hepburn gave a fine demonstration of her ability to develop within a role... The sensitive interaction between her and Bogart (in an unfamiliar guise) undoubtedly benefited from her many films with Tracy…

Bogart was given a rare opportunity to demonstrate his range as an actor, more than holding his own opposite the formidable Hepburn... He played many scenes with maximum effectiveness, down impossible rapids, where he becomes covered with leeches and suffers a severe fever attack, his drunk scene where he rebels against Hepburn and mocks her high-blown speeches, and the tender moments in which he realizes he's fallen under her bewitching spell…

"The African Queen" was not an easy film to make, most of it being done on location in the insect-infested, suffocatingly hot and humid African Congo… But the result was a brilliantly entertaining film, a successful mixture of comedy, character and adventure
60 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
not up to par with the best of Bogart &/or Huston; Hepburn gets wildly overpraised
Quinoa19843 November 2007
Term "overrated"; it wouldn't be something I would attribute to a film usually as directed by John Huston and starring Humphrey Bogart (co-star Katherine Hepburn is another matter). But overtime this little piece of romantic fluff/saga of war-time daring-do has been called one of the greatest American films ever made. And for those who do love it, more power to them. It is a star vehicle first and foremost- and in 1951 if you were going to have two stars for the majority of the running-time these were the two to get- and die-hard fans can praise it as much as they want. But when it comes down to it, the film hasn't aged as well as one might think, and it goes without saying that what was really on Huston's mind during filming (hunting elephants) probably had something to do with the focus coming off of things like, erm, logic. It is a yarn, to be certain, and under the terms of what is "light-hearted" (in quotes because it has some dark undertones) it works out alright. But an all-time classic I think not.

For one thing- and I know I would get some arguing over this- the two stars don't really have that much chemistry. It doesn't help matters that cliché steers the ship; Bogart and Hepburns' characters, Charlie and Rosie, are going down a river where at first they can't stand one another as one is a drunkard on gin and the other is a prissy go-for-it-all who doesn't really see the consequences, AND whenever Bogie somehow gets the African Queen over some rapids she suddenly starts to fall in love with the guy. I don't buy it- when comparing to something like, say, the real McCoy in Bogie and McCall, it doesn't hold a candle. Hepburn, until maybe the second half when she changes gears only slightly, and depending on the risks in the scene, doesn't alter much in her personality. While it is, in a way, a good performance at playing someone who is shrill and prissy, it doesn't help make one care that much about her.

Meanwhile, Bogie is still a pro at what he does (though not Oscar-worthy pro, not up against Brando- the performance that really deserved it was In a Lonely Place, which is sour grapes of course long after the fact). He, and Huston's occasional outbursts of creativity in the simple framework of the script, do make it mildly entertaining; it's a good picture to probably check out on a rainy summer's weekend afternoon with lots of tea (or gin). And there's even a few fascinating bits with the dangers of going down a river in Africa, i.e. the swarming bugs and the leeches as they try and get the boat out of the mud. But by the time of the ending, when the 'what-the-hell' moment happens as the torpedo strikes at the ship at the most unlikely- yet most likely- of moments, I couldn't wait for the recently married to get off the screen. If you haven't seen a film by Huston or with Bogie or Hepburn, look elsewhere to start. If exotic locales and silly romantic river-boat adventure is your game, be my guest.
32 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Classic Wartime Romantic Adventure.
AaronCapenBanner8 November 2013
John Huston directed this classic WWI romantic adventure that stars Humphrey Bogart as Riverboat Captain Charlie Allnut, an alcoholic and aging veteran of the river who is persuaded to lead pious Rose Sayer(played by Katharine Hepburn) by her missionary brother(played by Robert Morley) who is later beaten and left to die of fever by the German occupiers. Rose buries her brother, then sets out on the river journey, determined to avenge her brother's death(and do God's work) by tracking down and destroying a German submarine with a torpedo. Along the way, the mismatched couple connect and fall in love... Fine adventure with two perfectly cast stars at their best. Bogart won an overdue best actor Academy Award for his wonderful performance, with superb direction making this an authentic and memorable journey indeed, overcoming the predictable(yet believable) inevitability of the romance.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amazing and memorable movie!
mmintz13 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
MILD SPOILERS!

After having seen some of this in my youth, I finally broke down and watched the whole thing recently. I was very impressed! I thought it was entertaining and even moving at times. I could see (retrospectively) how this seminal movie has influenced many of my favorites. (Dead Man Walking, Stand By Me, Apocalypse Now, etc.)

Oddly, while "African Queen" had a strong beginning and ending, it was its incredible MIDDLE that made it such a classic. It is in its middle sections that "African Queen" wins our hearts. Here we see Rose lose her annoyingly prim composure during a vicious bug attack. We watch Rose and Charlie's first kiss and see their initially awkward love blossom into something comfortable and natural.

And of course my favorite: the leech scene! We see the now indomitable Charlie enter the water to drag the Queen through the mud. Then, before long, we see his utterly believable discomfiture as he and Rose discover that he is covered in leeches.

(SNAKES:INDIANA JONES::LEECHES:CHARLIE ALLNUT)

And then, once they've all been salted off...Charlie resigns himself to get back in the water. Why? For his new-found love of country, self, and (most significant) Rose. At least that's what his scared but determined face seems to say.

In such scenes, our love for these characters grows as does theirs for each other. In the face of terror and pain and even specific phobias, the initially annoying personas are stripped away and we see Rose and Charlie in their truest forms: afraid and hurting. Yet, in spite of their weaknesses, they struggle onward. In this, they are TRUE HEROES. They are terrified and discouraged (far from the imperturbable Superman-types) and still they do the impossible (or the unnavigable as the case may be). These are my kind of heroes!

And, while the eleventh hour ending may be a bit far-fetched, we don't mind. These two have earned a victorious ending, however it is delivered!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"What an absurd idea!"
GoD-s-LoNeLy-MaN27 October 2006
I watched "The African Queen" after I read it was on the Top 250. I have never been so disappointed by a movie off the Top 250-list before.

The plot is totally unbelievable and predictable. I know it is based on a true story (very loosely I assume) but the script is just awful. It seems really unrealistic.

The love story is highly unbelievable and cheesy. The action sequences are horribly dated. I know that this movie is from the 50's but the "special effects" are hilariously bad. Catherine Hepburn's character is annoying from the first second on. Whatever she says (example: "Mister Allnut?!"; she says that at the beginning of every sentence...just annoying and stupid since there was no other person than him on the boat) or does (e.g.: with the booze). She plays one of the least likable characters in the history of cinema. The idea she comes up with, which is the idea of the whole movie, wow, just plain ridiculous. This movie sucks big time.

Uninteresting movie about a man and a woman, both without metabolism, going on a boat trip to attack a battleship with their small boat.

* 4/10 *
22 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Indescribably Good
pmitsi-122 May 2009
A real gem of film-making! Bogart and Hepburn shine in this two-actors-adventure-movie and even without the breathtaking visual effects of todays' films, it outshines them in its simplicity and authenticity.

The plot is very good and straight and the situation where the two characters (polar opposites) interact is an eye candy for all film goers. Bogard's Oscar as well-deserved and Hepburn could won her fifth with that powerful performance. I consider the film a pioneer in war/jungle movies making and the fact that the "commandos" are so different (a Sunday school teacher and a drunk) makes it all the better.

If you have not seen it run and get it. You won't regret it.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the greatest romantic films of all time
LilyDaleLady20 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I can't believe there is any doubt after fifty-five years that "African Queen" is one of the greatest romantic/adventure films of all time, and one of Humphrey Bogart's most delightful roles.

Some "classic" films appear awkward and even amateurish after all this time, due to the stunning advances in film technology over the decades, but "African Queen" remains astonishing fresh. I believe this is due to the rugged on-location filming, which is a Hollywood legend in and of itself (Please read Katherine Hepburn's excellent book "Making of the African Queen" AND Clint Eastwood's outstanding film 'White Hunter, Black Heart", for an accurate and detailed look at the goings-on behind the cameras). The realism of the location filming feels as immediate and convincing as if the movie had been filmed this year.

Bogart and Katherine Hepburn turn in what must be among the very best performances of their respective careers, as a drunken captain and a prim missionary lady. Perhaps because they are initially not very sympathetic or traditionally "good looking" or even young, their courtship is deeply touching. I think that this is one of the most moving screen romances of all time because of this...it's a refreshing change from youth-obsessed Hollywood (then as now) to see 40-somethings in a convincing and deeply romantic love story.

My favorite scene remains the one where Charlie and Rosie, exhausted by their travails trying to get the African Queen through a reed-choked section of river, collapse unconscious in the boat, feeling they are doomed for certain death...while a crane shots shows that they have indeed reached the last portion of the reeds, and are gracefully floating into clear waters...what a beautiful metaphor for hope against all odds. This never fails to move me to tears.

Surely one of the source inspirations for modern stuff like "Indiana Jones", "African Queen" has plenty of physical adventure (white water rapids), evil Germans (always reliable baddies, even in WWI), gross out parts (the leeches) and suspense...so that this film seems equally loved by both men and women. It's a grand adventure as well as a sensitive love story. The ending is one of the most deeply satisfying in all of cinema history.

That brings me to the source material -- the original novel by C.S. Forrester. Many reviewers comment on this, but I'll bet that very few have READ it. I went to great lengths to order this long out-of-print novel (so short it's almost a novella) from interlibrary loan a few years back. The film is a remarkably faithful adaptation of the book, with ONE glaring obsession. I don't think it's an actual spoiler to remark on this for film history buffs, but I'll still buffer this:

"SPOILER ALERT! (well, sort of)"

In the movie, Rosie and Charlie are married by the German captain and this is one of the satisfying romantic highlights of the film, especially as they ask to marry just before what appears to be their certain execution. However, in the book, it's revealed at the novel's end (which otherwise mostly reflects the film's ending) that Charlie is a womanizer, who has already married (but never divorced) several other women. He's a bigamist, who doesn't take his vows with the least seriousness and will undoubtedly leave Rosie, just as he has the last three wives. Furthermore, due to his bigamy, their "marriage" is a sham and certainly invalid.

This is the ironic twist that ends the novel, and I can't say I am surprised that Hollywood cleaned it up to present us with the far more conventional (and I have to admit, far more satisfying) ending that exists. However, for film buffs, I think this detail is interesting and well-worth knowing!
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The most exciting, romantic and inspiring Odyssey of American Cinema
ElMaruecan8230 October 2013
He loves his boat and knows the African river like his pocket. She loves her country and believes in accomplishment driven by faith and patriotism.

It's all natural that the two main protagonists of "The African Queen" turn the titular boat into the unsung heroine of a military deed, whose success is as improbable as the very thought that a straight-laced Methodist missionary spinster would fall in love with a coarse, rudimentary and gin-soaked mailman, but not so when the romance serves as the very fuel of that mission, and when it's Humphrey Bogart, Katharine Hepburn and John Huston on the lead: the miracle of "The African Queen", as movie and story, is the result of three immense talents confidently maneuvering in the same direction.

Film historian and critic Richard Schickel said about Hepburn that her secret appeal relied on the characters she usually played: "a woman on her high horse with slightly pretentious, often comically stated ideas about the world. It was for men to bring her down and get her to reveal herself as quite a good gal, sporty and democratic" generally, the task would fall to "slightly rough-necked and good-natured male" But for once, "The African Queen" provides an interesting twist to the usual formula, because it's Rose who gets Charlie on her horse. The effect is even greater because it forces Bogart to abandon his tough-guy facade, and (for once again) play a man who tries to please a woman.

Huston's "Treasure of the Sierra Madre" had already demonstrated a new range of versatility in Bogart's acting, but even as the anti-heroic Fred C. Dobbs, Bogart was exuding a threatening toughness; as Allnut, it's a new step on his career, as a more lovable kind of loser, in a performance that will earn him an Oscar for Best Actor (Hepburn, Huston and James Agee for the screenplay will also be nominated). The word 'loser' might sound too harsh, but it's still better than coward, which seems to fit Allnut's initial plan to avoid trouble and hide in a spot with enough supply of gin, waiting for that worldwide war (the first) to stop. Too bad for him, he's got Hepburn aboard, an iron-lady who followed her bother (Robert Morley) in German East Africa only to witness the efforts of a lifetime being burned down by the Kaiser's army, a fatal shock for the brother.

But Rose is stronger than her ill-fated brother and when she accepts to set off aboard "The African Queen", she's most determined to be part of the conflict, not in the victim's departments. And the glorious boat, becomes the unlikely arena of two one dominant and one dominated spirit in Allnut, treating Rose as a lady, until he finds out that she's not a passive and fear-stricken female observer. It's indeed Rose who suggests the idea of building a torpedo, out of oxygen cylinders and inflammable material, to destroy a German ship blocking the way to British ships from a lake downriver. Allnut argues that it's going to a certain death, they'll have to navigate along a German fort, to negotiate a few rapids, to get mired on mud across dense reeds, their chances of survival are mighty slim. An unflappable Rose then confronts Allnut to his own responsibilities as both a man, and a Canadian subject of the Union Jack brandished by the boat, and Allnut, not to lose face, accepts with reluctance.

But we know it's a matter of time before Rose drives Allnut all nut, he finally gives himself a little one-to-one gin-soaked party, driving enough anger to finally take his promise back, disappointing his distinguished and courageous host. He wakes up with one hell of a hangover and all his emptied bottles floating on the river; trying to make amends from his behavior, he explains that his drinking is only expression of human nature, to which he gets the greatest cinematic come-back ever "nature, Mr Allnut is what we're put in this world to rise above", and the line resonates as the film's motto. It's never about what we have at hands, but what we can build on it. Rosie ignites the fire of bravery in Allnut, and the exhilarating cross of the first obstacles lead to the victorious embrace, sealing the existence of a love that got from one heart to the other, through a taped adrenalin-filled boiler hose, and a few rows as tumultuous as the rapids.

This is not Hollywood corny romantic comedy; this is John Huston confronting two genuine characters one another, an inspirational believer and a practical technician, both combining their strengths for survival and accomplishment. Katharine Hepburn might play her usual 'strong woman' role but she's never mean-spirited. On the other hand, Bogie is clearly in love with his 'Rosie', he admires her and can see that she's changing him for the better, it's not just about forming a couple, but being a team, not just about being a team, but improving, for love and for duty, whether for sharing a tent during under a heavy storm, to fix a propeller underwater or to even accept that God is still the one who has the last word.

That's "The African Queen": thrilling, romantic, inspiring, starring the two stars, honored by the American Film Institute as the greatest screen legends, Bogart and Hepburn, in interactions full of comedy given the opposition of their personalities and a believable chemistry built on trust, incentive and partnership, this is not 'holding-hands' heroism à la "Titanic", each step is tackled with technical precision. Which makes the climactic duel with the Germans a bit less realistic by contrast but this is another aspect of Hollywood's immortal classics, sometimes; every single element has not to be taken seriously for a triumphal ending.

Indeed, when you have great actors, great writing and great director on the tiller, the story can surely navigate its way to legend.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a queen of a movie
lee_eisenberg16 May 2005
Okay, so I admit that "The African Queen" is pure escapism, but you gotta love it. Katharine Hepburn plays Rose Sayer, a prim and proper missionary in German East Africa with her brother (Robert Morley) in 1914. Suddenly, right after they receive news that war has broken out in Europe, the German army comes in and demolishes their settlement. After the brother dies, hard-drinking stubbly sailor Charlie Allnut (Humphrey Bogart) comes in and agrees to take Rose down the river. Along the way, they bicker about various things (she's disgusted by his drinking, he finds her too pious), but they grow to respect each other.

Bogart and Hepburn pretty much play their usual roles, and the movie also stars a few crocodiles (most of the movie was filmed on location in Africa). The portrayal of the German army certainly seems to be an allusion to the Nazis. But overall, the movie is quite admirable, with Rose's and Charlie's personalities bouncing off of each other. It's like an early buddy comedy, even though it's serious.
19 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Two-Person Adventure Story That Entertains
ccthemovieman-126 October 2006
This is almost strictly a two-person movie with Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn dominating the story and screen time. It's a likable classic film because of those two famous actors, a nice romance, good adventure and even some comedy thrown in to the mix. I'm shocked a well-known film with these actors still isn't available on DVD in Region 1, as of late 2006.

The two actors squabble in the beginning but I like the fact that the film didn't go on too long in that regard as they did in many old-time battle-of-the-sexes movies. The story also a little unusual in that neither lead actor is in his/her prime, meaning it's almost a middle-age romance story.

Once they become enamored with each other, the movie mainly goes into the trials the two have in piloting this boat, "The African Queen" down river with the goal of reaching a German ship and blowing it up. Yes, it's a World War II movie, of sorts.

To be honest, the film does slow down a bit in the beginning of Bogie and Hepburn's romance but the last 30 minutes finish strong with one obstacle after another hitting the pair of adventurers, and it's interesting to watch.
30 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Maybe it's just me...
milkshakeboom12 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Possible spoilers...

I love films. I love classic films. This film was released over 20 years before I was. My dad was surprised I'd never seen this one, and I finally gave it a rent last week. I don't know, maybe I just wasn't in a movie frame of mind? This film did nothing for me at all.

I've seen better from both lead performers. In fact, I'm rather surprised this is the one Bogey won the Oscar for. Once the romance blossomed, it just seemed I was watching this thing constantly waiting and wondering, "When's this going to get somewhere?" A round or two of the rapids, ducking German fort gunfire, getting through the muck, having their tiff after Bogey overindulged on his gin...all of this ultimately didn't keep my interest very deeply. Only in the last 15 minutes did I really feel fully attentive to the film, and in that same last 15 minutes were probably among the funnier moments of the film.

The cinematography was excellent, whether any or all of the animal footage was first unit or second unit or stock footage or whatever. I didn't not like the film overall, but it's nothing I'll be rushing to see a second time.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A dissolute , hard-drinking seamer captain and a stiff , prim spinster join forces to sink a German gunboat
ma-cortes13 December 2018
This is the great classic movie it is often claimed to be , being impossible to deny its entertainment and thought-provoking value . A witty screenplay by James Agee and John Huston himself from C.S. Forester's novel and glimmer color cinematography raise this interesting and amusing story . Not-to be-missed this Huston movie made on location in dangerous , risked environments and under testing conditions . In Africa during World War I, after Bible-thumping spinster's (Hepburn) missionary brother (Robert Morley) is dead by fevers , a hard-drinking , sympathetic , gin-swigging riverboat captain (Bogart) is persuaded by her to use his boat and undertake a risked trip down African wild rivers . Not satisfied with sanctuary, Rose proposes him blocking German advance by attacking and trying to sink an enemy warship. Their trying odyssey downriver , of course, gradually sees the two incompatible falling in love . Along the way , and their time alone on the African rivers turn aversion and mistrust into comradeship and love , a transition effectively counterpointed by the continuing intrigue of their daring assignment. Bogart the King is back with the 'Queen!' . The mightiest adventure ever filmed . Actually filmed in the savage splendor and dangers of the Belgian Congo . The greatest adventure a man ever lived with a woman . As Rose says the following words : Nature is what we are put in this world to rise above .

Richly characterized film , this is a throughly agreeable movie . Both protagonists , Bogart and Hepburn , spend most of their time battling each other and facing off aquatic obstacles . Classy war of sexes screenplay adapted from known novel by C.S. Forester makes marvellous use of enjoyable humor and natural as well as sparking dialogue . However , Forester novel ends in John Huston style , as protagonists fail their attempt to destroy the warship . The always detached Humphrey Bogart is top-notch as a cowardly riverboat captain who is persuaded by a stern lady to carry out a dangerous voyage offering her safe passage . And top-drawer Katharina Hepburn as a strait-laced missionary . They are accompanied by a good support cast , giving brief but charming performances , such as : Theodore Bikel , Walter Gotell , Peter Bull and special mention for Robert Morley . The shimmer photography in Technicolor by the great cameraman Jack Cardiff , the intelligent script , musical score by Allan Gray and gorgeous African exteriors help to counteract the basically implausible and contrived nature of the tale . Being shot on location in various African and European countries such as : Budongo Forest, Democratic Republic Of Congo , then called Congo Belgian , Lake Albert, Uganda Ruiki River, Democratic Republic Of Congo , Biondo , Kabalega Falls, Kabalega Falls National Park, Uganda and Isleworth Studios, London Road, Isleworth, Middlesex, England, UK Worton Hall Studios, Isleworth , UK and Los Angeles, California, USA

It contains an attractive script by John Agee , John Huston and Paul Viertel , Deborah Kerr's husband , he published in 1953 a novel titled : White hunter , Black hunter , describing the shooting incidents and many years later adapted by Clint Eastwood with Eastwood himself as Huston and Jeff Fahey . Being well produced by Horizon Pictures a production company created by Huston and Sam Spiegel , and the British Romulus Film . Forester novel copyright was bought by Warner Bros that to be thought to hire as protagonists : Charles Laughton-Elsa Lancaster , and later on , the couple : David Niven-Bette Davis , and subsequently : Paul Henreid-Ida Lupino . Finally , the roles went to Bogart-Hepburn . The film was nominated to screenplay and Hepburn was also nominated for an Academy Award for her splendid portrayal of the stiff-upper-lip and rasp-tongued spinster who gradually developes mellower feelings forward her drunk , rugged companion . Bogart , at last ,won the Academy Award he deserved for his stunning portrayal of the alcohol-soaked riverboat captain
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent if overrated.
matthewssilverhammer29 August 2018
African Queen is a bit odd to me. Sometimes it plays like a capital-I "Important" movie, with its cinematography, performances and setting. At others, it's as light as a feather, especially in the jarringly corny and somewhat forced romance. Still, there's an ineffable joy to watching two titans work together so confidently and with such strong characters, and a better-than-expected ending.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Man Against the Great Zambeeze
thinker169122 May 2007
Few films are as long lasting as the great memories they create in the minds of their audience. In the life of some actors, few indeed stand out from their competition. The "African Queen" is one such film. The great John Huston took a boatload of cameras, a case of whiskey, film cargo, and two legendary actors and pitted them against the African elements. In doing so, an immortal saga was created. The story is that of bush river Captain Charlie Allnut, (Humphrey Bogart) being challenged by a spinster, named Rose 'Rosy' Sayer, who has tragically lost her missionary brother, (Robert Morley), to sail down the treacherous and formidable Zambeeze river. Once there, the plan is to sail out on Lake Victoria, engage and destroy a German warship named the Louisia. An insane voyage to be sure and one filled with many other terrors such as man eating crocodiles, swarms of flesh eating mosquito's and blood-sucking, black water leeches. The film is typical Huston and many believe that the scene where Bogart is pulling the tiny boat through the reed-lined African swamp, earned him his very first well deserve Oscar. For his fans, this is a classic which lives in the treasured moments of cinematic history. *****
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Missed opportunity: poor script makes for an uneven, overly-simplistic, uninteresting river-boat ride.
Ben_Cheshire30 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
(major spoilers - if you're a fan, do not read!)

The atmosphere is hot and wet, the music is obvious radio-style highlighting of the plot, the subject matter is handled with the subtlety of a broom-handle by brash director Huston, but most of all, the script needed heavy-duty rewrites.

It is impossibly uneven: having only seen clips from the movie before, i'd always thought the thing that drew people to it was how such totally different people as the old ship's captain and the reserved school-teacher could get together - but this most interesting aspect of the story was not well developed at all. Her transition takes place by far too quickly. Within the space of ten minutes, instead of what it should have been, a gradual progression from school-marm to ship's captain's wife throughout the film, she goes from getting onto the boat for the first time and kissing Bogart for the first time. So we can throw this out the window as a point of interest for the story: and its loss is felt deeply: from this moment on, the script fishes around for a purpose, for narrative drive: it dabbles in rapids, leaches, waterfalls, and sentimental moments of "i love you and you love me and there's no conflict," which go nowhere, but most pretentious of all was how Huston pulls a fast one on us by trying to suggest that these two would involve themselves in the war, which is going on off-screen, however small their intended input may have been, by fashioning some torpedoes out of reeds and saw-dust and cutting some holes in the bow of the African Queen to lay them in (never mind how they were supposed to have shot out of these holes...).

In the 90's people used to make jokes about how MacGyver used to be able to fashion a parachute out of some matchsticks, or an aeroplane out of an old shoe and some shaving cream. Macyver thus became a metaphor for the ridiculous situations filmmakers sometimes ask us to believe people could get out of. I can't see why audiences in the 50's didn't feel the same way about African Queen. Charlie and Rose "weld" a propeller back together using a campfire and a billower, they make a torpeedo god knows how (Bogey explains it, but he says it very quickly, in hopes the audience won't listen), they repair a massive hole in the bottom of the boat and fix the mast by similar impossibilities. There is a technical name for these kinds of cop-outs, and its "deus ex machina": usually it only refers to when a new character or event is introduced to rescue the protagonists from some situation they could not have plausibly escaped from. But these kinds of implausible ways the characters get out of situations in this movie are very similar. You may have heard this term in Donnie Darko (towards the end), and in Adaptation (Robert McKee warns against using it). Huston cops out and uses one in the end of African Queen, as well as the various other big fish he expects us to swallow throughout.

Huston should have realized the more interesting aspect of the story was not the political one, the anti-war sentiments, it was not the down-stream adventure either - it was, or should have been, the relationship between Charlie and Rose. This is indeed what has drawn people to it across the years, but if you look back at it, its really the part of the movie that is copped out on. Look at Pride and Prejudice by comparison: Mr Darcy and Elizabeth spend the entire book/movie/mini-series despising each other, and only in the last five minutes/pages do they give in. By contrast, Charlie and Rose only TAKE five minutes to give in! Huston's interests lay elsewhere: he clearly was not interested in romance, and so got the two of them together as quick as he could bear, so they could begin to lie in each others arms and call each other dear and proceed to have a couple of adventures, which fill out the rest of the film.

No, this is not one of the greatest pictures ever made. It wasn't even the greatest picture in 1951: see Streetcar Named Desire and An American in Paris for that honour, or any of the movies on my profile for better movies of all time. It had the potential to be great, but it was too poorly written. Bogey and Hepburn are good in this - Hepburn especially (when Bogey acted, it was great, and not how he was in real life, but it was always that same fast-talking, wise-cracking persona, not much different here than in The Big Sleep and the Maltese Falcon, i'm sorry to say. It was a crying shame that the Academy decided to award the Best Actor of the year to Bogey, in honour of a phenomenal career, instead of to Brando, for a phenomenal performance). There are sweet moments (though they quickly turn to sap), there are great scenes, but these are not enough to make a great movie. Kurosawa once said that even a great director can not make a good movie out of a poor script, and this is what Huston has baned himself with in African Queen. The characters, so loved and praised by many, end up being more two-dimensional than they could have been, due to the simplistic story. At the moment when they kiss, they immediately become boring, because they're just like every other lovey-dovey romantic leads of the period, calling each other dear, willing to go anywhere with each other, beyond the bounds of normal reason, considering they only just met! And all of a sudden there is nothing more complex going on under the surface than a bumpy ride down the river. It tells a simple story, but unfortunately the story was too simple to retain my interest. 3 out of 5.
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not the classic it is made out to be
grantss6 April 2017
I don't know why this is regarded as a classic. Conventional, predictable, trite plot. Really just a straightforward adventure story, told in the usual linear fashion. No twists, no great hidden meanings of life exposed.

Direction is fairly conventional too. No great camera tricks. Great settings though.

Humphrey Bogart is fairly solid but Katharine Hepburn's character is irritating from the word go, and stays that way throughout. Found it hard to like her, so didn't.

In the end I think it is the names of the people involved - Humphrey Bogart, Katherine Hepburn, John Huston - rather than the quality of the movie that make people regard this so highly.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed